Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The influence of american dream
Rational choice been the part of the white-collar crime
The influence of american dream
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The influence of american dream
White-collar crime is crime that typically goes by unnoticed, and receives little attention. This is because these acts of crime are nonviolent. White-collar crime is financially motivated and includes insider trading, embezzlement, fraud, tax evasion, and price fixing.
Robert Merton (1968) once wrote that, “In the American Dream there is no final stopping point. The measure of ‘monetary success’ is conveniently indefinite and relative. At each income level . . . Americans want just about twenty-five percent more . . .” (found in Simpson et al., 2013). This quote explains the American ideology that money is the motive. Material success comes above all else, and American people will do what ever it takes to attain it. Merton’s anomie theory
…show more content…
was updated by Steven Messner and Richard Rosenfield who conceptualized the institutional anomie theory. This is the “view that anomie pervades US culture because the drive for material wealth dominates and undermines social and community values” (Siegal, 2015: 152). In addition, they discuss the American Dream, which they describe as both a goal of achieving material success through competition, as well as a process in which one must be socialized to pursue material success. The feeling of anomie sets in when the desire to succeed weakens a community and drives people apart. The need for this material success becomes so intense it restricts other desires, such as respect. This relates to white-collar crime because these types of offenses are typically, not always, committed by the upper class. Despite already attaining a wealthy status, our society has become so revolved around money that greed takes over and white-collar crime offenders satisfy their needs for more by extralegal means. The Enron scandal is considered to be one of the most notorious white-collar crimes in American history. Enron had lobbied for deregulation, which allowed for the reduction of government power over their company, and in turn allowed the executives to oversee company reports. Enron began lying about their profits, and concealing their debts. They did not accurately represent their losses; instead they appeared to be a rather profitable company. Using their apparent success, Enron became manipulative. They created an energy crisis in California by causing blackouts. Enron then increased the price of electricity in order to make themselves more money. After making off with millions of dollars, Enron’s top executives could no longer keep their fraud a secret. After finally revealing their $618 million dollar third quarter loss, they filed for bankruptcy. The end results were devastating. “90,000 people lost their jobs. Enron employees, who had been encouraged to invest their retirement plans in company stock, lost $2 billion into the bargain. Stockholders lost another $70 billion in the Enron scandal, and the state of California sued for $6 billion in energy losses” (Rankin 2011). Enron’s employee accurately represented Merton’s quote in which he noted the American Dream was all about monetary success and wanting more. Enron’s top employees cared so deeply about increasing their wealth that it dominated their way of life, and they displayed total disrespect for their victims. By letting this desire take control of their lives, they failed to realize the consequences and before long the fraud was more than they could handle, which resulted in the demise of Enron. Rational choice theory states that crime is rational, and rational people are in control of their behaviors and choices.
When an individual is contemplating committing a crime, they will carefully weigh the benefits and consequences associated with that offense. Such benefits may include monetary gain, respect, and control. However, if the probability of being detected, and subsequently incarcerated is too high, it will deter them from becoming an offender. Punishments must be swift, certain, and severe enough to prevent the individual from rationalizing that committing a crime in hopes of attaining perceived benefits is the better choice. Rational choice theory is relevant in explaining white-collar crime, and the Enron scandal because the individuals are fully aware and in control of their actions. They actively and knowingly engage in illegal activates in order to reap the benefits, which in this case would be monetary gain. White-collar crime usually goes unnoticed due to its nonviolent nature. This makes it easier for these criminals to rationalize that the likelihood of them being caught and punished is exceptionally low. Due to their high status they may view any potential punishments as insignificant in comparison to the benefits they would receive. The Enron scandal was an elaborate scam that was not done in a spur of the moment way. It included mass deception hosted by highly skilled, and very wealthy men. They created a way to earn extra money that definitely …show more content…
required extensive planning, which shows that they truly were rational actors. Institutional anomie theory and rational choice theory mesh well together to create an explanation for white-collar crime, and the Enron scandal in particular.
Institutional anomie and the concept of the American Dream state that Americans continually want more. They want more material success, regardless of how much they already have. To attain their desired gains, white-collar offenders will do what ever it takes to achieve it even if it requires utilizing illegal means. Prior to committing such offenses for their own personal gain, they had to weigh the benefit and consequences of their actions. Taking into consideration their status and wealth, they were able to rationalize that they would be able to go undetected and therefore sought out to seek monetary success. Had the employees at Enron not been so intensely driven towards material wealth and had they not allowed the desire to drive them away from others and from conventional values, perhaps they could have been able to appropriately rationalize and realize that there are substantial consequences that will undoubtedly outweigh the perceived benefits. This alternative could have saved thousands of victims from one of the worst white-collar crime scandals in
history.
Money constitutes the American Dream, because in America, to be successful in life means being wealthy. We live in an industrialized nation, in which money controls our very own existence. The Lesson by Toni Cade Bambara establishes an argument about society’s injustice that entails financial opportunities by revealing the differences in living conditions between upper class and lower class. Another important point Stephen Cruz, a successful business person and a Professor at the University of Wisconsin at Platteville, makes in his speech is that the American Dream is getting progressively ambiguous, because the vision of success is being controlled by power and fear which only benefit 1 percent of Americans. For most people, the American Dream is to be financially stable to the point of content; however, realistically the accomplishment of the American Dream is often obstructed by society’s limitations and influences from higher power.
According to the text, Rational Choice Theory is comprised of two main thoughts, and they are, although people consider and are fully aware of the repercussion of the crimes they are about to commit, they proceed with the act, the second thought is that people will chose to commit a crime if they believe the benefit is greater. (Vito, 2007). In an article titled “Choosing White Color Crimes”, the rational choice theory has always been the acceptable method of interpreting and sustaining programs that help to combat crime (Shover, n.d.). Criminologists, Derek Cornish and Ronald Clark, clarify the two categories of the decision making process, the first one being criminal involvement, and the second one being criminal event.
...at the American culture places economic success at the pinnacle of social desirability, without listing legitimate ways for attaining the desired goal (Merton 672-682). Today, the American Dream no longer reflects the dream Adams had, but instead, the idea that one can only call themselves truly successful if they have become rich, regardless of the way they got there. The American Dream does not guarantee happiness, but rather the pursuit of it, but with the media strongly persuading people that money guarantees happiness, people are encouraged to do whatever it takes, even it means disregarding their morals, so that they achieve ‘success.’ The inability to achieve this goal often leads people to destructive, and ultimately life-threatening criminal behavior as their feelings of anxiety and frustration over this vision of the “American Dream” get the best of them.
White collar crime is a term created by Edwin Sutherland in 1939 that refers to crimes committed by people of higher social status, companies, and the government according to the book “White-Collar Crime in a Nutshell” by Ellen Podgor and Jerold Israel. White collar crimes are usually non-violent crimes committed in order to have a financial-gain (Podgor and Israel 3). A very well known white collar crime that has even been taught in many history classes is the Watergate scandal. This is a white collar crime that was committed by government authorities. Watergate was a crime that shocked the nation.
The nature and damage of white-collar crime can result in a variety of punishments for the offender. Some sanctions being time in prison, some being fines, and others being a combination of both. For example, Chalana McFarland who was a real estate attorney and was accused of fraud, money laundering and other crimes costing investors $20 million. She was charged with $12 million in restitution and thirty years in prison (Haury, 2012). Another example would be Bernie Madoff, who owned Madoff Securities, was involved in a Ponzi scheme. It is believed that investors lost $50 billion dollars. Curently Madoff is serving a 150-year sentence in a prison in Butner, N.C (Haury, 2012). As these white-collar crime cases show, the costs of these crimes can be quite serve and earn life sentences as well as very hefty fines. Moreover, white-collar crimes have huge economic effects on victims, often causing life altering losses. Under consideration white-collar crimes are quite high-cost actions that hold large possible punishments and large ethical issues. In a research experiment done by Christian Seipel and Stefanie Eifler, a theory branching from rational choice theory was tested in relation to crime. The theory they explored was referred to as high- and low- cost theory. This theory discusses the factors that influence low cost crime and high cost crime. Low cost being defined as crimes that have low
E.). There are various costs of white-collar crime, although an accurate measurement is not easy, they are hard to asses as well as very complex. There are enormous financial losses, sometimes physical damage as a result of negligence, as well as social costs: weakened trust in a free economy, confidence loss in political organizations, and destruction of public morality. “White collar crime could also set an example of disobedience for the general public, with citizens who rarely see white-collar offenders prosecuted and sent to prison becoming cynical about the criminal justice system” (Conklin, J. E.). White-collar crime is undeniably a crime and often encompasses elaborate
Today, worldwide, there are several thousands of crimes being committed. Some don’t necessarily require a lethal weapon but are associated with various types of sophisticated fraud, this also known as a white-collar crime. These crimes involve a few different methods that take place within a business setting. While ethical business practices add money to the bottom line, unethical practices are ultimately leading to business failure and impacting the U.S. financially.
White collar and corporate crimes are crimes that many people do not associate with criminal activity. Yet the cost to the country due to corporate and white collar crime far exceeds that of “street” crime and benefit fraud. White collar and corporate crimes refer to crimes that take place within a business or institution and include everything from Tax fraud to health and safety breaches.
For instance, any financial crime can leave individuals without shelter, money, or any reasonable quality of life due to the white collar offense. Therefore, white collar crime may not involve force, they still may affect people physically. As a matter of fact, white collar crime may result in a greater impact than street crimes. Nevertheless, we continue to operate on a dichotomy of beliefs regarding violent and non-violent crimes. In this paper, we will explore white collar crime as a non-violent crime. Those crimes under discussion are blackmail, bribery, embezzlement, and forgery. In addition, we will discuss violent crimes such as first degree, second degree, and manslaughter (Verstein,
Marilyn Price and Donna Norris” (Perri, J.D., CFE, CPA, 2011, p. 23). Even though white collar crimes do not seem as violent as someone that commits murder there is still major damage done. For example, a fraud victim goes through a lot of hardship. They can be harassed, have their identity stolen, and lose everything. This, in many cases, can be looked at as a serious crime.
White-collar crime occurs by a certain group of society, the upper social class. These people are appointed in highly respected jobs or fields. These people commit crimes such as corruption, fraud marketing, selling outdated ineffective products and unfaithful advertising. These people do this in order to enhance their personal wealth by income tax evasion or the agreement of bribes. This category of criminal activity is classed as very serious but the convicts tend to not go under a great deal of punishment because of who they are i.e. highly respected politicians and company directors.
...o be intense for arrests for white collar crime than for predatory violence or drug dealing. Indeed, political pressure is more likely to be exerted in blocking or derailing white collar crime investigations than in conventional crime cases, and the police can operate effectively against white collar crime only to the extent that they are relatively free of political influence” (2010:278). Until political influence and the powers of corporations are subdued little can be done to battle this type of crime. People who commit this type of crime have the power to avoid prosecution primarily due the powerful corporations they work for or the institution they are a part of.
...crimes rather than on street crimes. Rarely will you hear of these crimes on the news until after sentencing has taken place. Unfortunately, corporations can easily afford to pay thousands or even millions of dollars in penalties and fines therefore penalties need to be increased greatly. Due to corporate power, white collar crime is hard to prove even once it is suspected. Determining who began the crime and trying to persuade a jury whom already has a hard time understanding the complexity of these types of crimes can be difficult.
White-collar crimes and organizational structure are related because white collar-crimes thrive in organizations that have weak structures. According to Price and Norris (2009), the elites who commit white collar-crimes usually exploit weaknesses in organizational structure and formulate rules and regulations that favor their crimes. Makansi (2010) examines case studies to prove that white-collar crime is dependent on organizational structure. For example, the financial crisis that Merchant Energy Business faced in 2001-2002 occurred due to the liberal Financial Accounting Board, which failed to provide a standard model of valuing natural gas and fuel. Moreover, a financial crisis that rocked the securitization market in 2008 was due to fraudulence in the pricing of securitization products. These examples ...