Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Benefit of eugenic
Intelligence and psychological testing
Benefit of eugenic
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Benefit of eugenic
Reaching Beyond the “Moron”: Eugenics Control of Secondary Disability Groups (2009) by Gerald V. O’Brien and Meghan E. Bundy focused on The American Eugenics Movement and Eugenics Control. Eugenics, the approach of controlling a mass population through aborting, sterilizing and eliminating a group of people to procreate in hopes of eliminating or reducing their kind within society. O’Brien and Bundy’s article concentrate on the history of eugenics aiming to individuals with mental illness, epilepsy and physical impairments. It shows fundamental issues in society back then and today relating towards the oppression of individuals with disabilities within our society.
The Eugenics Movement began inserting itself into the American culture. Associations,
…show more content…
for example, the Eugenics Record Office (ERO), began springing up to do research into this field. This development increased by the use of examples done by a man named Gregor Mendel. "If environmental modifications could improve the status of "unfit" individuals, then a positive evolutionary path could be fostered through the development if such modification" (O'Brien and Bundy, p.157) Mendel reported that good genetic traits are controlled by qualities given by the individuals parents. The Eugenics associations’ utilized Mendel's data as backup and began looking into what they accepted was a significant issue. Meetings were taken place, medical histories and generations of families were being investigated, and individuals were on a watch. This was the beginning of a strong Eugenics Movement. Harry Laughlin, leader of the Eugenics Record Office asserted that hereditary imperfection was being given to the United States through outside nations (O'Brien and Bundy, p.155). Mental illness was highly looked down upon and was believed to be a hereditary and environmental case. Eugenicist still proceed on giving those with Mental illnesses the IQ Test believing “ the intelligence test led most to believe that feeble-mindedness was being accurately measured, whereas insanity was much more speculative” (O'Brien and Bundy, p.161). Those individuals with mental illness where force to stay in state-run institutions and be sterilized. They had no capability of meeting other humans to procreate. Its base originated from the thought that human race could be "fit" by disposing of its undesirable traits and the desirable traits could be duplicated.
Ones physical appearance, IQ Test, and social limitations could be controlled in people generally such as t Charles Darwin's development of natural selection. Through time, this perspective has introduced America and the World in a moral fight to create the best population of humanity. The development of the Intelligence Test (IQ exam) played a large part of Eugenic history. “As on might speculate, it was this large group of ‘higher functioning’ feeble-minded persons who were said to pose the most threat to the community” (O'Brien and Bundy, p.158). Although, the Intelligence Test was developed in France, United States quickly adapted to this strategy to determine and point out the “unfit” in society. The more this test was being used the more people they found out were unfit and procreating in the …show more content…
country. Eugenics is a topic of interest I was always fascinated by. Having the opportunity to learn about the issues and studies of Eugenics has broadened my horizon on how I think about my presence in society today. Have not learned about Eugenics in past history classes as I majored history during undergraduate school. Articles like Race in America (2003) by Peter Quinn and Reaching Beyond the “Moron”: Eugenics Control of Secondary Disability Groups (2009) by Gerald V. O’Brien and Meghan E. Bundy give great insight on Eugenics from a historical standpoint. Reading both Race in America (2003) by Peter Quinn and Reaching Beyond the “Moron”: Eugenics Control of Secondary Disability Groups (2009) by Gerald V.
O’Brien and Meghan E. Bundy article I was very shock and disturbed by the way these so called “researchers”, “doctors”, “scientist”, and “leaders” thought. We are so brainwashed by how great our nation is but little do we know what goes on behind the scenes the created this so called “great nation”. Eugenics is not okay nor is it helpful.
The idea of humans being examined and categorized and “fit” and “unfit” to be hereditarily purified sounds crazy. It is one thing to try to eliminate medical issues for the better of our society using medical treatment but to sterilize or kill of those with mental issues, physical issues harmfully is very brutal and unjust. Including qualities for knowledge or physicality would be an evil entity to our race.
Eugenics during the time period of Nazism was cruel and unforgivable. An issue that was held under the supreme court of justice like Buck vs. Bell (1927) sounded like something I would see in a horror movie. To basically neglect human rights and sterilize a seventeen-year-old girl because society considered her to be “unfit” is just not right. In addition, to state that “ three generations of imbeciles are enough” shows people like Holmes have no sympathy (Quinn, p. 1). I wonder if these higher power people where in the position of those who were considered “unfit” if they would act the
same. Eugenics may have been able to radically change what was recognized as the best race in society but it was performed in a bad way even though some people may differ. Today some may say Genetics is the new form of Eugenics. Although I believe in generic breeding for those who are less fortunate have given birth to a child natural. The idea of race cleansing in America and many other nations in the world has span far back that I could have imagined. Both article affected my ways of thinking about the issue and the lives of children, adolescents and/or adults with disabilities. Some individuals may be born with a disability and other may develop their disability overtime. Who has the right to determine whether a person should live or not because they are unable to serve their society the same purpose as someone who is not disabled. My views on Eugenics have remained the same if not I got a lot my devastated only to gain more information on the brutality of what the Eugenics Movement was about. Issues of Eugenics is a topic that should be introduced in High School so students could be informed and have a better understanding on issues regarding people with disability.
...ng on Justice Douglas view, it is not right to use genetics and issues of hereditary in legal decisions (Reilly, 1991). Such natural aspects should not violate the individual’s right of procreation and fourteen amendments. Everybody is therefore entitled to basic civic rights. Eugenics movement disappeared after the atrocities by the Germany regime. Although Holmes there was overturning of Homes decision eventually, Ms. Buck and many feebleminded American citizens were victims of State and Supreme Court immorality. Reviewing of the focus period, neither society nor individual got benefits of Compulsory sterilization statutes. The change of attitudes towards mental handicapped people over time is interesting. From late 1950s in the United States, civil and women rights movement, contribute to acts governing the handicapped rights including their rights to reproduce.
Galton, David J., and Clare J. Galton. "Francis Galton: And Eugenics Today." Journal of Medical Ethics, 24.2 (1998): 99-101. JSTOR. Web. 8 Mar. 2010.
Eugenics, the set of beliefs and practices which aim at improving the genetic quality of the human population played a significant role in the history and culture of United States prior to its involvement in World War Two. (Wiki) Gilman is the writer of late 19th and early 20th century and during this century which is known as progressive era, Eugenics was considered a method of preserving and improving the dominant groups in the population. The idea of Eugenics was brought up by Sir Francis Galton in America. They think that by the idea of eugenics there will be a development in a society. America also made American Breeder’s Association which later on founded the Eugenics Record office, and with certain mission and, in their mission statement, they wrote: Society must protect itself; as it claims the right to deprive the murder of his life so it may also annihilate the hideous serpent of hopelessly vicious protoplasm. Here is where appropriate legislation will aid in eugenics and creating a healthier, saner society in the
The problems with these critiques are that Niewyk ignores Germany's previous attempts at sterilization legislation in 1923 and the influence of foreign eugenic legislation and restrictions on the Nazi government. He also pays little attention to the evidence that shows the Nazi regime also strategically targeted individuals...
Rifkin, Jeremy. "The Ultimate Therapy: Commercial Eugenics on the Eve of the Biotech Century." Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum. 7th ed. Ed.
It was also this case, at least in part, which led to the acceptable sterilization of thousands of Americans and around 350,000 people in Nazi Germany in 1933. While there are definitely positive uses for eugenics within today's society including healthy children and a decreased population over time which would require less resources from the planet, there seem to be an outweighing of negative results in the form of forced sterilization, breaches of human rights and an overall misuse of power which could lead to a new threat on par with Nazi Germany.
The eugenics movement started in the early 1900s and was adopted by doctors and the general public during the 1920s. The movement aimed to create a better society through the monitoring of genetic traits through selective heredity. Over time, eugenics took on two different views. Supporters of positive eugenics believed in promoting childbearing by a class who was “genetically superior.” On the contrary, proponents of negative eugenics tried to monitor society’s flaws through the sterilization of the “inferior.”
With these new boundaries formed, eugenicists began their own “testing”, classifying people as either superior or inferior based on the size of their pocket book or their social connections. Families across the country rushed to be tested and deemed genetically fit, or otherwise...
The history of harmful eugenic practices, spurring from the Nazi implementations of discrimination towards biologically inferior people has given eugenics a negative stigma (1,Kitcher, 190). Genetic testing, as Kitcher sees it through a minimalistic perspective, should be restrained to aiding future children with extremely low qualities of life (2,Kitcher, 190). He believes that genetic engineering should only be used to avoid disease and illness serving the role of creating a healthier human race. He promotes laissez-faire eugenics, a “hands off” concept that corresponds to three components of eugenic practice, discrimination, coercion and division of traits. It holds the underlying works of genetic testing, accurate information, open access, and freedom of choice. Laissez-faire eugenics promises to enhance reproductive freedom preventing early child death due to genetic disease (3,Kitcher, 198). However there are dangers in Laissez-faire that Kitcher wants to avoid. The first is the historical tendency of population control, eugenics can go from avoiding suffering, to catering to a set of social values that will cause the practice of genetics to become prejudiced, insensitive and superficial. The second is that prenatal testing will become limited to the upper class, leaving the lower class with fewer options, creating biologically driven social barriers. Furthermore the decay of disability support systems due to prenatal testing can lead to an increased pressure to eliminate those unfit for society (4,Kitcher, 214).
"Eugenics: Did the Eugenics Movement Benefit the United States?" History in Dispute. Ed. Robert J. Allison. Vol. 3: American Social and Political Movements, 1900-1945: Pursuit of Progress. Detroit: St. James Press, 2000. 17-23. Canada In Context. Web. 19 Feb. 2014.
The Web. 27 May 2014. The "Eugenics" - "The. Dictionary.com. The World of the. Dictionary.com, n.d. -. Web.
In 1913 Teddy Roosevelt, who is considered to be one of the greatest US presidents to serve in office, wrote to the Department of Genetics, “Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind [...]. The problem cannot be met unless we give full consideration to the immense influence of heredity....” (Dykes, 2008, p. 1). What Teddy Roosevelt was referring to was the idea of enhancing the human population. Today genetic enhancement is paired specifically with technology, but throughout history genetic enhancement has been a very popular but controversial topic. It can be dated back to ancient times when men would pick wives who the men felt would reproduce the best offspring. Then genetic enhancement became extremely popular in the 19th century when Charles Darwin brought the idea of natural selection and eugenics to society. And it is taking new leaps today, where technology is being introduced with genetic enhancement. With this new technology scientists and ethicists are having a hard time trying to find an answer of whether or not this new and growing technology of genetic enhancement should be permitted. We, society, need to analyze the situation very carefully and ask ourselves, should genetic enhancement be allowed in society, or should it not?
Kennedy, Angie, C. (2008) 'Eugenics, "Degenerate Girls" and Social Workers During the Progressive Era' Journal of Women and Social Work Vol 23 (1) pp 22-37
When created in 1923, the American Eugenics Society exemplified an air of reform with a seemingly positive purpose, however this cannot be further from the truth. In reality, the society polluted the air with myths of weeding out imperfections with the Galtonian ideal, the breeding of the fittest (Carison). The founder of the society, Charles Davensport , preached that those who are imperfect should be eliminated(Marks). From the school desk to the pulpit, the fallacies of the eugenics movement were forced into society. Preachers often encouraged the best to marry the best while biology professors would encourage DNA testing to find out ones fate (Selden). A...
During the Progressive Era, eugenics was first perceived as a possible method to eradicate unfavored races and nationalist from American society. The eugenic movement soon became concerned with the creation of minimum wages since it could “[rid] the labor force of the ‘unemployable” and that “the most ruinous to the community is to allow them to unrestrainedly compete as wage earners.” (Leonard 213). The science grew rapidly as it “ it appealed to an extraordinary range of political ideologies, not just progressives” (Leonard 216). Eugenics also pushed for child labor bans “because the unfit poor would be unable to put their children to work and thus would have fewer children, a eugenic goal” (Leonard