Rhetorical Analysis Of The Article 'Goats' By Chris Iovenko

1541 Words4 Pages

In his piece titled "Goats may help prevent wildfires in California as drought worsens," Chris Iovenko skillfully explores the possibility of using goats as a means of reducing the intensity of flames that are occurring in California despite conditions of increasing drought. This paper attempts to analyze the success of Iovenko's use of ethos, pathos, and logos in persuading readers of the reliability of this suggested solution by a thorough rhetorical analysis of his work. Even though the article makes a strong case, it is important to evaluate the article's overall persuasiveness in persuading readers by critically analyzing the way these rhetorical devices are used. Chris Iovenko's skillful creation of credibility forms the basis of his …show more content…

Accessibility improves reader engagement while enabling people to make knowledgeable decisions about mitigating wildfires. Moreover, Iovenko emphasizes the significance of implementing sustainable and environmentally sound ways to wildfire prevention by placing his argument within the larger framework of environmental conservation and disaster management. By doing this, Iovenko not only convinces readers that using goats to prevent wildfires is effective, but he also pushes for a shift in thinking toward more sustainable and ecologically friendly methods. Essentially, Chris Iovenko's careful attention to detail in building credibility by incorporating professional statements and real-world proof strengthens his convincing case for the efficacy of using goats to prevent wildfires. By utilizing the experience of those who are well-versed in the area and supporting his arguments with actual data, Iovenko not only increases his credibility but also helps his audience develop a more sophisticated grasp of wildfire control

Open Document