Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of macbeth character essay
Analysis of macbeth character essay
Stanley milgram experiment analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of macbeth character essay
Read this paper! You have no other option! You already started so you must finish. You must keep reading!
Well if you’ve made it this far you have obviously given in to orders and obeyed my authority. But why is it that people so easily do what they’re told when they feel coerced? Did you even think twice about not reading my paper? (Probably not Mrs. Ficca because you’re obligated to grade this, but that’s beside the point). It is human nature to desire to appear cooperative, even if it requires doing something they know is wrong. An experiment by Stanley Milgram in the 1960’s attempted to prove that obedience to authority overrides feelings of conscience. The participants of this experiment could either be “teachers” or “learners”. The teachers’ job was to quiz the learners and administer a painful shock for every wrong answer. The intensity of the shock increased with every wrong response. The twist was that the person running the experiment was sitting right next to the teacher, urging them to continue administering the shocks. Many people continued to listen to this authority figure, even when the learner uttered cries of pain! The message of this experiment is that people tend to obey authority when they feel coerced, even if they know it’s wrong. (Encina)
The concept of obedience is also displayed in the Shakespearian play, Macbeth. Macbeth is persuaded by his wife, Lady Macbeth, to murder King Duncan. Macbeth knows this is wrong, and makes a weak attempt to argue against her. Macbeth recognizes that Duncan is a humble King and a gracious leader. He also knows that as host he should be protecting, not harming him.
“First, as I am his kinsman and his subject / Strong both against the deed; then, a...
... middle of paper ...
...r of a situation all throughout history and presently today. Take Nazi Germany for example. Hitler was able to persuade thousands of Germans to fight for his cause, a cause many of the soldiers would deem as immorally had they not been in the thick of the situation. (Encina) The desire to comply and be correct is very powerful. When someone can convince another that acting a certain way is correct, and that subject feels pressure and fear to comply, almost any action can seem justifiable in the eyes of the subordinate. In the case of Macbeth, Macbeth was the subordinate, and the pressure exerted by lady Macbeth was too much to take.
Works Cited
Encina, Gregorio Billikopf. “Milgram’s Experiment on Obedience to Authority”. The University of California. 27 March 2010.
Gerrig, Richard and Zimbardo, Philip. Psychology and Life. Boston: Pearson, 2005.
In "The Perils of Obedience," Stanley Milgram conducted a study that tests the conflict between obedience to authority and one's own conscience. Through the experiments, Milgram discovered that the majority of people would go against their own decisions of right and wrong to appease the requests of an authority figure.
Stanley Milgram’s experiments on obedience are the focus of Theodore Dalrymple and Ian Parker. Theodore Dalrymple is a British physician that composed his views of the Milgram experiment with “Just Do What the Pilot Tells You” in the New Statesman in July 1999 (254). He distinguishes between blind obedience and blind disobedience stating that an extreme of either is not good, and that a healthy balance between the two is needed. On the other hand, Ian Parker is a British writer who wrote “Obedience” for an issue of Granta in the fall of 2000. He discusses the location of the experiment as a major factor and how the experiment progresses to prevent more outcomes. Dalrymple uses real-life events to convey his argument while Parker exemplifies logic from professors to state his point.
In this article “The Pearls of Obedience”, Stanley Milgram asserts that obedience to authority is a common response for many people in today’s society, often diminishing an individuals beliefs or ideals. Stanley Milgram designs an experiment to understand how strong a person’s tendency to obey authority is, even though it is amoral or destructive. Stanley Milgram bases his experiment on three people: a learner, teacher, and experimenter. The experimenter is simply an overseer of the experiment, and is concerned with the outcome of punishing the learner. The teacher, who is the subject of the experiment, is made to believe the electrical shocks are real; he is responsible for obeying the experimenter and punishing the learner for incorrect answers by electrocuting him from an electric shock panel that increases from 15 to 450 volts.
Upon analyzing his experiment, Stanley Milgram, a Yale psychologist, concludes that people will drive to great lengths to obey orders given by a higher authority. The experiment, which included ordinary people delivering “shocks” to an unknown subject, has raised many questions in the psychological world. Diana Baumrind, a psychologist at the University of California and one of Milgram’s colleagues, attacks Milgram’s ethics after he completes his experiment in her review. She deems Milgram as being unethical towards the subjects he uses for testing and claims that his experiment is irrelevant to obedience. In contrast, Ian Parker, a writer for New Yorker and Human Sciences, asserts Milgram’s experiments hold validity in the psychological world. While Baumrind focuses on Milgram’s ethics, Parker concentrates more on the reactions, both immediate and long-term, to his experiments.
Stanley Milgram’s experiment shows societies that more people with abide by the rules of an authority figure under any circumstances rather than follow their own nature instinct. With the use of his well-organized article that appeals to the general public, direct quotes and real world example, Milgram’s idea is very well-supported. The results of the experiment were in Milgram’s favor and show that people are obedient to authority figures. Stanley Milgram shows the reader how big of an impact authority figures have but fails to answer the bigger question. Which is more important, obedience or morality?
Lady Macbeth used peer pressure in order for her to gain power as a queen. After reading the letter Macbeth took the time to send to her, Lady Macbeth doubts her husband. “Yet do I fear thy nature;/ It is too full o’th’ milk of human kindness/ To catch the nearest way. Thou wouldst be great,/ Art not without ambition, but without/ The illness should attend it” (1, 5, 13-17). Lady Macbeth finds out the fate of her husband, but she still doubts him. In the letter he calls her many nice names, but she ignores them and goes straight to the thought of her having power. She says her husband is too nice to even do anything to ensure his fate comes true. This shows Macbeth has to prove to his wife he will actually do something to prove his loyalty
Obedience to authority and willingness to obey an authority against one’s morals has been a topic of debate for decades. Stanley Milgrim, a Yale psychologist, conducted a study in which his subjects were commanded by a person in authority to initiate lethal shocks to a learner; his experiment is discussed in detail in the article “The Perils of Obedience” (Milgrim 77). Milgrim’s studies are said to be the most “influential and controversial studies of modern psychology” (Levine).While the leaner did not actually receive fatal shocks, an actor pretended to be in extreme pain, and 60 percent of the subjects were fully obedient, despite evidence displaying they believed what they were doing was harming another human being (Milgrim 80). Likewise, in Dr. Zimbardo, a professor of psychology at Stanford University, conducted an experiment, explained in his article “The Stanford Prison Experiment,” in which ten guards were required to keep the prisoners from
Obedience is a widely debated topic today with many different standpoints from various brilliant psychologists. Studying obedience is still important today to attempt to understand why atrocities like the Holocaust or the My Lai Massacre happened so society can learn from them and not repeat history. There are many factors that contribute to obedience including situation and authority. The film A Few Good Men, through a military court case, shows how anyone can fall under the influence of authority and become completely obedient to conform to the roles that they have been assigned. A Few Good Men demonstrates how authority figures can control others and influence them into persuading them to perform a task considered immoral or unethical.
Humans are always fascinated by power. Sadly, they do not realize the danger of it until it is too late. In the play Macbeth, William Shakespeare's underscores how Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are both consumed by power. In the beginning, Lady Macbeth dominates Macbeth, manipulating him to kill Duncan. After the death of Duncan, Macbeth becomes ambitious, and hires murderers to kill Banquo without notifying Lady Macbeth. Even though he is a decorated soldier, when Macbeth rises to power, he becomes ruthless. On the other hand, Lady Macbeth becomes weak, and insane. Shakespeare illustrates how Macbeth’s obsession with power undermines his moral judgement, leads to his mental deterioration, and ultimately results in his death.
Macbeth first feels forced externally, the source of it coming from his wife, Lady Macbeth, who wants for Macbeth to kill Duncan so that he can become king. At first, Macbeth feels apprehensive and tells his wife, “We will proceed no further in this business” (1.7.33). Lady Macbeth begins to pressure him further, even going to the extent of questioning his manhood, saying, “Wouldst thou have that/Which thou esteem’st the ornament of life, And live a coward in thine own esteem, Letting ‘I dare not’ wait upon ‘I would’, Like the poor cat i’th’adage?” (1.7.41-45). In her response, Lady Macbeth calls her husband a coward and accuses him of just fantasizing about becoming king without doing anything, instead of killing Duncan to become king right away. She also makes a reference to an old Latin proverb that loosely translates to, “The cat would eat the fish, but does not want to wet her feet”. After hearing th...
When considering a dilemma, we usually turn towards those we love for advice, since they are the ones to whom we listen. In William Shakespears' Macbeth, Lady Macbeth is greatly responsible for the killing of King Duncan. Lady Macbeth reveals her secret evil nature, which pushes her towards her evil doings. Once Macbeth learns his prophecy to be king, she immediately convinces and persuades Macbeth into following her plan. Towards the end, when the crimes have been committed, Lady Macbeth shows weakness and guilt for her evil deeds.
Through the interactions and relationship between Macbeth and Lady Macbeth, Shakespeare conveys that relationships in which one person is the clear leader and the other the clear follower usually end up with an ignorance of the consequences of one’s actions leading to unexpected and rapid destruction because the follower is likely oblivious to the repercussions of the actions of the leader. This is evident especially during Macbeth’s internal struggle on whether or not to kill Duncan. One of the key scenes which shows this is Act i, Scene vii. Here, Macbeth shows scepticism about their plan to kill Duncan saying “We will proceed no further in this business; he hath honour'd me of late; and I have bought golden opinions from all sorts of people, which would be worn now in their newest gloss, not cast aside so soon.” (I.vii).
Stanley Milgram is well known for his work with obedience to authority. His work, “The Perils of Obedience,” studied whether average individuals would obey an authority figure, telling them to do something that harms another individual.
It is in human nature that the more power one desires the more corrupt actions one must do to attain it. In Shakespeare’s tragedy of Macbeth, a Scottish noble's craving for power leads him to do terrible deeds that leads to his demise. Shakespeare shows that power corrupts by using Macbeth who corrupts under the thought of have power over others. Macbeth becomes corrupt under the thought of becoming king and gaining almost complete control over the people that he rules. Macbeth wants the power badly enough to do horrible deeds such as commit regicide. Lady Macbeth becomes very ambitious and allows herself to become seduced to the idea of becoming Queen. Her ruthlessness urges Macbeth to commit regicide by questioning his love for her and his own manhood.
Perhaps the most fundamental theme of Shakespeare’s Macbeth is the inherent corruptibility of even a seemingly good man when ambition turns to greed, and Macbeth himself exemplifies this concept throughout the play. While at the outset he is seen to be loyal to his king, generally considered trustworthy, and displaying numerous other laudable qualities, Macbeth ultimately succumbs to the influence of those around him and becomes unequivocally evil, setting aside all his previously held morals and coming to be driven only by his lust for power. This transition is brought about by a wide variety of factors and plays an integral role in the development of the plot. In his tragedy Macbeth, William Shakespeare employs