Pyrmont-Ultimo's Change Historically in Terms of Its Communities and Redevelopments
The proposal of the Pyrmont Point project, between the Council of the
City of Sydney and the Land Commission of New South Wales, 1981,
describes the Pyrmont-ultimo peninsula as,
'…a quality residential development on the last significant headland
in Sydney Harbour'.
This belief was a realisation by many in the late 20th Century and was
reinforced by the actions of local government and many major
construction firms.
The Pyrmont-Ultimo peninsula was once occupied primarily of
'blue-collar' workers, surrounded by derelict industrial waterfronts
and working-class terraces that dominated the industrialised land.
Over the past decade, massive urban renewal programs transformed the
two inner-city suburbs. The redevelopment of decayed buildings of the
working-class, improved both the employment opportunities and quality
of infrastructure. Due to the constant fluctuations in redevelopment
and development, the areas' population also fluctuated over the years.
In 1875, Pyrmont reached its climax in residential development and by
1981 the population had exceeded 19,100 (the highest in New South
Wales at the time) and a building boom of 3,699 dwellings. At the turn
of the century, the population of the peninsula peaked at 30,000- the
highest it would ever reach as stated by Micheal R. Mathews[1].
Thereafter the population declined 5 per cent per year. This rapid
decline was a result of the high amounts of industrial expansion in
Pyrmont-Ultimo. Industries such as the CSR Sugar Refinery needed
resizing and so terraces were demolished close by for expan...
... middle of paper ...
...se as development plans multiply due to its close
proximity to the CBD that provides employment, good investments,
aesthetically pleasing views and some of the elite educational
institutions in New South Wales such as UTS and Sydney University.
Until the peninsula s completely developed is when populations will
stablise however will continue to attract Sydneysiders to its
proximity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] Matthews, R Micheal. 1982 "A History of Pyrmont and Ultimo"
Southwood Press. Australia.
[2] " "
[3] http://www.reportage.uts.edu.au/stories/2000/jun00/affordable.html
[4] " "
[5] Video Education Australia. "Pyrmont-Ultimo Urban Redevelopment and
The Community"
[6]
http://www.shfa.nsw.gov.au/div/corporate_services/employmnet/job_list.cfm
In 1900, Pyrmont was an important port and industrial area, with a population of almost 30 000 people. There was a wide range of industries and services present including wharves, dockyards, warehouses, abattoirs, wool stores, railway yards and even an incinerator for the disposal of Sydney’s waste. It was deemed a working-class suburb with a predominantly Irish/Catholic population. As the income for Pyrmont was only modest, semi-detached cottages were the most common type of housing present. In the 1960’s however, Pyrmont-Ultimo was deteriorating at a fast rate and became an unfortunate example of urban decay.
- What/how does it tell us about living in Australia during times past? (100 - 150 words)
It is the 21st century: more than 85 per cent of Australians inhabit the urban areas sprawling along the coasts, and more and more rural areas struggle to survive.
In the Case study of Reclaiming Rose Place there are several issues to think about. The first is the community in which the issues are occurring. This community has an extended history of racial discrimination and hate. There are several white supremacist leaders who lived in the area and have left family living in the area. This hate has been ingrained in the family members who still live in the community. The second issue is the district forcing integration on this community’s school which is causing multiple problems. The new principal being part of the minority that has been hated for so long is immediately met with distrust and disregard. The community does not want a minority in control of their school. The school currently employs only
In the evaluation of why Britain colonised Botany Bay, Australia, one can draw on many conclusions. When the First Fleet arrived at Botany Bay in January 1788, little did they realise that for years to come historians would be contesting the real reasons as to why the British Parliament planned to establish a colony in Botany Bay. The Botany Bay debate, as it has been known to be called, began among historians in the 1950’s when Geoffrey Blainey said that it was colonised for strategic motives#. These motives included such plans as there was a plant nursery to be established on Norfolk Island and Australia was to become a flax farm and a market garden that was to be surrounded by goal walls; there had been a failure of the growing of flax and pine on Norfolk Island, this at first had been very promising; and that flax and timber were vital to Britains economy as explained by the British Politicians in many letters. Along with Blainey’s argument came another debate, this being that Botany Bay, was colonised as it was a good outpost for trading purposes. The traditional view in the debate was that Botany Bay was the chosen place for the convict population and it is this traditional view that my argument will follow.
Chicago in the 1920s was a turning point for the development of ethnic neighborhoods. After the opening of the first rail connection from New York to Chicago in the 1840s, immigration sky rocketed from that point on. Majority of the immigrants to Chicago were Europeans. The Irish, Italians, eastern European Jews, Germans, and Mexicans were among the most common ethnicities to reside in Chicago. These groups made up the greater part of Chicago. The sudden increase in immigration to Chicago in the 1920s soon led to an even further distinguished separation of ethnicities in neighborhoods. The overall development of these neighborhoods deeply impacted how Chicago is sectioned off nowadays. Without these ethnicities immigrating to Chicago almost 100 years ago, Chicago neighborhoods would not be as culturally defined and shaped as they are today.
Housing Affordability in Australia has become the focus point for urban planners in recent years. In particular, South East Queensland (SEQ) has experienced significant pressure as the demand for property and affordable dwellings increases and population growth in the region continues. The issue has come to the forefront in discussions for local governments in the region and there is a real need to address the problem of housing affordability. The subject of affordability is complex and is contributed to by a number of factors including the impost created by Council processes, which is the scope of the HAF-T5 Project.
Gard, S. (2000). A history of Australia. The Colony of New South Wales. South Yarra: MacMillan Education Australia Pty Ltd.
DETROIT, known as the "Automotive Capital of the World," is the largest city in the state of Michigan. The city sits at the heart of an official three-county metropolitan region comprising Wayne, Oakland, and Macomb counties.
It is often easy to castigate large cities or third world countries as failures in the field of affordable housing, yet the crisis, like an invisible cancer, manifests itself in many forms, plaguing both urban and suburban areas. Reformers have wrestled passionately with the issue for centuries, revealing the severity of the situation in an attempt for change, while politicians have only responded with band aid solutions. Unfortunately, the housing crisis easily fades from our memory, replaced by visions of homeless vets, or starving children. Metropolis magazine explains that “…though billions of dollars are spent each year on housing and development programs worldwide, ? At least 1 billion people lack adequate housing; some 100 million have none at all.? In an attempt to correct this worldwide dilemma, a United Nations conference, Habitat II, was held in Istanbul, Turkey in June of 1996. This conference was open not only to government leaders, but also to community organizers, non governmental organizations, architects and planners. “By the year 2000, half the world’s people will live in cities. By the year 2025, two thirds of the world population will be urban dwellers ? Globally, one million people move from the countryside to the city each week.? Martin Johnson, a community organizer and Princeton professor who attended Habitat II, definitively put into words the focus of the deliberations. Cities, which are currently plagued with several of the severe problems of dis-investment ?crime, violence, lack of jobs and inequality ?and more importantly, a lack of affordable and decent housing, quickly appeared in the forefront of the agenda.
The problem however, with these “renewal projects” is that the implemented changes are never usually intended to benefit the long time inhabitants of these communities, these changes are intended usually, to push out the element of poverty that exists in many of these communities (which is a direct result of decades of neglect) in exchange for the opportunity to cater to a more affluent (usually less “ethnic”) demographic. In laymen’s terms, city planners, elected officials, prospective businesses, and even law enforcement, all converge for the purpose of removing poor people from an area by simply making it too pleasant and by exten...
One major example of the help that was put into areas of Toronto is prominent is Regent Park, Toronto before gentrification. Regent Park showed that there are 65% apartments and houses that are market price but then there are 35% of the properties that are rent geared to income (Williams, 2009). Even though this was not a high percentage and was still beneficial to people who worked near the location of Regent Park in Toronto. Making it easier to access everyday necessities can make a lot of other expenses in life go down as well, when you do not have to worry about paying more than 30% of your income. Regent Park had a revitalization project to help turn this area from an area with high poverty rates to a nicer area by demolishing most of the public housing pushing the poorer people out of the area.
Apart from Manila, several other areas, more specifically provinces, were also affected by the developments. These provinces which experienced the massive conversion from agricultural lands into “residential, commercial a...
Yarra Rangers Shire Conci, . (2012, 04 05). Retrieved from Yarra Ranges Shire Concil: vic.gov.au/Business/What_is_Economic_Development
Briefing about the leases that were granted, I would start with explaining about the Holroyd River Holding. First lease was issued in 1945 to Marie Stuart Perkins under the Land Act 1910 (Qld) for pastoral work. IIn 1973, it was withdrawn. The second lease that was granted in 1974 for the period of thirty years under the Land Act 1962 (Qld) was not only confined to pastoral works. Coming to next, i.e. the Mitchellton Lease, this lease was granted for pastoral purposes.