Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reincarnation is real essay
Arguments for reincarnation in Hinduism
Reincarnation is real essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reincarnation is real essay
Reincarnation
Reincarnation is the belief that after death, one's soul keeps existing and
is reborn another person or animal. It keeps reborning until it redeems itself.
Then it returns to the temple of god, which the Buddhists call "Nirvana" -
eternal tranquillity. Two of the many ancient tribes who believed in
reincarnation are the Greeks and the Egyptians.
Karma, the belief that our actions determine our future, is one of the
foundations of reincarnation. For example, a person who lived a sinful life will
return, after death, as an animal, as opposed to a person who lived an honest
life, who will return as a person.
Despite the resistance of many Jewish leaders, reincarnation also played a
role in Judaism due to the Kabala who developed this idea. Some Jewish
philosophers even believed that a soul of a sinner can enter a live man's body
and "posses" him. Special rituals were used in order to "cure" the man.
T. Gomertz, a famous philosopher, thought of three very good reasons why one
should believe in reincarnation:
1. It is believed that dreams are attempts of the soul to live the body. If this
is true, than the soul can leave the body and it does so when a person dies.
This also means that a soul can exist without a body.
2. If we assume that the soul dies with the body it is connected to, than we
will have to assume there is an endless number of souls which is improbable.
3. Matter is enduring and, therefore, so is the soul. If the soul exists after
death, hens it had existed before birth.
Gomertz believes the origin of this belief is in India, where it was
believed that every action had a hidden reaction, other than the obvious one.
This reaction is obscure at first and is only later revealed, sometimes even in
the next life.
Reincarnation in Different Cultures and Religions
Judaism: In this religion, it was believed that a sinners soul can posses a
living man. This is called an Obsession but it's actually very similar to
reincarnation.
This belief only exists in Judaism. It appears repeatedly in "The Glow"
which is a book written in the 16th century. This book claims that every soul
has its purpose / mission. If this mission isn't completed, the soul returns to
earth and possesses someone. It stays in this state until it either completes
its mission or is banished by special rituals which are performed by the Rabby.
This belief was most popular in the 16th century. At that period, in some
parts, every illness was considered an obsession.
One’s soul could be liberated from one’s body without death through this secret knowledge. (454)
Socrates a classical Greek philosopher and character of Plato’s book Phaedo, defines a philosopher as one who has the greatest desire of acquiring knowledge and does not fear death or the separation of the body from the soul but should welcome it. Even in his last days Socrates was in pursuit of knowledge, he presents theories to strengthen his argument that the soul is immortal. His attempts to argue his point can’t necessarily be considered as convincing evidence to support the existence of an immortal soul.
And if it goes to death from life and life from death it must exist after death in order to be reborn. Therefore, the philosopher should not fear death, with the idea he shall be born again because the soul is immortal, only changing between life and
Life and death are opposites of P5. The soul will never admit death. That which does not admit death is immortal P7. The soul brings along the immortal P8. The immortal is an indestructible P9.
The argument begins by making a distinction between corruptibility and incorruptibility. This distinction made is that because the body is corruptible, and the soul is viewed as a substance that is incorruptible, an explanation is needed as to how the soul can continue
...erstand the nature of the soul are, as Epicurus says "incomparably stronger than other men" (Letter to Herodotus 83), since they will be able to understand and set aside their fears and worries about themselves after death.
Since the body is a physical object, subject to physical laws, it follows that at least the connection between the two (body and soul) must obey the laws of physics.
The first theme of the relationship of the body and soul as separate was almost universally accepted by every one except the Atheist. The Atheist representative neither agreed nor disagreed, simply stating that there is no proof either way. However, the idea that there is a distinctive difference between the soul and the body even if very much related was a common theme among all the other religions represented. This manifested itself in different ways, however, as some participants claimed that it is because of this connection that any physical harm to the body will have direct effects on the soul, while others claimed that this relationship is void after death with the soul moving on to another place. For example, the male Christian representative explained that because the soul moves to heaven or hell after death, it does not matter what is done to the body. This aligns with the Christian belief that the soul is separate from the body and a direct link to God. In contrast, the Hindu and Buddhist belief that the soul is connected to the body until after a proper crematory service means that whole body donation would negatively affect the soul in its journey to Enlightenment or the next life. The participants stated that this view is not agreed upon among all Hindus, but it is a major factor for why more Hindus do not donate. These results align with the proposed ideas of the soul as a distinct entity, separ...
For it is not a body, but something which belongs to a body, and for this reason exists in a body, and in a body of such-and-such a kind (414a20ff)”. However, we can be mislead when we speak of “souls” and “bodies” because it can appear as though the soul and body could exist independently, as shown with Plato and Descartes’ work. Despite this factor, Aristotle’s theory rejects the potentiality of the soul as the form of a living organism; for Aristotle, a living thing is primary substance, it is not a union of the primary substance of soul and body. Aristotle also denies the existence of Plato’s realms, and appeals to our senses, claiming it is through the senses that we are able to experience reality. The man problem with this claim is that we cannot offer any evidence to suggest that our senses are completely
Even if one could say something definite about the soul, speculation on its nature would still be useless because in ...
This essay has stated reasons and evidence supported greatly by the materialists proving that the existence of the soul ceases to be. The arguments provided by the dualists and the philosophers suggested statements that were not strong enough to confirm a valid theory in order to prove the existence of the soul and without a doubt, the theories conducted refrained from being convincing. Any such form of the afterlife does not prove to be of much logic as it cannot be proven completely, thus, there is no such immaterial essence that pre-existed or that will exist after death. The existence of the soul has not been established by any sort of physical evidence either. In contrast, to prove that there is no such sort of the afterlife, the Occam’s Razor is said to be the best weapon to eliminating a concept formed like the ‘soul’. It has come about confirmed that the Occam’s Razor is the simplest argument opposing the existence of an immaterial being. Additionally, the dualists theories are said to have created an added complication which is another reason that was stated in the arguments opposing the existence. There is no need to develop a complicated hypothesis. As a final point, there is no afterlife, there is no soul and there is no form of an immaterial
So, the soul’s immortality isn’t being questioned anymore but the process of the opposites taking place is. If they are opposites then there is a process with which they work together and come to be from each other. So where is the soul when the living is born and where do the souls go once the body is dead. There are too many unknowns in my opinion to show how they are true opposites.
To Plato, the soul is a self mover that is not restricted to mortality. He also states that without the soul, the body would not be able to move; the soul is the provider of energy for movement in the body. Since the soul is a self mover, it is inherently a source of energy and life that depends on nothing else to exist; therefore, the soul is immortal.
All three arguments propose an intriguing account for Socrates’ claim that the soul exists past death. Plato’s three arguments for the proving of the immortality and longevity of a soul provide clear and concise reasons to agree with his approach. It seems that any counterargument can be debated using at least one of the three arguments, simply begging the question.
Within this rebirth, humans are capable of achieving “higher” forms of life, such as demigods or even superhuman beings (Molloy, 2010). As rebirth can move in either direction, the human stage of life considered a dangerous