Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Budgeting methodology
Impact of ACA on health insurance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Budgeting methodology
You are the CEO of a large multi-specialty group practice and have financial problems, as well as conflicts over compensation between your primary care and specialty care physicians. There have been substantial changes over the years regarding payment structures, case mix, and capital costs. Now, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) has added other potential changes into the mix and has raised the question as to whether your practice should become an ACO. Discuss what analyses you would undertake to evaluate the financial situation of and the conflicts within the group practice. Be able to justify the underlying rationale for the analyses and how you will use the results to address the financial concerns, the organizational conflicts and the potential changes facing the organization. This question response should explore organizational behaviors, financial and budgeting issues, personnel management and strategic planning. A multispecialty group practice is one that consists of individual physicians who offer various medical and specialty services in that practice by contracting to a managed care plan. Managed Care Organizations are formed by insurance companies that either own a provider network or create one by arranging with independent providers (Gapenski, 2009). The payment structure used to reimburse providers regardless of services provided falls into the category of either fee-for-service or capitation based. Fee-for-service is the reimbursement according to services provided, either through reimbursing based on the cost of services provided or reimbursing based on rate schedule of services provided. On the other hand, in the Capitation system, providers are paid a fixed amount depending on the number o... ... middle of paper ... ... R., & ... Fisher, E. S. (2010). Higher Health Care Quality And Bigger Savings Found At Large Multispecialty MedicaL Groups. Health Affairs, 29(5), 991-997. Yim, D. (2008). The logic and Mill’s infamous proof in utilitarianism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 16(4), 773-788. Doi: 10.1080/09608780802407530. Yuan, J. (2013). The Magic of Networking: Who Will Exit? Who Will Be Promoted? Canadian Social Science, 9(4), 152-157. doi:10.3968/j.css.1923669720130904.2604 Zazzali, J. L., Alexander, J. A., Shortell, S. M., & Burns, L. R. (2007). Organizational Culture and Physician Satisfaction with Dimensions of Group Practice. Health Services Research, 42(3P1), 1150-1176. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00648.x Zibulewsky, J. (2001). EMTALA: what it is and what it means for physicians. BUMC Proceeding, 14(4), 339-346.
Miller, H. D. (2009). From volume to value: better ways to pay for health care. Health Affairs
All of the cases presented in utilitarianism and Mill’s views are very vast. Mill does have some good points but really avoided justifying his theory.
McGlynn, E, Asch, S, Adams, J, Keesey, J, & Hicks, J. (2003). The quality of health care delivered to adults in the united states. The New England Journal of Medicine, 248(26), 2635-2645.
...d in the discussion of promise keeping and beneficence, identifiable logical or practical contradictions arise when attempting to universalize morally impermissible maxims (according to the CI). Mill argues that the CI only shows “that the consequences of [the maxims] universal adoption would be such as no one would choose to incur.” This is erroneous for there is no such “choice” available. The logical and practical contradictions that Mill fails to recognize produce an outcome (rejection of the maxim) necessitated by rationality and a free will. It is not that the consequences are unpleasant, but that their production is irrational.
John Stuart Mill believes in a utilitarian society where people are seen as “things.” Moreover, in utilitarianism the focus of the goal is “forward-looking”, in looking at the consequences but not the ini...
Formed in 1998, the Managed Care Executive Group (MCEG) is a national organization of U.S. senior health executives who provide an open exchange of shared resources by discussing issues which are currently faced by health care organizations. In the fall of 2011, 61 organizations, which represented 90 responders, ranked the top ten strategic issues for 2012. Although the issues were ranked according to their priority, this report discusses the top three issues which I believe to be the most significant due to the need for competitive and inter-related products, quality care and cost containment.
Managed care dominates health care in the United States. It is any health care delivery system that combines the functions of health insurance and the actual delivery of care, where costs and utilization of services are controlled by methods such as gatekeeping, case management, and utilization review. Different types of managed care plans came into development by three major factors. These factors include choice of providers, different ways of arranging the delivery of services, and payment and risk sharing. Types of managed care organizations include Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) which consist of five common models that differ according to how the HMO is related to the participating physicians, Preferred Provider Organizations (PPOs), Exclusive Provider Organizations (EPO), and Point of Service Plans (POS). `The information management system in a managed care organization is determined by the structure of the organization' (Peden,1998, p.90). The goal of a managed care system is to provide subscribers and dependants with needed health care services at the lowest possible cost. Certain managed care plans also focus on prevention by trying to keep members healthy.
John Stuart Mill argues that the rightness or wrongness of an action, or type of action, is a function of the goodness or badness of its consequences, where good consequences are ones that maximize the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. In this essay I will evaluate the essential features of Mill’s ethical theory, how that utilitarianism gives wrong answers to moral questions and partiality are damaging to Utilitarianism.
Background: Formed by a merger in 1996, CareGroup is the second largest health care organization that serves eastern Massachusetts. CareGroup includes a variety of physician offices, academic health centers, and community hospitals. Some of the hospitals that are part of CareGroup include Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Mount Auburn Hospital, and New England Baptist Hospital. There were several factors that resulted in the merger of CareGroup, and these factors include gaining contracting power over insurance companies (HMO’s), creating an integrated system across hospitals, and achieving a competitive advantage in terms of prices.
Cahn, Steven M., and Peter J. Markie. "John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism; Chapter 2: What Utilitarianism Is." 2009. Ethics: History, Theory, and Contemporary Issues. 4th ed. New York: Oxford UP, 2009. 330-41. Print.
John Stuart Mill claims that people often misinterpret utility as the test for right and wrong. This definition of utility restricts the term and denounces its meaning to being opposed to pleasure. Mill defines utility as units of happiness caused by an action without the unhappiness caused by an action. He calls this the Greatest Happiness Principle or the Principle of Utility. Mill’s principle states that actions are right when they tend to promote happiness and are wrong when they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. Happiness is defined as intended pleasure and the absence of pain while unhappiness is defined as pain and the lack of pleasure. Therefore, Mill claims, pleasure and happiness are the only things desirable and good. Mill’s definition of utilitarianism claims that act...
"Utilitarianism by John Stuart Mill." Utilitarianism : past, present and future. N.p., n.d. Web. 9 Mar. 2014.
Act-utilitarianism is a theory suggesting that actions are right if their utility or product is at least as great as anything else that could be done in the situation or circumstance. Despite Mill's conviction that act-utilitarianism is an acceptable and satisfying moral theory there are recognized problems. The main objection to act-utilitarianism is that it seems to be too permissive, capable of justifying any crime, and even making it morally obligatory to do so. This theory gives rise to the i...
Mill, J. S., Bentham, J., & Ryan, A. (1987). Utilitarianism and other essays. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin Books.
Mill, John Stuart. "Utilitarianism." Philosophy: A Literary and Conceptual Approach. Third Edition. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Incorporated, 1995. pp 306-319.