Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Differences and similarities in quantitative and qualitative approaches to research
Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative and quantitative research methods
Compare and contrast quantitative and qualitative research methods
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
On reflection of my first term in Doctoral studies with the University of La Verne, I must revisit earlier thoughts on my prospective role as a scholarly practitioner. My definition of the term has not changed significantly. I still feel that scholarly practitioners should bridge the gap between academia and the real world. Their goal is to apply academic research to practical application for the purpose of solving pressing problems in their chosen field. This requires them to constantly evolve in their careers as they continue to gain knowledge and share their ideas with others in various formats. Personal values, commitment, and ethical conduct combined with theory and research allows the scholarly practitioner to recognizing problems and …show more content…
In the PADM 609 course we discussed several research methods in the categories of qualitative and quantitative information. Quantitative research focuses on information based on methods such as a review of longitudinal data, multivariate tests, statistics, and “hard” data. While I recognize the significance and importance of this data, my preferred research method lies in the qualitative category. Qualitative research tends to focus on the historical review and the in-depth study of cases involving people, groups, or organizations. Historical research focuses on the review of data related to past occurrences in order to test hypotheses concerning causes, effects, or trends of these events that may help to explain present events & anticipate future events. In my opinion, case studies allow us to better examine the personal side of a situation that can be easily overlooked when reviewing numbers and hard data. Data for case studies tends to take the form of notes, memos, interviews, video or audio recordings, or other personal documents that when prepared and organized tell a story. By summarizing the data, we are able present the case in narrative form. Charts, tables, and figures are often used to support the narrative, but I feel it is more helpful to the audience to explain the findings. Ultimately, I feel case studies and historical reviews are research initiatives that better integrate a scholarly practitioner
One being that the Scholar-Practitioner is located at the end of the continuum. This displays that the Scholar-Practitioner is the ideal level. McClintock states “Scholar Practitioners are committed to the well-being of clients and colleagues, to learning new ways of being effective, and to conceptualizing their work in relation to broader organizational, community, political, and cultural contexts.” From McClintock’s model, the Scholar-Practitioner is described as a scholar who has an intimate understanding of their specialty and are able to apply their knowledge in several ways. Capella’s Learning Model also differentiates the Scholar-Practitioner and describing them in that same fashion. The Capella’s Learning Model provides in depth examples of a Doctoral-Level (Scholar-Practitioner) assignment. In the assignment, terms such as extract and evaluate, demonstrate the higher level thinking required as a Scholar-Practitioner. Bloom’s Taxonomy also identifies terms such as evaluate and create as higher thinking processes. An expert, the Scholar-Practitioner, is able to put together information in innovative ways and think outside of the box, versus recalling information. Both the Capella Learning Model and McClintock’s Scholar-Practitioner Model support the idea of the Scholar-Practitioner being a researcher who is highly skilled and able to apply their knowledge in unique
Example, I am a practitioner-scholar at Capella University acquiring the required knowledge and skills that are essential for the field of clinical psychology specialization in forensic psychology. Whereas, the scholar-practitioners are experiential scholars who are aspiring toward or already hold a doctoral degree, the scholar-practitioner connects academia and experience amalgamating both research and theory McClintock
Case study uses information obtained from one person or a few people to illuminate the behaviors of others and suggest further research. Sigmund Freud popularized case study along with his psychonalytic theory of personality. A major advantage of the case study is that focussed on one person allows researchers to gather a great deal of detailed information. The goal of a case study is to use the information gathered from one person to understand the behaviors of others. “The case study is often used by used by psychologist in order to research into aspects of the human psyche.” (Keirs, 2009) Psychologist use experiments, interviews, questionnaires, observations, diaries, and psychometric tests are used within a case study. There are two basic types of case study; retrospective and longitudinal. In retrospective, your information comes from the history of the person you are studying. If it were a person who was being studied, you would have been to interview the person about their childhood and their family, as a result developed a report of their life and early life. In contrast longitudinal, investigates the future. They research consequences of a certain situation that has happened. The key feature in the case study method is subject matter. The subject matter is usually a person or an animal. Much like experimental case study, it often uses variables. As with any other method, it has its advantages and disadvantages. The advantage of case study is the ecological validity of it. The information that is used in these studies is from real life environment. The information is good information because the research is so in depth. The research if often very useful. There are also disadvantages and potential disadvantages. One main disadvantage is case studies usually relate to one individual, and what applies to you may not apply to me. Replication would not be easy with case study because of the unique situations.
The type of data collection for a qualitative research study depends on the research design. The qualitative design itself originates out of the disciplines and flow throughout the process of research (Creswell, 2014). Creswell (2014) recommends narrative, phenomenology, ethnography, case study, and grounded theory as common qualitative research methods. These were recommended because of they are popular across the social and health and science research studies. Hays and Woods (2011) asserted that selecting a research tradition congruent with one's research orientation and study purpose, and at the same time, infusing it in all phases of qualitative inquiry, is one of the key criterions for trustworthiness of the research results. Hays and Woods (2011) recommends six qualitative research traditions, including ground theory, phenomenology, consensual qualitative research, ethnography, narratology, and participative action research. Indeed, while there are additional qualitative research methods available, scholars have identified these six qualitative traditions consistently or identified them as emerging and common methods of qualitative research (Hays & Woods, 2011).
Qualitative research relies on subjective data to provide a deep understanding of the meaning of an event from the point of view of certain individuals (Lobiondo-Wood & Haber, 2014). In contrast, quantitative research uses an objective approach (Lobiondo-Wood
Lastly, it was a great opportunity to conduct interviews with Dr. Githens and Mr. Collins. I could reaffirm the motivations and the reasons why I want to pursue a doctoral degree. Having the suggestions from the two great scholars, I have more confidence that I can concentrate on the important components of what it takes to be a successful scholar. The way to be a scholar is a long road, time-consuming, and particularly difficult work expected of pursing the doctoral degree; however, it will allow me to see the impact and growth on an individual’s development. I look forward to continuing on the next level of my education in human resource development. I believe that the way to be a professional scholar is a never-ending road, and the most important thing is to keep learning, thinking and being critical with a passion.
No matter what the topic is, which whether it’s a practical or very unusual, a case study can supply very descriptive, qualitative information. With using this method and collecting all this information, one becomes very knowledgeable of the subject, which makes it easier for the researcher to connect with their work. By the connection made between the subject and researcher, the researcher will then have a different in-depth perception of the case. Finally, while this method has its disadvantages, the case study method proves to present a unique platform for a variety of studies that create remarkable insights into areas of analysis versus all the other research
According to Smith (1983) quantitative research is to explain, predict and develop laws that can be universally applied and Qualitative research is the interpretation and understanding of what people give to their situation. The researchers clearly stated the purpose of their studies, aim, objectiv...
First we need to recognize the scholar's resources: nature, classification, and the presents of spirit. Second, we need to examine the duties associated with being a scholar: trust, honor, and the ability to dedicate ourselves to the institution in which we belong. Third, we need to go beyond our old ways of thinking we need to create a unique culture and traditions distinctive to this new Country.
Some researchers exclusively use quantitative (one) or qualitative (the other) research approaches citing that there are differences in the two styles. Professing quantitatively an objective truth and a single reality or promoting qualitatively a subjective truth and multiple realities (Castellan, 2010). It is also possible, and maybe even desirable to use both qualitative and quantitative methods combined, but if doing so, the researcher needs to be warned that it is very difficult to maintain the integrity of each approach when completing a comprehensive qualitative study while conducting a sophisticated quantitative study (Castellan, 2010). In comparing two assigned research studies, we
This essay is going to critically discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using surveys and questionnaires as a method of Socio-Legal research. When conducting socio-legal research, a number of methods can be used to collect useful information.
Stejskal, S.M. (2010) Quatiative and Qualitative Research Methods are not and should not be Mutually Exclusive, Grinn Verlag.
Qualitative and Quantitative study designs both can be beneficial in research design. They both provide valuable options for researchers in the field. These techniques can either be used separately in a research study or they can be combined to achieve maximum information. This paper will define the terms qualitative and quantitative; describe the similarities and differences between each; discuss how qualitative and/or quantitative research designs or techniques could be used in the evaluation of my proposed research; and discuss why linking analysis to study design is important.
Quantitative methods in the social sciences are an effective tool for understanding patterns and variation in social data. They are the systematic, numeric collection and objective analysis of data that can be generalized to a larger population and seek to find cause in variance (Matthews and Ross 2010, p.141; Henn et al. 2009, p.134). These methods are often debated, but quantitative measurement is important to the social sciences because of the numeric evidence that can be used to drive more in depth qualitative research and to focus regional policy, to name a few (Johnston et al. 2014). Basic quantitative methods, such as descriptive and inferential statistics, are used regularly to identify and explain large social trends that can then
...chniques and procedures among those associated with quantitative or qualitative research. A literature review, which included document analysis, was used to answer sub-questions one, two and three. A model building approach was suggested to answer sub-question four. In addition, the study uses a case study as a proof-of-concept. The use of a case study is a qualitative empirical study to strengthen the research validity. Since the research methods directly responding to the research questions (Literature review and Model building) make use of textual data, we classified this study as a qualitative study. Table 3.1 below summarises the classification of this study in terms of the dimensions discussed above.