Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Historical background of south china sea
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Historical background of south china sea
This South China Sea dispute has been described as “mother of all territorial disputes” (Baviera 2004: 505). In the post cold-war era, it is ex
Background to the South China Sea Dispute.
For centuries, countries have quarrelled over territory in the South China Sea, but the area has recently seen resurgence in tensions. This upsurge has caused international concern that the area is becoming a tinderbox with potential global consequences. The argument is regarding territory and sovereignty over oceanic areas and two island chains that are claimed in part or in whole by numerous countries, the Spratleys and the Paracels. Along with these islands, there are many uninhabited sandbanks, atolls, rocky outcrops and reefs, for example the Scarborough Shoal.
http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/67616000/gif/_67616829_south_china-sea_1_464.gifSCS
Of all the claims from different states, China’s is by a great deal the largest portion of territory. This area covers from the Southern province of Hainan stretching hundreds of miles south and east. China cites its claim of right comes from to millennia of history where the Paracel and Sprately island regions were held as important facets to the Chinese nation. A map was produced by China explaining the claims in 1947, illustrating the Paracel and Sprately islands included in full in its territory. The same claims were cited by Taiwan (the Republic of China). Vietnam however, contests China’s historical explanation that China did not claim sovereignty before the 1940’s. Instead Vietnam argues that it has documents to prove that since the 17th century Vietnam has actively ruled over both islands. The Philippines is another major claimant which “invokes its geographical proximity” to the Sp...
... middle of paper ...
...ates as not willing to initiate conflict which is up against severe power imbalances.--- Therefore in China’s interest to seize opportunities that are unlikely to be challenged militarily.
Future solutions recommendation according to or
Strengths and weaknesses(critiques) and their solutions
Overall strength of OR and China’s trajectory overall towards economic security/regional great power.
Conclusion
Slow and incremental
MAD
- US and Sousteast asian powers
What am I saying: China is increasingly adopting a more aggressive approach to its claims in the SCS. Reflecting that China is seeking to further its economic security. China’s rise is inevitable, and the tone of this rise is yet to manifest.
China’s current actiosn towrd the SCS dispute can be likened remarkably to Mersheimers offensive realism theory. In analyising China through this theory, China’s future
...ities as a responsible state holder. One of the consequences of the international community questioning China’s military capabilities is that the international community could potentially induce an unproductive arms race with China. If China is to participate in the race, China will have a weakened competitive position in the races of economic and intellectual strength. Secondly, China will lose the ability to use its army as a form of soft power therefore making it harder to believe that China can be a responsible state holder since it will seem like propaganda. In terms of China, the world is in a very exciting position with the promotion of the China’s model an alternative governing system is being offered. However, we need to remain vigilant and aware for just as quickly as China rose, it has the potential to fall as well if it doesn’t play it’s cards right.
On the other hand, hard-core realists predict that since China’s economy is on the rise, and United States economy is declining, it may create conflict. During World War I, a war occurred between England, a declining dominant hegemony, and Germany, a dissatisfied challenger on the rise (Wong, The Rise of Great Powers, Nov.18). However, war will not spark between China and...
But every coin has two side, so does war. Some people think war will always around us because the country need develop. “The prominent University of Chicago political scientist John J. Mearsheimer, a self-declared “card-carrying realist,” sees great danger for the United States in China’s continued prosperity: “Can China rise peacefully? My answer is no. If China continues its impressive economic growth over the next few decades, the United States and China are likely to engage in an intense security competition with considerable potential for war” (2006, 160).” (James Payne, 2012) People around the world can see that China follow a peaceful way to develop fast both on military and economic. But there are still have some people believe it’s dangerous. I can understand what they are concern about, but every country wants to develop as well as the U.S., and the main goal is not to occupied or flaunt anything, the main aim is to make the ordinary people who live in the country have a better life. And the country develop their military is in order to protect their citizen, and make their citizen fell safety. There is a Chinese old saying “One shouldn 't have the heart to harm others, but must be vigilant so as not to be harmed.” We cannot have a bad idea for others, but we still need protect ourselves to avoid hurt. I think this view is the same as between
Nathan, Andrew J. "U.S.-China Relations Since 1949." U.S.-China Relations Since 1949 | Asia for Educators | Columbia University. Columbia University, 2009. Web. 26 May 2014.
Some opportunities only come once in a lifetime. In the early 1900s, the United States had a major source of debate: the retention of the Philippines (Dudley 42). The only propitious side to this debate is to retain the Philippines as an American territory. The Philippines are much too valuable to simply be abandoned. This group of islands is a crucial point in the expansion of the United States and its trade.
"Q&A: China-Japan islands row." BBC News. N.p., 24 Apr. 2014. Web. 26 Apr. 2014. .
Grouchier, C & Walton, L. 2013. The maritime world: The Atlantic, Pacific and Indian Ocean World. Vol 2. London & New York.
Given these sets of circumstances, china, Taiwan and United States have much to gain and even more to lose if an armed conflict erupts in the Taiwan Strait. All three countries have political, economic, and national security issues involved and united states and china are both in competition economic...
Taiwan then came under the one-party dictatorship of the Nationalist Party and represented “China” in various international forums (Dittmer 476). Throughout years of additional complicated events, Taiwan’s national identity, as stated by Chu Yun-han “fluctuates according to
78, no. 1, pp. 137-146. 5 (3), 27-45, http://www.politicalperspectives.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Sino-US-relations1.pdf 9. Wang, Hui, “U.S.-China: Bonds and Tensions”, RAND Corporation, 257-288, n.d., http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1300/MR1300.ch12.pdf 10. Yuan, Jing- Dong, “Sino-US Military Relations Since Tiananmen: Restoration, Progress, and Pitfalls”, Spring 2003, http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/articles/03spring/yuan.pdf 11. Yan, Xuetong. "
Realism is one of the important perspectives on global politics, it is a notion about the conservative society and political philosophy (Heywood 2011: 54; Shimko 2013: 36). Besides, Gilpin (1996) claims that “realism…, it is not a scientific theory that is subject to the test of falsifiability, therefore, cannot be proved and disproved.” (Frankel 1996: xiii). The components of the realist approach to international relations will be discussed.
China's Foreign Policy Since the initial warming of U.S.-China relations in the early 1970’s, policymakers have had difficulty balancing conflicting U.S. policy concerns in the People’s Republic of China. In the strange world of diplomacy between the two, nothing is predictable. From Nixon to Clinton, presidents have had to reconcile security and human rights concerns with the corporate desire for expanded economic relations between the two countries. Nixon established ties with Mao Zedong’s brutal regime in 1972. And today, Clinton’s administration is trying to influence China’s course from within a close economic and diplomatic relationship.
Ng, Teddy. “Rise of China’s Military and Economic Power Leaves the Rest of the World Wary.” South China Morning Post. South China Morning Post Publishers. 20 Sep 2012. Web. 10 Mar 2014.
The discipline of international relations (IR) contains several theories that contain theoretical perspectives to the idea of power. Within the realist perspective there are two approaches that help paint the portrait of the realist theory, the classical approach to realism and the neo-realist approach. Classical realism and neorealism both have been subjected to criticism from IR scholars and theorists representing liberal and constructivist perspectives. The key tenets to realism contain three essential characteristics of international relations which are the state, anarchy and the balance of power. This essay will closely analyse all three characteristics with special regards to power being central to the realist perspective.
With the end of the Cold War emerged two superpowers: The United States and the Soviet Union. The international system then was considered bipolar, a system where power is distributed in which two states have the majority of military, economic, and cultural influence both internationally and regionally. In this case, spheres of influence developed, meaning Western and democratic states fell under the influence of U.S. while most communist states were under the influence of the Soviet Union. Today, the international system is no longer bipolar, since only one superpower can exist, and indisputably that nation is the United States. However China is encroaching on this title with their rapid growth educationally, economically, and militaristically.