Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts
Book Review
Wineburg, Samuel S.Historical Thinking And Other Unnatural Acts: Charting The Future Of Teaching The Past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2001.
Nick Melvin
Troy University
Since the beginning of early history, scholars have mourned young people’s absence of historical knowledge and advised that foolishness of the past denounces humanity into repeating the mistakes of the past. In today’s society, in the United States this dreadful outlook sparks a controversial debate about what major events, people and nations are necessary for teaching history students. Sam Wineburg argues that we are asking the wrong questions. Wineburg’s book proves his point by destroying the traditional
…show more content…
belief that there is only one true history and one way to teach it. However most of us believe that history is taught best as a combination of dates, facts, and influential figures, for historians it is a procedure for expanding knowledge about the connections of individuals and events in the past. As a cognitive phycologist, Sam Wineburg was involved in studying what is innate to historical thinking, how it could be taught, and why the majority of student’s still follow the “one thing after the other” idea of history. Wineburg’s book proves that people think about the past and utilize it in order to understand their future. Wineburg argues that we retain lessons about history in a variety of environments such as at the movies, dinner table and even the world-wide web. He is committed to involve lessons from new understandings of cognition to the study of history and why history is important to this method. Sam Wineburg’s answer to Why study history? is not very simple. It is very apparent what he does not highly value. He seems to be very aggravated with some of the debates among historians dealing with deciding which facts to honor. Wineburg seems to be highly pleased with the more recent examples of social history that pertain to issues such as gender. Mostly he is determined to show attention to what history can do to replicate thought. Sam Wineburg seems to love history that shows detachment from existing assumptions, to develop ideas of what it is to be human. A portion of his interest with the study of primary sources involves the same idea that differ from current suggestions. He is also intrigued by history’s ability to encourage moral debate. Wineburg’s essays involve a short history of the ways in which historical thinking has developed.
Sam Wineburg’s part one gives the reader an outline of the important themes of the book, reflecting on the “History Wars” in which he studied the standard movements of the 1980s and 1990s, then researched the teaching and learning of history. Wineburg used this passage in order to ask the question why teach history, he argues that this question which was lost in debate should be taught. “The debate over which history should be taught controlled the debate.” (Wineburg p. …show more content…
xii) Sam Wineburg’s part two is situated around the challenges that novices face in learning history. (Wineburg p. xii) In chapter three Wineburg compares the readings of professional historians with the readings of high school students. Chapter four provides the reader with information about a case study of two college students getting ready to become teachers. Chapter five focuses on how fifth and seventh graders visualized the past and curriculum interventions that help to overcome customary assumptions about gender. (Wineburg p. xii) For instance, Wineburg wants to know how we could bring balance to both boy’s and girl’s depictions of the past. He explains that lining the classroom with pictures of prominent women can help to balance male-dominated curriculum in the classroom setting. (Wineburg p. 129) Wineburg’s part three takes up history teaching.
He uses three essays that came from his experience with Lee Shulman’s teacher assessment project that he completed at Sanford. (Wineburg p. xii) Wineburg and Wilson’s essays “Models of Wisdom in the Teaching of History” and “Wrinkles in Time and Place: Using Performance Assessments to Understand the Knowledge of History Teachers, are both great essays that show exemplary history teachers with various approaches to their subject matter.
Wineburg’s final collection of essays in part four attempts to find an extensive context for history instruction by comparing it to other “memory sites” in society. (Wineburg p. xii) Wineburg uses the first essay in the classroom setting and it is evident that high school students bring to their assignments extremely engrained narratives from the home. In his final chapter Wineburg attempts to “reach out past the classroom and the school setting in order to embrace the home, community, church, and the cultural history curriculum of the larger society.” (Wineburg p.
xiii). How do the findings of this book contribute to our understanding of American History? Wineburg mentions an increase in violence in American schools has brought about an increase in the need for character education courses in schools. (Wineburg p. 230) Wineburg believes that discussions in classrooms will boil over into conflict and tension that characterize a free society. (Wineburg p. 230) Wineburg believes that schools are not “training grounds for democracy” rather they are where democracy is achieved. (Wineburg p. 230). He mentions that we will either learn to communicate with one another or suffer the consequences of never learning to. (Wineburg p. 230) Wineburg makes an excellent point in today’s society it is very common to see students keep their opinions to themselves in fear of what other student’s might think of their belief system. Wineburg makes a great point that school is where democracy is achieved and that students should be able to voice their opinions and if they can not then we have to suffer the consequences of never learning to. In conclusion, Wineburg does a tremendous job in proving his point to the reader that there is more than one way to teach history and to be successful at it. Wineburg argues that we are asking the wrong questions when it comes to teaching history. He believes that we retain history in a variety of different environments such as the movies, dinner table, and the world wide web. Wineburg makes a great point that school is where democracy is achieved and students should feel free to voice their opinions in the classroom setting.
With a cultural background like Mike’s, survival in the American educational system is a difficult struggle at best. However, Jack helped fill in some of the critical cultural blanks. “He slowly and carefully built up our knowledge of Western intellectual history – with facts, with connections, with speculations” . And Jack served as more than simply a source of numb...
...s of the Americas, what was their life like, and how did it change when Columbus arrived ,’ wrote a student of mine in 1991. ‘However, back then everything was presented as if it were the full picture,’ she continued, ‘so I never thought to doubt that it was.’” Most students after high school, fail to analyze controversial issues in our society. What citizens know about our past is what they have learned in high school history courses.
Why do children graduate high school without fully understanding concepts that relate to the core subjects of Math, English, Science, and History? Because education is unequal in America. Sociologist Doctor James W. Loewen and award winning writer Jonathan Kozol agree that classicism is to blame. Loewen also believes that history textbooks take some of the blame, for the student’s ignorance of inequality within education. Loewen and Kozol make great points on classicism, and it is important to understand how classism and textbooks affect education, and also to think of solutions to the problem.
In 2010, Charlotte Danielson wrote an article, “Evaluations That Help Teachers”, for the magazine The Effective Educator. The purpose of this article was to explain how a teacher evaluation system, such as her own Framework for Teaching, should and can actually foster teacher learning rather than just measure teacher competence, which is what most other teacher evaluation systems do. This topic is especially critical to decision-making school leaders. Many of the popular teacher evaluation systems fail to help schools link teacher performance with meaningful opportunities for the teachers to reflect on and learn from in order to grow professionally. With the increased attention on the need for more rigorous student standards, this then is an enormous opportunity missed. Students can only achieve such rigorous expectations if their teachers can effectively teach them, and research has shown that teachers who are evaluated by systems that hold them to accountability and provide them for continuous support and growth will actually teach more effectively.
...and walked home.” Collins contrasts the students’ misbehavior with the teacher’s ignorance, thus implying a relationship between the history teacher’s inability to teach his students and their ensuing misbehavior.
James Loewen wrote the book ?Lies My Teacher Told ME? to help the students of the United States become aware of their true history. This book attempts to show how and why American history has been taught the way it has without regard for the truth. Mr. Loewen had compared twelve different history textbooks they are: The Great Republic, The American Way, Land of Promise, Rise of the American Nation, Challenge of Freedom, American Adventures, Discovering American History, The American Tradition, Life and Liberty, The United States ? A History of the Republic, Triumph of the American Nation and The American Pageant. Loewen has argued his cases for Heroification, Euorcentrism and the first settlers, and Racism in our history. He has done this knowing fully that most people do not want to know the harsh realities of our nations past. The United States has tried to maintain a positive image throughout history. Unfortunately, it has many skeletons in its closet that need to come out to heal this great nation on many levels. If the public at large new the real role of racism in our nations infancy and how men tried to pursue their way of thinking as opposed to what is good for the country they would be ashamed at what the United States has stood for in the past.
“Why Western History Matters” is an essay adapted from a speech Donald Kagan delivered to the National Association of Scholars, and was reprinted in the December 28, 1994, issue of the Wall Street Journal. Throughout Kagan’s essay, he describes the essential need for the college course, Western History. He does so by examining older cultures and explaining why they were quintessential to the past and to our future development as a society. I strongly concur with Kagan’s standpoint of the necessity of history, and the realization of how exactly our flourishing society came about. History is a key constituent in determining who we are; for to determine who we are one must first know from whence they came. In the words of George Santayana, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it”.
“History never says goodbye. History says see you later” (Eduardo Galeano). History teaches us valuable lessons from the past, which can be used for the present time, yet our leaders usually overlook these lessons and repeat previous mistakes. I have recently immigrated to the United States and since in my home country history classes are not a place to really discuss the history, I was amazed by the way that this history class challenged every event and fact. I have learned that history is told by bias, so we should be able to think critically and question what we are taught. History is usually written by the dominant group of the society, so if we are looking for the truth, we should study each event from different resources and different
What more is the point of learning and understanding human history than obtaining the knowledge and structure between what is right and what is wrong? We continuously believe that we as humans have the ability and intellect to learn from the lessons taught in our past in order to enrich our future. In comparison to the time frame that is human history the one hundred year period of time we discussed in the second halve of this semester is nothing but a slight blimp on the map that we have traversed. Yet, throughout our recent readings we can easily assimilate into the idea that although time may pass, and that we may attempt to learn from our history it is simply in human nature to repeat the mistakes that we have
Gorn, Elliot J., Randy Roberts, and Terry D. Bilhartz. Constructing the American Past: A Source Book of a People’s History. 7th ed. Vol 2. New Jersy: Pearson Education Inc., 2011. Print.
make it work? In C.A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning
As the first chapter in this long analytical book, chapter one serves as the foundation for the rest of the novel, with a basic premise that “history textbooks make fool out of the students.” It shows how portrayal of historical figures and events in the best light for the reputation of United States leads to biased and distorted historical education.
In Graham Swift’s Waterland, Tom Crick says, “Children, it was one of your number, a curly-haired boy called Price… who once… asserted roundly that history was ‘a fairy-tale’… ‘What matters… is the here and now. Not the past… The only important thing about history, I think, sir, is that it’s got to the point where it’s probably about to end’”(6,7). It is very likely that we all have come to a point in our education, at one time or another, where we have encountered sentiments similar to those of Price. In most schools the subject of history is treated more or less in the same way- as a recounting of events, an examination of how the past has led to the present. This seems to be a good definition at first glance, but perhaps it is lacking in that it fails to account for the “here and now”(6). In Waterland Graham Swift not only addresses the problem of the fears his students face in the here and now, and the prospect of a nightmarish future; but, he also gives an unlikely solution in Tom Crick’s theory of history as explanation and personal story.
In spite of the importance of assessment in education, few teachers receive proper training on how to design or analyze assessments. Due to this, when teachers are not provided with suitable assessments from their textbooks or instructional resources, teachers construct their own in an unsystematic manner. They create questions and essay prompts comparable to the ones that their teachers used, and they treat them as evaluations to administer when instructional activities are completed predominantly for allocating students' grades. In order to use assessments to improve instruction and student learning, teachers need to change their approach to assessments by making sure that they create sound assessments. To ensure that their assessments are sound they need include five basic indicators that can be used as steps to follow when creating assessments. The first of these indicators and the first step a teacher must take when creating a sound assessme...
When most people think about history they remember a boring class they took in school a long time ago, they recall memorizing important dates, taking map tests, and falling asleep while listening to a lecture. The truth is that history really is an important subject to be teaching students. History is more than just some lecture you receive in class, history lets us look back, see the good things and the bad things, it allows us to learn from our mistakes and prevent such mistakes from happening in the future. Things that happened in the past are still changing things that are happening today. History is needed for everyone, from government leaders down to individuals; everyone has learned one thing or another from history at some point in their life.