Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Casual analysis essay on zen and art of motorcycle maintenance quality
How Can Religion Shape Personal And Societal Values
Religion and its impact on individual values and society values
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Robert Pirsig’s Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance offers an extensive look into the author’s concept of reason in relation to discovering an ultimate truth. Pirsig, the implied narrator of the novel, wrestles with his memories of his past life as Phaedrus and must rediscover who he is and what he truly believes. One of his most recurring issues is his search for an eternal and absolute truth in the conglomeration of logic, philosophy, quality, and classics which he refers to as Reason. Reason, to Pirsig, is the most paramount aspect of his university. Pirsig, however, does not define a university in the most familiar and traditional terms. A university, like a church, is not the bricks and mortar that make up the building. It …show more content…
When practicing religion, Pirsig notes that it is vital to serve God first and the community and financial incentives second. This can best be seen when he states, “[A preacher’s] primary goal isn’t to serve the members of the community, but always God” (Pirsig 66). Pirsig takes these beliefs and converts them into his Church of Reason when he declares, “The primary goal of the Church of Reason, Phaedrus said, is always Socrates’ old goal of truth, in its ever-changing forms, as it’s revealed by the process of rationality. Everything else is subordinate to that” (Pirsig 66). He is makes Reason the top priority of his existence in ways similar to religious churches when prioritizing their God. In fact, the narrator has left the physical manifestation of the University a couple of times out of loyalty to his intangible Church of Reason. While he was a teenager, Pirsig found a fault in the logic of the Scientific Method that threw his entire outlook on the purpose and progress of Reason into confusion. This dubiety made him unable to complete university work and terminated his drive to continue with it. Pirsig explains …show more content…
From the narrator’s perspective, Reason includes quality, romanticism, classic mindsets, truth, logic and philosophy. Pirsig takes on the overly ambitious task of attempting to give concrete definitions of all that Reason is. Pirsig’s shortcoming is that he is only human. The human mind can only comprehend so much, and there are certain concepts, such as God and Reason that cannot be fully grasped by a mortal intelligence. Because Pirsig is not an all-knowing being, he has often found himself stumped on his logic and reasoning. When Pirsig speaks of God, he often speaks of Church, which has a Christian affiliation. While it can be debated by different denominations, a generally held view of Christians is that God is never-changing, and free of logical fallacies. Under these standards, Reason would not truly be a God as it changes each time a being adds to it. Furthermore, with the use of the Scientific Method, it has been shown that a permanent, definitive truth cannot be reached as long as hypothesis are infinite. Consequently, Reason could not really be defined as a God with all its flaws and paradoxes. It should be noted, however, that Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance is recited from the mind of Robert Pirsig. He is creating his very own concepts of God in Reason and is not basing any of his conclusions on the Christian Bible’s definition of truth. In his own
The following book of Peter Kreeft’s work, The Journey, will include a summary along with mine and the authors’ critique. As you read the book it is a very pleasant, symbolic story of always-existing wisdom as you go along the pathway of what knowledge really is. It talks about Socrates, someone who thinks a lot about how people think, from Athens, is a huge part in this book. This book is like a roadmap for modern travelers walking the very old pathway in search of reality. It will not only show us the pathway they took, but the pathway that we should take as well.
Throughout human existence, scholars have earnestly pursued knowledge and the attainment of truth. Historical figures such as Plato, Descartes, and Emerson sought answers to daunting questions of: ‘What is truth?’; ‘What is reality?’; ‘How is wisdom acquired?’ Many scholars believe these philosophers presented conflicting viewpoints: Plato encouraging skepticism among all previous historical, cultural, and personal perspectives; Descartes questioning definitions of reality and his very existence; Emerson encouraging self-trust and confidence in one’s ideals, opinions, and convictions. Surprisingly, reconciliation can be reached from these three differing hypotheses. Emerson’s thesis merely expounds from Descartes and Plato’s philosophies. He builds from Descartes’ search for self-identity and reconciles Plato’s skepticism with his views of self-trust and unconformity among scholars.
Pharinet. ""Is College for Everyone'"." Practical Argument: A Text and Anthology. Ed. Laurie G. Kirszner and Stephen R. Mandell. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2011. 635-636. Print.
Lucretius’ account of his work invites the more enterprising atheists to become more informed and familiar with the patina of a respected tradition, blurring their ability to decipher between enlightenment and classical rationalism. In order for enlightenment rationalism to achieve its end, it must fundamentally transform not only the nature of philosophy itself, but also what we as humans understand as the good life.
ABSTRACT: Antisthenes of Athens was an older student of Socrates who had previously studied under the Sophists. His philosophical legacy also influenced Cynic and early Stoic thought. Consequently, he has left us an interesting theory of paideia (reading, writing, and the arts) followed by an even more brief one in divine paideia, the latter consisting of learning how to grasp the tenets of reason in order to complete virtue. Once properly grasped, the pupil will never lose it since it is embedded in the heart with true belief. However, there is a danger of being confused by human learning, which may delay or obviate completing divine paideia. Nonetheless, with the help of a teacher who gives a personal example, like Socrates or the mythical Centaur Chiron, the pupil has a chance of reaching his or her goal. Through a series of myths, Antisthenes gives us the foundations of his logical and ethical theory together. Reasoning is both a way to grasp virtue and also to fortify it. Although he would have chaffed under a modern university educational system, we may learn from him to value concise philosophical studies as a necessary adjunct to basic lessons in liberal arts.
For many years humans have pursued the meaning of truth, knowledge and understanding. For many this pursuit of understanding the meaning of truth doesn’t end until one finds a “truth” that is nourishing to them. Even if this is the case one may choose to look for an alternate truth that may be more satisfactory to them. This pursuit of truth does not always have to follow the same path as there may be different ideas for everyone on how truth is actually obtained and which is a better way to obtain the truth is. Two philosophers of their time, Plato and Charles Peirce had their own methodologies and ideas on how truth and knowledge could be obtained.
First, the meditator begins by noting that as a youth he held numerous false opinions, and that all the beliefs that he had held subsequently developed into other opinions whose validity are doubtful. In order to develop firm and lasting beliefs that could have a momentous impact, he realizes that he must start anew. In order to accomplish this endeavor, he utilizes Descartes’ philosophical methodology, known hyperbolic do...
Peace of mind isn't at all superficial, really, I expound. It's the whole thing. That which
Is it possible for human beings to rise above the sensory interpretation about the world and become an intellectual? Both Plato’s “The Allegory of the Cave” and René Descartes’ “Cogito, Ergo Sum” examine this issue, and come to the conclusion that it is possible, and from this ascent, to become certain and rational. For each author, though, this is accomplished in different ways. Plato’s allegory points out that we need to look beyond the surface of the knowledge we learn and let the idea of good be our basis in life. Descartes expresses that we need to eliminate doubt in order for us to know certainty and feel comfortable in our knowledge.
Reason can be defined as trying to understand God and the explanation behind his decisions. We can understand God, and reason gives us hope at understanding God through scripture. Reason is a tool that we can use to discern and interpret God’s word and to gain insight into God’s character and personality. The nature of God is eternal, omniscient, omnipresent, and supernatural, and reason provides a lens to look at the behavior of God through his nature. “God is not irrational,” and there is a reason behind everything that he does (WQL 5). Reason is a valuable tool for the Wesleyan Quadrilateral but reason does not stand
Religion is and always has been a sensitive topic. Some choose to acknowledge that there is a God and some choose to deny this fact to the death. For those who deny the presence of a higher being, “Life of Pi” will most likely change your thought process concerning this issue. Yann Martel’s, “Life of Pi”, is a compelling story that shows the importance of obtaining religion and faith. Piscine (Pi) Patel is both the protagonist and the narrator of Martell’s religious eye-opener who undergoes a chain effect of unbelievable catastrophes. Each of these catastrophic events leaving him religiously stronger because he knows that in order to endure what he has endured, there has got to be a God somewhere.
On its surface, Martel’s Life of Pi proceeds as a far-fetched yet not completely unbelievable tale about a young Indian boy named Pi who survives after two hundred twenty-seven days on a lifeboat with a Bengal tiger named Richard Parker. It is an uplifting and entertaining story, with a few themes about companionship and survival sprinkled throughout. The ending, however, reveals a second story – a more realistic and dark account replacing the animals from the beginning with crude human counterparts. Suddenly, Life of Pi becomes more than an inspiring tale and transforms into a point to be made about rationality, faith, and how storytelling correlates the two. The point of the book is not for the reader to decide which story he or she thinks is true, but rather what story he or she thinks is the better story. In real life, this applies in a very similar way to common belief systems and religion. Whether or not God is real or a religion is true is not exactly the point, but rather whether someone chooses to believe so because it adds meaning and fulfillment to his or her life. Life of Pi is relevant to life in its demonstration of storytelling as a means of experiencing life through “the better story.”
After all education which is one of the best in his time he went through, he felt unsatisfactory with the knowledge he had. Then he decided to search for truth from stretch by his sole reasoning not by his senses, common beliefs, and opinions of other people. “It is some tim...
Kaebnick, Gregory. “Reasons of the heart: emotion, rationality, and the "Wisdom of Pepugnance." The Hastings Center, August 2008. 4. Religion and Philosophy Connection (1874269020).
In the first section of The Art of Religious Communication Kupfer explains why “religious belief and interpretation of experience are better expressed artistically than argued for rationally” (310). Often when people try to explain God rationally they run into many problems because, as Kupfer explains, God cannot be understood through rational argument. God is not a being that fits into the realms that science is because “God’s existence is unlike anything the existence of anything else” (Kupfer 311). Trying to explain the existence of God through rational arguments will always fail. Rational arguments must have limits, so when the thing being explained is limitless, the arguments will always fail. In explaining any other thing, the existence of the item is not the same as its qualities. “The shape, weight, or color of something presupposes that it exists” But with God men often try to explain his existence using his attributes (311). It is obvious why this fails. The existence of God is the even more basic than the ...