Recently, only 60% of registered voters have actually voted in presidential elections. This brings up the question: should Americans be required to vote? This question receives very mixed answers. Many Americans believe that they should have the choice and the freedom to vote or not; many Americans also believe that mandatory, or required, voting is simply a civic duty. Currently, American citizens are not required to vote. Citizens seem to like this system, but because voting is not mandatory, the amount of citizens that vote in elections is rather low. Americans should not be required to vote because it forces people to vote that are uninterested, makes citizens unhappy, and damages other people’s votes.
Americans should not be required
…show more content…
to vote because it forces people to vote that are uninterested. People could be uninterested in voting for a number of reasons. They might be uneducated on the vote going on, and they may not wish to educate themselves. They might not like any of the candidates, and therefore want to refrain from voting. They might not care about who wins at all and decide to just let the other Americans vote. People that are uninterested or uneducated should not be forced to vote. It is not fair for the Americans that do want to vote and do care about the outcome of the election. In Document B, we are told that in 2008, only 39.4% of people without a high school diploma voted. In addition, in 2008, a little over 50% of people between the ages of 18-29 voted. If voting becomes mandatory for all Americans, those numbers would increase to 100%. 100% of uneducated Americans and 100% of young Americans would be voting in elections. This is not a good thing. Young people voting is not necessarily a bad thing, but they are likely less experienced than older voters. They also maybe not be as informed as older voters, as older voters have voted before. 100% of uneducated voters voting in elections would likely be a bad thing. Why would people who didn’t graduate high school want to research which candidate would be the best choice in the election? It is very likely that they wouldn’t, and they would make an uninformed and uninterested vote. In Document G, unpracticed people using power tools or rollerblading is compared to uneducated people voting. Uneducated people voting is is incredibly dangerous for everybody, whereas unpracticed people using power tools or rollerblading is only really dangerous for themselves. People who are uninterested in voting should not be forced to, as it can be dangerous for everybody involved. Americans should not be required to vote because it makes citizens unhappy.
In Document D, it tells us that although Italy has a compulsory voting system in place, it “ranks low” in political satisfaction among western countries. In addition, many voters have “unfavorable attitudes towards their electoral system”. When citizens are required to vote, their attitudes towards voting can become negative. In addition, in places like the US, where voting is optional, voters have the “highest voter satisfaction rates with their political institutions”. So, citizens are much happier with their government when they are given the choice to vote, not when they are forced to do it. The government doesn’t want their citizens to be unhappy; in the past, unhappy citizens has lead to revolts against the government. Citizens being unhappy about compulsory voting is shown in Document E. In Peru, citizens are required to vote and will receive a penalty of US$35 if they do not vote. Because of this penalty, 13% of ballots cast are blank or null. These citizens either “spoiled” their ballots or refused to vote for any of the candidates. It is clear that these citizens were unhappy about being forced to vote and they were unhappy about the penalty for not voting, so they voted, but they voted by casting ballots that were blank or null. Is it really better to have citizens that vote when they are submitting blank or null ballots? No. If citizens are so against voting that they will submit blank or null ballots, they should just be allowed to not
vote. Americans should not be required to vote because it damages other people’s votes. Think about taking standardized tests in high school. Although many students were required to take them, for the most part, they do not matter in the long run. They will not be sent to colleges, and they don’t affect your GPA. Many students, knowing these tests were not important, filled them out completely at random, or they filled out the bubbles in fun patterns. They drew pictures instead of writing answers or actually trying to solve the problems. These standardized tests and the students that don’t take them seriously are like voting and the voters that don’t want to vote. Although Americans are allowed to vote, they don’t necessarily want to vote. Requiring all Americans to vote would lead to things happening like with standardized tests. Citizens would either pick a random candidate, make up a candidate, or submit a blank ballot. This is actually demonstrated in Document E. Peru has compulsory voting, and because of this, 13% of ballots cast are blank or null. The citizens don't care enough about voting, so they submit invalid ballots. Blank or null ballots do not necessarily damage other people's votes, but people who make up candidates or choose a candidate randomly can damage other people's votes. Citizens being required to vote could actually damage other people’s votes because if say, 30% of people choose a candidate at random during mandatory voting, that candidate is receiving 30% more votes than they would have during an optional election. Those people do not actually support this candidate; they just chose a candidate at random. Now, that candidate has won the election. Although this candidate did receive more votes than the other candidate, they were not “real” votes. They were votes given at random by people who do not care about the outcome of the election. This is not at all fair to informed voters, or to the candidates. The informed voters votes essentially mean nothing, and the candidate that didn’t win was basically cheated out of the win, because the other candidate received random votes. Document G discusses how because the United States has low voter turnouts, some groups urge people to vote. They are not necessarily trying to get them to vote for a particular candidate, the groups just want people to vote to exercise their civic virtue. This can be a very bad, very dangerous thing. Document G says that it is “irresponsible to encourage the unaware to put their ignorance into action so aimlessly”, and it also compares urging uninformed citizens to vote to urging the “unpracticed to use power tools or Rollerblade”. It is clear that unpracticed people should not be trying to use power tools they are unfamiliar with, nor should they be trying to rollerblade. And they definitely shouldn’t be using both at the same time. It is dangerous, just like allowing uninformed people to vote. Uninformed people being allowed to vote is much more dangerous than allowing unpracticed people to use power tools or rollerblade because they'd "injure only themselves". Uninformed people being allowed to vote can injure much more than just themselves. In conclusion, compulsory voting should not be introduced to Americans because it forces people to vote that are uninterested or uneducated, it makes citizens unhappy with their government, and it can damage the votes of other people who actually want to vote. However, the amount of American citizens that vote in elections is drastically, worryingly low. Something should be done to get more Americans informed about elections and to get more Americans to vote, but compulsory voting is not the way to make those changes. Compulsory voting would likely cause many more problems than it would fix.
Should America have compulsory voting? In my opinion, compulsory voting is a good way to increase the voting turnout. People currently don't like to vote because they don't have the time, or are just too lazy. If the government gives them an incentive then they will be happy to take time off to vote. Also, a reason to fear not to vote should be installed, like an annoying fine. When only a few people vote, the voter satisfaction is low. But when everyone puts their idea in, the satisfaction rises because the actual majority will win.
Since the turn of the twenty first century, in Canada voter turnout has made a significant and consecutive decline. In the last five federal elections on average only sixty-one per cent of eligible voters voted. If each eligible citizen voted in an election the government would be on par with the primary interests of the people. The easiest way to achieve this objective is by implementing a compulsory voting system. Mandatory voting systems are appealing because all citizens are affected by decisions made by the government, so it makes sense to have all those affected apart of the election process. As a result, the voting results would be more representative of the country and that would lead to an increase of stability and legitimacy. It would also be beneficial to Canadians because would cause political parties to address and focus on the needs of every socio-economic level. However, one of biggest problems that accompanies mandatory voting laws is that the choice to exercise the right to vote is taken away. Another primary concern about compulsory voting is that a large number of uninterested and uninformed voters are brought to the polls. Conversely, uninformed voters will become familiar with and learn the polling procedures and electoral system over time and uninterested voters are not forced to mark a name on the ballot. Compulsory voting laws would only make registration and attendance at the polls mandatory, not voting itself. Therefore the freedom to exercise the right to vote or not is still intact. A greater emphasis on alternate voting practices may be established such as electronic or online voting. Positive changes would not only be evident in the policies of political parties but also in the voting procedure. Th...
The most critiqued argument is that mandating voting is just un-American. The con side argues that forcing people to vote violates our freedom of speech. But they don’t feel that the requirement to pay taxes and serve as a jure are unjust. This seems contradictory. The second argument is that requiring all citizens to vote would result in many uninformed and carelessly voters. They continue this argument by stating many people would cast “donkey votes” which are votes for a random candidate because they are required to vote by law. There are many arguments for and against compulsory voting but it comes down to what makes something
Without mandatory voting, some people chose not to vote because they do not care, or are uninformed. Forcing these people to vote could lead to random choices when voters do not take responsibility to study the candidate's position on specific topics. "It may increase the number of informal votes, ballot papers which are not marked according to the rules for voting," _ Matt Rosenberg_. Compulsory voting may lead many people to not truly vote, but to put their name on a ballot and turn it in. While this is possible, a greater number of potentially interested people would also vote. If people are required to vote, the country will obtain every eligible voters’ opinions. Some of the citizens may not care who is elected, but they still can have a say if they want to. Without mandatory voting, the people who do not want to vote, do not and went about with their life. "Because a majority of the voters are turning out to cast ballots, the formation of the government can be a more accurate reflection of what the population of any nation wants," _Asia-Pacific Economics_. In a government with two different parties, the majority of the citizens decide how they want the government to be formed till the next election.
There is a way that is already put in use to increase voter turnout in Australia is to make voting mandatory. People in Australia are forced to vote or they will be fined, or even jailed if they do not vote repeatedly. It is very effective in term of improving voter turnout; however, there is still some argument against it. One of them being people would only vote because they have to, so they are ignorantly voting for the candidates just to be done with it. I completely agree with this idea. The voter turnout can be really high, but it would be meaningless if the people just vote to escape from the punishments. Yale Law School Professor Stephen Carter also suggested that, instead of punishing people do not vote, we should reward people who vote. It is the same with the mandatory voting. I think it will only be effective in increasing the voter turnout, but the results will not. People should vote voluntarily for the best and fair outcome. To have more people voting, I believe we should take a look at why people do not vote. We must assure people that if everybody thinks their vote does not count, then no one would vote. We should be able to change their attitude about their own votes. If people cannot vote because they are busy with work or schools, we should have a national day off on the election day. By doing so, much more people will be able to participate in voting. There should also be
Firstly, the idea of compulsory voting that involves every citizen having a civic duty, rather then a right to vote, which has been introduced in over 20 countries worldwide, a good example being Australia. In Australia, the system has been a success, producing an impressive turnout of 94% in the 2013 election, which therefore means that the Australian government will have a much higher level of legitimacy compared to the UK. However, critics of compulsory voting argue that such a system is undemocratic by itself as it does not provide a citizen with a choice on whether to vote or not, resulting in a serious debate around the issue. However, I must agree with the critics of the system, as the people voting because they have to, are likely to be less passionate and well informed about the person they have to
Should we have the freedom to chose weather we vote or not? Currently the United States allows citizens not to vote, but some believe that this makes our politics undemocratic. Some think forcing people to vote is against the freedoms we have today. In the following essay, I will give the views of Arend Lijphart and Austin Ranney about these topics.
Contrary to what may seem logical, majority votes under a compulsory voting system do not necessarily represent accurate opinion. Rather, compulsion encourages apathy, characterized by “a lack of concern, enthusiasm or interest” ("Definition of Voter Apathy"). In essence, voter apathy “occurs when voters decide that they really don’t care who wins or loses” ("Definition of Voter Apathy") due to “a general feeling that a person’s vote doesn’t matter or even a distrust in regards to how the election is actually being run” ("Definition of Voter Apathy").
As an American citizen do you think the government should enforce compulsory voting? A country usually needs three things to have a successful compulsory voting system, a national voter registration database, rewards to encourage voters, and punishing non-voters. Should americans be required to vote? There are three reasons why Americans should be required to vote, first, so citizens have interests and political knowledge, second, to increase amount of younger voters and finally, requiring people to vote is the least a citizen can do.
To enforce voting to be mandatory , this will prompt more Americans to pay attention to the choices for their representatives. Mandating would stimulate the demand side, motivating voters to understand and acknowledge who they are voting for. Therefore , voting is to be a responsibility than a option.
On the contrary, citizens should be required to vote. For example, text 1 line 20 states "A democracy can't be strong, if its citizenship is weak"; therefore when being forced to vote against our own will, it is to strengthen our nation. In addition, if the turnout rates are high, then political parties reaches out to the citizens. As a result, the voices of the less educated and the poorer Americans will be heard and not ignored. Not to mention, William A. Galston states that voting evens out the inequalities stemming from income, education, and age in text 1. Most importantly, mandatory voting only benefits us a nation and individually. Clearly, compulsory voting should be enforced.
Voting is an opportunity given to Americans. As Americans we live in a democracy. Americans live in a democracy that is subjected to vote; a democracy where people have fought for the right to vote on many situations and for the rights of Americans to not be infringed. However, sometimes people just do not vote. Perhaps, reason being is some Americans are not familiar with the background of America and where voting all started. Maybe, some Americans think it all boils down to the electoral votes and their vote simply is not significant. Maybe, it could be that they possibly do not care for politics and do not intend on involving themselves around something they do not understand. There are many reasons why Americans choose to vote and many reasons why Americans choose not to vote.
Women were not allowed to vote in the nineteenth century. This was mainly due to opposing views sweeping America at that time, which were pushed forward by two well known political arguments-a report from the Senate's Committee on Priviledges and Elections and an address by Isabella Beecher Hooker. In 1878, the Senate Committee wrote a response to a proposed constitutional amendment that would give women the right to vote, stating the main reasons why women shouldn't be given the ability. Some of these reasons announced that female voters had no experience in political affairs, while being quite generally dependent upon the other sex and incapable of performing military duty. Without the power to enforce the laws they could create, what good
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the Immigration and Nationality Act Amendments averted the prejudice and discrimination that states had previously implemented against people of color, but it did not solve all issues, for all races, equally. For different races, it took different lengths of time and different measures to reach the same equality when it came to voting. And even today, there are still issues with minority representation in politics.
In 1965 congress had passed Civil Rights law for all citizens to be able to vote. Before, African American and white women did not have the same equal rights to vote as white men did. The white males allowed a small number of free African Americans to go register and vote. For a African American to vote they were required to be a free citizen and not a runaway slave. In 1867 congress made it possible for African Americans to vote. The new constitutions guarantee black suffrage and congress tried to protect the African Americans right to vote by putting the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendment. When congress passed the Civil Rights law African American still suffered from voting because congress made it unaffordable for poor people to vote. A