The working class was the clear target of the white supremacy propaganda. Because the Democrats targeted this group with precision, it means that the support of the working class was necessary for white supremacy to succeed in 1898. While Democrats tried to reach out to whites in all classes, such as elite business leaders in cities like Charlotte, Simmons needed the working class men due to the sheer amount of them. He needed these poorer and easily influenced whites in his corner to carry out the most critical component of white supremacy’s success, intimidation of blacks. To execute intimidation, the Democratic Party needed a strong foundation in every part of the state, meaning most counties had to become organized and active in the 1898 …show more content…
campaign. This statewide movement of the Democrats broke down into several smaller groups to ensure they won the election.
Late in the 1870s Wade Hampton and Ben Tillman completed a violent election cycle in South Carolina that North Carolina Democrats used to as a foundation for their 1898 campaign. The Red Shirts were the most violent group of the Democratic Party and were active almost every day of the last two months of the campaign. The Red Shirts had origins in South Carolina elections in the 1870s, led by Wade Hampton and Ben Tillman. They were violent supporters of white supremacist politics, but had no official presence in North Carolina prior to 1898. The Red Shirts represent the most extreme version of those who participated in the 1898 but they attracted many supporters, indicating the eagerness of whites to unleash violence in various black communities. There were thousands more who were either participating in the renewed mobilization of the Democratic Party or at least sympathetic to it who would ultimately be acting against their own economic and social …show more content…
self-interest. Tillman himself led one of the biggest Red Shirt rallies in North Carolina sometime in October of 1898, to much success. In fact, H. Leon Prather practically credits Tillman with the origin of the North Carolina Red Shirts, which is a bit of a disservice to the economic and social tension that had been building for years. Tillman did not come into North Carolina until about six weeks before the election nor did he usher in with him the soon to be perpetrators of the violence that would strike Wilmington. He simply was one of the most popular voices in the south that offered further legitimacy to the Democrats. Tillman was playing on the frustration that was within the state and there were few men who could rally the masses and motivate with anger like Tillman. Waddell was one of them and future governor Aycock another. Both traveled the state and their oration of white supremacy in North Carolina was unmatched, hitting a base of support that consisted of white laborers and Confederate veterans, knowing they needed broad backing across the state. They were the men would could speak, tasked with rallying and energizing the many disillusioned working class men in North Carolina and the huge sizes of these rallies was at times astonishing. In order to win over working class whites, the Democratic leaders needed to make black success a bad thing.
Democrats made their supporters believe that black progress was the reason for their own economic and social decline that so many had felt over the previous decade or so. Certainly, it was perplexing for farmers and other white laborers to witness black success while their fortunes were continually on the downturn, but leaders like Simmons, Waddell, and prominent newspaper editor Josephus Daniels used this frustration to prey upon whites and used it to their advantage to make political gains. The Raleigh News and Observer, owned and operated by Daniels, strongly supported the Democrats and white supremacy. Throughout the 1890s, Daniels’ paper forcefully established a place for white middle class and businessmen in North Carolina to find a reason for their struggles. The city of Wilmington and the state were still mostly run by whites, yet Democrats wanted to shift blame for any shortcomings on blacks. It is in these editorials that many readers could see their angers articulated. For whites who felt they were not getting a fair deal economically, Daniels’ words let them know that at the very least, they were still members of the superior race and not beholden to some seemingly corrupt Republican party. In September of 1898, the paper editorialized its belief that the Negro was “a good servant, but an awful master,” and described Eastern North Carolina, which was at
the time ruled by Republicans, to be in “appalling condition.” Middle class and poor whites could not fathom a society where they were on an equal playing field with blacks, even ones that they already shared a socioeconomic sphere with. Seeing nowhere else to turn, many whites found themselves swept up in the Simmons and Democratic Party’s propaganda push. In his infamous editorial, Alexander Manly suggested that “the morals of the poor white people are on par with their colored neighbors.” Josephus Daniels recounted how the Democrats seized their chance in the wake of Manly’s words. The Democrats used these words to rile up whites across the state and Wilmington in particular, a strategy that essentially promised whites a return to their pre antebellum era status and that the jobs that blacks had occupied, especially ones as elected officials, could be available to them, if they just supported the 1898 Democratic campaign. Manly wanted to point blame back at white leadership, but his editorial only further served the Democratic agenda. Though most blacks struggled in the aftermath of slavery, the Democrats created the perception that blacks were universally advancing in North Carolina under current Republican and Fusionist rule, at the expense of the common white man . When Manly wrote his editorial, it gave the likes of Alfred Waddell and Furnifold Simmons another piece of propaganda to use to recruit white working class support. It was perhaps the final push towards the violence of November 10.
Making Whiteness: the culture of segregation in the south, 1890-1940 is the work of Grace Elizabeth Hale. In her work, she explains the culture of the time between 1890 and 1940. In her book she unravels how the creation of the ‘whiteness’ of white Southerners created the ‘blackness’ identity of southern African Americans. At first read it is difficult to comprehend her use of the term ‘whiteness’, but upon completion of reading her work, notes included, makes sense. She states that racial identities today have been shaped by segregation, “...the Civil War not only freed the slaves, it freed American racism
C. Vann Woodward, who died in 1999 at the age of 91, was America's most Southern historian and the winner of a Pulitzer Prize, for Mary Chestnut's Civil War. He’s also a Bancroft Prize for The Origins of the New South. In honor of his long and adventurous career, Oxford is pleased to publish this special commemorative edition of Woodward's most influential work, The Strange Career of Jim Crow. The Strange Career of Jim Crow is one of the great works of Southern history. The book actually helped shape that historical curve of black liberation; it’s not slowed movement; it’s more like a rollercoaster.
Over the course of five chapters, the author uses a number of sources, both primary and secondary, to show how the National Negro Congress employed numerous political strategies, and allying itself with multiple organizations and groups across the country to implement a nationwide grassroots effort for taking down Jim Crow laws. Even though the National Negro Congress was unsuccessful in ending Jim Crow, it was this movement that would aide in eventually leading to its end years later.
...isely. This book has been extremely influential in the world of academia and the thinking on the subject of segregation and race relations in both the North and the South, but more importantly, it has influenced race relations in practice since it was first published. However, Woodward’s work is not all perfect. Although he does present his case thoroughly, he fails to mention the Negroes specifically as often as he might have. He more often relies on actions taken by whites as his main body of evidence, often totally leaving out the actions that may have been taken by the black community as a reaction to the whites’ segregationist policies.
Woodward’s The Strange Career of Jim Crow immediately became an influential work both in the academic and real worlds because of the dramatic events that coincided with the book’s publication and subsequent revisions. It was inspired from a series of lectures that Woodward delivered at the University of Virginia in 1954 on the Jim Crow policies that the South had reverted to in order to deal with the dynamics of its Negro population. The original publication debuted in 1955, just prior to the explosive events that would occur as part of the civil rights movement climax. Because of these developments in less than a decade, the book’s topic and audience had drastically changed in regard to the times surrounding it. Woodward, realizing the fluidity of history in context with the age, printed a second edition of the book in 1966 to “take advantage of the new perspective the additional years provide” and “to add a brief account of the main developments in ...
The original edition of The Strange Career of Jim Crow had as its thesis that segregation and Jim Crow Laws were a relative late comer in race relations in the South only dating to the late 1880s and early 1890s. Also part of that thesis is that race relations in the South were not static, that a great deal of change has occurred in the dynamics of race relations. Woodward presents a clear argument that segregation in the South did not really start forming until the 1890s. One of the key components of his argument is the close contact of the races during slavery and the Reconstruction period. During slavery the two races while not living harmoniously with each other did have constant contact with each other in the South. This c...
Although some of Woodward’s peripheral ideas may have been amended in varying capacities his central and driving theme, often referred to as the “Woodward Thesis,” still remains intact. This thesis states that racial segregation (also known as Jim Crow) in the South in the rigid and universal form that it had taken by 1954 did not begin right after the end of the Civil War, but instead towards the end of the century, and that before Jim Crow appeared there was a distinct period of experimentation in race relations in the South. Woodward’s seminal his...
... newspaper article shown by Woodward gave a picture of how new the idea of segregation was in the South. Woodward put it best when he stated, “The policies of proscription, segregation, and disfranchisement that are often described as the immutable ‘folkways’ of the South, impervious alike to legislative reform and armed intervention, are of a more recent origin.” (65) He wanted to show how the roots of the system were not integrated with slavery. Jim Crow laws and slavery were both horrible institutions, but they existed as two seperate entities. Woodward does not claim the South to be picturesque, because the Jim Crow laws were not established in the region. The South established Jim Crow laws and made them worse than found in the North. Woodward’s goal was not to protect the South’s legacy, but to give a clearer picture of the facts regarding the Jim Crow laws.
Even though northerners were hesitant to work with blacks, employers were recognizing the demand for labor. The North heavily depended on southern reserve of black labor. This is when black men in particular got their first taste of industrial jobs. One motive for the great demographic shift as we know today as the “Great Migration” were jobs. Jobs in the North offered many more advantages than those in the South. Advantages such as higher wages, which was another motive. Other motives included educational opportunities, the prospect of voting, and the “promised land.” As blacks were migrating to the North in search for jobs, there was also a push for equality. There were heightened efforts to build community and political mobilization as more people migrated. Although white conservatives did not hold back their postwar reactions, the optimism to move forward with attempting to change racial order did not disappear. The Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters in the 1920’s, the National Negro Congress, Don’t Buy Where You Can’t Work, as well as the March on Washington launched a style of protest politics that carried on well into the
The Strange Career of Jim Crow, by C. Van Woodward, traces the history of race relations in the United States from the mid and late nineteenth century through the twentieth century. In doing so Woodward brings to light significant aspects of Reconstruction that remain unknown to many today. He argues that the races were not as separate many people believe until the Jim Crow laws. To set up such an argument, Woodward first outlines the relationship between Southern and Northern whites, and African Americans during the nineteenth century. He then breaks down the details of the injustice brought about by the Jim Crow laws, and outlines the transformation in American society from discrimination to Civil Rights. Woodward’s argument is very persuasive because he uses specific evidence to support his opinions and to connect his ideas. Considering the time period in which the book and its editions were written, it should be praised for its insight into and analysis of the most important social issue in American history.
The next few paragraphs will compare blacks in the north to blacks in the south in the 1800’s. In either location blacks were thought of as incompetent and inferior. The next few paragraphs will explain each group’s lifestyle and manner of living.
In the 1920s and 1930s, segregation was a massive thing for everyone. Minorities were looked down upon mainly because of their different skin color and culture, as people from all over the world started to come to America because of its freedom that it offered. They did receive many of the rights that was said to be given, nor much respect, especially from caucasians. They were mostly slaves, workers or farmers for caucasians. Although they would work as hard as they can, they wouldn’t receive fair pay. In the result of that, they were never able to live the life of a middle-class citizen. They were always low on money. Also, taxes would bug them as it would rise only for the lower-class...
As the United States developed and grew, upward mobility was central to the American dream. It was the unstated promise that no matter where you started, you had the chance to grow and proceed beyond your initial starting point. In the years following the Civil War, the promise began to fade. People of all races strived to gain the representation, acknowledgement and place in this society. To their great devastation, this hope quickly dwindled. Social rules were set out by the white folk, and nobody could rise above their social standing unless they were seen fit to be part of the white race. The social group to be impacted the most by this “social rule” was the African Americans. Black folk and those who were sympathetic to the idea of equal rights to blacks were targeted by the Ku Klux Klan. (Burton, 1998) The turning point in North Carolina politics was the Wilmington Race Riot of 1898. It was a very bold and outrageous statement from the white supremacists to the black folk. The Democratic white supremacists illegally seized power from the local government and destroyed the neighborhood by driving out the African Americans and turning it from a black-majority to a white-majority city. (Class Discussion 10/3/13) This event developed the idea that even though an African American could climb a ladder to becoming somebody in his or her city, he or she will never become completely autonomous in this nation. Charles W. Chesnutt discusses the issue of social mobility in his novel The Marrow of Tradition. Olivia Carteret, the wife of a white supremacist is also a half-sister to a Creole woman, Janet Miller. As the plot develops, we are able to see how the social standing of each woman impacts her everyday life, and how each woman is ...
Nabrit, James M. Jr. “The Relative Progress and the Negro in the United States: Critical Summary and Evaluation.” Journal of Negro History 32.4 (1963): 507-516. JSTOR. U of Illinois Lib., Urbana. 11 Apr. 2004
During the Gilded Age white were understood to be at the top and all other ethnicities were below them as well in the 1941, however during the 1950-1980 things were starting to change but not dramatically. White men in all three periods were allowed to speak their minds and say whatever they wanted because in their minds they understood that they were at the top.4 For example, white men joined forces and created the unions to go against the overbearing power of corporations.5 These corporations c...