Rape Discourses

2005 Words5 Pages

Dominant conceptions of what exactly comprises rape as well as the ways in which rape is not only caused but also perceived by society today, are all a concordant act whose social code differs from context to context. (Brownmiller, 1976; New York Radical Feminists, 1974; Medea & Thompson, 1975; Toner, 1977; Rape Counselling and Research Project, 1977). This essay will explore some vital aspects of the construction of rape discourses, and then move into two divergent contexts within which rape occurs; prisons and war. Each context will not only bring to the forefront the fluid nature of the concept of rape but also pay special attention to the role of the media as well as the court of law. The discussed discourses and the contexts within which …show more content…

Moreover, this essay will aim to showcase how dominant discourses of rape work to aid its perpetrators, and illustrate a direct link between media reports and their role in articulating the discussed discourses of rape. Finally, the focus will shift onto the ways in which laws are socially controlling and stigmatizing of certain populations all the while illustrating a direct link with deviance and social control.

As with most phenomenons, the definition of rape has changed throughout time. Up until the Sexual Offences Act of 2003, the United Kingdom failed to recognize the penetration of the anus or mouth without consent as rape, for example (Kruttschnitt, 2004). Moreover concepts such as marital rape were non-existent. Today’s modern conceptualization of rape is seen as more inclusive of the array of issues and concepts which fall under it. So why is it that the definition of rape, and so many other concepts change throughout time? The answer is because rape is an act, a behavior. And behaviors or acts become deviant through the process of social construction. In 1977, Spector and Kitsuse put forth the Social …show more content…

Victory in arms brings group power undreamed of in civilian life. Power for men alone” (Brownmiller, 1978). Within the context of war, rape is unfortunately ‘’a common, and indeed universal abuse” (SEP, 2009). During war, rape presents in different forms, from mass rapes of female civilians to a recreational activity and even as a reward for military victory. Renowned psychiatrist, Ruth Seifert sheds light onto the common view amongst not only army generals, but essentially civilians, that rape is simply ‘’a regrettable byproduct of wartime social breakdown and lack of military discipline’’ (Seifert, 2014). It can be argued that rape which occurs during a time of war, has a special social function; to regulate power relations between the male and female gender. During wars rape is employed as a military strategy, as a way of undermining the will and morale of the enemy populations (Seifert, 2014). In societies today, the female is perceived as the one who unites the family, the community, so the mass raping of ‘enemy women’ during war could be a physical and emotional attack aimed at the enemy. “The rape of women of a community, culture, or nation can be regarded … as a symbolic rape of the body of that community” (SEP, 1996). In short, the mass raping of women during a time of war is an effective way to exert power over the

Open Document