Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Community crime prevention strategies
Community crime prevention strategies
Reasons for recidivism in crime
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
An estimated 650,000 offenders are released from prisons each year. Most generally leave with only a few dollars, some clothes, and possibly a bus ticket. Release practices like this are common and can be especially disastrous for mentally ill inmates. If immediately released without access to health care, the mentally ill will suffer from interruption of continuity of care. In prison, they may have been receiving medication, therapy, or other forms of treatment. Interruption of care could lead to excelled deterioration in their mental health. This tends to lead to a higher rate of recidivism among mentally-ill former prisoners. (Hummert, 2011.). A contributing factor of the lack of health care for released mentally ill inmates …show more content…
is that while in prison their Medicaid may have been terminated. States are not permitted to receive federal reimbursement for the cost of services provided to incarcerated individuals. Officials have indicated that they terminate instead of simply suspending Medicaid in order to prevent any confusion that may lead to wrongful billing. Other medical benefits may lapse if an individual is incarcerated for more than a year. Social Security benefits are also immediately suspended upon incarceration. If the individual is incarcerated for more than a year, they will have to reapply for benefits. (Hummert, 2011.). There are several other reasons why mentally ill offenders may have higher rates of recidivism.
They may find it more difficult to get housing, obtain employment, and may have higher re-occurring substance abuse issues. Although, offenders without mental illness may face the same challenges, it is assumed that the mental disorder only adds to the increased chances of recidivism when unable to obtain necessities to be successful while living independently. Inadequacies in the very systems that are designed to assist in reintegration may actually exacerbate barriers faced by mentally ill offenders. An example of this is that many community-based advocacy and treatment programs are ill-prepared to meet the unique need of mentally disordered offenders. There also is issues with overloaded case managers and the lack of funding to increase staff positions. Specialized treatment programs are needed for mentally ill offenders. (Torgersen, 2013).One study conducted in a small New York State prison found that 64 percent of mentally ill offenders who were returned to the community were re-arrested and returned to prison within 18 months of release compared to 60 percent of offenders without a mental illness diagnoses (Hall, Miraglia, Lee,Chard-Wierschem, & Sawyer, 2012). While not a major difference in percentage rates the study does prove that prisoners with mental health diagnoses appear to be more prone to re-entry if they are unable to link with proper resources in the community. (Torgerson,
2013).
Today, prisons are the nation’s primary providers of mental health care, and some do a better job than others. Pete Earley focuses his research on the justice system in Miami, Florida. He documents how the city’s largest prison has only one goal for their mentally ill prisoners: that they do not kill themselves. The prison has no specialized
Policymakers on the national, state, and local levels are always finding ways to improve the nature of the reentry process. The reentry process starts in correctional facilities and helps inmates prepare themselves for release and proceeds with their transition back into society as law-abiding citizens. In comparison to the average American, ex-offenders tend to be less educated, less likely to gain employment, suffer from substance abuse, or have been diagnosed with a mental illness. All of these aspects discussed are shown to be risk factors for recidivism, which is the tendency that causes criminals to re-offend. Generally, the offender reintegration process needs to be improved by properly monitoring the outcomes for reentry programs in order to return prisoners back to society safely.
Mentally ill offenders face many challenges while being incarcerated and after being released. Rehabilitation is effective on mentally ill offenders by reducing their symptoms of distress and improving their behavior.
The United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world and of that over sixty percent of jail inmates reported having a mental health issue and 316,000 of them are severely mentally ill (Raphael & Stoll, 2013). Correctional facilities in the United States have become the primary mental health institutions today (Adams & Ferrandino, 2008). This imprisonment of the mentally ill in the United States has increased the incarceration rate and has left those individuals medically untreated and emotionally unstable while in jail and after being released. Better housing facilities, medical treatment and psychiatric counseling can be helpful in alleviating their illness as well as upon their release. This paper will explore the increasing incarceration rate of the mentally ill in the jails and prisons of the United States, the lack of medical services available to the mentally ill, the roles of the police, the correctional officers and the community and the revolving door phenomenon (Soderstrom, 2007). It will also review some of the existing and present policies that have been ineffective and present new policies that can be effective with the proper resources and training. The main objective of this paper is to illustrate that the criminalization of the mentally ill has become a public health problem and that our policy should focus more on rehabilitation rather than punishment.
According to the United States Federal Bureau of Prisons (2013), there are currently 217,862 people incarcerated. Of that total population, 93.3% are men with the remaining 6.7% being women. The current prison populations range from 39-51% over their allotted capacities (James, 2013). Results of overcrowded prisons are seen through increased taxes, lowered staff to inmate ratio and an inability to maintain the structures housing these inmates (James, 2013). Researchers have also determined a correlation between inmate misconduct and overcrowding, adding to the list of negative effects (James, 2013). Along with increasing prison population rates, the diagnoses of mental illness, specifically personality disorders have also risen. The CDC reported in 2011 that at least 25% of US adults have a mental illness and about 20% of US adolescence has a diagnosable ment...
While living as an inmate in a prison, it is likely that one would go through some sort of transformation. While some go to prison and become reformed while showing the desire to change their life around, others may have a negative change. This negative change could include becoming more volatile and violent as a result of harsh prison treatment or prolonged isolation from the public. In a popular reality show, The Real Housewives of New Jersey, cast member Joe Giudice recently spoke of his plans for going to prison for tax fraud, saying “You either learn how to become a criminal, or a better person. So, I’m going to try to become a better person.” These differing changes can be seen in the prison writings of Robert Beck and Jack Henry Abbott.
Thousands of people statewide are in prisons, all for different reasons. However, the amount of mental illness within prisons seems to go unaddressed and ignored throughout the country. This is a serious problem, and the therapy/rehabilitation that prison systems have do not always help those who are mentally ill. Prison involvement itself can contribute to increased suicide (Hills, Holly). One ‘therapy’ that has increased throughout the years has been the use of solitary confinement, which has many negative effects on the inmates.
To punish or to rehabilitate incarcerated inmates is a debate decades in the making. The majority of correctional facilities are currently punishment-oriented. There is such a strong focus on punishment, as correctional facilities are built upon disciplinary objectives, that it is difficult to create effectual rehabilitative programs for inmates. Rehabilitation while incarcerated can include a wide variety of assistance such as education, vocation training, and hands-on experience. Mental illness support can also be a large portion of inmate rehabilitation, as the U.S. Department of Justice estimates that sixty-one percent of inmates in state prisons struggle with mental problems (Glaze and James). Ignoring mental illness, rather than helping
This creates the problem of a patient who is no longer psychotic, needing to remain in a hospital because the legal committee will not release him/her. The question whether the hospital is the proper place for that patient and if public safety is an actual concern is at hand. This then raises issues on how to treat a mentally ill individual who has committed a crime after recovering from their psychotic state, to ensure they will not relapse and become a danger to society. In various countries, there is no legal substitute for prevention. In the article, Mentally Ill People Who Commit Crimes: Punishment or Treatment, the author Dr. Melamed proposes the question, "If the individual is no longer ill, but still dangerous, should he or she remain in the hospital or be transferred to a nonmedical incarceration facility?" While some believe treatment is a better alternative, society is unable to bear the costs of treatment/ rehabilitation which means the individual will be transferred to an incarceration facility. In Connecticut, annually, the average cost for an inmate is $33,000 while the average cost for a mental hospital is $500,000. However, psychiatrist cost more than the average prison guards, the additional $467, 000 does not out way the cost for continued treatment in an outpatient facility
Prior to taking this course, I generally believed that people were rightly in prison due to their actions. Now, I have become aware of the discrepancies and flaws within the Criminal Justice system. One of the biggest discrepancies aside from the imprisonment rate between black and white men, is mental illness. Something I wished we covered more in class. The conversation about mental illness is one that we are just recently beginning to have. For quite a while, mental illness was not something people talked about publicly. This conversation has a shorter history in American prisons. Throughout the semester I have read articles regarding the Criminal Justice system and mental illness in the United States. Below I will attempt to describe how the Criminal Justice system fails when they are encountered by people with mental illnesses.
For much of society prison is viewed as a facility that segregates and imprisons individuals who commit acts of crimes considered deviant from accepted social behaviors, to ensure the safety and security of the overall community. These individuals are thus handed down a mandated sentence, stripped of their individual freedoms, and are told to reflect on their actions as a means of punishment. However, this method fails to recognize the notion that a majority of these people will one day be allowed back into society, and as a result those who are released tend to fall back into old habits contributing to the rising recidivism rate that currently plagues our prisons. In recent years there has been a gradual push for the implementation of rehabilitation
The problem with incarcerating the mentally ill people is the way health care workers, sheriff and prison officers treat psychiatric patients
Moore and Virginia Hilday (2006) conducted a research study on the effectiveness of mental health courts, they compared the recidivism rate among mentally ill offenders that that attended mental health courts to mentally ill offenders that attended traditional criminal courts. They found that defendants that attended mental health courts had an approximate 50% lower re-arrest rate than defendants that attended traditional criminal courts. Defendants that fully completed the mental health courts programs had a less than one fourth re-arrest rate of defendants that attended traditional criminal courts. (Moore, Hiday, 2006) Therefore, their findings clearly suggest that mental health courts significantly reduce the recidivism rate, especially when defendants fully complete the mental health court
Mental Health is something that millions of people struggle with daily, but find treatment and coping methods to help them get through it. However, incarcerated people do not have this ‘luxury’ of getting help with their mental illnesses. Mental health in prison is a very broad topic that encompasses many aspects. Because of the immensity of this topic, my group broke it down into treatments, social programs, sexual abuse to prison pipeline, pre-screening, and the effects of solitary confinement.
Although providing healthcare for a prisoner sounds costly, it is important to provide treatment and rehabilitation for those with mental and physical illnesses. Some of the health care services that the prison provides for its inmates is, “administration, medical care, dental care, mental health care, pharmaceuticals, hospitalization, and substance abuse treatment.” 3 Although it seems excessive to provide these kinds of services for those who have committed crimes, According to PEW trusts, “prisoners have a constitutional right to adequate medical attention and concluded that the Eighth Amendment is violated when corrections officials display “deliberate indifference” to an inmate’s medical needs. ”3 There should be a clear balance of recognizing that these are people who have committed crimes, so why give them better health benefits than most Americans receive. There needs to be a better way to reduce spending, without jeopardizing an inmates health and safety.