Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The womens liberation movement essay
Introduction to the womens liberation movement
Edmund Burke and his views on the French Revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The womens liberation movement essay
Patricia Kisinger
Amy Joy Triola
English Composition II
Final Draft
22 September 2015
Rhetorical Analysis of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman
A Vindication of the Rights of Woman is the first exhaustive feminist philosophical treatise. It was published in 1792 during the French Revolution. She believed that women should have equal rights as men. The author, Mary Wollstonecraft, argues that women are not naturally inferior to men but that they have not been given the same opportunities and privileges, like education, that men have.
Mary Wollstonecraft was a feminist and in her time wrote several pieces for the equality of rights for men and women. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman was a philosophical 208 page book in which she passionately expresses the right to educate women. It was written as a response to Jean-Jaques Rousseau's views expressed in Emíle (On Education) in which he argues that women should be educated only to entertain and cater to men. It is also a follow up of a pamphlet she published two years prior, A Vindication of the Rights of a Men. This was a response to Edmund Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France in which he critisized the French revolution and aplauded tradition. In her response, she says that our rights cannot be based on old
…show more content…
traditions. She also attacks heirarchal rank and privilege. The argument was inspired as a response but it expands so much further and was a gateway for her views to be expressed more in depth. It was not specifically written to men or women because both needed to read to the argument to understand equality. Women who were being denied education might not have realized that they're not being treated fairly because it was the norm. Publishing during the French Revolution was an opportune time because men were fighting for democratic rights and she inserted women into the conversation. It was a good time for the argument since change was already being fought for. The challenge the author is facing at this time is that she is a woman talking about equal rights for women. She is seen as inferior and her views and opinions are harder to make valid. She has also overcome challenges to this point because she has been educated and she is getting published. Her goal is to change the way we raise women. The main claim is that women are thought to be inferior than men. She says it is thought that the greatest thing a woman can do with her life is get married. Once they've accomplished marriage, they're behaviors are simply reduced to that of children by spending their time on their appearance and household hobbies. Women are treated as though there's no need to think if you're still pretty for your husband. She claims it is essential to the nation to educate women because they raise and educate their children. If they're properly educated they can also be better companions to their husbands. She challenges the men to let women have an education and for the men to become more modest and see if the women are still seen as inferior. A woman is not built so different from a man, give them an education and they will understand it. The topic of education for women is clearly personal for her because she is a woman.
She doesn't just write from her perspective though. She writes it for all women to have an equal opportunity to educate themselves. She has accomplished a lot in her life despite being a woman and wants others to do the same. She has been previously published and her opinion is valued. Given the time period, it is still thought her opinion was met with complete hostility. Although there was some resistance, overall it was well reviewed and sparked a debate reguarding a womans position within society . There were several British and American editions printed . It was later translated and printed in
French. Mary Wollstonecraft was definitely trying to get an emotional response out of her audience with her writing. Her writing style is dry and at times sarcastic. She mocks her argument and pokes fun at the way women were only viewed as objects of mens desires. She talks about how women are responsible for raising their children and how we should all want women to be better educated for that purpose. She says women are more cunning and methodical than men are aware which can make them smarter. By now, we have seen a lot of progress that has started with this argument. She showed her level of education by curating a well formed argument on why women should be educated equally. The fact that it was personal ignited a greater emotional response for a change.
A short speech from a politician during the Civil Rights era is “For the Equal Rights Amendment”, delivered by Shirley Chisholm. In this speech, Chisholm uses ethos, pathos, and logos to argue her point of equal rights. An example of ethos that could be found in the speech is when Chisholm says “The Constitution they wrote was designed to protect the rights of white, male citizens. As there were no black Founding Fathers, there were no founding mothers -- a great pity, on both counts. It is not too late to complete the work they left undone. Today, here, we should start to do so.” This would serve as an example of ethos because Chisholm is showing creditably by mentioning why the Constitution was wrote. Additionally, she challenges what the
The Declaration of Independence stands as a representation of justice, equality, and natural human rights. With it being written to liberate the American citizens from British control; allowing the citizens to live freely as they wish - as equal humans. However, there are numerous discrepancies and controversies to this document. Especially in the field of gender-equality and women 's rights. Mary Wollstonecraft, writer of A Vindication of the Rights of Women, is a forerunner of this movement. Comparing her work to the Declaration of Independence, it can be seen that Wollstonecraft 's work can be served as a critique against the masculinity put forth in the Declaration of Independence. With the declaration making numerous remarks with recognition
Born as a free woman in London, England Mary argued for education along with unjust laws for women that subjected them to a form of slavery. As the world around her at the time was facing a political breakthrough with the United States using idea’s formed by philosophers John Locke and Thomas Hobbes theories in the social contract, to break free from England, she hoped the French Revolution would create an era of equality and reason. Wollstonecraft places her opinion that the condition of adult women is caused by the neglect of education for girls. Most of the essay is based on her argument for education of
It amazes me how a few decades ago can seem like a whole different world. A course of time can impact our lives more than we know it. In the article, A Day Without Feminism by Jennifer Boumgoidnei and Amy Richntds, both of these authors created this piece to inform their audience that although women have gained more rights over time, there was still more progress to be made. These authors gave many examples of how life for women had been, the obstacles they had to overcome, and the laws women had to break for equality.
Within Hon. Shirley Chisholm’s well known speech, Equal Rights for Women, which she presented on May 21, 1969, she discusses in detail the ideology of woman’s rights before the United States House of Representatives. She touches base on her own experience with discrimination, how society has prejudice against women, and introduces the Equal rights act, in which she states “that has been before every Congress for the last 40 years and that sooner or later must become part of the basic law of the land.” With her speech, Hon. Shirley Chisholm makes a substantial argument about women’s rights. With her use of anecdotes, counter arguments, and statistics, her speech obtains great value.
On September 5, 1995, Hillary Clinton delivered an influential speech at The Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing. Clinton expresses general concern over escalating violence toward women, in other word’s gendercide. “Gendercide refers to the systematic elimination of a specific gender group, normally female. It’s most common in India, China, and other regions in Southeast Asia” (GirlsKind Foundation). Crimes, such as bride trafficking, infanticide, abandonment, and dowry related murder; often take place within private households, going unnoticed and not even acknowledged. “Tragically, women are most often the ones whose human rights are violated. Even now, in the late 20th century, the rape of women continues to be used as an instrument of armed conflict Women and children make up a large majority of the world’s refugees” (Clinton 3). By addressing her speech in Beijing, where gendercide is prevalent, Hillary expressed her objective effectively not just the United Nations, but to audiences across the world. Clinton effectively delivered her speech by portraying her purpose for women to achieve equality and better opportunities, with ethical appeals, emotional appeals, and logical appeals.
Chimamanda Ngozi describes a feminist as “A person who believes in the social, political, and economic equality of the sexes.”During her Ted Talk from April 12th, 2013, She talks about how since she knew she was female she would have to try and prove her worth in school. She states that “I was worried that if I looked too feminine I would not be taken seriously. I really wanted to wear my shiny lip gloss and my girly skirt, but I decided not to. I wore a very serious, very manly, and very ugly suit.The sad truth of the matter is that when it comes to appearance we start off with men as the standard, as the norm. Many of us think that the less feminine a woman appears, the more likely she is to be taken seriously.” Her words ring true especially
Indisputably, Mary Wollstonecraft was one of the most influential figures of Enlightenment, also considered the ‘first feminist’. It is certain that her works and writing has influenced the lives of many women and altered the outlook of some societies on women, evolving rights of women a great deal from what they used to be in her time. It is clear that Wollstonecraft’s arguments and writing will remain applicable and relevant to societies for many years to come, as although there has been progression, there has not been a complete resolution. Once women receive so easily the freedom, rights and opportunities that men inherently possess, may we be able to say that Wollstonecraft has succeeded in vindicating the rights of women entirely.
Mary Wollstonecraft was as revolutionary in her writings as Thomas Paine. They were both very effective writers and conveyed the messages of their ideas quite well even though both only had only the most basic education. Wollstonecraft was a woman writing about women's rights at a time when these rights were simply non-existent and this made her different from Paine because she was breaking new ground, thus making her unique. Throughout her lifetime, Wollstonecraft wrote about the misconception that women did not need an education, but were only meant to be submissive to man. Women were treated like a decoration that had no real function except to amuse and beguile. Wollstonecraft was the true leader in women's rights, advocating a partnership in relationships and marriage rather than a dictatorship. She was firm in her conviction that education would give women the ability to take a more active role in life itself.
When creating a comparative rhetorical analysis of two different feminist essays, we must first define the term “feminism”. According to Merriam-Webster.com, feminism is “the belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities”. Feminism is a also a long term social movement, one that’s been in the works since the early 1900’s. However, as any challenger to the norm might receive, the words ‘feminism’ and ‘feminist’ have gotten a bad reputation. Throughout the years, popular opinion has agreed that if you’re a feminist, you hate men, and don’t shave. It’s a very close-minded belief, and both Lindy West and Roxane Gay agree. Both authors of the essays I am comparing today, West and Gay try and convey their beliefs that feminism isn’t what you think it is. However, they do it in very different ways. Who conveyed their beliefs of feminism better and the superior argument? That is what I am going to display today.
In the nation, women make up approximately fifty percent of the population. Due to their sex, they are unable to obtain the same goals that are provided to men in Thomas Jefferson 's declaration. One notable difference between men and women is physiology. Nevertheless, Mary Wollstonecraft in the Vindication of the Rights of Woman states that both sexes were created equally by God (Wollstonecraft 45). Wollstonecraft’s argument is that rights should not be beneficial for one sex, but for all sexes since God created humans. Though there are slight differences between the two, women should have the rights as men, especially since they coexist together in society. In the "Declaration of Sentiments," Elizabeth Cady Stanton writes that women do not possess the right to property, right to vote or the right to formal education. In addition, the standards on which women are judged upon is harsher for women in the relationship between husband and wife. Cady Stanton relays, “In the covenant of marriage, she is compelled to promise obedience to her husband, he becoming, to all intents and purposes, her master—the law giving him power to deprive
The thesis of “We Should All Be Feminists” is everyone should be feminists because men are always viewed as the ones who have to greater than women in almost everything and it must be fixed. A feminist does not have to be a woman, a man can be one too. More importantly, she is specifically trying to cause awareness of the gender inequality in Africa because that is where she is from and it is where she has seen the stereotype against women. If this was a written essay, the category it would fit into is a persuasive essay because Adichie uses logos, pathos, and ethos to persuade the audience.
Wollstonecraft, Mary. “A Vindication of the Rights of Women with Structures on Political and Moral
Vindication of the Rights for Women by Mary Wollstonecraft was published in 1792, during the French Revolution. Wollstonecraft preached that intellect will always govern to persuade women not to endeavor to acquire knowledge but convince them that the soft phrases, acceptability of heart, delicacy of sentiment, and refinement of taste, are most preferred. By intellect, I mean the men because they were the ones that were allowed to get an education therefore allowing them to become intellectual. Wollstonecraft cleverly does not try to prove her point through protests or accusations, but argue that women are not naturally inferior to men, but appear to be only because they lack education. She suggests that both men and women should be treated as rational beings and imagines a social order founded on reason. She believed it was unfair for women to be treated differently and passionately wanted to make a change. That it was time to let go of feelings and begin the thought process behind the rationality of the women’s predicament. Men felt that while they would get an education an...
Mary Wollstonecraft was a self-educated, radical philosopher who wrote about liberation, and empowering women. She had a powerful voice on her views of the rights of women to get good education and career opportunities. She pioneered the debate for women’s rights inspiring many of the 19th and the 20th century’s writers and philosophers to fight for women’s rights, as well. She did not only criticize men for not giving women their rights, she also put a blame on women for being voiceless and subservient. Her life and, the surrounding events of her time, accompanied by the strong will of her, had surely affected the way she chose to live her life, and to form her own philosophies.