Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Failure of the Russian provisional government
Peasant life pre revolution russia
Long term failures of provisional government russia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Failure of the Russian provisional government
The Weakening of the Provisional Government of Russia
The Provisional Government, led by Prince Lvov, was the old Duma in a
new form. When Milyukov, the foreign minister, read out the list of
ministers in the newly-formed government, someone in the crowd called
out ‘Who appointed you?’ Milyukov replied, ‘We were appointed by the
revolution itself.’ In that exchange were expressed the two besetting
weaknesses of the Provisional Government throughout the eight months
of its existence.
It was not an elected body. It had come into being as a rebellious
committee of the old Duma that refused to disband at the tsar’s
command. As a consequence, it lacked legitimate authority. It had no
constitutional claim upon the loyalty of the people and no natural
fund of goodwill on which it could rely. It would be judged entirely
on how well it dealt with the nation’s problems.
The Provisional Government’s second major weakness was that its
authority was limited by its unofficial partnership with the Petrograd
Soviet. It was not that the Soviet was initially hostile. Indeed, at
first, there was a considerable degree of liaison between them. Some
individuals were members of both bodies. For example, Alexander
Kerensky, the SR leader, was for a time chairman of the Soviet as well
as a minister in the Provisional Government.
The Soviet did not set out to be an alternative government. It
regarded its role as supervisory, checking that the interests of the
soldiers and workers were fully understood by the government.
(Disagree…) However, in the uncertain times that followed the February
Revolution, the Provisional Government often seemed unsure ...
... middle of paper ...
...stances of post-tsarist Russia had produced a
situation in which the peasants were acting as a truly revolutionary
force. This modification of Marxist theory thus allowed Lenin to add
Russian peasants to the proletarian cause.
‘Land to the Peasants’, a slogan lifted from the programme of the SRs,
became the new Bolshevik catchphrase. What this meant in mid-1917 was
that the Bolsheviks recognised the peasant land-seizures as a fait
accompli. Lenin declared that what the peasantry had done was wholly
in keeping with ‘revolutionary legality’.
This produced a considerable swing to the Bolsheviks in the
countryside. It had the further effect of splitting the SRs, a
significant number of whom began to align themselves with the
Bolsheviks. Known as the Left SRs, they sided with the Bolshevik Party
on all major issues.
In 1918, while the rest of Europe was still engaged in World War I, a newly formed communist government was developing in Russia. Much like 18th century Americans, they had just managed to overthrow what was viewed as a tyrannical government and hoped to form a new nation free of the injustices of the previous rule. Both countries wrote a new constitution as well as a declaration of rights to facilitate this, but their respective documents had vast differences. These disparities stemmed from differences in the ideologies of the new governments. The primary objectives of the Russian Declaration of Rights of the Working and Exploited People and the later constitution were the “abolition of all exploitation of man by man, complete elimination of the division of society into classes, merciless suppression of the exploiters, socialist organization of society, and victory of socialism in all countries.” Americans wanted equality of opportunity and personal freedom instead of the social equality desired by the Russians. The American constitution and Bill of Rights were created to protect personal liberties and individual freedom while the Russians were more concerned with the welfare and equality of the population as a whole. This difference is partially due to the differences in the conditions leading to revolution in each country. The American Revolution was initiated by the wealthy in response to what they considered unfair treatment by a foreign ruler while the Russian revolution was instigated by the poor in reaction to centuries of oppression and exploitation by the wealthy within their own country.
World War I's Responsibility for the Collapse of the Provisional Government in 1917 The Provisional Government assumed control of Russia following the abdication of the Tsar Nicholas II. It only had a brief period in power lasting about seven months. Historians have disputed the main cause for its failure, Marxist historians, such as John Reed, have rewarded it to the Bolshevik's effective propaganda machine, whilst more revisionist historians, such as Christopher Read, take a more encompassing position on the issue. They lay blame at a range of factors such as the First World War and the dual authority in relation to the Petrograd Soviet.
The first five-year plan, approved in 1929, proposed that state and collective farms provide 15 percent of agriculture output. The predominance of private farming seemed assured, as many farmers resisted collectivization. By late 1929, Stalin moved abruptly to break peasant resistance and secure the resources required for industrialization. He saw that voluntary collectivism had failed, and many “Soviet economists doubted that the first plan could even be implimented.”1 Stalin may have viewed collectivization as a means to win support from younger party leaders, rather than from the peasants and Lenin’s men. “Privately he advocated, industrializing the country with the help of internal accumulation” 2 Once the peasantry had been split, Stalin believed that the rural proletarians would embrace collectivization . Before this idea had a chance to work, a grain shortage induced the Politburo to support Stalin’s sudden decision for immediate, massive collectivization.
this was the seen to be “freedom” for them as they began to get what
The majority of those elected were Liberals (Kadets) and reformists who were angered by the Tsar’s back tracking on his promises. They demanded that there power be increased which the Tsar rejected and dissolved the assembly in June. This showed the Duma was trying to fight the Tsar and that he didn’t have control over it so he appointed Peter Stolypin as his
The most important war in relation to political change of 1855 to 1964 would be the Civil War (1917 – 1922) because it directly led to the Bolsheviks taking power in Russia implanting new ideologies (communism) into the state as well as forming of the USSR and dismantling state religion. For example take this quote from the declaration of the rights of the people of Russia which was drafted by the first Bolshevik government in 1917 "resolve to establish as a basis for its activity in the question of nationalities the following principles will be applied: Equality and sovereignty of peoples of Russia, Right of peoples of Russia of a free self-determination, including secession and formation of a separate state and Abolition of all national and religious privileges and restrictions" This shows that there were political changes in Russian society that would never happen if not the Bolsheviks got in power. The dismantling of state religion shows that the new Bolshevik government were taking strides in replacing the old political structure of society which consisted of state religion and heavily autocratic state Duma with new Soviet administration's at every level of society including the military and at industrial level which ensured a secular Marxist state.
Lenin’s pragmatic leadership was the most considerable factor in helping to fortify Bolshevik power. His willingness to take power in October/November 1917 and the successes of the move, through his right-hand man, Trotsky, was critical as it helped give him unquestioned authority within the party despite members of the Central Committee i.e. Zinoviev and Kamenev who suggested industrialisation needed to occur first. This highlighted Lenin’s communist ideology in practice which was essential to the Bolsheviks maintaining power. Following the failure of the Provisional Government, Lenin recognised that it was the Bolshevik’s priority to legitimise their government. As a result, issues of ‘Peace, Bread and Land’ were addressed through the issuing of a number of decrees in late 1917 including decrees on land, peace, Workers’ Rights as well as reforms to marriage and religion. ...
In order to conclude the extent to which the Great Terror strengthened or weakened the USSR the question is essentially whether totalitarianism strengthened or weakened the Soviet Union? Perhaps under the circumstances of the 1930s in the approach to war a dictatorship may have benefited the country in some way through strong leadership, the unifying effect of reintroducing Russian nationalism and increased party obedience.
A temporary government was set up to decide on what kind of government Russia was going to set up. Two political parties were set up. The Bolsheviks were one of the two. The leader of the Bolshevik party was a man named Lenin. Lenin was a firm believer in the theories and ideas of Karl Marx.
The Russian revolution of February 1917 was a momentous event in the course of Russian history. The causes of the revolution were very critical and even today historians debate on what was the primary cause of the revolution. The revolution began in Petrograd as “a workers’ revolt” in response to bread shortages. It removed Russia from the war and brought about the transformation of the Russian Empire into the Union of Soviet Socialist Republic, replacing Russia’s monarchy with the world’s first Communist state. The revolution opened the door for Russia to fully enter the industrial age. Before 1917, Russia was a mostly agrarian nation. The Russian working class had been for many years fed up with the ways they had to live and work and it was only a matter of time before they had to take a stand. Peasants worked many hours for low wages and no land, which caused many families to lose their lives. Some would argue that World War I led to the intense downfall of Russia, while others believe that the main cause was the peasant unrest because of harsh living conditions. Although World War I cost Russia many resources and much land, the primary cause of the Russian Revolution was the peasant unrest due to living conditions because even before the war began in Russia there were outbreaks from peasants due to the lack of food and land that were only going to get worse with time.
Autocracy-A government system, where a person or group has total power over a country. The Russian autocrat at the time of the emancipation of the serfs was Alexander the Second who was assassinated.
One of the major contributors to Kerensky’s failure to maintain power within the Provisional Government
...iks and the Petty Bourgeoisie." Lenin Collected Works. Vol. 12. Moscow: Foreign Languages House, 1962. 179-83. Marxist Internet Archive. Web. 15 Apr. 2014.
The Struggle for the Succession in the USSR · When Lenin had his first stroke in May 1922, succession to the leadership of Russia became urgent. Trotsky, owing to his record and his charismatic qualities, was the obvious candidate in the party rank and file, · However jealousy among his colleagues on the Politburo combine against him. As an alternative, the Politburo supported the informal leadership of the troika composed of Zinovyev, Lev Kamenev, and Stalin. · In the winter of 1922–23 Lenin recovered partially and turned to Trotsky for assistance in correcting the errors of the troika, foreign trade policy, the handling of the national minorities, and reform of the bureaucracy. Trotsky was still Lenin’s right hand man at this
As communication was poor to the rural areas of Russia, the peasants had little or no knowledge of political parties and so did not support the Bolsheviks in their takeover. When the Bolsheviks changed to the Communist party in 1918, many peasants believed these to be a new party challenging Bolshevism and so made banners saying ’Down with the Communists, Long live the Bolsheviks!’ The national minorities currently part of the Russian empire, predominately Finland and Poland, were demanding independence and Russia’s allies, Britain, France, USA, Japan, etc. were growing ever suspicious of Bolshevism and so were set to intervene if the Bolsheviks were to pull out of World War 1.