Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literature writing about love
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Cormac McCarthy’s novel The Road explores the resilience of human life and human sentiment. But the most tenacious emotion exemplified in the novel appears to be love. The novel illustrates how love influences the characters to endure in a godless post-apocalyptic world. The father and son are emotionally controlled by the love that they share for one another. Without the resilience of human emotion, the father and son would have perished with the rest of the world. McCarthy illustrates how the complex emotion of love can influence his characters will to survive in the desolate new world. The role that love plays in McCarthy’s novel has been a theme of immense discussion. Marcel DeCoste states in a literary criticism that “the father's …show more content…
love transcends mere survival, his own or the son's; this love counsels other virtues that enable life-giving relationships with others” (68). The idea of McCarthy establishing these “life-giving relationships” in his novel is not uncommon. Critic, Thomas Schaub, suggests, that McCarthy establishes "the basis for meaning in the father's love for his son, …this meaning transcends the father's efforts to affirm and protect his son's life" (153). The power of love is of upmost importance when attempting to analyze the connection between the father and sons relationship and will to endure. The character’s love for each other mechanizes a self-perpetuating wheel that enables their survival. This symbiotic mutualistic relationship is depicted multiple times within the novel. In The Road, McCarthy writes, They squatted in the road and ate cold rice and cold beans that they'd cooked days ago. Already beginning to ferment. No place to make a fire that would not be seen. They slept huddled together in the rank quilts in the dark and the cold. He held the boy close to him. So thin. My heart, he said. My heart. But he knew that if he were a good father still it might well be as she had said. That the boy was all that stood between him and death. (44) This serves a prime example of how the father and son enable each other’s survival in this new apocalyptic world.
Without his son, the father would have relinquished his will to live much earlier. Another instance of loves perseverance in the novel is when the boy’s father lay dying; the father states, “I'm sorry. You have my whole heart. You always did. You're the best guy. You always were. If I'm not here you can still talk to me. You can talk to me and I'll talk to you. You'll see.” (279). It is as if the boy is the fathers heart in the metaphorical sense. The father’s love for his son is so great that he exonerates his previous motive of having his son perish alongside of him. Even in his dying breaths the father encourages his son to continue in his pursuit of survival. McCarthy, being an expert novelist, allows the reader to gain a deeper understanding of the role that love plays in the new world. McCarthy does so through referring to love as “the fire” and referencing those who carry “the fire” as the “good …show more content…
guys.” Those who still maintain the ability to love in this post-apocalyptic new world are those who carry the fire and are ultimately the ones who can be trusted. One of the most prominent themes that can be derived from the novel is the power of love. This reoccurring theme has led many critics hail the novel as a great love story between a father and son. The novel puts parental values into stark perspective, and continually reveals the influence of paternal love. McCarthy’s rather bleak and pessimistic novel is riddled with life sustaining emotions. The child in the novel is glorified as being a harbor for ethical values, even though having been raised in an immoral world where cannibalism, rape, and murder are social norms. This is in unambiguous contrast with the father who was raised in a wholesome society. It can be assumed that the father imparted these moral principles unto his son; however, he himself has lost some of these values in the interest of protecting his child. Dialogue between the father and son firmly establishes that the father continues surviving for his sons sake. A short excerpt of dialogue from the novel reads, What's the bravest thing you ever did? He spat in the road a bloody phlegm. Getting up this morning, he said. (272) This is another instance where the fathers love prevails in light of his sons survival. The idea that the father pursues life regarding the survival of his son is virtually uncontested by literary critics. Jingjing Guo writes, “In trying to fulfill his parental responsibility, the father displays virtues in human nature like responsibility, love, perseverance, and self-sacrifice. After his wife's death, he is forced into the role of sole guardian, protector, and teacher of their son. He views his identity ‘Papa’ as his most important identity and seems to take protecting his son as the ‘sole, divinely appointed function’ (Quoted in Guo 3). McCarthy has the father make many self-sacrifices as proof of his literal unconditional love. These selfless acts exemplify how love leads to the prolonging of his sons life. The father believes that God appointed him to protect his son and he will do so by any means necessary. The father’s sacrifices and selfless acts extend from denying himself food to murder in the name of survival. The father states “My job is to take care of you. I was appointed to do that by God. I will kill anyone who touches you. Do you understand?” (65). This divine appointment leads the father to make drastic decisions to secure his sons safety and wellbeing. In order to fully understand the impact that love has on the characters you must also analyze the son, who like his father makes many sacrifices of his own. The sons sacrifices are not as radical, yet ever important concerning the analysis of character’s love for one another. He walked back into the woods and knelt beside his father. He was wrapped in a blanket as the man had promised and the boy didnt uncover him but he sat beside him and he was crying and he couldnt stop. He cried for a long time. I'll talk to you every day, he whispered. And I wont forget. No matter what. Then he rose and turned and walked back out to the road. (286) A major sacrifice that the boy makes is deciding to leave his father’s body and to pursue life.
The boy refuses to surrender his will to live even though the only person who he truly loves has died. When describing the choices that the character’s make, it is important to understand that love is resilient in the boy, while the father only loves his son and nothing more. Therefore if the boy died the father would ultimately commit suicide; however, the boy has the ability to love more than just his father and that drives his will to pursue life after his father’s death. Unlike his father, the boy recognizes that there is still good in the world. Between the boy maintaining his ability to love and to trust, there seems to be a chance for the regeneration of a wholesome society. The boy truly carries the fire in his heart, while the father carries nothing but a small dying flame that is only capable of loving his son. The boy can survive in this new world without his father, yet the father inability to pursue love and trust would cause him to die if his son
died. Upon analysis it is clear to see that the father and son enable each other’s will to persevere; however, the son is stronger than his father and holds the capacity to pursue life with or without him. The father is a static character who is incapable of loving anyone but his son. The boy’s decision to continuing caring and trusting even after his father’s death is why he survives in the cruel new world. The father is the one who establishes that there is still good people in the world and that some people do still carry the flame; however, he refuses to give people a chance. This is opposed to the boy who is willing to trust those who he deems honest. If the boy was as close minded as his father he would have likely died with him. It is the power of love that enables the father to live as long as he does, and it is this same power that allows the boy to endure an apocalypse without his father.
He always wants to help someone else in need before himself, whereas the father is only concerned about their own personal wellbeings. He “is the one” who worries about their ethical choices and wants to help a stranger in any way he can (259). McCarthy proves the importance of the boy’s spirit of love for other people when his dad dies and he must take the leap of faith to continue along the road with a new family. Despite all the corrupted people they encountered beforehand, the boy meets someone who is “carrying the fire” (129). This mantra by the father and son, symbolizes hope and humanity. The qualities Steinbeck labels for a writer to create in his writings can be summed up in “carrying the fire” since the two never did give up. It is the greatness of the heart and spirit Steinbeck notes that is “inside [them]. [And] [i]t [is] always there” (279). It is noteworthy that even in the midst of death and ashes, the two are able to hold onto their relationship and sanity. The “good guys” can continue to carry meaning and structure in their lives, even in a time where society turned into a battle to survive on the remnants of
McCarthy’s novel is not about a boy trying to find his place in society, but about a boy trying to find himself and who he really is apart from society. John Grady begins the story with no answers, and at the end he still doesn’t have a clue. There is no resolution for him; there are only more questions, conflicts, and misunderstandings. I think that McCarthy’s point is that to live romantically is to live without cause, without real hope, and ultimately without love. Despite the author’s obvious compassion for John Grady and his idealism, he shows us through romantically descriptive writing that a romantic lifestyle cannot work in this world. The book ends with John Grady riding out into the sunset, having learned nothing, with no place to go. Until the character learns how to compromise with society and give up his romanticism, his life will have no purpose.
He has endured and overcame many fears and struggles, but during this section, we truly acquire an insight of what the little boy is actually like – his thoughts, his opinions, his personality. Contrary to his surroundings, the little boy is vibrant and almost the only lively thing around. I love him! He is awfully appalled by the “bad guys” and shockingly sympathetic toward dead people. For example, when the father raided a house and found food, the little boy suggested that they should thank them because even though they’re dead or gone, without them, the little boy and father would starve. My heart goes out to him because he is enduring things little boys should never go through, even if this novel is just a fictional
In Cormac McCarthy’s The Road, the boy and his father carry the fire within themselves. This image of fire is the true nature of their courage to continue on the road to the unknown.
Despite all the trouble that his parents put him through, he still had love for them both. His mother never came back for him and his siblings but he did not despite her regardless of her abandonment. He grew up on his own but still respected his parents and always wanted to keep in touch with them even if it never happened. He did not want to grow up in the same environment as them. He wanted a happy home but it never seemed to be granted to
McCarthy is trying to show that during desperate times there is a sudden loss in humanity due to the uneasiness and the drastic measures one will take in order to survive. A person will do anything it takes to survive in desperate and desolate worlds. McCarthy is proving this with his diction and choice of imagery. A man and a boy set out to survive in a tragic and dangerous world, where the main food source is depleting and all resources are deteriorating. A novel about what is left of a man’s family and how they struggle to survive. Humanity is tested and shows just how extreme ones actions can be. The want for life is tested, one could question whether or not survival will be possible for the man and the
McCarthy wrote the novel in ways that force readers to remove themselves from their comfort zones. He wrote The Road with a lack of punctuation that can make things somewhat confusing for readers. Some critics find that without quotation marks it makes the book hard to follow. But when I read the book I found that after the first fifty pages I understood when the characters were speaking. Finding that I had to pay a little more attention didn’t bother ...
...a fresh positive mind which helps them to survive. The boy is young and it’s hard for any child his age to understand the reality of life in certain situations that is why the man consistently attempts to help the boy understand what they are going through and what it is going to take to survive.
With the son’s fear amongst the possibility of death being near McCarthy focuses deeply in the father’s frustration as well. “If only my heart were stone” are words McCarthy uses this as a way illustrate the emotional worries the characters had. ( McCarthy pg.11). Overall, the journey of isolation affected the boy just as the man both outward and innerly. The boys’ journey through the road made him weak and without a chance of any hope. McCarthy states, “Ever is a long time. But the boy knew what he knew. That ever is no time at all” (McCarthy pg. 28). The years of journey had got the best of both, where they no longer had much expectation for
Nonetheless, this really is a tale of compelling love between the boy and his father. The actions of the boy throughout the story indicate that he really does love his father and seems very torn between his mother expectations and his father’s light heartedness. Many adults and children know this family circumstance so well that one can easily see the characters’ identities without the author even giving the boy and his father a name. Even without other surrounding verification of their lives, the plot, characters, and narrative have meshed together quite well.
The boy comprehends the severity of the situations he is faced with, such as lack of food or water, and treats his father with the same respect and equality that the man gives him. He insists on sharing his portions with his father when they are uneven, and he remains cautious at all times, even when his father is not. The boy’s fire is fueled by his love for his father, which is shown by the boy’s priority on caring for his father’s wellbeing, just as the man does for him. This love and responsibility, manifesting in the form of self-sacrifice and compassion, lies in direct juxtaposition to the rest of the world, where selfishness and indifference reigns
...he thought it was beauty or about goodness.” Things that he’d no longer any way to think about at all.” (McCarthy 129,130). “The man” still shows acts of kindness towards strangers here and there in hopes that the boy will not follow in his footsteps and give up fate as well; he wants “the boy,” as McCarthy states it, to continue “to carry the fire.”
He follows with that the memory he has of his father is of a voice who fought with his mother, slept on the couch, and then slept somewhere else. It doesn’t seem the father was part of this son’s life any more after that, until one day when he was 17 he got a call from his dad while at school saying he would meet him. There is hope in the son’s wondering what might his father have to say, what new beginnings…alas his father said to him ‘sign this’. The father wants to cash in an insurance policy that he had on his sons, then speeds off after it is signed, however the son never told anyone. This act is the finality of any hope of a relationship with his
At first the relationship between a father and his son can be perceived as a simple companionship. However, this bond can potentially evolve into more of a dynamic fitting relationship. In The Road The Man and his son have to depend on one another because they each hold a piece of each other. The Man holds his sons sense of adulthood while the son posses his father’s innocence. This reliance between the father and son create a relationship where they need each other in order to stay alive. “The boy was all that stood between him and death.” (McCarthy 29) It is evident that without a reason to live, in this case his son, The Man has no motivation to continue living his life. It essentially proves how the boy needs his father to love and protect him, while the father needs the boy to fuel ...
In Cormac McCarthy’s The Road, in the post-apocalyptic world that the man and the boy live in, dreams begin to take on the form of a new “reality.” As the novel progresses, the man’s dreams, initially memories remnant of his pre-apocalypse life, become “brighter” as the boy’s dreams become darker and nightmarish. Through the use of color and distinct language, McCarthy emphasizes the contrast between reality and dreams. The man’s reliance on bad dreams to keep him tied to the harsh reality alludes to the hopelessness of the situation; he can never truly escape. McCarthy suggests that those who strive for a life that no longer exists are deluded with false hope. Having dreams is a natural human tendency, but in a world that has become so inhumane, the man can’t even afford to retain this element of being human. The loss of the past is a concept that the characters living in this ashen world struggle with, and McCarthy presents memory as a weakness to be exploited.