Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Fascism in the 20th century in Italy
Influence of religion on politics and legislation in Italy
Henry the 8th and the catholic church
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Fascism in the 20th century in Italy
The deepest roots that comprise my ancestral background began in Europe, specifically in Ireland and Italy. When thinking of this background in relation to the course themes and ideas, I began to consider the notions of religion and independence as major topics of discussion. The Christian religion is a shared characteristic between Ireland and Italy, and one trait that is a serious subject regarding the creation, development, and current affairs of both nations. Religious persecution and dominance as a link to independence movements, rebellions, and revolutions alike is a common theme that has been discussed in this course and is the most radiating piece of subject matter that both of these countries possess. When most people think about …show more content…
Mentioning the 1500’s is important, however, because in the 1530’s, English rule under the authority of King Henry VIII attempted to convert the Irish people to Protestantism. There were many attempts of conversion, but most failed and Ireland remained mostly Catholic in nature. This period of religious change is referred to as the Reformation. In his work, Wallenfeldt states, “Henry VIII’s breach with Rome resulted in vast conversion attempts and rebellions ensued.” King Henry VIII broke ties with the Catholicism after Pope Clement VII denied the king’s request for an annulment. This act is a prime example of a leader abusing his power to further his own agenda. King Henry VIII fabricated his own religion to settle his personal needs, not caring how it would affect those who he ruled over. The people of Ireland wanted to practice their own faiths, majorly Catholicism, but Henry VIII’s new religion called Protestantism impeded them from doing …show more content…
An example that defies the previous statement is the authoritarian leadership of Benito Mussolini in Italy during World War I. Mussolini formed Italy into the first fascist country, which turned the nation into a nationalistic authoritarian state. One would assume that under these pretenses, there would be an attempt to unify the nation as a whole both culturally and spiritually. However, Mussolini was intelligent and understood the power of the Roman Catholic Church in Italy. He decided to work together with the Church in a simple deal that basically stated Mussolini would worry about the political aspects and the Church would worry about the spiritual aspects. Nonetheless, Mussolini knew that it would be difficult to get the Church to accept fascist policies, so he worked to make his creation benefit the faith. For example, Mussolini had his children baptized in Catholicism, closed down nightclubs, condemned contraception, and outlawed divorce throughout Italy so that he could relate the wills of Catholicism with the outcomes of fascism. There was one aspect of society that the two entities disagreed on, however. Both the Church and Mussolini wanted to control education. The Church wanted education under their power of control because they wanted Catholic teachings to be instituted into the school system of Italy. However, Mussolini needed authority
To begin with, it must be remembered that Catholic culture and Catholic faith, while mutually supportive and symbiotic, are not the same thing. Mr. Walker Percy, in his Lost in the Cosmos, explored the difference, and pointed out that, culturally, Catholics in Cleveland are much more Protestant than Presbyterians in say, Taos, New Orleans, or the South of France. Erik, Ritter von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, points out that the effects of this dichotomy upon politics, attributing the multi-party system in Catholic countries to the Catholic adherence to absolutes; he further ascribes the two-party system to the Protestant willingness to compromise. However this may be, it does point up a constant element in Catholic thought---the pursuit of the absolute.
Contrary to many commonly held notions about the first crusade, in his book, The First Crusade and the Idea of Crusading, Jonathan Riley-Smith sets out to explain how the idea of crusading thought evolved in the first crusade. In his book, Riley-Smith sets out five main arguments to show how these ideas of crusading evolved. Firstly, he argues that Pope Urban’s original message was conventional, secondly that a more positive reaction was drawn from the laity (due to the ideas surrounding Jerusalem), thirdly, that the original message of crusading had changed because of the horrible experiences of the first crusaders, fourth, that due to these experiences the crusaders developed their own concept of what a crusade was, and lastly, that these ideas were refined by (religious) writers and turned into an acceptable form of theology. Riley-Smith makes excellent points about the crusade; however, before one can delve directly into his argument, one must first understand the background surrounding the rise of the first crusade.
Kings often struggled with the Church over power and land, both trying desperately to obtain them, both committing atrocities to hold onto them. Time and time again, the Popes of the postclassical period went to great extremes to secure the Church’s position in the world. Both the Crusades and the Inquisition are examples of this. D...
The religious wars of the 16th Century caused intense strife throughout Europe, economic hardships, personal and emotional questioning of belief. Through the pain of many rose rays of hope from artists and intellectuals to help guide them through their uncertainty (455).
Pope Urban II naturally had a religious control over his people and when he gave his speech at the Council of Clermont in November 1905, he constantly referred to it as the will of God. His speech reminded them that the Crusades were their “concerns as well as God’s” . Throughout his speech, the Pope is constantly trying to align the need for men to fight with t...
Since this paper is my reflection, I will be honest by stating that I am nineteen years old, white, a male, and have been raised in a Catholic family just outside of Louisville, Kentucky. Now why is this important? This is important because the only viewpoint of the crusades that I have studied, prior to my experience with Maalouf, has been from the Christian point of view. Until now, I have yet to place myself in the shoes of those on the opposite end of the sword, shields, and Jihad. History is a touchy subject for me because I have come to learn there is always another side of the story to learn from. This fact leads to the first main thesis of Maalouf’s adventure.
Among some of the largest conflicts in the world stand the Crusades; a brutal conflict that lasted over 200 years and was debatably one of the largest armed religious conflicts in the history of humankind. Since this is so clearly an event of importance, historians have searched vigorously for the true answer as to why the crusades began. Ultimately, because of accusatory views on both the sides of the Christians and of the Muslims, the two groups grew in such hatred of each other that they began to act in deep discrimination of each other. Moreover, Christian motives seemed to be driven mostly by the capture of Jerusalem, the dark ages of Europe and the common-folks desperation for land, wealth, and a spot in heaven. What seems to be continually
God’s Battalions: The Case for the Crusades by Rodney Stark, will cause readers to question much of what they know about the Crusades, the Crusaders themselves, and the formidable Muslim forces they encountered along the way in liberation of the Holy Land. Stark gives compelling reasons for the Crusades, and argues that readers should not be too quick in following the lead of historians who cast the Crusaders in less than positive light. Stark makes his case supported by evidence that vindicates the valiant struggles of the Crusaders who accomplished the task of keeping Christianity alive through troubled times.
The discrepancies of beliefs between Natives’ and Europeans’ and ambitious evil purpose both contributed the conflict. For Europeans in 15th century, the Catholicism was a major belief, and for Natives
...ced by permission of." Renaissance and Reformation Reference Library. Ed. Julie L. Carnagie, Peggy Saari, and Aaron Saari. Vol. 1: Vol.1: Almanac. Detroit: UXL, 2002. World History in Context. Web. 30 Apr. 2014.
There is no doubt that Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini shared many similar characteristics. They shared movements that were typical of National Socialism: they adopted a radical nationalism, militaristic hierarchies, violence, the cult of charismatic leadership, contempt for individual liberties and civil rights, an anti-democratic and anti-socialist orientation, and a refusal to socialize industries.
In order for the crusades to begin, the Christians needed to gather an army to travel and fight the forces of Muslims. With all the power being held by monarchies at this time, the church needed to be cleaver in order to gain troops to put their lives on the line. To gain the support of these warriors and dedication of men, Pope Urban II (1088-1099) challenged those morals of men by telling them to grab their weapons and join the holy war to recover the land of Jerusalem. It was not the challenge that convinced men to take part in this war. The promise of “immediate remission of sins” attracted the men to stand up for their religion and beliefs while at the same time, promising them a trip to heaven when life comes to an end. With this statement, men instantly prepared for battle which in a very short period of time gave the church power which has been held by the monarchies. Men of rich and poor prepared for battle, some wearing ...
Mussolini’s Consolidation of Power Between 1922 and 25. “ It seems that Mussolini from the outset was determined to retain power in his hand; but he was uncertain of the method to be employed. towards the other political parties and their leaders, towards the press, and towards parliament” (F.L. Carsten, an academic historian and specialist on European history. Fascism, The Rise of Fascism (1967). In 1922 Mussolini had just been appointed Prime Minister after the fascist march on Rome.
the power of the Roman Catholic Church in Italy or to work with it. He
A lack of secular authority, or lack of separation of church and state, was beneficial to the Catholic Church in some ways. For example, it provided the Church with authority over leaders who followed the religion, as the pope was thought to be the communicator of God and therefore his word was absolute and infallible even above those who ruled over nations. For instance, Canon 6 of the Council of Trent states that anyone who does not acknowledge the Catholic Church as a divine hierarchy shall be excommunicated. The message of this was directed to everyone, including the rulers of nations, displaying the absolute and official position that the Catholic Church established for itself. Ignatius Loyola, a Spanish priest, stated, that Catholics should obey the “hierarchical Church” despite any private judgement, meaning that the Church is a to be obeyed as a type of divine government. Again, the intended audience was all Christians, and therefore leaders of nations. However, the religious involvement in politics was not unique to the Catholic Church. For example, John Calvin, who himself founded a protestant religion, declared to the villages around Geneva that those who do religiously disgraceful acts such as blaspheme, contradict the word of God, or perform evil acts shall be punished by political means such