Reaganomics Rhetoric Analysis

2316 Words5 Pages

The thirty-second president of the United States, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, exclaimed during his Inaugural address: “The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little” (Kleinknecht 26). This quote provides a stark contrast between the priorities of Reaganomics, the supply-side economic policy that did nothing but benefit the wealthy. In the history of American politics, no president stands out quite like Ronald Reagan. His presidency remains the subject of constant examination in terms of his economic policies. Not only that, the fortieth president’s rhetoric especially became a point of scrutiny, revealing his ability to manipulate the …show more content…

The devastating effects of Reaganomics were felt for years to come, as the country struggled to escape the chains of these misguided economic policies. Sadly, Ronald Reagan and the conservative party at the time used pandering rhetoric to make Reaganomics seem like a way out of the upcoming recession; because of this, Reaganomics was a maleficent force against the working class of America. To begin, one must first understand exactly what “Reaganomics” is, and how Reagan made it seem so beneficial. Reaganomics is a term used to describe the very popular “trickle-down” or “supply-side” economic system supported by Ronald Reagan and his administration. Also known as the “Laffer Curve”, the economics seemed quite simple: “sharply lowering taxes, particularly the higher marginal rates paid by the upper strata, would stimulate productivity that would actually increase the amount of revenue that the government ultimately raised—thus reducing the need for budget cuts” (Bunch

Open Document