Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of women in roles of power through history
An essay on women leaders today
Essay on female leaders
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of women in roles of power through history
Queenship in the Middle Ages has taken a back seat in history to the predominately known and discussed Kingship, much like how typically in history women have taken a back seat to men. It has been revealed, however, that queens were often very important instruments or contributors to a King’s reign. Despite society’s efforts to minimize the role of queens and make them less important, queens directly affected a king’s reputation through their own and through their influence. These attributes, therefore gave queens the power that was so adamantly denied to them. Queens had many menial duties including keeping the household and bearing and rearing the king’s children. These roles, for the most part, kept queens out of politics or diplomacy, …show more content…
She did this through strategically surrounding not only herself, but her husband as well, with loyal subjects, and most importantly making sure her power was solidified through her family and above all her children. Her children were most important because they would continue their parent’s …show more content…
In this, she touches briefly upon the power queens could unconsciously hold in the way that their societies viewed them. In stating, “the public images of elite women were carefully constructed to put their male kinsmen in either a positive or a negative light.”14 de Jong uses three examples of the idea of Queens and beauty to illustrate her point (centered around Judith), but also the point of the influence Queens could
“The key factor in limiting royal power in the years 1399-1509 was the king’s relationship with parliament.”
When Chaucer’s knight stands judgment for the rape of an innocent girl, it is the queen’s authority that decides his fate: “And yaf him to the queene, al at hir wille, / To chese wheither she wolde him save or spille” (903-904). Using her power to humiliate the knight even further, she metes out the most ironic of punishments: “I graunte thee lif if thou canst tellen me / What thing is it that wommen most desiren” (910-911). With the queen’s decree, a great importance is placed upon the understanding of a woman’s needs—for this knowledge is the only hope in saving a man’s
He pledged to do whatever this mysterious lady wanted when he said “... there is nothing you could order that I would not do to the best of my ability, be it utterly foolish or wise” (6.4.). The women are looked at their other beauty – emphases are more on the appearance than who they really are inside, mysterious, wealthy, and powerful. It seems to me that they - especially queen - depicted to be superficial and vengeful. This can be seen “the queen got angry, she was furious, and spoke without thinking”
The role of the Royal Mistress or maitresse entitre often extended further than that of just the bedroom, and she did have influence, but remaining in this position was no small feat2. The popularity of the mistress to the king is the primary force behind her maintaining her position, this can be inherently difficult for the best of women. Royal mistresses were subject to instant dismissal if they feel out of favor with the King, as was the case for the two previous mistresses that resided before Jeanne-Antoinette3. Along with the responsibility of entertaining the King, the royal favorite also had to contend with the royal family, the court, and the public.
In conclusion, gender role in Elizabethan era is very complex with respect to women’s role. Men are the masters of the home and society; they preside over every aspect of life. They are however, expected to take care of their family and also be actively involved in politics, war, and they inherit their father’s properties. Women role varied a according to their social status. All women were raised to be subservient to men. Unlike upper class women, lower class women were denied any kind of education. And all women are expected to get married and bear children. The qualities Shakespeare gave Beatrice are very significant because it contrasts traditional Elizabethan theater. Gender role has evolved over time, especially women’s role and it will continue to evolve as long as there are women like Beatrice around.
Queen Elizabeth I, also known as the “Iron Queen”, was a remarkable woman of her time, she ruled with great power and longevity. She was one of the greatest feminist of time. Coming to the throne in 1558, she took the place of her father, Henry VIII. She was given one of the most difficult jobs fit for a man or King, ruling England. At the time women were second class citizens, they could not vote nor own properties and such. Surprising England with her intelligence and fierce rulings, she changed herself to make better decisions. She proved through her rulings, to everyone that females were strong and could rule just as well as a king. She refused to marry, giving a feeling of “I don’t need a man for anything.” The Queen was responsible for giving females a voice in literature and it is shown through Shakespeare’s writings.
Upon the death of her sister--in November of 1558--Elizabeth ascended to the thrown of England. Until Mary’s rule, no woman--apart from the unrecognized rule of Matilda, daughter of Henry I--had ruled England of her own right1. Much like her sister, Elizabeth began her rule widely accepted and welcomed2. There were, however, still many who felt that women were unable to rule, being that women were said to be the weaker sex. John Knox argued that, “God by the order of his creation hath spoiled women of authority and dominion, [and] also that man hath seen, proved and pronounced just causes why that it so should be.”3 Women had always been no more then property, first to their fathers and then their husbands. If a women were to be the anointed queen of a realm of her own right and then marry, whom was beholden to whom? A woman was to do as instructed by her husband in all things, yet a sovereign was to be under the command of God only.
Gender was the leading cause of distress in the 1500’s: King Henry VIII wanted nothing more than to have a son, yet was “cursed” with the legacy of a sickly son, whom died before the age of 18 and two daughters, one of whom broke every convention of her gender. Queen Elizabeth I never married nor had children, yet can be considered one of England’s most successful monarchs. By choosing King James VI of Scotland as her heir, unbeknownst to her, she created the line that leads to the modern Queen of England, Elizabeth II. The question posed is then, how did Elizabeth I’s gender affect her rule?
Women in different societies around the world, during the Middle Ages, experienced different hardships and roles. These hardships and roles helped shape how they were viewed in their society. Some women were treated better and more equal than others. In Rome, Medieval England, and Viking society, women’s legal status, education, marriage and family roles were considered diverse, but also similar. In certain nation’s women have more or less power than women in other nations, but none equal to the power that women have in America today.
The Book Catherine of Aragon written by Garrett Mattingly is about the life of Catherine of Aragon, the princess of Spain during the late 1400’s and early 1500’s. The book begins with Catherine’s life as a small child, before she became Queen. The first section of the book talks of Catherine’s upbringing as a princess and includes details on the duties of her and her siblings. A good example of this is described on page 17 as it shows how Catherine and her sisters had to be educated on their bloodline, heraldry and genealogy as well as dancing, cooking, and horsemanship which were the interests of her class) .
Throughout the historical literary periods, many writers underrepresented and undervalued the role of women in society, even more, they did not choose to yield the benefits of the numerous uses of the female character concerning the roles which women could accomplish as plot devices and literary tools. William Shakespeare was one playwright who found several uses for female characters in his works. Despite the fact that in Shakespeare's history play, Richard II, he did not use women in order to implement the facts regarding the historical events. Instead, he focused the use of women roles by making it clear that female characters significantly enriched the literary and theatrical facets of his work. Furthermore in Shakespeare’s history play, King Richard II, many critics have debated the role that women play, especially the queen. One of the arguments is that Shakespeare uses the queen’s role as every women’s role to show domestic life and emotion. Jo McMurtry explains the role of all women in his book, Understanding Shakespeare’s England A Companion for the American Reader, he states, “Women were seen, legally and socially, as wives. Marriage was a permanent state” (5). McMurtry argues that every woman’s role in the Elizabethan society is understood to be a legal permanent state that is socially correct as wives and mothers. Other critics believe that the role of the queen was to soften King Richard II’s personality for the nobles and commoners opinion of him. Shakespeare gives the queen only a few speaking scenes with limited lines in Acts two, four, and five through-out the play. Also, she is mentioned only a few times by several other of the characters of the play and is in multiple scenes wit...
Queen Elizabeth I was born on September 7, 1533, in Greenwich, England. Elizabeth reigned queen of England and Ireland from November 17, 1558 until her death. Elizabeth never married, and died a virgin, sometimes called “The Virgin Queen” (Gale 2). Elizabeth was born to King Henry Tudor VIII and Anne Boleyn; she was the fifth and last monarch of the Tudor dynasty. This paper will prove Queen Elizabeth I was a woman wholly devoted to her country and brought it much prosperity and growth; these qualities made her the most respected leader of the entire history of England.
When understanding the concept of nobility, a clear distinction must be made. That is, the distinction between being noble and belonging to the nobility (of Roman society). Before acknowledging this discrepancy one must also keep in mind that neither definition is exclusive, that is to say that a person can be of noble character while also belonging to the nobility and vice versa. As well, a person can belong to the nobility and not be of noble character and a person of noble character might not belong to the nobility. Aristotle, in relation to nobleness, once said that:
Early modern queenship studies understand women in relation to their husbands, fathers, and brothers. When defined outside of her own actions, a woman’s agency marginalizes. Patriarchal dominance over the centuries paints politically active women negatively even when primary evidence of their lives differs from the textbook narrative. After the rise and fall of the courtly love tradition, Anne Boleyn (~1507-1536) showed the deadly combination that masculine rhetoric and femininity formed. Her use of sexuality, adoption of masculine rhetoric, advancement of her family, and open expectations of her husband set her apart from her predecessors.
As a young child, I always wanted to be royalty. I dressed up as a princess for Halloween, I read hundreds of books on the Medieval times and the Elizabethan age, and I even tried stealing our house from my parents to turn into my own personal queendom. Despite all that hard work and hope, I was still just an ordinary American kid, without any chance of securing an apartment for myself, much less a queendom. Or so I thought until I read the book Do Not Open, by John Farndon over the summer before sixth grade.