Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on the origins of HIV
An essay on the origins of HIV
An essay on the origins of HIV
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“This is not a distant threat. It is a present danger,” said political activist, Mary Fisher in her speech, on HIV/AIDS. The speech was presented at the 1992 Republican National Convention Address, in Houston, TX, and suggests for people to speak up and support those affected by HIV. Diagnosis of HIV were at all time high during this time, 1992-1993(HIV and AIDS). Much of the public was not aware of many of the aspects of HIV therefore, awareness needed to be brought on the topic. Fisher develops her plea by first providing compelling data, then building her credibility, and finally using an emotional appeal. Her purpose is to shed light on the issue of HIV to inspire people to speak up. She creates an informative and sympathetic tone for those ignorant to the struggles of the HIV community.
Mary Fisher uses compelling data to emphasize the major impact that HIV/AIDS is creating.
…show more content…
Fisher said, “40 million, 60 million, or 100 million will be infected in the coming years,” to hint how quickly this disease can and will spread. The use of data in her speech creates an urgency for the audience to do something to stop the spread of AIDS. Fisher exposes the fact that “AIDS is the third leading killer of young adults … but won’t be third for long.” In doing so, she brings to attention how common HIV/AIDS is and how it could increase. The data in the speech creates an eye-opening response in the audience, since they may not be aware of the effect caused by a disease, that does not directly affect them. Having data to refer to, creates a since of trust that Fisher is informed on the epidemic of HIV. Fisher shares her own experience to build credibility, so people can trust that she knows what she is talking about. In the start of the speech she said, “I would never have asked to be HIV positive,” this reassures those unaware of how she is connected to the problem. By starting off with this, the audience can know that she speaks from her own personal experience. She explains how her family have changed in the way they support her; “My 84-year-old father…will not accept the premise that he cannot heal his daughter…Sisters and friends, and my brother Phillip, all have helped carry me over the hardest places.” Her family has been her biggest support system and this shows how it is hard to go through something so big, alone. Again, being able to share her own experiences a bond of trustworthiness with her audience and herself. The reality that she mentions, “If it is true that HIV inevitably turns to AIDS, then my children will inevitably turn to orphans,” can explain how difficult this would be for her family. Fisher build her credibility by highlighting the most difficult times during her experience with HIV, which can also be interpreted as an emotional appeal. The main device that Fisher uses is an emotional appeal to evoke sympathy in her audience.
Mary Fisher sheds light on the different situations people are in due to HIV- “I am one with a black infant struggling with tubes in a Philadelphia hospital.” In doing so, she creates an atmosphere where you feel sorry for the innocent baby that has no clue what he/she is going through with HIV. Fisher said, “It does not care whether you are Democrat or Republican...black or white, male or female, gay or straight, young or old,” and acknowledges the fact that HIV can affect anyone. Many people, especially the young adults, had a mindset that they would not be affected by HIV. With this quote, she gets the audience thinking that they are not safe by any means and the only way to prevent becoming infected is to inform themselves. Another form of emotional appeal, used by Fisher, is by questioning the morals of her audience. She said, “we must act as eloquently as we speak -- else we have no integrity.” She wants people to not just say things to sound supportive but instead to act based on their
words. Mary Fisher speaks out about HIV so that other’s will do the same and support the fraction of the population that has been affected. She achieves her purpose by including captivating data in her speech along with building her credibility, and creating an emotional appeal. This speech brought awareness to a disease that was being silenced but, affecting millions. She brings up the fact that HIV can affect anyone and without an educated public, the number of people diagnosed will increase rapidly. Each person is in their own situation and going through their own personal struggles but, if they don’t help each other out then they are just weighing everyone down. Fisher inspires people to unite by taking a stand for each other to support each other and the different situations that everyone is in and becoming each other’s support system.
Margaret Sanger, a well known feminist and women's reproductive right activist in USA history wrote the famous speech: The Children's Era. This speech focuses on the topic of women's reproductive freedom. Sanger uses rhetorical forms of communication to persuade and modify the perspectives of the audience through the use of analogy and pathos. She uses reason, thought and emotion to lead her speech.
In, “The Speech of Miss Polly Baker” written by Benjamin Franklin (one of the Founding Fathers) in 1747, brought up the disparities that were between men and women within the judicial system. Also, “The Speech of Miss Polly Baker” also briefly points out, how religion has been intertwined with politics. All throughout “The Speech of Miss Polly Baker,” Benjamin Franklin uses very intense diction and syntax to help support what he is trying to express to the rest of society. Also writing this speech in the view point of a women, greatly helps establish what he is trying to say. If Benjamin Franklin was to write it as a man, the speech my have not had the same passionate effect as it currently has.
Poor, young children being forced to work nearly 24 hours day is a terrible evil that is no longer necessary in the 21st century, thanks to those willing to fight against it. One of those people was lover of freedom Florence Kelley. At the National American Woman Association on July 22, 1905, she gave a speech urging the women to ally with “workingmen”, ln 89, to vote against unfair child labor laws. In her speech, Kelley uses appeals to empathy, sympathy, logic, ethos, repetition, word choice, tone, and current events to defend her case.
Samir Boussarhane During the early 20th century in the U.S, most children of the lower and middle class were workers. These children worked long, dangerous shifts that even an adult would find tiresome. On July 22, 1905, at a convention of the National Woman Suffrage Association in Philadelphia, Florence Kelley gave a famous speech regarding the extraneous child labor of the time. Kelley’s argument was to add laws to help the workers or abolish the practice completely.
Florence Kelley appeals to the masses that the conscription of unregulated child labor is abhorring through the use of ethos, juxtaposition, and pathos. Kelley’s speech tackles on one of her main goals in life, regulations on child labor. Her speech moved the masses to fight for the rights of children, and she won. Kelley is responsible for the safe working conditions and the child labor laws that the United States has in implementation today.
During the late 1800’s and early 1900’s the fight for equal and just treatment for both women and children was one of the most historically prominent movements in America. Courageous women everywhere fought, protested and petitioned with the hope that they would achieve equal rights and better treatment for all, especially children. One of these women is known as Florence Kelley. On July 22, 1905, Kelley made her mark on the nation when she delivered a speech before the National American Woman Suffrage Association, raising awareness of the cruel truth of the severity behind child labor through the use of repetition, imagery and oxymorons.
Florence Kelley was a social and political reformer that fought for woman’s suffrage and child labor laws. Her speech to the National American Woman’s Suffrage Association initiated a call to action for the reform of child labor laws. She explains how young children worked long and exhausting hours during the night and how despicable these work conditions were. Kelley’s use of ethos, logos, pathos, and repetition helps her establish her argument for the reform of the child labor laws.
“Always remember that you are absolutely unique. Just like everyone else.” This mantra from Margaret Mead is a somewhat humorous yet slightly satirical spin on how people tend to think of themselves as one-of-a-kind, irreplaceable human specimens. However, one English teacher from Wellesley High School takes this critique one step further with his polemic presentation at the school commencement. David McCullough, a Massachusetts English teacher, gave a seemingly somber sendoff to his graduates in 2012, with a speech that contained some unapologetically harsh sentiments. However, by looking past the outwardly dismal surface of the speech, the students can infer a more optimistic message. By incorporating devices of asyndeton, paradox, antimetabole, and anadiplosis, McCullough conveys to each student that even though none of them is unique, their commonality is not a fault they all have merit and should strive to view the world through a more selfless lens.
In the era of American slavery, the rights of the colored were denied under authoritative rules, such as the Fugitive Slave Act that required the retrieval of all runaway slaves. It was during this time, Mary Ann Shadd Cary, an African American living in Canada, felt the need to combat racial injustice by voicing her opinions on the newspaper Provincial Freeman. In her second issue of the newspaper, she argued the need to continue her editorials is to promote the antislavery cause by embedding repetition to unify her targeted audience and by approaching her audience with a cautious tone to build on more support.
On September 5, 1995 Hillary Rodham Clinton delivered a speech to the United Nations 4th World Conference during a Women Plenary Session, located in Beijing, China. Clinton spoke about how women around the world were not treated equally, how women rights should be equal to human rights, and the ghastly abuse and discrimination women faced around the world. The reason for the conference was to strengthen women, families, and societies in order to empower women to taking control of their lives and not be subject to such discrimination. She emphasized how education, health care, jobs, and political rights were not equal between genders and that the world needed to change. Clinton gave a very convincing speech because of her use of rhetorical techniques. The use of pathos, ethos, logos, and anaphora created a powerful, persuasive argument against the way women were treated around the world. Clintons main goal of this speech was to appeal to the audience and convince them that this is unequal treatment is an immense matter and needs to be addressed all over the world.
Even after the disease and its modes of transmission had been correctly identified, fear and ignorance remained widespread. In the mid 1980s, “AIDS hysteria” became a well known term in the media and public life. For example, a magazine published details about how extensive AIDS/HIV related discrimination became. “Anxiety over AIDS in some parts of the U.S. is verging on hysteria,” the authors wrote; they later published this disturbing example:
The HIV epidemic hits nowhere else in the world harder than Sub-Saharan Africa, which accounts for more than two-thirds of the entire world’s cases of HIV. In her book, “The Invisible Cure”, writer Helen Epstein explores the myriad of reasons as to why the HIV outbreak is so alarming as well as differentiated than any other area of the world. Epstein explores how cultural factors influence individual behaviors as well as generations that grow up under these cultural conditions, how political involvement (or lack thereof) can often misinform people, and how structural levels of privilege allows less opportunity for those in poverty to obtain the help that they may need.
"Demanding that life near AIDS is an inextricably other reality denies our ability to recreate a sustaining culture and social structures, even as we are daily required to devote such time to the details of the AIDS crisis." -Cindy Patton
On August 19, 1992 in Houston, Texas, Mary Fisher, the HIV-positive daughter of prominent Republican fundraiser Max Fisher, gives her keynote speech “A Whisper of Aids” to the Republican National Convention (1). Fisher’s purpose is “to lift the shroud of silence which has been draped over the issue of HIV/AIDS” epidemic (1). Fisher succeeds in her overall persuasiveness by effectively using ethos, logos, and pathos throughout her address to the conservative Republican Party to advocate for awareness, education, and the prevention of HIV/AIDS.
From the moment scientists identified HIV and AIDS, social responses of fear, denial, stigma and discrimination have accompanied the epidemic. Discrimination has spread rapidly, fuelling anxiety and prejudice against the groups most affected, as well as those living with HIV or AIDS. It goes without saying that HIV and AIDS are as much about social phenomena as they are about biological and medical concerns. Across the world the global epidemic of HIV/AIDS has shown itself capable of triggering responses of compassion, solidarity and support, bringing out the best in people, their families and communities. But the disease is also associated with stigma, repression and discrimination, as individuals affected (or believed to be affected) by HIV have been rejected by their families, their loved ones and their communities. This rejection holds as true in the rich countries of the north as it does in the poorer countries of the south.