Residential Hall Security

819 Words2 Pages

In light of the recent incident in Pierpont Hall, we must address the university’s current policies involving residential hall security. In February, a student was assaulted and a gun was shown in Pierpont Hall after two men entered the freshman residential hall. Although security threats are rare at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, the incident raises questions about the university’s current security policies. To monitor guests, other universities have added policies such as 24-hour residential security, keeping a record of everyone who has entered the building and preventing unwelcomed guests. UMass must improve its current security policy to keep up with other universities. As students of the university, we believe to ensure our …show more content…

Residential hall security, a division of the UMass Police Department, is responsible for employing students as security monitors and police cadets while also providing the walking escort service. Police cadets are students trained in police and de-escalation techniques who serve as foot patrol on campus (“Residential Hall Security”). These cadets are well trained and work closely with residential security. Security monitors are the last line of security for students living in residential halls and deal directly with those entering the building. Security monitors check residents’ identification, register guests, and screen visitors during the evening hours in residential halls (“Residential Hall Security”). Both cadets and security monitors are vital to keeping the campus safe. Problems arise when security is off duty. Although halls are locked 24 hours a day, when security is off duty, entrances to residential halls are only monitored by security cameras via UMPD (“Residential Hall Security”). Access to residential buildings is limited to the students living in the building because doors are only unlockable with correct ID. But, there is a loop hole the university has failed to address. Intruders can follow a resident into his/her building and access dorm rooms. If security cameras fail to identify a problem, an intruder enters the building and no immediate action …show more content…

At Northeastern University, security monitors are present at all times. Northeastern employs proctors in each residential hall to monitor access to residential halls 24 hours a day. There, guests and visitors must present a photo ID to the proctor and be signed in by their host (“Annual Information Report 2014-2015” 8). Perhaps one reason Northeastern has addressed the issue while UMass has not is Northeastern’s location in urban Boston provokes a more real possibility for security threat. Located in rural Massachusetts, UMass doesn’t face the major threats urban universities face. However, this doesn’t mean UMass should shy away from the possibility of a threat. According to data from 1997-2010, the rate of violent crimes on college campuses compared to the general population has risen from 2009 to 2010 nearly 1% (Birnbaum 11). This has occurred on both urban and rural college campuses. UMass trials behind other universities in residential security and should introduce further policies to keep its students

Open Document