Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Society in Lord of the Flies
Sociol theory in lord of the flies
Sociol theory in lord of the flies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Society in Lord of the Flies
Furthermore, nobody checked to be sure that Simon was not the beast. As the text states, “A thing was crawling out of the forest. It came darkly, uncertainly….The beast stumbled into the horseshoe.” (Golding 141). This proves that no one checked to be sure that the beast was not Simon or anybody else. In their fear and madness the tribe assumed that Simon was the beast. This supports the fact that this is nothing but involuntary manslaughter on the part of the tribe because of their inattentiveness in not checking to be sure that the beast was not Simon and this supports the fact that they were not in their right minds at the time. If someone, whether it be Jack or the tribe, had checked to be sure that the beast was not Simon this entire event
There wasn’t any kind or response as they saw Simon get murdered in this moment, except expressing emotions of fear. They saw him, and knew it wasn’t the beast. No one stopped to help Simon, they let him die to the hands of Jack and his group of hunters. That also went along with another psychological factor. The boys were following whoever took charge which led them to be manipulated, or they were under blind obedience to authority. This quote of dialogue shows us that they were going to let a chief takeover decide things for them instead providing ideas themselves: “‘Seems to me we ought to have a chief to decide for things.’ ‘a chief!, a chief!’” (Golding 22). Clearly showing their willingness to have a leader and more importantly, to be led. This was only the beginning of the boys just following and needing a leader just because they couldn’t do anything, along with them being under the influence of fear. Everyone just followed whoever took charge and didn’t bother to weigh the pros and cons, or actually question if they were a good leader. They were so blinded and would do whatever it takes to survive. This also connecting to this next psychological
At Simon’s murder the boys, “Leapt on to the beast, screamed, struck, bit and tore.”
As the boys killed Simon, they had let out their savage urges and acted in a cannibalistic manner. Even after the death of Simon Jack and his tribe did not feel any penitence to what they had done, killing them had become second nature. The circle became a horseshoe. A thing crawling out of the forest. It came darkly, uncertainly.
So far there are several rumors of the beast and this one is the most farfetched by a long shot. Simon is the first character in the novel to recognize that the beast is not a tangible being, instead, it is an idea of sorts, and in turn, this quote by Simon actually is actually foreshadowing one of the major themes of the novel, the fact that there is evil resting in all of us. Simon represents all that is good in man whereas the Beast represents all that is bad in man.
Simon’s death was not an act out of savagery, it was caused by the carelessness of Jack and his influence over his group. Jack’s statement “Do our dance! Come on! Dance! (Golding, Lord of the Flies 151)” caused the young and naive boys to get focused on killing which led to Simon’s death. Jack from the start tried to influence the children towards negativity
The group actually ends up killing a boy named Simon, who was very mysterious, but likeable character throughout the novel. Here is what Piggy, another literary character in Lord of the Flies, says caused the murder, “It was dark. There was that-that bloody dance. There was lightning and thunder and rain. We was scared!” (Golding 156). This quote shows that the boys were truly scared by Simon’s appearance and since they already had spears, their response was to kill. They thought that Simon was a creature on the island set to kill them. This means that they were scared to be killed by it, so they let fear tell them to kill it. The beast was not the only thing that used or created fear in the other boys. Jack also did
On contrary from all the other boys on the island Simon, a Christ like figure in the novel, did not fear the ‘beastie’ or the unknown. “Maybe there is a beast....maybe it's only us” Simon explained. (p. 97) The fear of the unknown in the novel contributes to the boys’ terror of the beast, the beast is an imaginary figure which lays in all of the boys’ minds and haunts them. Golding uses the beast as a symbol of the evil that exists in every creature. "You knew, didn't you? I'm part of you? Close, close close! I'm the reason why it's no go? Why things are the way they are?" The sow head announced to Simon to be the “lord of the flies”. The “lord of the flies” is a figure of the devil, and brings out all the evil and fear in people. It wants you to fear it, but if you don’t believe in the “lord of the flies” nothing can happen to you. Therefore Simon didn’t fall into the trap, but the beast killed him, meaning the other boys on the island did. Simon discovered that the beast is in fact just a dead parachute man before he died and ran down to tell the boys about his finding. When Sim...
In Beast From Air, the boys have the false idea of the beast being the dead parachutist that falls on the island: the fear the boys have of the beast leads to the death of Simon in chapter 9, A View to a Death. A factual interpretation of the beast would be that it represents danger and a direct threat to the boys; it can be a symbol of chaos and death within the island. An extended interpretation of the beast is that it represents the innate evil in humans, the primal, bestial feelings within us all: one of the novel’s main themes. Although the beast is metaphorical, the boys' behavior is what brings the beast into existence, so the more savagely the boys act, the more real the beast seems to become. This is realized by Simon and is proposed in Beast From Water after a littlun suggests the possibility of the beast on the island: “What I mean is . . . maybe it’s only us”. Simon explains that perhaps the beast is only the boys themselves. The boys ignore Simon’s realization, yet Simon’s words are central to Golding’s point that inborn human evil exists. Simon is the first character in the novel to see the beast not as an outer force, but as a constituent element of human nature.
Simon has a spiritual perception, a mystical connection to nature that none other characters possess. He also makes it clear that the beast real identity is the evilness which exists inside everyone. Finally, Simon treats other characters, especially the little boys with kind manners and shows interest in their well-being, contrasts to the cruelty of Jack and many boys who have let their savagery rule over them. After his death, Golding then shift the focus from Simon’s body toward the unchanging nature, such as the sun, moon, and earth that is because the character Simon, represents a knowledge as fundamental as the natural
...re. There were no words, and no movements but the tearing of teeth and claws.” (152-153) Simon was almost eaten alive. After all of this happened it mental damaged Ralph. Everyone did realize that they killed Simon, but it only sent them into more of a craze. This allowed Jack to convince everyone he should be the new leader. Jack was the one who wanted to kill the beast the most; he was almost like a hero in some sense.
Simon has a different perspective of most things then the rest of the boys. HE seems to be more mature, but simaltanously less mentally stable. He hallucinates that he speaks to the Lord of the Flies, where it says ''Fancy thinking the Beast was something you could hunt and kill... You knew, didn't you? I'm part of you.'' (William Golding, page 143). This quote states that the beast is inside of Simon, as it is in all of us.
Jack corrodes the group using the beast as during the meal Jack screams “Kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood!” Jack didn’t care to first scout out or pursue who the beast was and ended up killing Simon, who just came to explain his discovery of the beast. In this incident Jack caused the group to cross the boundary line to savages who lack rational thinking because of they had murdered Simon.
Jack sways the minds of his followers away from the world of rational thinking by claiming that he can save them from the fears that haunt them both day and night. Jack claims that “ we’ll close in and beat and beat” (91) when encountering the beast because “we're strong - we hunt”(91). This claim of protection causes boys to trust him as well as follow his every instruction because hope, even false hope, motivates people. Eventually, Jack’s followers stop thinking rationally about their actions and surroundings, slaving to Jack’s every word without a second thought. “The littluns sat solemnly thinking of meat, and dribbling” (142), as Jack instructed them to do, but act blindly towards “the cannon boomed again and the dry palm fronds clattered in a sudden gust of hot wind” ( 142). In addition to not knowing what goes on around them, they also forget about the significance of their actions. When murdering Simon, his attackers seize to refer to him as Simon and solely refer to him as “the beast” (152) because fear of the beast has taken over their thoughts. Even little Percival, who only knows his name and address, forgets it after enduring murder after murder because his mind can no longer thinks about anything but his fears; “Percival Wemys Madison sought in his head for an incantation that had faded clean away” (201). As opposed to fear taking over people, those who possess the ability to think rationally, do not fear the beast. Simon can recognize the goriness behind the actions of Jack and his followers; “The blood and his gaze was held by that ancient inescapable recognition. In Simon’s right temple, a pulse began to beat on the brain” (138). Interestingly, Simon, who can recognize barbaric actions, does not fear the beast. When asked by the beast if he feared him, “Simon shook his head” (143). Simon can see reality clearly, unlike Jack and his followers, because fear has not taken
In chapter five, the beast was made-up and did not exist. Many of the boys were afraid of it. Ralph called a meeting because he saw the boys were having problems with their fear of the beast. It is Jack who states, “If there were a beast I’d have seen it. Be frightened because you’re like that- but there is no beast in the forest (Goldberg, p. 83). Symbolism for the beast changes in the novel from a real beast that they think exists to realizing that the beast exists within them. It is Simon in chapter five who states that perhaps the beast exist within them. He states, “What I mean is … maybe it’s only us (Goldberg, p. 89). Simon felt that the beast does not really exist but evil exists among them.
While Simon was concealed in the forest, watching the self-proclaimed “hunters” kill a sow, he observed them place the head of this pig on a stick as an offering to the “beast.” After the hunters left, Simon began to see what that the pig’s head represented. It showed that an immense amount of turmoil was going to take place on the island. This turmoil began when Jack started his own little tribe that was comprised of all the hunters and offered anyone free membership. Everyone, except Ralph and Piggy, joined the new clique because Jack claimed that they would always have meat to eat. Ralph and Piggy knew that this was the wrong decision to make because Jack was very immature had no clue how to lead anyone and all he wanted to do was kill.