Response to Margaret Kantz
Question 1: Kantz writes that Shirley “believes that facts are what you learn from textbooks, opinions are what you have about clothes, and arguments are what you have with your mother when you want to stay out late at night “ What does Kantz contend that facts, opinions and arguments actually are?
Kantz contends that facts and opinions are basically the same type of statement. A fact is a claim that an audience recognizes as being true without demanding evidence and only inquiring about clarification. An opinion is a claim that an audience wants proof for. Kantz sees an argument as the writers stand on a topic and the conversation between the writer, the reader, and of the topic.
Question 2: Make a list of the things Kantz says
…show more content…
I personally apply to all of the things she says. Or, at least I have at some point. I understand now that not all sources tell the truth, facts are actually claims, and source texts are actually arguments of academia. I do need to try and not read my sources as stories, as well as completely understand what my teacher wants and what the actual assignment is about, and also using my new knowledge to best answer a question or problem.
Question 4: Do you think Krantz contradicts herself when she says that we should think of sources neither as stories nor as repositories of truth? Explain why or why not.
No, I don’t think that she contradicts herself by saying this. I feel going into any reading the reader should have an opened mind about a text. The source may have a “big image” that the author wanted the reader to take from the reading. As well as read as if it was a story, it would help with getting what the author wanted. However some texts need to be read with a higher train of thought and a reader needs to be conscious about
58. According to the passage, O’Brien believes that storytelling conveys a stronger meaning than any real account. It amplifies the message one is trying to assert by engaging an audience through vivid, but fictional detail. O’Brien uses false events to represent greater emotional truths, which is best displayed through fictional accounts. This is a prevalent and recurring ideal throughout the
I agree with Tan on this subject, as not every piece of writing has to have some extraordinary meaning behind it. Some literature is simply just a story. It can be made for entertainment first and foremost without the need for hidden motifs. That being said, many people have chosen to criticise her work, rather than search for the symbolism in it. I have dealt with criticism in my life, as I am sure everyone else has, but none of it has been as extreme as the kind Amy Tan has received.
Authors have the ability justify the worst actions. Authors have a way of romanticizing certain situations in order to convey a specific message. A good author has power to influence the reader into believing whatever it is the author wants. When it comes to the story of Hannah Dustan, authors such as John Greenleaf Whittier have romanticized her captivity story along with the actions she took throughout her journey.
Annie provides evidence by studies, published in 2006 and 2009, in her second paragraph. The evidence provided by the studies was "that individuals who often read fiction appear to be better able to understand people." By including this in her essay, she is able to support her claim about the importance of "deep reading."
... she is indeed angered and fed up at the fact that there is a stereotype. The way in which she contradicts herself makes it hard for readers to understand the true meaning or point to her poem, the voice was angry and ready for change, yet the actions that the individual was participating in raised questions of whether or not he actually fit the stereotype.
Brief Guide to Argument. Ed. Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau. 8 ed. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martin’s, 2014. 125-128. Print.
The book is very thought provoking in the sense that it raises various issues in life and in the readers' own thoughts that the reader didn't know existed or was aware of these thoughts but denied thinking them. The final page of chapter one talks about the unmistakeable tone of the author, but then contradicts itself by saying that this tone is unrecognisable. The reason behind this is because we all read books in a certain tone in our head that we unconsciously presume to be the storyteller but is in reality our own conscience reading the book. This is quite amusing in itself because of the truth of it, but it is also serious...
...She writes of the type of person that one can only hope exists in this world still. The message of her writing and philosophy is contained in a single phrase from the novel: “I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine,” (731). This is an inspiration, awakening an inner voice and drive that impels each person to do their absolute best. It implores the soul of the reader to awaken, to become the ideal of the human spirit, and to rise until it can rise no higher. It is a call to anyone with reason, anyone with the strength to be an Atlas, and it is reminding him or her of their duty to live up to the individual potential. For as long as there are those who would hear the message, there will still be hope for mankind.
...ntury readers. "The Story of An Hour", "The Storm", and The Awakening, all held themes that were controversial in a male dominated society. Critics criticized her literary works based not on prejudice and shock, not on the quality of the writing.
An argument is described as, “an exchange of diverging or opposite views, typically a heated or angry one.” Arguments are used in everyday life in order to prove points. There has been heated debates on whether or not liver transplants should be given to alcoholics. Many may say that Alcoholics shouldn’t be able to get transplants due to alcoholism being a choice. Well Cohen completely disagrees. He makes many valid points that just because someone is an alcoholic doesn’t mean that they shouldn’t be able to get any transplants!
When one is given an argument to analyze, one must think very clearly about the facts and consider the claim that is taken by the author in the argument. Today, there is a variety of different ways an argument can take place. Arguments mostly take the form of; magazines, social media, and can be located in other media. In most cases, it is easier for one to be presented with an engraved version of an argument rather so one can reexamine the facts and claims to truly reveal a better sense of analyzation. During the analyzation process, one must think clearly upon what the author is actually revealing, in doing this the reader will determine if the author is being biased or not representing the claim correctly. An author must also examine the
A woman name Krissy Keefer sue a ballet school for not accepting her daughter Fredrika Keefer because Fredrika’s body was not the right fit. Krissy’s think she knows what is best for her daughter, just like every mother would think. Ryan though it was wrong of the women to do such a thing because everyone is not fit to do the same thing. everyone is different, and it is not wrong for the school not to accept Fredrika. Although Kix and Ryan are both subjective and objective, they are different in the way they use their objectivity and subjectivity because Ryan uses more personal story and Kix uses more facts and details to show their objective, both Ryan and Kix uses their opinions to show their
Readers often find themselves trying to correlate the works they read to their respective authors, even when those works are fictitious. The need to find a human connection pushes readers to draw conclusions on who the author is based on their stories. Catherine Bush believes that this “autobiographical reading” takes away from the experience of the book and puts the author in a box they don't belong in. It is wrong to assume that the author has a direct personal link to their fictional creation, unless indicated by the author themself. It makes sense though to assume the story does reveal their ideologies and viewpoints. This is seen in Margaret Atwood’s works Murder in the Dark and The Handmaid’s tale, in both works there are messages to be found that
...ssions that art exaggerated.” (2/15 p.236), Emma cannot free herself from the vicious circle of imagination and reality. Therefore, confusing the imagination with the reality at some points Emma searches for reality in her imaginations up until her death.
Readers of a story can interpret the plot in any way. But not every story can give the same interpretation to everyone. For example, a character may say something that one reader may interpret as funny. While, the other reader may interpret the sentence as offensive. Bruce Anders states some of his opinions about Randa Jarrar’s A Map of Home’s fourth, ninth, and fourteenth chapter. And although he states some good points, I do find that he is missing some important points.