Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Quantum science applications to religious beliefs
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Quantum science applications to religious beliefs
Russell has applied quantum theory thinking about cause to evolutionary biology (genetics/variation) and explored its implications for divine action in the natural world. Russell uses the backdrop As genetic mutations can be caused by quantum level processes, the quantum effect is demonstrated to have macroscopic consequences (cite) to postulate how a theistic evolution would work through such processes (cite primary Russel).. If occasionalism is taken absolutely into the quantum realm, with God strictly in control of all creation, its significance is intensified into what may be called quantum occasionalism. With increasing knowledge of the complexity of quantum relationships, such an occasionalism would clarify various otherwise inexplicable
occurrences, whilst concurrently presenting a determinism that is hard to reconcile with any notion of (secondary) causality (or free will) whatsoever. Yet what quantum mechanics appears to show is that the quantum realm is ruled by indeterminism, which does not sit well with a theological conception of divine action in the world. Yet a God who only intervenes on occasion would appear selective or opportunistic, which is also a contentious notion. Whilst these issues represent the quantum equivalent of the theological problem of accounting for divine action in the world, they may, as Russell argues, also help with proposing an appropriate resolution. As the EPR paper suggests (HANDLE BASED ON FOOTNOTE!), further studies may discover a determinism to complete quantum theory, offering a balance between both non-absolute occasionalism and (secondary) causality at play. Whilst the balance argued for in mainstream (Abrahamic) theology between free will and determinism continues to undergo debate on the quantum level, Russell has argued that a reconciliation may be possible if determinism is seen to operate on the quantum level, but that as increasing life and consciousness arise, determinism gradually ceases and top-down causality begins to influence outcomes. Thus the necessary theological accommodation of and balance between God’s action in the world of creation and creation’s own actions within it can be mirrored in the determinism and then secondary causality existent in and between the quantum and macro-level in the universe.
In Charles Darwin’s life he had helped make a significant advancement in the way mankind viewed the world. With his observations, he played a part in shifting the model of evolution into his peers’ minds. Darwin’s theory on natural selection impacted the areas of science and religion because it questioned and challenged the Bible; and anything that challenged the Bible in Darwin’s era was sure to create contention with the church. Members of the Church took offense to Darwin’s Origins of Species because it unswervingly contradicted the teachings of the book of Genesis in the Bible. (Zhao, 2009) Natural selection changed the way people thought. Where the Bible teaches that “all organisms have been in an unchanging state since the great flood, and that everything twas molded in God’s will.” (Zhao, 2009) Darwin’s geological journey to the Galapagos Islands is where he was first able to get the observations he needed to prove how various species change over t...
The phenomenon of the creation of the universe has baffled many for some time. The question of whether or not a designer/God put together this most intricate world in a personal quest or project leaves many in great debate. Was life brought about by some evolutionary feat? Or, in opposition, did an intelligent being create life with perfection in mind? Both questions can be answered in many different ways. Steven Weinberg, writer of A Designer Universe, offers his thoughts, through abduction, regarding the likelihood of a designer creating the universe.
John Lennox is a multilingual philosopher, mathmatition and some will claim, devout Christian. Lennox has written extensively on the relationship between science and religion, including Gunning for God and Seven Days that Divide the World. He is renowned for his reasoned and academic response to his opponents, such as Dawkins, who he has publically debated numerous times. Almost all of his works are a telling riposte that give away his inclination toward atheist scientist’s both past and present. He finds through his exhaustive research that “The rational intelligibility of the universe, for instance, points to the existence of a Mind that was responsible both for the universe and for our minds.”(p. 207) He is a firm believer in the compatibility of a scientific worldview and religion.
Part I: The Edge of Knowledge Chapter 1: Tied Up with Strings This is the introductory section, where the author, Brian Greene, examines the fundamentals of what is currently proven to be true by experimentation in the realm of modern physics. Green goes on to talk more about "The Basic Idea" of string theory. He describes how physicists are aspiring to reach the Theory of Everything, or T.O.E. Some suspect when string theory is completely understood that it might turn out to become the T.O.E.Part II: The Dilemma of Space, Time, and Quanta Chapter 2: Space, Time, and the Eye of the Beholder In the chapter, Greene describes how Albert Einstein solved the paradox about light. In the mid-1800's James Maxwell succeeded in showing that light was actually an electromagnetic wave.
Over a 1950 summer lunch at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, the great physicist Enrico Fermi asked his colleagues an unexpected question – “Don’t you ever wonder where everybody is?” Laughter went around the table as everyone immediately knew that he was talking about extraterrestrial intelligence [1]. If life arises fairly commonly, as Fermi believed, it follows that there should be advanced civilizations with the desire to visit and colonize Earth close enough to do so. However, there is no incontrovertible evidence of aliens on Earth, either now or in the past. This is called the Fermi Paradox. The lack of observational evidence for extraterrestrial intelligence is known as the ‘Great Silence.’[13]
In this philosophical scientific research paper, I will proceed as follows. First I will address the pros and cons of creation and evolution. Second, I will analyze the philosophical scientific causes of this issue in light of St. Augustine and Charles Darwin. Last I will infer my own results and therefore propose some scientific suggestions.
The first metaphor in Rifkin’s article suggests that genetic alterations are tantamount to a, “Second Genesis.” (Lunsford 245) First, the Genesis was the beginning or ori...
It is my intention, in the course of this essay, to take the work of David Hume and reapply it to causality using quantum mechanical theory.
The information presented in evolution studies must be viewed with an open mind since there is no definite proof or law of evolution. The dilemma boils down to science vs. religion. God has been our creator since beginning of time, but the discoveries of recent science are sudde...
In conclusion, it is possible for science and religion to overlap. Although Gould’s non-overlapping magisterial claims that creationism doesn’t conflict with evolution, it doesn’t hold with a religion that takes the biblical stories literally. Moreover, I defended my thesis, there is some overlap between science and religion and these overlaps cause conflict that make it necessary to reject either science or religion, by using Dawkins’ and Plantinga’s arguments. I said earlier that I agree with Dawkins that both science and religion provide explanation, consolation, and uplift to society. However, there is only conflict when science and religion attempt to explain human existence. Lastly, I use Plantinga’s argument for exclusivists to show that such conflict means that science and religion are not compatible. It demands a rejection t either science or religion.
Theistic evolution is the principle that religious teachings about God corresponds to the scientific concepts of biological evolution of modern times . This evolution is not a scientific theory , but only a line between science and religious beliefs ( Scott , 2004) . This is contrary to the ...
"The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins was New York Times bestseller in 2006." Richard Dawkins who is an atheist holds the view that, God is the most unpleasant character and that the existence of God is a scientific question. Claiming that God created the universe is a claim that must be investigated by science. In this essay, I will demonstrate Dawkins view of God and nature which is that there is absolutely no ability for science and religion to co-exist. When we come across the signs of religion there is no scientific evidence for us to believe in them. I will demonstrate this view by discussing the God Hypothesis which opposes the idea that there exists a supernatural intelligent person who created the universe. The existence of the
This paper examines how such fundamental notions as causality and determinism have undergone changes as a direct result of empirical discoveries. Although such notions are often regarded as metaphysical or a priori concepts, experimental discoveries at the beginning of this century—radioactive decay, blackbody radiation and spontaneous emission—led to a direct questioning of the notions of causality and determinism. Experimental evidence suggests that these two notions must be separated. Causality and indeterminism are compatible with the behavior of quantum-mechanical systems. The argument also sheds some light on the Duhem-Quine thesis, since experimental results at the periphery of the conceptual scheme directly affect conceptions at the very core.
The development of quantum mechanics will not, at least in directly, revolutionize the way society at large views the relationship between religion and science. Quantum mechanics is not, after all, taught in high schools and general education college
In the world of subatomic particles, the rules that normally apply to objects that are visible by the human eye are totally disregarded. Subatomic particles behavior can be attempted to be explained by a term called quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics gives the probability of where a particle will be located at, such as point A or point B. It describes atoms or particles, really anything at that level or smaller in a similar way in which relativity describes the laws of how much larger objects behave. But quantum mechanics itself goes so much deeper than just simply saying it is used to predict where a particle will be located, it is also known as quantum physics.