Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethics in a homeless shelter
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction of the Client Renee Heikamp, 19, and case worker from the Catholic Children’s Aid Society (CCAS), Angie Martin, were charged with criminal negligence resulting in the 1997 death of newborn baby, Jordan Heikamp. The charges were dropped shortly after Jordan’s death, due to a lack of evidence from the investigation of a 63-day inquest. (CBC, 2001). Renee Heikamp and her baby were residing at the Anduhyaun shelter that services Aboriginal women fleeing abuse during the time of his death. Jordan Heikamp had starved to death, weighing only 4 pounds, 4 ounces less than what he weighed at his pre-mature birth, in May 1997; a photograph shown to witnesses at the inquest revealed the corpse of the baby who was little more than a skeleton. …show more content…
Medical evidence of Heikamp’s autopsy showed significant signs of starvation approximately 10 to 14 days before his final days and hadn’t been fed for one to two days before his death (CBC, 2001). The lack of pre-natal care support and education provided to the young mother to raise a child was a result in the unfortunate death of her baby boy. His mother, who was diluting his formula with far more water that the instructions directed, carried him wrapped in a blanket, making it hard for the Anduhyaun staff to observe the physical condition of Jordan. When asked about her transition to motherhood and the well-being of baby Jordan, Heikamp assured her support system that both were doing just fine and Jordan was doing great and gaining weight; none of the professionals assigned to work with her questioned her assurance (Philip, 2001). The overlap regarding the lack of information for Renee and the lack of support from the services she was connected with caused conflicting decisions on who should be deemed responsible for Jordan Heikamp’s death. Social Services Accessed At the time of Renee’s pregnancy, she was also homeless was placed in the Anduhyaun shelter by the CCAS. At the time of Jordan’s birth, the nurses at the hospital were very concerned with the young woman’s lethargic behavior towards the birth and well-being of her newborn baby. Child-welfare authorities were contacted upon the discharge of Renee and Jordan; Angie Martin, case worker with the CCAS was then assigned to the pair for supervision (Philip, 2001). Between the connections with the CCAS and the Anduhyaun shelter, Renee and Jordan received very little support. The supervisor at the shelter has assured Martin that the shelter had two registered nurses on their staff team; Angie Martin then scheduled appointments to see the woman and her baby once a month with the assumption they would receive around the clock care from the nurses at shelter. During the five short weeks of Jordan’s life, now one observed the physical state of the baby (Philip, 2001). Frequent support from both the shelter and the Children’s Aid Society would have benefitted Renee and would have prevented the tragic death of baby Jordan. System Success VS. System Lapses Pregnant and homeless, the Catholic Children’s Aid Society provided positive assistance to Renee by promptly placing her into to Anduhyaun shelter before she gave birth to her son. The CCAS was very successful in ensuring that Renee was placed in a culturally sensitive shelter, as it serviced young women of the Aboriginal background. They also were successful by providing her with a case worker that was meant to supervise her at the time of her birth and to support her in any way necessary. There were many discrepancies in those services that influenced the death of Jordan. The workers at the Anduhyaun shelter could have improved their practice by doing a proper assessment to seek adequate understanding of Renee’s needs in order to serve her better. Becoming a new mother without any knowledge of how to care for a baby should have prompted the staff to check on the mother and newborn frequently and ensure that she is providing the basic necessities of life properly to Jordan. The two registered nurses that were staffed at the shelter could have provided advice and support on how to care for the child; teach her how to properly change his diaper, make sure he is getting enough food and nutrition, how to safely burp him, and how to properly cloth the baby. The CCAS could have improved by also doing a proper assessment to identify her needs in order to serve her better. Her case worker, Angie, could have connected a shelter that provides services for young Aboriginal women with children, not a shelter for abused women. Other services and support such as counselling and societal re-integration peer programs was certainly an option for Angie to consider because at the time of receiving Renee as a client, she had no internal supports to add to her situation of being homeless and pregnant. Monthly visits were too far apart for a women who was in need of support and care while raising a new born baby, therefore, a weekly visit to evaluate and update Renee’s situation and Jordan’s well-being would have prevented the tragic incident of Jordan’s death. Having Angie advocate for Renee and have her enrolled in free services such as prenatal and postnatal care programs would also have benefitted the overall situation. Societal Stigma’s & Ethical Dilemmas One of the biggest societal stigmas that are related to this case is that Renee Heikamp not only had a baby out of wedlock as a teenager, but conceived the child while homeless and unemployed.
No matter what age an individual is, society automatically deems a person to be an adult once they have a child. Unfortunately, Renee dealt with a lot of isolation, neglect, lack of emotional, physical, psychological support that would have helped her successfully transition into a new chapter in her life. Renee was treated like an independent and competent adult when in reality, she was in serious need of many support systems to educate and support her. As a social worker, Angie Martin’s actions within her practice created an ethical dilemma when she failed to maintain the best interest of her client, Jordan. Angie was expected to fulfill her role as a social worker by playing a vital role in coaching and educating Renee on how to care for Jordan. If there were frequent scheduled appointment in place, there would be enough evidence from Angie’s file on Jordan and Renee alone to decipher who should have been responsible for the death of Jordan. Frequent visits to the young mother and her child would have given Angie the opportunity to provide the courts with enough documentation to understand the case thoroughly to make a conviction, in needed, without dropping charges and dismissing the
case. Inquest Recommendation After a 63-day inquest in the death of Jordan Heikamp, a total of 44 recommendations were presented from the jury. The recommendations were also directed at governments, including the City of Toronto, as well as several institutions such as agencies who work with homeless mothers and their children. A brief description of a few of the recommendations includes the following (ANGELIZD’s Place, n.d.): Any worker involved in child protection services must understand that their client is the child in need of protection, not the parent The worker must schedule face to face follow ups on a weekly basis for children under the age of four months of age Workers must comprehend that young individuals registered in the shelter system are adept to manipulating and lying against the system to benefit their situations All staff within a shelter must have appropriate and relevant knowledge and education in order to recognize signs of malnutrition and/or inadequate care of babies Newborn baby risk assessments completed by children’s aid worker should be every seven days, rather than every 21 days The government should provide increased funding opportunities to supervising agencies New prenatal and postnatal programs should be established for teens and homeless mothers
Cynthia Adae was taken to Clinton Memorial Hospital on June 28, 2006. She was taken to the hospital with back and chest pain. A doctor concluded that she was at high risk for acute coronary syndrome. She was transferred to the Clinton Memorial hospital emergency room. She reported to have pain for two or three weeks and that the pain started in her back or her chest. The pain sometimes increased with heavy breathing and sometimes radiated down her left arm. Cynthia said she had a high fever of 103 to 104 degrees. When she was in the emergency room her temperature was 99.3, she had a heart rate of 140, but her blood
Milwaukee teacher Katherine Gonzalez had a twisted way of helping her 11-year-old "chronically depressed" student cheer up.
The Daniel Pelka serious case review is one of many that are conducted around the United Kingdom every year. A serious case review is a local enquiry into the death or serious injury of a child, where abuse or neglect are known or suspected. These are conducted by the Local Safeguarding Children Boards; with the main focus being on what lessons can be learnt locally to prevent this from happening again (Brandon, Bailey, Belderson, 2010). In this textual analysis we will be looking back at previous case reviews including Jasmine Beckford and Baby P. We will then look at what recommendations have been made and use the Peka case to see weather we have learned from our previous mistakes or are we still in the same position now as we where then.
The areas in which these reforms should occur are twofold. One argument that Judge Ross raises repeatedly is that measures should be taken to insure the sustainability of Family Court employees through more manageable caseloads. The necessity of this change is evident in countless examples of children suffering as a result of constantly changing, thin-spread, staff. In one particular instance, a six month child abuse case is adjourned because they “don’t have the medical records” in time (128). The second argument that can be implicitly made based off of Judge Ross’s expressed frustrations is that, if given the proper time for consideration, there should be more room for consideration of circumstance in Family Court. From a legal standpoint, there is substantial evidence for the validity of a common law approach to Family Court over the traditional civil law. Judge Ross establishes that ideally “In each case to protect children, to assure due process, to remain neutral until the facts are established, to apply common sense and sound judgment within the framework of the law in making decisions—the Family Court judge’s charge lies quite outside the arena of public policy, comment, and debate” (104). However, as seen in many of his cases, the combination of the overflowing workload and an inability to apply proper consideration to any given circumstance makes it impossible for the pre-existing
Child Protective Services systems are often called “broken,” and the case of Logan Marr is a solid example of why. Logan was taken away from her mother, Christy, after an extensive battle that involved accusations, investigations, and mandates. After the struggle, Logan was finally placed into a foster home under the supervision of Sally Schofield, a child caseworker of the Maine Department of Health and Human Services. Schofield admits that she soon saw that book-learning and experience were two different things. Her lack of true preparation for the supervision and care of Logan ultimately lead to the death of the child.
Alameda has had a hard life as a young girl growing up, both of her parents were alcoholics. Alameda was a 16 year old minor who had a baby and dropped out of school, and then was unable to care for the infant. A case manager by the name of Barbara LaRosa was assigned to Alameda case. Barbara took on Alameda as her client and made a visit to her parents’ home, while making the visit she found Alameda dad incompetent, and could not get any information from him to help with his daughter well-being.
Throughout this essay, the health, safety and welfare policy and practise that came about after the Victoria Climbie case will be reviewed and evaluated. After arriving in England in November 1991 from the Ivory Coast, eight-year old Victoria Climbie suffered abuse from her great-aunt, Marie-Therese Kouao, and her great-aunts partner. The anguish and eventual murder of Victoria in 2000 from hypothermia, caused by malnourishment and damp conditions, provoked ‘the most extensive investigation into the child protection system in British history’ as described by Batty (Macleod-Brudenell, 2004). The high media profiled incident exposed a clear lack of precision and communication between all professionals and agencies involved. This is shown by the fact that the mistreatment Victoria was suffering had gone unnoticed by the social services, police and NHS staff, who failed to make each other aware of the clear danger signs. Within the Lord Laming Inquiry into Victoria Climbie’s death (2003), it can be seen that some features recur time after time in child abuse cases; inadequate resources to meet demands, inexperience and lack of skill of individual social workers. In addition, it can also be seen that crucial procedures were evidently not being followed. The procedure that was established after this case included the recommendations made by Lord Laming such as the Green Paper of Every Child Matters (DfES, 2003) and the Children Act (DfES, 2004). These ensure that all children have the fundamental right to be protected from harm and abuse. In addition to this, it also certifies all adults who come into contact with children and families have a duty to safeguard and promote the welfare of children.
The article is about a four years old boy who was starved to death by his mother and was left in his cot for two years. She was found accountable for killing him and was given 12 years for killing him and three years for child cruelty, as shown in the (Pidd,2013) newspaper article.
This student conducted a pie assessment with client Paige Russell. During the initial assessment, the student looked at one particular ethical dilemma along with one particular diversity issue. The ethical dilemma that the student focused on was importance of human relationships, and the diversity issue included discrimination by age. The overall problem that the student assisted the client with was aging out of foster care.
When dealing with an ethical dilemma, social workers usually reference back to Reamers 7-step process to help with ethical decision-making. In the given case study, we meet Lori a bright fourteen-year-old who is smart, involved in school activities, and sports. She has had a non-normative impacted life since she was young, such as her mother dying of breast cancer and father dying as well. She has no immediate family and was lucky enough to be placed in a foster home with a family who loves her and wants the best for her.
The job of a child welfare worker appears to be a demanding profession that promotes the child’s safety, but also strengthens the family organization around them in order to successfully raise the children. This child welfare workers work in the system known as the Child Protective Services whose initiative is to protect the overall welfare of the child. The short novel From the Eye of the Storm: the Experiences of a Child Welfare Worker by Cynthia Crosson-Tower demonstrates the skills necessary to deal with the practice of social work along with both its challenges and its happy moments. The novel consists of some of the cases involving Tower’s actual career in social work. In reading the book, I was able to experience some of the actual cases in which children dealt with physical and mental abuse from their families that caused them to end up within the system. Also, some of these children had issues in adapting to foster and adoptive families based on the issues they faced earlier in life. As we have learned earlier in the course, the violence that a child experiences early in life has an overall affect on the person they become as they grow into adulthood. When children deal with adverse childhood experiences, they are at a higher risk for abusing drugs and/or alcohol, increased likelihood of abusing their own child or spouse, higher rates of violent and nonviolent criminal behavior, along with several other issues throughout their lifespan.
The family lives in a public housing subsidy tenement and received public assistance from the State. Her first child, who she called "Mongo", because she was born with a disease called Down syndrome lived with her grandmother, but on days the social worker would visit the grandmother would bring the child by to visit. Though the grandmother was very much aware of the abuse that was taking place in the home, she turned a blind eye. I personally think she was one of the contributor to the dysfunction, though it never show her hurt or abusing precious the fact that she pretend like everything was okay and would help the mother lie to the social worker, so she could continue to receive benefits from the state for her daughter and granddaughter show how e...
...sion, no matter what is done or said now Jeffrey is still lost. A poor five year old boy who did not deserve to die the way he did. The grandparents were charged and convicted of second degree murder and faces “22 and 20 year sentences, respectively” (The Canadian Press, 2014). The CCAS needs to step up their standards and screen everyone no matter the reason or cost. The CCAS failed to live up to their mandate and have now tarnished what it means to be an organization that helps children. All the people who could have stopped Jeffrey from dying should have come to police to tell them about the horrors occurring in Jeffrey’s home, should face consequences. Communities, government and most of all parents want to protect their children and with the new recommendations from the Coroner’s Jury, hopefully we will never hear of a case again, like that of Jeffrey Baldwin.
Precious’s case is unique and layered with many factors that affect her ability to grow into a healthy functioning adult. It is critical to make interventions that consider economic, cultural, psychological, biological and environmental factors that shape the client’s experiences. Providing a safe environment, and supporting Precious on making responsible decisions for the success of her future are my main objectives as her social worker.
The social work profession and its Code of Ethics dictate that social workers must act in the best interest of the client, even when those actions challenge the practitioner’s personal, cultural and religious values. In practice; however, ethical decision-making is more complex than in theory. As helping professionals, social workers are constantly faced with ethical decision-making or ethical dilemmas. As noted by Banks (2005), an ethical dilemma occurs “when a worker is faced with a choice between two equally unwelcome alternatives that may involve a conflict of moral principles, and it is not clear what choice will be the right one” (as cited in McAuliffe & Chenoweth, 2008, p. 43). In addition, ethical decision-making is a process that