Isaac Evans
Dr. Harless
British Literature
7 April 2014
An Explication of Religio Medici
Although members of a religion may title themselves with the name of a faith, each member has their own opinions, interpretation, and application of the teachings of their embraced religion. In Religio Medici, Sir Thomas Browne illustrates how he interprets the Christian religion and also how he applies the teachings of Christianity to his sense of reason. His writing is a reflection of his inner most mental convictions. His writing also illustrates how he combines his own ideas and world-view with the dogmatic precepts he has learned form his Christian faith. In paragraph one Browne states that in regard to his own religion some people might think he has no religion whatsoever. However, Browne then writes that he is of the honorable style of a Christian. Browne writes with the intention to prove to his readers that he is a Christian and also to stop people from labeling him as an atheist.
Perhaps Browne is aware that some people believe that even though a person can be bred by their parents as Christian, the child-turned-adult may reject the teachings he or she was taught to believe as a child. Browne works in his writing to prove to his readers that he is not a person who has rejected the faith of his upbringing. He states, “Having in my riper years and confirmed judgment seen and examined all, I find myself obliged by the principles of grace and the law of mine own reason to embrace no other name but this [: Christian]” (Greenblatt 1697).
The framing of Browne’s writing is built and written with such a sequence that enlightens the reader with understanding about what type of Christian best defines Browne’s inner most thoughts. F...
... middle of paper ...
...s a coat of armor in order to be seen as undeniably Christian by his observers.
Religio Medici was written by Browne to serve as a creative tool that provokes thoughts of allegation – that Browne is not Christian – from the minds of his readers. He cleverly answers each thought of allegation with examples about why he is not a heretic by using his own brain to answer certain questions left unanswered by constitutions of the Church.
In conclusion, Browne exemplifies how it is possible for a person to paradoxically attach to the dogmas of a religion and also to the dictates of the human brain. Browne teaches us that it is acceptable to be double-minded individuals in regards to religious faith. It is possible to believe in double-faced philosophical truths and also to hold firm to the divine road that religion paves for its followers to walk (Greenblatt 1700).
...traight from the tavern world – survival is more important to him, unlike those of the court world who live by honour, and care not if it leads to their death, but only that they one day may come to be ‘honourable’, whether dead or alive. He closes with the comment that what he has told us is his ‘catechism’. This suggests an idea that his religion is to avoid honour, and ever to question its value.
Upon close examination of the story “Young Goodman Brown” one might notice that Goodman Brown had stored his faith in three places; in his neighbors, in his wife, and in his personal experiences. The placement of Goodman Brown’s faith with his neighbors is the first...
He would still be looked down upon, even by the children, no matter how close they stood during prayer, and no kid would choose that over a little white lie, just to fit
In this short reflection paper I will be comparing the movie, “The Brook Ellison Story” and the book, “The Book of Job.” Both of these magnificent stories are highly respected by the public and they both give wonderful example of M.R. DeHann book, The Broken thing: Why we suffer. Some of the things that will be disgusting in this paper is a summary of both of these wonderful stories, how four out of the seven main questions for my search for meaning class best relates to both of these stories, which three out of ten “Key Principles of Catholic Social Teachings” closely relate to the two stories, and how both of these stories answer the question, “Does God Exist?” which is a popular fundamental question that was asked frequently in Agbonkhianmeghe Orobator book, Theology: Brewed in an African Pot.
Theological objections, treated at length in the current volume, cut to the heart of the
...stressing is Meynell's apparently blithe ignorance of the best recent constructive work by Christian philosophers on topics of central concern to him. In addition to those I mentioned in the first paragraph of this review, Meynell should take some account of the work of such as Robert Adams, Bill Wainwright, and Bill Alston. Engaging and using their work would have supported and improved his.
In today’s society, there are two topics of conversation that most people shy away from discussing in order to avoid the endless debates and pointless agreements these topics can evoke with a mere mention of them; debates which educate no one on a different point of view but only cause people to fight with relentless passion to defend their own view. These two hot button topics are religion and politics. Even though the touchy nature of these topics is widely known, Thomas Mardik decided to disregard this notion and discuss his religious beliefs in the semi public manner by making them the topic of his “This I Believe” essay. The main belief he discussed was a basic one and is fairly common; millions of others all over the world hold this same belief to be true. This belief is the belief in God. The purpose of his paper was to inform his audience of his belief and to explain aspects of his belief, events that have strengthened his belief, and ways his belief is part of his life. Thomas’s essay is a semi success mostly due the ways he tries to appeal to his audience in the three different areas. These three areas of appeal are logos, ethos, and pathos. Today I will be analysis how Thomas used logos ethos and pathos in his essay.
In this analysis, we will be looking at just how Flannery O'Connor accomplished this seemingly impossible task, non-didactic Christian fiction, by examining elements of faith, elements of style, and thematic elements in her writing. While secondary sources are included for perspective, I have focused primarily upon Miss O'Connor's own essays and speeches in my examination of the writer's motivations, attitudes, and technique, most of which are contained in the posthumous collection Mystery and Manners. Unlike some more cryptic writers, O'Connor was happy to discuss the conceptual and philosophical underpinnings of her stories, and this candor is a godsend for the researcher that seeks to know what "makes the writer tick."
Religion and morality exist together in parallel according to Alan Keyes. Alan Dershowitz stated that if religion and morality are not separated, it could have negative discourse. James Fowler followed Piaget, Kohlberg, and Erickson when selecting the stages to his development of faith across the life span. These three men all selected different ways to look at religio...
C. Stephen Evans is stating there is a problem with the philosophy of religion having a neutral stance. Evans rejects both fideism as well as neutralism, and believes that by trying to have a, “neutral, disinterested posture,” a person could, “cut themselves off from the possibility of even understanding what religion is all about,” (Evans, 1985 p. 115). Evans notes that the view of faith and reason, by some religious believers think it is an impossibility to have “rational reflection” on religion. After his arguments that disprove many ideas in both fideism and neutralism, he proposes an alternative solution which he has named, “critical dialog”, that he hopes will, “preserve the strengths and eliminate the weaknesses of the initial theories,” (p. 115). “Correct thinking about religion is rather a genuine faith, a personal commitment,” (p. 116).
Because of their Puritanical beliefs, it is no surprise that the major theme that runs throughout Mary Rowlandson and Jonathan Edwards’s writings is religion. This aspect of religion is apparent in not only the constant mentions about God himself, but also in the heavy use of biblical scriptures. In their respective writings, Rowlandson and Edwards utilize scripture, but for different purposes; one uses it to convey that good and bad events happen solely because of God’s will, and the other uses it, in one instance, to illustrate how it brought him closer to God, and, in another instance, to justify his harsh claims about God’s powerful wrath.
When Brown sets out on his journey, Faith confesses her fears to Brown as she attempts to convince Brown to stay home. She explains, “A lone woman is troubled with such dreams and such thoughts, that she’s afeard of herself” (133). The prospect of an evening of isolation causes Faith to be anxious; the loss of her husband’s companionship deprives her of a predictable world, but her discomfort is of no concern to Brown. Instead, reassuring his wife from the doctrine of his theology, Brown tells her to “say thy...
...s distributed in Theology 101 at the University of Notre Dame, Fremantle on 22 April 2008.
Kerr, H. (1990). Readings in christian thought (2nd ed.). H. T. Kerr (Ed.). Nashville: Abingdon Press.
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR THE PSYCHOLOGY OF RELIGION. (2009). Journal of Psychology and Theology, 37(1), 72. Retrieved April 21, 2009, from ProQuest Religion database. (Document ID: 1675034711).