Public Sanitation And Sanitation

1919 Words4 Pages

The implementation of the “Clean and Green” campaigns in Singapore since 1965 reveals how important a role sanitation, hygiene and cleanliness plays in the development of a nation. Indeed, sanitation and public health have been major concerns for governments and ruling authorities throughout the course of history, as maintaining a sanitary city meant that disease could be managed and populations could be kept healthy and productive. The obsession over filth, cleanliness and sanitation is perhaps best exemplified through colonial medical practice, as colonial governments sought to fashion their colonies into a desired mould through the imposition of western sanitary science and colonial conceptualizations of cleanliness and hygiene. Indeed, I argue that sanitation takes on a significant political agenda in the colonies – one where colonial powers govern and wield influence over their colonial subjects through Foucault’s “biopolitics”. As Michaels and Wulf asserts, “the state has come to represent power over biological life and power over the body, an authority that controls the population, establishing law and order through the knowledge and practices of public sanitation”. This is the lens through which this essay will be viewing sanitation – as a tool of governance that serves to consolidate political agenda and legitimacy, and that explains why the domain of sanitation became such a critical part of colonial medical practice, and has lasting implications for politics even up till today.

To start off the discussion then, this paper will first address how sanitation and cleanliness came to be viewed as an important concern in medical practice, referring to the miasma theory as the basis for the increased attention towards sani...

... middle of paper ...

...dressed how and why filth, cleanliness and sanitation has become such a critical part of colonial medical practice, and its lasting legacies even up till today, where governments still employ sanitation policies to consolidate their political agenda and legitimacy, and to encourage ideal citizen behaviors and lifestyles. In his discussion of sanitation in colonial India, Pande comes to the conclusion that ‘the history of Calcutta thus seems to confirm the complex entwinement of political ideology and medical technology”. Truly, this applies not merely to Calcutta but can be observed in many countries and societies, both past and present. The discourse of cleanliness and sanitation is one that is intricately intertwined with politics, and thus the discussion of biopolitics and political ideologies cannot be discounted in any discussion on sanitation and cleanliness.

Open Document