Reporting For Journalism: Annotated Bibliography: Annotated Bibliography

Annotated Bibliography
Frost, C., 2001. Reporting for journalists. Second Edition. London: Routledge.
This book focuses on what journalists can and cannot report. According to the Press Complaints Commission journalists are doing anything to get a good story which is making the media industry more competitive. This book helps back-up the book written by B Richards as it mentions the censorship of what journalists can and cannot write. It also talks about new laws that have been recommended to be introduced to stop unsavoury ways of gathering information so that they do not damage the innocent when it comes to reporting criminal cases, which is what has happened in past cases. This is useful as it puts into perspective what can go wrong with

There is no way to censor what is written or taken and journalist state that the invasion of privacy is in the public interest. A large section of the book looks at what is ethical and what is not. In Sir David Culcutt’s second report he stated ‘I recommend that the government should now introduced statutory regime’ (1993: Para 9, P. Xii). His view will be important in regards to the question.

Gentzkow,M. And Glaeser, E L. And Goldin, C., 2006. Corruption and Reform: Lessons from America’s Economic History [online]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
This journal states that a free and informative press is widely agreed to be crucial to the democratic process. Society and the Government are seeing a threat because of allegations of distortion and potential bias in media. The journal is partly in support of the press and that they will provide unbiased information however a part of it explains that the press have the potential to be dangerous considering their freedoms. These two opposing views are essential to the question. The journal is comparable to the book written by P Norris titled Driving Democracy as it gives a broader explanation on the essential process of democratization in regards to the right of the freedom of

It must contain all different views that make a specific story successful. It is essential that journalists pay attention to the codes of ethics (Frost 2000). In regards to journalists, it stands as an example against which there work can be judged. For the public it acts as a guarantee that they are receiving accurate and fair information. Recent incidents over the recent years have raised questions in regards to the security of people’s privacy and to combat this the codes’ requirements on privacy intrusions have been made more severe. Self-regulation protects both freedom of expression and citizens from abuse of this freedom, and these two often come into conflict. There needs to be a clear definition of what is and is not in the public interest. This is all mention in the book ‘Media ethics and Self-Regulation’ (Chris Frost 2000) where Sir David Culcutt gave a statement saying ‘I recommend that the government should now introduce a statutory regime’. The Levinson Inquiry has brought the topic of press freedoms into the limelight recently. Due to the intrusion of so many high profile celebrities’ private lives, the public have slowly been losing confidence in the press’ motives. According to surveys written for the Committee on Standards in Public Life, tabloid journalists consistently ranked below politicians