Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative interviews
Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative interviews
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strengths and weaknesses of qualitative interviews
A qualitative interview is one of the many research methods that sociologists can use to find out certain information. There are two main types of qualitative interviews; semi structured and unstructured. Both of these interview types are flexible meaning that different questions can be asked and questions can be asked in different orders. There are many key factors that show the difference between a qualitative interview and an ordinary conversation. The first key factor is that qualitative interviews have set questions and agendas whereas ordinary conversations are open for any discussion and questions meaning any topics can arise. (McIntosh & Punch, 2005, p60) Another key factor that shows the difference is negotiating access, which is when …show more content…
During an interview, the interviewer has to be very professional and take the lead in order for the interviewee to feel comfortable and know what they are doing. In an ordinary conversation, no one person is in charge and they speak mutually to each other. (Mason, J. 1996. p46) argues that the interviewer will have to have or have learned certain key skills in order for the interview to be successful. He argues that he or she should actually listen to the interviewees answer and interpret questions on what they say. He also says that they cannot just ask questions, not listen and then ask another question as the question they ask may not be relevant to what the participant has just said and it may cause confusion or upset the flow of the interview. Another skill Mason states that the interviewer should have to be professional is to remember what they say and what you have asked to ensure no repetition of questions and so the interview does not take any longer than necessary. Balance is also a key skill according to Mason that would help the interviewer. They have to balance between speaking and listening. They cannot speak for the whole time as the interviewee will not have time to speak or give their own opinions and answer questions and they cannot listen the whole time as they have to ensure they get the right information and by getting this, they will have to ask plenty of questions. However, a similarity between a qualitative interview and an ordinary conversation is balance as usually in an ordinary conversation both or all people involved also speak and listen for roughly the same time and not over do one of
When I start looking at the people I should interview I must first assess the reliability of the information that the person wil...
There are two types of research that can be conducted in research studies, these are qualitative and quantitative (Newman, 2011). Qualitative research is a process that uses detailed oriented methodology that tries to achieve a profound knowledge or understanding of specific incident and circumstance, wh...
Qualitative research is one of the main types of the scientific investigation. The qualitative research seeks to explore the research 's issue from the perspectives of the involved population. Qualitative research is effective for gaining culturally specific information about particular social contexts and identifying intangible social factors. The most popular methodologies of this research are consensual qualitative research, grounded theory, phenomenology and heuristic inquiry. Since all these methods have certain differences, their comparison and contrast will be helpful for improving proficiency in qualitative research.
Qualitative research is a method of inquiry appropriated in many different academic disciplines, traditionally in the social sciences, but also in market research and further contexts (Denzin, Norman, Lincoln & Yvonna . 2005).
The term methodology refers to the way in which we approach problems and try to find answers and in social science, it applies to how research is conducted, our assumptions, interest and purposes shape which methodology we choose (Steven, 2016:3).Qualitative research is understanding people from their own perspectives, their viewpoint and experiencing reality as they experience it. Qualitative research has many approaches or methods of collecting data and one of them is an interview which I have chosen to explain further based on it as a method of collecting data. The interview is the most common method of data gathering used in qualitative research and it is used in deferent ways by every main theoretical and methodological approach.
Qualitative research is an approach that attempts to situate an activity that locates the observer in the world by providing the study to occur in their natural setting and by attempting to make sense of, or interpret information (Denzin and Lincoln, 2005). A characteristic of qualitative research is to use a variety of empirical materials such as personal experience, interviews, and questionnaires. It is imperative to understand the task at hand and how to fully carry out the study when using a qualitative research approach in order to find out the information needed. One view of qualitative research is it involves examining individual’s experiences and documenting those experiences in detail (Jones, 2011). By documenting these observations the researcher is ensuring validity in his or her data and giving the correct creditability to those who participated in the study.
A good interviewer is comfortable around people and he will help others to feel at ease with them. He should arrive at the right time, professionally attired and be impartial when dealings with the respondents. Sherman could have arrived on time at 8 a.m. without the escorting of a muscular security guard carrying a nightstick. This action could help the interviewees feeling comfortable with Sherman. A good interviewer sits fairly close, but not so close to the interviewee.
This essay intends to compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of the quantitative and qualitative approaches to research which addresses young people and bullying using two journal articles. The first article (quantitative) aims to “establish the relationship between recurrent peer victimisation and the onset of reported symptoms of anxiety or depression in the early teen years” (Bond et al. 2001, p. 480) while the second article (qualitative) aims to “investigate the nature of teenage girls’ indirect aggression” (Owens et al. 2000, p. 70).The two articles will be critically compared in terms of research design, methods used, approach to data analysis, reported results and the plausibility and appropriateness of the conclusions and recommendations posed. The aim of this essay is thus to evaluate and assess the methods of social science research currently undertaken in published research.
Types of Qualitative Methods When a qualitative approach seems to make the most sense, the task becomes one of selecting the qualitative method or methods to be used. A number of different ways of framing qualitative methods exist. Lee, Mitchell, and Sablynski (1999) use purposes (e.g., theory generation, theory elaboration, theory testing, or critical theory), research design (e.g., case study, ethnography, and in-depth interviews), and analytic data techniques (e.g., grounded theory approaches, pattern matching in case study research, and hermeneutic techniques) as a way of categorizing types of qualitative research. Creswell (1998) speaks of the following “five traditions” of qualitative inquiry: biography, phenomenological study, grounded theory study, ethnography, and case study. Merriam (2002b) is the most comprehensive in her discussion of types of qualitative research, suggesting that the following eight approaches are the most common: Basic interpretive qualitative study.
Field notes, audio/ video recordings, and transcripts are the different types of data obtained from the qualitative methods discussed above. Open-ended questions and probing questions enabled the researcher to get more in depth information from the participants. While sample is the representation of the whole population by a small group which is chosen randomly or by certain criteria to estimate characteristics of the whole population. The objectives of our research question along ...
Qualitative and quantitative research methods take different approaches to gathering and analysing information. Whether it is a qualitative or quantitative study, the research study begins with a question or series of questions. Both use rigorously designed studies to get the most accurate, detailed and complete results. Qualitative studies common methods are interviews, surveys and observation. A qualitative study aims to provide a detailed description of the study results, often using pictures and written descriptions to describe what the research revealed. A qualitative study looks at the big picture, helping researchers to narrow in on points of interest that then can be followed up on in a quantitative study. While a quantitative study has a narrower focus, it attempts to provide a detailed explanation of the study focus, along with this using numbers and statistics. And the results from a quantitative study can reveal bigger questions that call for qualitative study. Or vice versa a qualitative study may reveal at analysis that a more focus and direct approach may be needed. With both methods analysis is a key part of any study whether qualitative or quantitative.
You are being invited to take part in this in-depth interview because as the investigator of this study, I want to approach and understand this topic through a professor’s lens and standpoint. In addition, your role as an arts professor, being equipped with critical thinking skills and familiarity with the social science/humanities discourse will fit perfectly for this qualitative interview. We appreciate you taking the time to participate in the interview. This interview will help to learn more about how individuals use internet, the gratifications received through its usage and our relationships and presentation of self in the digital world.
One type of characteristics in a qualitative research is that it is carried out in a natural setting. As a consequence, when a researcher is conducting a research they are committed to spend time doing field work. This will ensure that their claims are not bias or incorrect. Furthermore, the sitting for their research is typically places similar to a board room, or a class room. Also, it is usually limited to a smaller group. As a result, it allows the research to be more personal. (Smith & Davis, 2010)
Qualitative data analysis is the process of transforming data into information, information into understanding and understanding into knowledge (Davenport & Prusak, 1998). Furthermore, qualitative data analysis can be described as a blend of scientific studies and artistic style to create an innovative product. The research acts as the primary research tool, and must be able to sustain composer throughout the entire study. In addition, the researcher must be able to pay attention to the small details of the study, without losing sight of the big picture of the study (Chenail, 2012).
...n process is very important for an organization to hire new members, as employees need to select the right person to do the right job. Therefore, employees need to read through applicant’s document and qualifications, hence organize an interview to be more close with the applicant, to know more about the applicants, see if they are suitable for the job position. Selection process can help the employees not to make wrong decisions, this is a good opportunities to assess skills, aptitude and abilities. (John, 2007)