Response To Hannah Staats's 'The Floater'

996 Words2 Pages

Dear Hannah Staats, thank you for your commentary on submission 10000 (“The Floater”). Your specific and general comments are insightful and concise, and would certainly be appreciated by any author. Your comments on word choice are simply excellent! I had nothing to add to your comments regarding diction as well. In order to aid the author, however, please format your comments in the same manner (for instance S1, L4 rather than Stanza 1, Line 4). You also draw attention to some of the awkward wording of the poem very well. However, please also make sure to add specific suggestions that the reader can follow. Simply stating that the wording is awkward would not be as effective to the reader as offering a replacement or a restructuring. You do this very well and thoroughly in some of the specific comments and the general comments. Great job!

Second Reader’s Comments: …show more content…

Are the “them” the other members on the “stage”? Are they specific players/actors? You might consider clarifying this pronoun so that it comes across as less vague and impersonal to the reader.
S1, L3 - I believe that you meant to convey the meaning of "calmly" through the use of the word "cooly". As a result, the correct spelling of the word should be utilized in this line - "coolly" rather than "cooly".
S1, L5 - In my opinion, the words in this line come across as a little confusing. Are you trying to convey that the floater's words are insignificant and that the audience's thoughts regarding these words are even less significant? By including “words” and “thoughts” in the same line without a possessive pronoun indicating the difference between the floater and the audience, it may come across as befuddling to the reader. I would recommend clarifying this line, as a result.
S2, L2-3 - The characterization of the “floater” comes across as very striking in this line. I like how you’re able to capture this element of him in a unique and concise manner. Nice

Open Document