Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of civil liberties
The importance of civil liberties
The importance of civil liberties
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of civil liberties
I have not taken a civics, government, or social studies class since I was in High School, back in 1992-1996. I can honestly tell you that I was not interested in those types of classes, even though I did well in them! This class, however, was different. I am not sure if it was because I am older or if the book and other martials were more effective, but I feel that I have learned a great deal about our government from this course.
I have learned a lot about how our government works, but most importantly why the government was set up the way it is. I enjoyed the textbook, Keeping the Republic, by Christine Barbour. My co-workers and I would go through the book just to look at all of the graphs, Snapshot of America and the Big Picture parts in the book. We all found it fascinating! By having them sprinkled throughout the book, it gave a nice visual to help understand the data and broaden our understanding of how the government works.
…show more content…
I liked that the discussions were more of a “discussion” and not just another assignment. I felt that they were more opinionated and I really enjoyed that. I liked reading what everybody else’s opinions were and how they felt about certain issues. I felt that was not alone in how I feel about how the government is being run or just about the government in general. With the weekly quiz assignments, I appreciated how quickly you got back to me and all the additional information you gave. I felt that you took the time and effort to read and then to respond, not just pass a grade. Truth be told, it was actually
Candice Millard’s Destiny of the Republic is a historical novel that explains who James Garfield was, how he became the United States’ 20th president, as well as his assassination. Millard explains how James Garfield started out as a child in a poverty-stricken family who overcame poverty to later become President of the United States. In this novel, Millard shows the kind of people person James Garfield was in comparison with the type of person his assassin Charles Guiteau was. Destiny of the Republic takes a personal look at whom the United States’ 20th president was, his family, his assassin, and the medical care he received after he was shot. Candice Millard brings up many good arguable points and essential thesis elements in this historical novel. Perhaps the most important thesis elements in Destiny of the Republic include the character of James Garfield, the level of security deemed unnecessary at that time in history for the president of the United States, and the errors made by doctors following the shooting. As an author, Candice Millard developed her thesis elements well and in an intriguing way throughout the book, which can be difficult for writers to do who also strive for historical accuracy. For some readers, the characters in Destiny of the Republic might appear to be
Edmund Sears Morgan, the author of, The Birth of the Republic, was a Sterling Professor of History at Yale University. Morgan's studies focused on American colonial history and English history. He wrote many books examining the colonial period and the period of Revolution, an example of which is The Birth of the Republic. He is also known for writing a best-selling biography of Benjamin Franklin.1
The Radical and the Republican by James Oakes is an enlightening book about Fredrick Douglass and Abraham Lincoln, their different approaches, and united goal. Oakes reveals how dissimilar Douglass and Lincoln were in their views and actions, but the author also tells how both of these men influenced each other and evolved into radical Republicans in order to accomplish the abolition of slavery. Oaks clearly and soundly argues that both Lincoln became more radical and Douglass became more political in order to accomplish the complete abolition of slavery. The transformation in their way of thinking, conduct, and actions clearly show how Lincoln and Douglass became radical Republicans in the end.
Another point was Thomas Paine the author. It covers in great detail what kind of person he was and covered information from his parents and his childhood, all the way to his death. I think Slaughter painted that graphic picture of him which allowed us to get to know Thomas Paine. I think that it sheds a whole new light on what he did and just how much we owe him for our freedom. I know the book really helped me see that because prior to this class, I was not aware of the magnitude Common Sense and The American Crisis had on the people of America back then.
Australia is a monarchy of the United Kingdom. It always has been, and yet this does not seem to have significantly and adversely affected our development and growth towards our country. Thus, there seems no legitimate purpose to change this; since a republican Australia displays a lack of conclusive benefits towards our economy and ‘way of life.’ An Australian republic would cost billions to undertake and is simply unnecessary as there are more important issues facing Australia; and if the Australian citizens are not calling for a referendum, then any serious discussions from politicians or other related public figures are irrelevant and meaningless.
Socrates was a renowned philosopher in the ancient Grecian times. His peak was around the Peloponnesian War, when the Spartans defeated the Athenians and ended the Golden Age. The reason Socrates is one of histories most famous philosophers is largely due to Plato's writings. Two of Plato's famous works include The Apology and The Republic, both written about Socrates' views about the so called "wise philosophers" of his time. The two works hold unique views about government, as well as opening the eyes of the Grecian people to the world as they knew it.
The hallmarks of freedom can stay a part of our democracy if the state governments don’t pass any laws that fully take away or excessively restrict rights granted by the Bill of Rights and if the people find alternative ways to exercise their rights without breaking any laws established by the federal government, specifically the Supreme Court and Congress. In “We the People: An Introduction to American Government” by Thomas Patterson, it is stated that “…individuals do not have the right to hold a public rally at a busy intersection… or the right to turn up the volume on loudspeakers …where they can be heard miles away.” (p.102). This law only takes away one specific situation where people can protest, but the people can still find other ways
The subject matter of the “Republic” is the nature of justice and its relation to human existence. Book I of the “republic” contains a critical examination of the nature and virtue of justice. Socrates engages in a dialectic with Thrasymachus, Polemarchus, and Cephalus, a method which leads to the asking and answering of questions which directs to a logical refutation and thus leading to a convincing argument of the true nature of justice. And that is the main function of Book I, to clear the ground of mistaken or inadequate accounts of justice in order to make room for the new theory. Socrates attempts to show that certain beliefs and attitudes of justice and its nature are inadequate or inconsistent, and present a way in which those views about justice are to be overcome.
According to the article “A Review of Healing the Heart of Democracy: The Courage to Create a Politics Worthy of the Human Spirit” written by Brace L. Mallory, Parker J. Palmer's teachings and writings are the primary understanding of the connection between education and knowledge, heart and mind, and individual and expert. He describes Palmer as the same one who invokes the spirit, words, and challenges of political leaders. Also, Mallory discusses Palmer’s book titled “Healing the Heart of Democracy” that it is an important document that shows the tensions among and capacities created by the private domain, political systems, and the public platform. Besides, Mallory talks about Palmer’s concern about the general passive pedagogies found
I had thought that we could have been more specific on many of them, although our justifications were very well written. We did not accomplish exactly what we wanted for the military and boundaries one, but they did have offers that supported our reasons and justifications. As for our money resolution, much of it was accomplished, and we had added a few other points to it, too. I thought our team had done very well on achieving peace for the nations, but we could have tried to achieve fewer arguments by being specific with our thoughts and being more open to new ideas proposed by other countries. Our team had collaborated together very well and were somewhat efficient compared to the other groups I have worked with. Although, because I had written the money resolution, the introduction, and had helped my teammates write, I had thought that I did much more than my
Our Founding fathers hoped for a dream where any man could come to this country and
Between political philosophy and ideology, comparative politics, and public policy, I can say that I feel I have the most basic understanding of politics. The title The Challenge of Politics: An Introduction to Political Science, says it all; politics is a challenge to fully grasp, but this text and this class has given me a solid foundation of knowledge from with I can base my future decisions on. No matter my future career path, this class taught me valuable information. Just in general it is important as a citizen to understand how our government works. In addition, it helped me form a well-educated idea on what type of government I want to elect into power. Furthermore, the text was full of basic political science material; thus, giving me a good overview of the things I will continue to learn in political science classes. The text was well written with great additional graphs, pictures, and resources between the covers. Although there were a few things that could be improved upon, I think that this text is worth using for the future classes of POLS
We live in a republic governed not just by majority rule but also by law. We use law in our country to limit the power of majority rule. The basic reason that we do this is because society can be flawed. This "flaw" can come from a variety of areas, but the one that I would like to focus on is sexism. In criminal law the courts are blind to the ideas that people are different. Every person is given the same privileges and limitations as the next person regardless of sex or race. We do not live in a system were there is a set of rules for men and a different set of rules for women. The application of these laws can be flawed however, because the means in which law is applied is done through human eyes. In theory law should protect every person in the same way, but the application of our laws falls short of this ideal.
The feedback that I was provided by Cayla helped me tremendously because previously I lacked confidence in my writing because I had no clue if anyone else shared the same view as I. She expressed that she has similar views and told me to further extend my ideas. Admittedly I was afraid of being judged for having this sort of view but she helped me realize that I am not alone in believing this, and most importantly to not limit my writing based off of my fear of being judged by my peers. If I were to grade this assignment, I would give myself a middle B because I feel that I improved tremendously in terms of concreting my values across to the reader. By writing this paper, I seriously feel like i'm more knowledgeable about some of my values
First and foremost, this course is one of the best courses I have taken here at Wilmington University. I have learned about 80% from this course, compare to what I knew before. This course has incredibly added to my knowledge about public policy in the United States. I have learned the importance of publicly policy in America and the intricacies of who and what influence public policies in America.