King concludes with optimism about the future of the relationship between the currently segregated blacks and whites. He hopes that “[o]ne day the South will know that [the Negroes] were in reality standing up for the best in the American dream” (47), and that “the evil system of segregation” (46) will come to an end. He wants the South to realize the struggles that the Negroes have gone through to gain their freedom, and consider them as heroes who fought for their rights. King believes that eventually there will be freedom for all Americans, regardless of their race or socioeconomic status. He ends by softening his tone and closes with “[y]ours in the cause of [p]eace and [b]rotherhood” (49). This closing statement reiterates King’s central …show more content…
mission, and urges the clergymen to join the cause of peace and brotherhood by supporting his campaign of civil disobedience. 13. “To believe your own thought, to believe that what is true for you in your private heart is true for all men, that is genius” (Emerson) The purpose of a periodic sentence is to add emphasis and structural variety.
A periodic sentence is much stronger than its opposite, a loose sentence. In this example, Emerson employs a periodic sentence to emphasize that one must trust themselves. 14. “The high school student was drowning in a sea of homework from all of his AP and honors classes.” The purpose of metaphor is to make writing more thought provoking and meaningful, as well as to provide emphasis on a subject. Metaphor also creates vivid imagery in the reader’s mind, as can be seen with the metaphor I have created. Upon reading it, the reader literally imagines a student drowning under a sea of papers and work, unable to break free and reach the surface. 15. “That’s one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind.” - Neil Armstrong The purpose of antithesis is to express an idea more emphatically, and create contrast between the two elements juxtaposed in the sentence. This illustrates the stark difference between the two elements, and emphasizes the ideas contained within the antithesis. In the famous quote from Neil Armstrong, Armstrong compares the small step he took with the giant leap that mankind just took by making contact with another celestial body for the first time in history. By comparing it with a small step, Armstrong further emphasizes the significance of this …show more content…
achievement. 16. “From forth the fatal loins of these two foes/A pair of star-cross’d lovers take their life” (Shakespeare) Alliteration functions to reinforce meaning, unify sounds, supply a musical sound, and in some cases to echo the sense of the passage. In this case, from Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, alliteration helps create a musical sound which was essential in plays. Also, the words that follow the alliteration of “f” and “l” are emphasized, and outline the ending of the tragedy. 17. “Now is the time to make real the promises of democracy. Now is the time to rise from the dark and desolate valley of segregation to the sunlit path of racial justice. Now is the time to lift our nation from the quicksands of racial injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood. Now is the time to make justice a reality for all of God’s children” (King 6). The purpose of anaphora is to emphasize a point, and drive it home. In his “I Have a Dream” speech, King employs anaphora by emphasizing that the time to take action against racial injustice is now. Anaphora is extremely effective in speech, because it engages the audience and helps the audience understand the message the speaker is conveying. 18. Martin Luther King is blatantly sarcastic in his opening paragraph. He mentions that many criticisms “cross [his] desk” (1). This is clearly sarcastic, because he is in a jail cell at the time and does not have the comforts of a desk. King also states that his “secretaries would be engaged in little else” (1) if they answered each of these criticisms. It is glaringly evident that King neither has access to secretaries nor a desk upon which to write this letter on. Furthermore, King refers to the clergymen as “men of genuine good will” (1), which he clearly does not believe based on the rest of his letter. He conveys his “disappoint[ment] with the white church and its leadership” (33) in his arguments, and it is evident King does not believe the members of the clergy are acting in good will. This opening paragraph is saturated with sarcasm, from the wild notions that King has secretaries and desks in jail to the sentiment that he believes the members of the clergy act for the benefit of all demographics. 19. King utilizes repetition heavily when he appeals to pathos and explains that the movement for justice cannot be postponed any longer. By using “when” (14) to link numerous examples of why justice cannot be denied any longer, King insures that the clergymen will understand the plight of the Negro. Furthermore, the repetition of “when” (14) is a call to action for the oppressed Negroes reading this letter, reminding them of the great injustice and hardship they face. King states that “when you are harried day by day and haunted by night by the fact that you are a Negro…when you are forever fighting a degenerating sense of ‘nobodyness’ – then [the clergymen] will understand why [the Negroes] find it difficult to wait” (14). This statement strongly places the clergymen into the situation the Negroes face every day, and makes the idea of waiting for a time when justice is convenient to be absolutely absurd and illogical. King contends that the injustice and the struggles that segregation brings can no longer be tolerated by the African American society, and argues that their “legitimate and unavoidable impatience” (14) is clearly warranted. 20.
The most important literary text to have in order to understand the ideas King presents is the original statement of concern and caution issued by the eight white clergymen. Martin Luther King’s letter is a response to that statement, and it is imperative to have access to it in order to understand which points King is countering and why he is doing so. Without this text, a reader would not know who is being referenced when King references “men of genuine good will” (1). In addition, context regarding the Bible would also be beneficial, since King alludes to it repeatedly throughout his letter. King justifies civil disobedience by comparing it to the “refusal of Shardach, Meshach, and Abednego” (21), which was described in the Book of Daniel. A key historical context that would be valuable to the reader is World War II. King employs the policies of Nazi Germany and Hitler to further persuade his reader that unjust laws should not be followed. Without knowledge that Hitler was a vicious dictator who ruthlessly segregated against Jews, a reader would not be able to fully understand the sarcasm that King expresses when he states that “everything Hitler did in Germany was ‘legal’” (22). It would also be very beneficial if the reader had context on the ideas of Jon Bunyan, Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson, and others who King references in his letter in order to better understand his
proposals. King chose to write a letter in lieu of a spoken speech at a later date simply because the Negro community could no longer tolerate the injustices that the “evil system of segregation” (46) brought upon them. He could not wait until a later date to orate a speech, because for every moment he waited, more and more Negroes were being lynched, abused, and segregated. There was also growing tension between the Negroes and the white moderates; the Negroes were “no longer willing to be plunged into an abyss of injustice where they experience the bleakness of corroding despair” (14). Instead, they wanted to fight back and reclaim their constitutional and God-given rights. At the time of writing, the “disease of segregation” (32) had caused considerable unrest in Birmingham, Alabama, and King could not afford to wait until he was released from jail to orate a speech. Instead, he was forced to write a letter to respond to immediate criticism from the clergymen and diffuse his ideas to the general public.
In this excerpt, King conveys the prejudiced feelings that every African American would feel in this kind of society, which causes the reader to automatically feel sympathy towards the cause. Martin Luther King Jr.’s approach towards ending segregation was not only tactful, it was forthright in the ideals of racial equality. His argument holds such strong logic, that it seems like it is unchallengeable. This letter is solid proof of the intelligence and passion that contributed greatly towards African Americans gaining the rights they fought for, and rightfully deserve.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was arrested on April 12, 1963, in Birmingham, for having a protest without a proper permit. On the exact day King was arrested, eight clergymen from Alabama wrote a letter called “A Call for Unity.” The letter called for termination of civil activities and demonstrations and designated King an “outsider” and saying that outsiders were the problems in Birmingham and not the blacks that are from there. On April 16 King wrote “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, which was his responds to his fellow clergymen. He wrote the letter as a means to convince the clergymen and the white moderate that the nonviolent demonstrations that had got him arrested, were a necessity and to enlighten them on why the segregation laws in the southern states needed to be changed. In “Letter from Birmingham Jail” King uses logos, pathos, and ethos to persuade the clergymen and convince them in assisting him in putting an end to segregation laws of blacks in Birmingham, Alabama.
The tone set by Dr. King in the part of the letter where he describes “pent-up resentments and latent frustrations,” and where he recognizes the “vital urge” being suppressed, is very passionate. His passion shines through loud and clear. The way Dr. King feels is, in fact, quite clear throughout the entire letter, yet the overriding sense of reason and logic that anyone can relate to is ever apparent. As he describes the unrest he finds in his community, the community as a whole really; he explains that he did not encourage them to “get rid of your [their] discontent” he instead encouraged them to, “make prayer pilgrimages to city hall;… go on freedom rides,… and try to understand why he [they] must do so”; these quotes from the letter point out the ways Dr....
Recently you have received a letter from Martin Luther King Jr. entitled “Letter from Birmingham Jail.” In Dr. King’s letter he illustrates the motives and reasoning for the extremist action of the Civil Rights movement throughout the 1960’s. In the course of Dr. King’s letter to you, he uses rhetorical questioning and logistical reasoning, imagery and metaphors, and many other rhetorical devices to broaden your perspectives. I am writing this analysis in hopes you might reconsider the current stance you have taken up regarding the issues at hand.
In his letter, Martin Luther King is trying to persuade his readers to understand his action and point of view of an African-American living in this era. He did so all while replying to the public published statement and criticisms written to him by the eight Alabama clergymen. This illuminating work of art that King had created was filled with heightened terminology which was gratified by his precise framework. By King writing this response letter with such high dialect, it reflects off of his determined and highly educated mentality immensely. In this letter King directly tries to build a connection
King's main thesis in writing the Birmingham letter is that, racial segregation, or injustice to the black American society, is due to the continuous encouragement of the white American society, particularly the powerful communities in politics and religions. King defends his primary thesis all throughout the length of his letter, and the arguments that he has made to prove that his thesis is true and valid will be the focus of this rhetorical analysis.
King introduces two phases of the Negroes struggle: “the first began in the 1950’s when Negroes slammed the door shut on submission and subservice,” and “when Negroes assertively
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was the leader of a peaceful movement to end segregation in the United States this mission led him in 1963 to Birmingham, Alabama where officials and leaders in the community actively fought against desegregation. While performing sit-ins, marches and other nonviolent protests, King was imprisoned by authorities for violating the strict segregation laws. While imprisoned King wrote a letter entitled “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, in which he expresses his disappointment in the clergy, officials, and people of Birmingham. This letter employed pathos to argue that the leaders and ‘heroes’ in Birmingham during the struggle were at fault or went against their beliefs.
In considering the letter from Birmingham Jail written by Martin Luther King, Jr., It was decided that I would write in the same format as him. I hope you don’t mind. The purpose of this “letter” is to discuss the most effective rhetorical device used by Dr. King. Three rhetorical devices are pathos, logos, and ethos. In my opinion, the all work hand in hand, therefore, I will discuss all three of them.
Martin Luther King Jr. is one of the most convincing civil rights activists recorded in history; but what made his speeches so successful to the public? According to Aristotle, there are three rhetorical appeals: ethos, pathos, and logos. Ethos appeals people through trustworthiness, pathos appeals by creating empathy from the crowd, meanwhile logos is the appeal of reason.
Martin Luther King Jr. Letter from a Birmingham Jail gave the general population a knowledge into the brain and his unwillingness to abandon his fantasy for better life and appreciation for 'Negroes'. In any case, it was not only his mindset we have an understanding on additionally his rationality, his mantra. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a dedicated Christian and declined to utilize remorseless, disparaging words and superfluous brutality to express what is on his mind to the general population. He battled against the shameful acts brought on upon the dark individuals by the 'white force' in Birmingham. Letter from a Birmingham Jail additionally gave understanding into his identity and character. All through the letter, he never utilized merciless words, he never utilized words that could be taken disagreeably by the general population who he was dissenting against, now and again, what he says can be taken happily and flippantly, and he generally chatted with
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. changed America with his non-violent campaigns during the civil rights movement. Although his campaigns consisted of morally legal protests, speeches, and marches, he was still sentenced to jail on multiple occasions due to unjust laws. In King's “Letter from a Birmingham Jail,” he addresses the issues and injustices in Alabama with his responses to his fellow clergymen. King’s letter effectively uses Aristotle’s strategies of ethos (credibility), logos (logic), and pathos (emotions) to convince his readers that he is on the right side of these racial issues.
The United States of America as a nation suffered multiple racial and social forms of segregation even before its formation, but as the years passed and as each group fought for the right of freedom, they all united under one flag and fought for the values they all believed in such as freedom, dignity and democracy until they gained independence. After the British left and the end of slavery, Americans started to build this nation of success where dreams of those that work hard become true. Martin Luther king had a dream as well, a dream where all Americans are subject to equal rights and live under the same high moralities and values that founded this nation. But during his life, citizens of color and specifically African-Americans were segregated within society and treated as second class citizens.
Though the Civil Rights Movement continues to spread throughout the world, hatred still lingers and resists by hiding behind law. Fueled by hatred, privileged communities and law enforcers express violence against innocents, but are protected by their superiors. The injustices committed against the minorities are voiced by activists such as Martin Luther King Jr. and Desmond Tutu. Similarly, these famous figures worked peacefully to start revolutions by negotiating with the oppressors who have implicated injustice upon the oppressed.
Martin Luther King, Jr. and Cornel West are both influential and significant scholars within the black community. The main concepts that they address, nonviolent campaigns and nihilism, while different in approach target the same issues of inequality within America. A non-violent campaign is made up of several steps, however, nihilism can be defined as a philosophical ideology of foundational skepticism and hopelessness, it defines the pessimistic beliefs of meaninglessness and despair. Both concepts that prevalent within many scholarly works, particularly when referring to oppressed minorities within society. Within this essay, I analyze West’s Nihilism and Black America and King’s Letter from Birmingham Jail. I discuss the relationship