Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Restorative justice pros and cons
Restorative justice pros and cons
Restorative justice victim rights
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Restorative justice pros and cons
Stephen has been developing and facilitating restorative interventions for school districts, police departments and private sector clients for over a decade. As a Restorative Justice practitioner, Stephen has developed a continuum of responses for private and public schools to effectively transform conflict into cooperation, increasing social capital, and building a sense of community, where the occurrence of negative behaviour including bullying and harassment, are diminished significantly.
Lorraine Stutzman Amstutz states how schools that claim they are following restorative approaches through their policies in discipline are not necessarily restorative, but have enough flexibility to allow a restorative response.
Once tolerance and acceptance is established and taught, bullying and harassment in secondary schools will significantly drop. Aside from the ineffectiveness of bullying programs, “Targets of bullying behaviors are more likely to suffer from depression, anxiety, and loss of self-esteem” (Domino, 2013). Not only are schools being ineffective with their programs, the students are facing the effects of this. “Research has advocated that individuals must work together to effectively reduce bullying practices within schools” (Jones and Augustine, 2015). By creating a kindness program, students will be taught to work together to solve problems, and, in the end, create a better society.
Jamie Nabozny is gay. Today the fact causes him few, if any, difficulties in life, however, throughout middle and high school Nabozny was both physically and verbally harassed; he was beaten, kicked, urinated on, called hurtful terms and abused to the point of hospitalization. However, the worst part of this innocent victim’s abuse was the role that his administration played, or rather refused to play; no action was taken to protect Nabozny despite the fact that school officials knew what was going on and had been repeatedly confronted about his abuse. In time the abuse Nabozny suffered led to doleful moods, severe depression, attempts of suicide, endeavors to run away from home, and other drastic consequences. Eventually, this young vigilante decided to fight back in order to prevent others from experiencing what he had gone through. Nabozny took legal action and, with the help of Lambda Legal Law firm, sued his former school officials for their failure to do their job of keeping him safe in school, eventually winning nearly a million dollars in a monetary settlement. Jamie Nabozny’s case has inspired the response of countless others and forced schools to take responsibility for their actions in bullying cases, because of this role model’s singular determination and readiness to stand up for himself, he has affected and inspired millions. Proving, once and for all, that one person can make a difference.
How would a conservative reply to a proposal for restorative justice? How would a restorative justice advocate respond to a conservative proposal for more prisons?
Blood, P., & Thorsborne, M. (2013). Implementing Restorative Practice in Schools: A Practical to Transforming School Communities. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley
The purpose of this paper is to examine the processes of both Restorative and Retributive justice through the case of Sara Kruzan vs. The State of California. First we will establish the principle philosophers associated with each type of justice and those system's theoretical applications in our criminal justice system. Then we will apply both systems to Sara Kruzan's trail and determine the publishable outcomes. Finally we will review Sara's Life after her trial and speculate on what system would have produced a more just outcome.
The concept of restorative justice became a game-changer in juvenile justice system. Through the course of time, professionals explored every possible methods and approaches that could positively affect the children without the expense of harming their future and wellbeing. The idea of restorative justice is “administer justice that focuses or repairing the harm done to the victim and the community. (Save the Children-UK, 2005)” The four guiding principles are to: (1) Repair and restore the balance within the community. (2) restitution for the victim. (3) Ensure that the offender understand and take responsibility. (4) Help the offender to change and improve. In South Africa, this is practiced in their community throughout
This approach has introduced a criminal justice policy agenda. In the past, victims to criminal activities have been outsiders to the criminal conflict. In recent times, many efforts have been made to give the victims a more central role in the criminal justice system. Some of these efforts were introduced a few years back, though even at that time, these efforts were seen as long overdue. Some of these efforts include access to state compensation and forms of practical support. For advocates of restorative justice, crime is perceived primarily as a violation of people and relationships, and the aim is to make amends for all the harm suffered by victims, offenders and communities. The most commonly used forms of restorative justice include direct mediation, indirect mediation, restorative cautioning, sentencing panels or circles and conferencing. In recent...
If restorative practice is being practice during my junior high school days , there could have been an opportunity for us to participate in a circle and the harm could have been repaired and the other four students who ended their educational career in the street could have been restored back to the classroom . Braithwaite , (2004 ) in his definition of restorative justice said ; is the " idea that because crime hurt , restorative justice should heal " . The question now is . How many schools are using restorative justice to heal the crime or offences committed by the student ? The answer is unknown . Restorative justice is not an alternative to zero tolerance , not a substitution for school discipline , neither a way to control student behaviour , nor a school package program . It is a philosophical approach that honours the worth of all regardless of they are and what they do
It was evident to me that Parris simply did not believe that restorative justice would ever work and that victims want nothing other than to see their offenders serve time (personal communication, September 23, 2015). Clemones on the other hand, while not fully believing restorative justice could work, at least came to the realization that the current system does not work and agreed that he could help the individuals that he bonds out by providing them with information about the resources in the community (personal communication, September 23, 2015). I do believe that their similar responses to the idea of restorative justice could come from the fact that they have both worked for the same department, which obviously functions on a highly retributive system. Clemones ability to better accept a different approach could come from the fact that he has been removed from the internal parts of the department for a few years now. I would really like to hear from individuals within the criminal justice field that work in a higher crime area and see how their thoughts may differ on this subject. This assignment has inspired me to tell more people about restorative justice, as my eyes were opened to the fact that in some departments this idea is unheard of. Despite what some people believe, restorative justice is real and it
“Restorative justice is an approach to crime and other wrongdoings that focuses on repairing harm and encouraging responsibility and involvement of the parties impacted by the wrong.” This quote comes from a leading restorative justice scholar named Howard Zehr. The process of restorative justice necessitates a shift in responsibility for addressing crime. In a restorative justice process, the citizens who have been affected by a crime must take an active role in addressing that crime. Although law professionals may have secondary roles in facilitating the restorative justice process, it is the citizens who must take up the majority of the responsibility in healing the pains caused by crime. Restorative justice is a very broad subject and has many other topics inside of it. The main goal of the restorative justice system is to focus on the needs of the victims, the offenders, and the community, and focus
progressive take on how to address key issues such as bullying, vandalism, and other conflicts. “ It 's
If restorative justice has support by the community, this demonstrates that the community wants to help the offender reintegrate. Communities have the resources to reduce crime and promote the social well-being of others (Faulkner, 2003, p.294). Therefore, the community has a lot of responsibility to acknowledge and help offenders successfully reintegrate back into society. In turn, the community will flourish and demonstrate strong unity. For example, offenders that received help from the community had lower rates of recidivism (Burnett & Maruna, 2006, p. 88). This evidence suggests that community involvement can deter further crime. Help should not solely depend on the criminal justice system rather there should be services such as victim support groups (Faulkner, 2003, p.303). Help from others such as volunteers from the community can be beneficial. Community involvement can bring awareness and help to local offenders
On the afternoon of April 9, 2010 I found myself in a meeting with Kerri Evans, the assistant principal of Pleasant Ridge Middle School, and my son Nicholas. I was there because my son had become a victim of verbal abuse. It was shocking to learn that bullying has become such an epidemic in our school system. “Nearly 1 in 3 students is involved in bullying” (Hertzog, 2010). In a perfect world there would be no bullying. Kids wouldn’t get shoved into lockers, and they wouldn’t be beat up in the hallway. Students wouldn’t talk about another student behind their back because of their shape, size, race, or religion. In a perfect world this wouldn’t happen, but at that moment in our imperfect world it was happening to my son. The question is, why does it happen and what can we do to stop it? “According to a 2009 federal survey of school crime and safety, 32 percent of middle and high school students said they'd been victimized during the academic year, compared with 14 percent in 2001” (Tyre, 2010). Bullying was making its way into my home and affecting my life. It was then that I realized that bullying was a problem that needed to stop. Bullying in schools is escalating and becoming a bigger and bigger issue, and we must take action to eliminate it.
Purcell, 22 March 2011, Working to Stamp Out Bullying, Finda Sunshine Coast, accessed 30 March 2011,