Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Character analysis of ralph lord of the flies essay
Character analysis of lord of the flies
Lord of the flies character analysis ralph essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Character analysis of ralph lord of the flies essay
There are certain traits that make a great leader. Those traits can be found in the character Ralph, in the Lord of the Flies, written by William Golding. As the novel opens, the reader meets the characters of Jack and Ralph who were stranded on an island with their peers. It is quickly realized that there is no adult supervision and the boys vie for the position of chief. Ralph, the protagonist, is elected over Jack, the novel’s antagonist to lead the group of young boys. Ralph’s best traits that make him a better leader include his ability to prioritize, his ability to think and recognize ability in others, and the attractiveness of his leadership that persuades people into falling under his leadership.
Ralph’s ability to prioritize is a prominent
…show more content…
The children do not hesitate to choose Ralph over Jack as a leader even after they have been exposed to the fact that he was chapter chorister and head boy. As shown in Chapter 1, “‘Because I’m chapter chorister and head boy’... the clamor changed from the general wish for a chief to an election by acclaim of Ralph himself” (Golding 22). Most of the boys do not heed to the fact that Jack has had prior experience in the matter and choose to elect Ralph. Soon after, when the votes for Jack are counted, the choir raises their hands reluctantly and as Golding states, “with dreary obedience” (23). The children who voted for Jack do not vote because they believe that Jack may be the better leader based on experience and character, but out of fear and submission to Jack. His authoritative style of leadership creates a disconnect between the children in regards to obeying his orders which will lead to less effective leadership in the short term and anarchy in the long
The first step into being a successful leader is taking initiative. A good leader has to show they are in charge and are willing to take control of a group. In “Lord of the Flies”, Ralph takes initiative right from the beginning of the story. As Ralph and Piggy meet the other group of boys on the island, Ralph takes control by raising the conch which is the item he uses to get the boys to meet. He then says, “Seems
The Lord of the Flies by William Golding is a peculiar story about boys stranded on an island, and the plot and characters relate to many prevailing events and problems. A specific problem that is currently occurring is the mutual hatred and enmity between North Korea and South Korea. This is a current event, but the North and South’s hostility has been ongoing since 1945, when Korea was split into North and South, Communist and Capitalist. When the 38th parallel(Border between North and South Korea) was created, Kim Il-Sung ruled the North, and Syngman Rhee ruled the South. As of now, a power hungry dictator, Kim Jong-un rules the north, and an optimistic president who wants to see change was recently elected in the South, named Moon Jae-in. In Golding’s book, Ralph is a character who aimed to keep everyone alive and to stay together. Jack on the other hand, wanted to have fun and hunt, and although he also wanted to be rescued, he made no effort to help. In this sense, North Korea is a clear representation of the character Jack and his quest for power, and opposingly, South Korea is a representation of Ralph and his strive for order, democracy, and civilization.
When it comes to Jack’s fear of not being chief, it brings out the worst in him and it has an effect on others. For instance, when the boys are deciding on who should be the chief, Ralph wins by a landslide. “Even the choir applauded; and the freckles on Jack’s face disappeared under a blush of mortification” (Golding 19). That is the first physical evidence of Jack being humiliated by Ralph and judging by Jack’s personality, he is not used to failure so it has a big impact on him. This motivates him to destroy Ralph and the rivalry between the two begins. Another point is that Jack uses fear and threats to control the boys. For example, when Robert tells Roger “’He’s going to beat Wilfred.’ ‘What for?’ Robert shook his head doubtfully” (Golding 176) it shows that Jack is violent and is using his...
Leadership is something that stands out in people. In a group, people tend to look to the strongest person to follow. However, the strongest person may not be the best choice to follow. In Lord of the Flies by William Golding, Ralph and Jack each have leadership qualities. Jack is probably the stronger of the two; however, Ralph is a better leader. He has a better understanding for the boys. He also has more common sense and treats the boys better than Jack.
Hostile demand is not what makes a great leader. Jack doesn't understand priority, and it's seen in chapter four after a ship passes the island and there is no fire to create smoke as a signal. Ralph says, “You let the fire go out.” (Golding 80). Jack's unprioritized guilty mind is noticed here in this quote, “He flushed, conscious of a fault. "The fire's only been out an hour or two. We can light up again--" He noticed Ralph's scarred nakedness, and the sombre silence of all four of them” (Golding 81). This is why it's unreasonable to say that Jack would be a better leader. He is unable to prioritize the needs of their society and of his peers because he doesn't fully understand what it means to be a leader and look at the bigger picture. Jack is the definition of chaos, and with him as a leader, the society would deteriorate quickly without the proper structure that Ralph
I wouldn’t follow Jack as a leader because he was selfish and violent. He would lash out on Piggy and others for the littlest reason. Jack was more focused on hunting and killing more than looking out for the boys and making sure they had a place to keep safe. He also didn’t care about the signal fire which could have saved him from the island, he was more focused on hunting and killing. Jack doesn’t care about other people’s feelings and he was the reason for Simon’s death and didn’t even feel bad for doing so. He only cared that he “killed the beast”, why have leader who cares more about killing than the people he’s leading? I personally have known someone who started out as a good person but once they started getting more popular and when they started to get a high position, they started letting the power get to their head and became really mean. They also started to become a straight bully and bully anybody who wasn’t as “good” as them. Just like Jack, letting the power get to his
Is everybody born purely good inside? Or are we all filled with certain amounts of good and evil? In Lord of the Flies by William Golding a plane full of school boys lands on a deserted island, killing all the adults. With no adult supervision or civilization the boys descend back into the madness and savagery that is human nature. In Lord of the Flies by william Golding his character Simon uses spiritual power by finding out what the beast really is, showing how he failed to warn the others, how his use of the power affected the book as a whole, and how spiritual power is in the real world.
In William Golding’s novel, the Lord of the Flies, even though Ralph became chief of the stranded boys, Jack eventually rose to power through scare tactics, confidence, determination, and control. When Jack demonstrated his leadership skills, it was evident that he was superior to Ralph and would use his sense of Social Darwinism (survival of the fittest) and his oratory skills to surpass and isolate Ralph completely. Regardless of Ralph’s strengths, such as his conch, democratic maneuvers, firm motives, and kind demeanor, Jack’s mere presence ousted Ralph’s chances of taking effective leadership. By using propaganda against Ralph, gaining support from his partisan tribe members, and overpowering Ralph through his persuasive techniques and appearance, Jack clearly demonstrated how his leadership of the island was inevitable.
An individual by the name of Donald McGannon once said, “Leadership is an action, not a position.” In order for a leader to know what needs to be achieved and be able to relentlessly drive to complete it, they must exhibit different qualities and abilities that will be beneficial and vital to their success. This is important in view of the fact that it prompts and inspires others to be able to follow in their example. In Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, after a group of boys crash onto a deserted island, an example of this is seen through Ralph, who best exhibits good leadership qualities that will help bring the boys to safety and rescue. This is especially in comparison to the power-hungry Jack Merridew. The three main leadership qualities
How are the characters of Ralph, Jack and Piggy established in the opening chapters of the novel Lord of the Flies At the start of the novel we learn that during a nuclear war, there was an atomic explosion. Many boys were evacuated on an aircraft with a detachable passenger tube. They were flying over tropical seas via Gibraltar and Addis Ababa when the tube was released and crashed-landed in the jungle of an island. The aircraft flew off in flames and overnight the remains of the tube were swept out to sea in a storm.
middle of paper ... ... Hence, with Ralph as their leader, the boys have a much greater chance of getting back to their homes, safe and secure, while with Jack, the boys may be stuck on the island forever. The evidence is overwhelming: Ralph is a better leader than Jack in every way possible.
Once again they choose their "chief" by the easiest rather than the best means. The reasons that lead the boys to choose him allowed Jack to become an "irresponsible authority" and make him somewhat synonymous with the dictators that people have willingly chosen throughout
It can be seen from the very beginning of the novel that the schoolboy’s divided themselves into groups. When Ralph calls the first meeting by summoning them with the conch shell he decides they should vote on a leader. Ralph’s decision on voting for a leader is democratic and civilized. Unlike Ralph Jack Meridew claims he should be the leader because he is "chapter chorister and head boy." (“I ought to be chief,” said Jack with simple arrogance, “because I’m chapter chorister and head boy. I can sing C sharp.” Pg 29).When it came time to vote the choir members voted for jack while the other boys voted for Ralph. Ralph lets Jack be in charge of his choir. This causes the group to be divided into two groups, one led by Ralph and one led by Jack.
... Ralph has proven to have a much better understanding of people and their needs and this makes him a much better leader than Jack. With Ralph's understanding of the need for order and rules, he improves the condition where the boys are living in. Jack's condition was horrible. Also, Jack treated the boys very badly and like he better. Ralph, on the other hand treated the boys all equally and with respect. Ralph's priority to get off the island shows his wisdom and ability to make good decisions. Although Jack was popular on the island for the short amount of time the boys were there, he would not have been popular for much longer. He does not have any of the qualities that a good leader should have and turned himself and the rest of the boys into complete losers. Jack's plan would have soon faded but if Ralph had become leader, his wisdom would last much longer.
Jack demonstrates his need to have power over the boys by volunteering himself to be chief “I ought to be chief… because I’m chapter chorister and head boy” (Golding 18). Jack shows his need to be a leader as he believes he is the only who deserves to be chief. Jack thinks he is superior over the other boys. Consequently he considers himself to be the only one who can be the authoritarian figure. The boys elect a chief and Ralph is given authority over all of the boys; however, “The choir belongs to you