Response To Arthur Chu's Toxic Masculinity, Racism,

866 Words2 Pages

Arthur Chu, a writer for news media outlet, Salon, published a fiery editorial detailing his thoughts on the public continuously blaming mass shootings committed by white males on mental illness, rather than “race, guns, hatred and terrorism.” He believes that “toxic masculinity, white supremacy, misogyny, and racism” are the real issues behind the majority of hate crimes caused by caucasian men, not mental illness. Pointing fingers at mental illness is a way for people to weasel out of having a necessary discussion on these fatal issues and gives killers a crutch to place the blame for their actions on. Chu struck at kairotic moment in time to intervene in the media’s conversation on mass shootings, being that his editorial was published only one day after Dylan Roof fired on African American members of a church in Charleston, South Carolina. The reader can easily pick up on the strategic pathos intertwined in his writing by the relevancy and charge behind his words. Chu utilizes fallacious, emotive language to force feed his …show more content…

These three men are some of the most recent, well known shooters in the United States. Their violent actions were blamed on mental illness by the media. Chu insists that white, male shooters are the only ones who are labeled as mentally ill when in reality, the racism, misogynism, white supremacy, etc.., taught by society, are more so to blame. However, notice how Seung-Hui Cho, the Virginia Tech shooter, pictured on the right is not white. He is Asian. Chu chips away at his own argument when he argues that only the actions of white, male shooters are blamed on mental illness, when he chose to picture and write about Seung-Hui Cho, and Asian, male shooter. What is especially ironic is that Chu himself is an Asian male. Either he identifies himself and the Asian race as caucasian or he overlook or choose to ignore this prominent

Open Document