Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Bolshevik Revolution, the Soviet Union
The Bolshevik Revolution, the Soviet Union
Russia in revolution1881-1924
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Bolshevik Revolution, the Soviet Union
Repression in Russian Leadership
Repression was used under both Nicholas 2 and the Bolsheviks to
control the Russian population. The liberal methods employed preceding
both governments (Alexander 2 and the Provisional Government
respectively) failed completely and discouraged any other form of
liberal or democratic controls. The strict extremist ideologies of
both the Tsarist and Bolshevik regimes also necessitated violent
repression to ensure total compliance. This was needed due to the
major political upheavals taking place - the decline of Tsarism
despite Nicholas' determination to continue his autocratic rule and
the rise of Bolshevism to replace it meant that both parties needed to
take a very harsh line. This was exacerbated by the fact that neither
party came to power with the 'legitimate vote' of the public and so
faced strong opposition that they wished to eliminate. Conflict, in
the form of Civil War and the Great War, was an apparent complication
in both regimes. This caused additional economic disarray and social
disruption, hindering the plans of the 2 major governments of this
era. Consequently this encouraged the use of repression in an attempt
to resurrect the country and increase their power. Further
difficulties during this period were caused by Russia's long term long
problems, particularly the vast land area and a high percentage of
distinct ethnic minorities causing a lack of cohesion and sense of
national identity. Bad communications and retardation of
industrialisation meant poor social conditions which led to vocal
rebellious groups requiring violent put downs i.e. repression. Russia,
at this time, appeared...
... middle of paper ...
...e ideologies of the government. Repression was imperative for both
governments; the Tsarist to cling to power and the Communists to
snatch it from them. Both had many unpopular economic, political and
social reforms to pass. War highlighted the problems of the country
and the presence of strong opposition against both governments. In the
view of both it increased the need for repression to realign the
economic and social structure. Under both regimes the cause and the
effect of repression was the same; it resulted in the death or
displacement of many. Unfortunately, it was just a prelude to the
terror that was to be experienced during the 'High-Stalinism' of the
1930's. During this decade, 7 million died, mostly after being sent to
a labour camp for failing to conform to the Communist ideal of
'collectivisation'.
Tensions in Russia in the Early 1900 In the early 1900, Russia faced various kinds of problems in terms of society and politics. Although the largest country in the world, Russia could only offer 5% of its land for farming. The rest was useless due to the extremely low temperatures throughout the year. The problem with land meant that peasants did not produce a sufficient amount of food, consequently resulting famine all over the country.
During the 19th century, Russia was experiencing a series of changes with its entire nation and society overall. The government was trying to adapt themselves to them at the same time. It was not an easy time period for Russia whatsoever. Vladimir Lenin helped change this.
Historically, Russia has always been a country of perplexing dualities. The reality of Dual Russia, the separation of the official culture from that of the common people, persisted after the Revolution of 1917 and the Civil War. The Czarist Russia was at once modernized and backward: St. Petersburg and Moscow stood as the highly developed industrial centers of the country and two of the capitals of Europe, yet the overwhelming majority of the population were subsistent farms who lived on mir; French was the official language and the elites were highly literate, yet 82% of the populati...
As a dictator Stalin was very strict about his policies, especially working. For instance. Stalin had set quotas very high , as they were very unrealistic. The workers had very long days, and under the rule of Stalin most people worked many hours in overtime, and resulting in no pay. Stalin treated workers very, very harshly. Those who did not work were exiled to Siberia or killed. Some may say you got what you deserved in Stalin’s time. Those who worked very hard for Stalin sometimes got bonuses such as trips, or goods likes televisions and refrigerators. The workers had to conform to Stalin’s policies . Stalin’s harsh treatment of workers received a very unwelcoming response, but in fact the liberal amount of goods that the workers had made, had in fact
Stalin’s hunger for power and paranoia impacted the Soviet society severely, having devastating effects on the Communist Party, leaving it weak and shattering the framework of the party, the people of Russia, by stunting the growth of technology and progress through the purges of many educated civilians, as well as affecting The Red Army, a powerful military depleted of it’s force. The impact of the purges, ‘show trials’ and the Terror on Soviet society were rigorously negative. By purging all his challengers and opponents, Stalin created a blanket of fear over the whole society, and therefore, was able to stay in power, creating an empire that he could find more dependable.
Kennedy-Pipe, Caroline. Stalin’s Cold War: Soviet Strategies in Europe, 1943 to 1956. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995.
The effects of the purges on the political structure and community of the USSR can be described (as Peter Kenez asserts) as an overall change from a party led dictatorship to the dictatorship of a single individual; Stalin. Overall power was centred in Stalin, under whom an increasingly bureaucratic hierarchy of party officials worked. During the purges Stalin's personal power can be seen to increase at the cost of the party's. It could be argued that this increasing power for the single leader drawn from his party was due to the need for fast, decisive and unquestioned leadership of the type needed in battle. After all Russia was portrayed by the Soviet propaganda machine as being at war with its own industrial backwardness as workers were urged to industrial `fronts'. If the period of the 1930s is considered, it was a time of crisis. The building tension due to the rise of Nazi Germany making European foreign politics a risky place to navigate, the economic onslaught at home in Russia and the economic depression in the rest of the world making the times harsh. This change then could be argued as being beneficial to the USSR as only a single individual can provide the strong leadership needed, amongst a large group of individuals disputes would hinder the decision making process. However, the idea of the...
When most people hear the name Joseph Stalin, they usually associate the name with a man who was part of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and was responsible for the deaths of millions of people. He was willingly to do anything to improve the power of the Soviet Union’s economy and military, even if it meant executing tens of millions of innocent people (Frankforter, A. Daniel., and W. M. Spellman 655). In chapter three of Sheila Fitzpatrick’s book, Everyday Stalinism, she argues that since citizens believed the propaganda of “a radiant future” (67), they were able to be manipulated by the Party in the transformation of the Soviet Union. This allowed the Soviet government to expand its power, which ultimately was very disastrous for the people.
I. A good majority of the Russian people were weary and uncontent with the way the war was going and with the Czar's rule. This uncontent, along with economic hardships, caused riots and demonstrations to break out. The Czar called for the army to put down the revolution, as they did in 1905. But the army joined the revolt and the Czar was kicked out of power soon afterwards.
Repressive-To not allow someone to do something, to control someone or something by force. The Russian empire under the rule of Nicholas the First suppressed novel, religion, and cultures that did not have to do with Slavic traditions and the Russian Orthodox Church. Alexander the second lifts some of the oppressiveness of the government only to be twice as repressed after Alexander the second assignation , and Alexander the third taking the throne. In 1831, Russia stop a polish uprising and, destroyed its army, and annulled the polish constitution.
Totalitarian regimes take over control of every aspect of an individual's life in which the state holds total authority. The only thing Totalitarian regimes do for its community is cause the basic rights of humans to be destroyed by brutality and terror. The Totalitarian society of any regime is constantly moving toward some end goal, even though the totalitarian state never reaches it. It instead creates the illusion of doing so. As soon as one goal was reached, it was replaced by another and such was the case in Stalin's Russia.
The Weakening of the Provisional Government of Russia The Provisional Government, led by Prince Lvov, was the old Duma in a new form. When Milyukov, the foreign minister, read out the list of ministers in the newly-formed government, someone in the crowd called out ‘Who appointed you?’ Milyukov replied, ‘We were appointed by the revolution itself.’ In that exchange were expressed the two besetting weaknesses of the Provisional Government throughout the eight months of its existence. It was not an elected body.
But the Tsar had least central control. After the 1905 Revolution the Russian people were granted civil rights, an... ... middle of paper ... ... ressed the Tsars lost support from the nobles and power, after 1905 revolution Nicholas II had very little central control.
Over the next few years, Russia went through a traumatic time of civil war and turmoil. The Bolsheviks’ Red Army fought the white army of farmers, etc. against Lenin and his ways. Lenin and the Bolsheviks won and began to wean Russia of non-conforming parties eventually banning all non-communist as well as removing an assembly elected shortly after the Bolshevik’s gain of power. Lenin’s strict government, however, was about to get a lot stricter with his death in 1924.
Russia had been defeated in all except the war with Turkey and its government and economy had the scars to prove it. A severe lack of food and poor living conditions amongst the peasant population led firstly to strikes and quickly escalated to violent riots. Tsar Nicholas II ruled Russia with an iron hand while much of Europe was moving away from the monarchical system of rule. All lands were owned by the Tsar’s family and Nobel land lords, while the factories and industrial complexes were owned by the capitalists’. There were no unions or labour laws and the justice system had made almost all other laws in favour of the ruling elite.