Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Historiography of the origins of the cold war
The historical context for the cold war
THE COLD WAR QUIZLET
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Kennedy’s speech, Ich bin ein Berliner, he works to convince people of the flaws of communism as well as the ill effects of the construction of the Berlin wall while motivating and assuring the people of West Berlin that the United States supports them. He does so through the use of parallel structure, anaphoras, absolute statements, logic, meaningful diction, and metaphors. At the time of this speech, the world is in the midst of the Cold War and the Berlin wall has recently been constructed to prevent Germans from the Soviet east from fleeing to the free west. While Kennedy’s speechmakers had attempted to write an address without offending either side, Kennedy decides to go in his own direction. He instead writes his own speech, set …show more content…
on swaying the people to see the wrongs of the communist system and the flaws of the wall. His approach is very effective and succeeds in providing the west with the motivation to push onward while convincing people of the dangers of division and the imperfection of communism. Kennedy opens up his speech with a statement laced with parallel structure. He says, “I am proud to come to this city as the guest of your distinguished Mayor”, Kennedy then continues on to say, “I am proud to visit the Federal Republic with your distinguished Chancellor” (Kennedy 1). His language in these two phrases serves to humble himself in the eyes of his West Berlin audience. By stating his pride twice, he appeals to the audience’s nationalism and overall makes them more receptive to his argument and words. In respectfully acknowledging two of their authority figures, he works to show a unity between Berlin and the United States. These two small statements do an effective job of demonstrating the United States’ alignment with West Berlin and its support of their ideals. Following this, Kennedy uses an anaphora to convince the audience of his point. Over and over he repeats the phrase “Let them come to Berlin” (Kennedy 4). In between each of these identical statements, Kennedy speaks directly to those who see benefits in communism. By repeating this phrase he challenges those who see communism in a positive way or think that it can coexist with freedom. He makes Berlin a tangible example of this incorrect manner of thought. With this sentence “Let them come to Berlin”, he challenges those who are blind to the division and heartbreak that communism brings to come to Berlin, and see firsthand the damage it inflicts. The use of repetition and parallel structure serves to emphasize the importance of a point, here it is the abandonment of communism, one of his central arguments. The next major rhetorical device Kennedy uses is absolute statements.
In the first example, Kennedy says, “Freedom has many difficulties and democracy is not perfect. But we have never had to put up a wall to keep our people in” (Kennedy 5). In this comparison of democracy to communism, Kennedy is referring directly to the Berlin wall. His statement is strengthened by his decision to address the nation from in front of the wall. By first admitting the flaws of democracy he demonstrates an impartial attitude, increasing his credibility. He then makes his absolute statement which directly attacks the morality of the communist system. Kennedy makes a black and white comparison which clearly shows communism in a negative light. This obvious fact is not only irrefutable but also one that would effectively show those in East Berlin as well as the communist world the issues in their system. In citing this ethical dilemma, the wall, Kennedy supports his argument and is able to reach one of his target audiences. Kennedy uses another absolute statement paired with logic later on when he says, “Real, lasting peace in Europe can never be assured as long as one German out of four is denied the elementary right of free men” (Kennedy 7). This statement is highly motivational because it cites an injustice felt by a quarter of the population and one of his main audiences, West Berlin. By discussing a common issue caused by Germany’s division, he unites west Berlin in their common struggle, …show more content…
providing them with the strength to push through and stay strong against the crushing grip of the communist world. In stating that there is only one way to achieve peace, he motivates Germany and Europe as a whole to push toward unity. Both of these statements help to prove Kennedy’s anti-communist point and to motivate the people of West Berlin. Kennedy’s next section focuses on motivating the Berliners and convincing them to persevere.
He uses a metaphor to accomplish this goal by saying, “You live in a defended island of freedom, but your life is a part of the main” (Kennedy 8). Here, Kennedy compares west Berlin to an island of freedom in the middle of a sea of communism, and much like a small island, they must fight the rising tide that is the surrounding communist world. As a small section of Berlin fighting a constant battle for their freedom outside support is crucial. This is why his statement “your life is a part of the main” is so significant. Kennedy is comparing them to an isolated island but here reminds them that they are a part of the mainland, essentially verbalizing the free world’s support, in particular, the United States’ support. Lastly, Kennedy uses meaningful diction to wrap up his speech and leave a lasting impact. He says, “All free men, wherever they may live, are citizens of Berlin...‘Ich bin ein Berliner’” (Kennedy 10). In this statement, Kennedy makes Berlin a symbol of freedom. All free men are the members of the free world and since they are all citizens of Berlin, Kennedy is demonstrating their support of the people in West Berlin and their struggle. The very last line in his speech is delivered in German and it is scattered throughout his entire address. He says I am a Berliner, a statement holds immense power. By affiliating himself with the people of West Berlin in their mother
tongue, he works to bridge the gap between Germany and the United States. In addition to declaring support, this meaningful dictionary also appeals to their nationalism, encouraging the people to trust in Kennedy’s words. In his Ich bin ein Berliner address in West Berlin, Kennedy speaks to both the communist and the free world in order to convince people of the United States’ support of West Berlin as well as the flaws of the communist system. He does this by using parallel structure, a powerful anaphora, two absolute statements, an appeal to logos, a metaphor, and meaningful diction. With Germany divided and the Berlin wall separating family and friends, Kennedy’s powerful speech effectively rallied the people of West Berlin while proving the errors of the communist system. Living in a state of division is not conducive to a peaceful environment and seeing this, Kennedy takes action. While it must be a challenge to give a speech to blatantly disrespecting the enemy, he does what he knows is right and convinces others to follow his path as well.
He used a very selective vocabulary, purposely using emotionally charged words such as: “wholly unjustifiable and irresponsible defiance” (lines 4-5), “ruthless disregard” (line 82), and “restraint and sacrifice” (lines 14-15). By using words with strong connotation, he powers the emotions of his audience once again directing support for himself and appearing as the calm figurehead amongst the emotional chaos. He also makes his speech very personal by mentioning individual American families, literally using the phrase “every American family” (line 25). He appeals to the strong sense of patriotism in the American public by mentioning the four servicemen who died in Vietnam. Despite the fact that they are almost completely unrelated to the rise in steel prices and, if they were alive, would be unaffected by the rise in price, either. And yet, Kennedy mentions the servicemen to make the situation appear that much more dire. By mentioning the tragic deaths of these men, Kennedy aims to trigger a strong emotional response in his audience that would turn into support for
It was on January 20th 1961 that John F Kennedy gave his inaugural address after winning the presidential race and beating future president Richard Nixon. President, John F Kennedy in his speech, The Inaugural Address, he describes his plans for growth in America. Kennedy’s purpose is unite the people of the U.S. and bring everyone together for the good cause of promoting growth in the country. He creates a very inspirational tone in order to establish a connection with the U.S. people. In his speech Kennedy really used several rhetorical strategies of persuasion to motivate and persuade the U.S. people that they made the right choice in choosing him.
On January 20th, 1961, John Fitzgerald Kennedy gave a speech to the nation, which encompassed a new vision for the country with a new generation. That speech was JFK’s Inaugural Address. As the new 35th president, JFK was the youngest president to enter the oval office at the age of forty-three ("Inaugural Address."). The nation was still in in the process of healing after World War II. In the eyes of the masses, John Fitzgerald Kennedy was a breath of fresh air for the American People. He was a youthful president, with his youthful image; he was able to rally the younger generations with a progressive vision. This speech was a message to the nation in which JFK outlines a new direction for The United States by securing it’s freedom, being a competitive nation in all aspects, and rallying the citizens behind the government.
Kennedy, “When President Kennedy spoke at the City Hall those 24 years ago, freedom was encircled, Berlin was under siege. And today, despite all the pressures upon this city, Berlin stands secure in its liberty. And freedom itself is transforming the globe” (Reagan par. 15). He relates this image to inspire people in a difficult time, because in the same way that John F. Kennedy spoke to the people of Berlin during rough times and delivered a message of hope and freedom that was expressed through a vision of seeing Germany and all of Europe united, “Freedom is indivisible, and when one man is enslaved, all are not free. When all are free, then we can look forward to that day when this city will be joined as one and this country and this great Continent of Europe in a peaceful and hopeful globe” (Kennedy par. 8). Reagan hoped to relay the same message during tough times as well and with the hopes that his words would be received with the same openness and eagerness the German people exhibited when Kennedy visited in
John F Kennedy delivered one of the finest speeches on January 20, 1961 after being sworn into office. His inauguration speech was so powerful that it captured the entire nations attention, and quotes from it are still remembered by people today. It is one of the finest speeches ever written. It provides a strong appeal to pathos, ethos and logos, and it is because of this that people who never heard the speech can quote lines from it.
He has the audience infer that the steel companies raising their prices was what they were doing for their country, and what they were doing was not helping like Kennedy has wished. This reference back to something that had a huge impact on many people strengthens Kennedy’s point of view and helps him achieve his
Hence, through various rhetorical strategies, Kennedy achieves his purpose of gaining the spectators’ favor through stressing major current events that concerned the American people. These significant concepts include American patriotism and American diplomacy, stressed when he begins four consequent paragraphs with the same recurring three words, “Let both sides.” Kennedy’s brilliant use of pathos, parallelism, antithesis, and varied syntax successfully convey his ambitions and hopes for America, as it makes Kennedy’s speech a very memorable one in history.
Though Kennedy and Clinton addressed their audiences nearly thirty-two years apart, each rhetor faced a common rhetorical barrier – an American populace too heavily focused on the personalities within each respective presidential election rather than the true issues confronting the United States. To overcome that barrier, both Kennedy and Clinton utilize definitional strategies – in the form of association – as well as language strategies –specifically, historical allusions. Whether or not the speeches directly correlate with both candidates winning their presidential elections does not concern the examination; this paper observes how exactly the rhetorical devices used served to dissolve the barriers between the rhetor and the intended audience.
As emblematic representatives of their country, U.S. Presidents exercise their beliefs and concepts regularly through the use of eloquence. John Fitzgerald Kennedy was elected president of the United States in 1960. Kennedy became president during times of great danger and fear for the nation of America, and others around the globe. With Communism being further more popular, and large weapon’s being frequently produced all around the world, the people of America needed a new premier commander. As the youngest elected official to ever govern the White House, Kennedy wanted to show his genuineness as a ruler, and verify that his presidency would lead to great hope and future. The president’s inaugural address allows the president to lay out his
Kennedy uses refrences from past events in history to emphasize his point of taking a risk and trying something new, and inspiring his audience. An event from 1630 is used in JFK’s speech as an allusion to make the reader feel a sense of , “William Bradford, speaking in 1630 of the founding of the Plymouth Bay Colony, said that all great and honorable actions are accompanied with great difficulties, and both must be enterprised and overcome with answerable courage” (Kennedy 2). He is proving that after all the hard work, it is succesful and worth it. William Bradford created a colony by the devotion and hard work. Kennedy is relating himself and the country to Bradford, showing the audience that it is possible. Using an example from history makes the audience more committed to landing on the moon when they think the probability for success is high. It gives off the encouraging thought of, “if they did it, we can do it”, which is exactly what JFK was trying to succeed. Kennedy also uses an allusion to exaggerate to sudden change in tecchnology and show how advanced this country...
President John F. Kennedy brings about a new way of thinking in his inaugural speech. He brings in a sense of selflessness and relentlessness for the country. He uses literary devices such as, antithesis, repetition, and rhetorical questions to bring about that sense in the audience. He begins by putting himself to the people and allowing the audience to feel welcomed. The use of literary devices in his speech allows the audience to recognize his goal, which is moving forward and bringing change to the country.
... Americans are so happy in this country. Freedom is was what this country was founded on and he wanted to spread it to the world. Ethos is quite simple in his speech. John F. Kennedy is obviously a smart, brilliant man that became president. He wouldn’t be where he was if he wasn’t those things, there American people would not have elected him to office.
In his Inaugural Address he said, that he would bear any burden, pay any price, and the hardship, to oppose any foe and success of liberty(Kennedy.5). This meant that he was to do as much as he possibly could to ensure and spread freedom around the world. Because European countries wanted a communist country which was to have all of your property owned not by you but everyone. Since there was no freedom or constitution Kennedy’s wasn’t going to approve of this idea. President Kennedy also stated, “...those who foolishly sought power by riding the back of the tiger ended up inside.” (Kennedy.8). He stated something very powerful with how the Nuclear attacks were occurring then that he said, that people who want power and use force will be destroyed before he can control
Primarily, the speeches focused on the Soviet Union. From Churchill referring to the borders on the East as an “iron curtain,” to Reagan demanding the Soviet Union to tear down the Berlin Wall, the Soviet Union was targeted in those speeches. JFK’s speech didn’t revolve around the Soviet Union quite as much as Churchill’s or Reagan’s. By calling the borders to the East an “iron curtain,” and stating that the Soviet Union had some eastern countries not only under its influence, but under its control, Churchill very explicitly makes a target of the Soviet Union. He makes the Soviet Union out to be the world’s newest enemy. Similarly, when Reagan puts the Soviet Union on the spot by demanding them to tear down the Berlin Wall in his speech, he also makes the Soviet Union a target. He makes them out to be a threat to the sense of humanity itself in his speech, and leaves them no choice but to tear down the wall.
Kennedy also used other rhetorical devices such as anaphora, alliteration and metaphors. Kennedy used a technique called anaphora, also known as the repetition of the opening phrase of a sentence for added effect, when he said Cuba will be “free from foreign domination, free to choose their own leaders, free to select their own system, free to own their own land, free to speak and write and worship without fear or degradation.” By using anaphora, Kennedy emphasizes the fact that he truly wants peace, not only for his nation but for Cuba as well. He does not blame Cuba for the missiles but instead realizes the fact that they are under the control of “tyrants”. Therefore, through this line Kennedy gains the respect of many that are listening since he is being practical and sensible in the situation despite the severity of it. Another rhetorical device used by Kennedy is alliteration, which is the recurrence of initial consonant sounds, in the following statement, “large, long-range missiles.” The purpose of this statement is to emphasize the threat that the missiles possess by stressing their size and location through alliteration. This statement can stir the fear or curiosity of those listening which is effective in getting their attention and keeping it for the duration of the speech. Lastly, metaphors were also used to compare two things by stating one is the other. This can be seen when he stated that “the fruits of victory would be ashes in our mouths." Once again, this device is used to emphasize the severity and threat of the missiles. Furthermore, Kennedy emphasizes the devastating effects nuclear war can have that not even victory itself will be satisfying since so much destruction was caused. This metaphor will steer those listening, away from taking an offensive action and possibly starting a war to support his defensive plan which does not have a destructive war as a result. It is natural for us as human beings to go with a plan that