According to CDC (2015), “the goal of the national accreditation program is to protect and improve the health of the public by advancing the quality and performance of all public health departments in the country—local, state, territorial, and tribal”. To this end, the Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB), which is nonprofit, serves as the independent accrediting body. Though a voluntary accreditation process, many health departments are working towards accreditation and those that are already accredited, pride themselves in their accreditation status. Because such accreditation Increase accountability and credibility in the communities they serve by merging together all the fractioned policies and procedures of the health departments seeking …show more content…
Other benefits include but are not limited to improved communication between the health department and the governing board of Health, and the enhancement of the said health department to be more competitive in funding opportunities (“National Voluntary,” …show more content…
On the other hand, the hospital accreditation agencies have longer history in the community and hence, better credibility. A great example is JAHCO, an accrediting agency that was founded in the early 195os. JACHO has great credibility and is held in high standard within the medical community. Therefore the agency’s stamp of approval is incredibly prestigious in that, many hospitals’ funding activities and reputation are heavily tiered to JACHO’s accreditation. As most health care workers can attest, one of the most stressful weeks in a health institution is when JACHO’s inspectors are in-house conducting their survey (“About joint Commission,”
Strengths Long-standing reputation Provision of quality healthcare Highest rank in patient satisfaction Recipient of Joint Commission accreditation Serving a diverse population Weaknesses Smaller than other four hospitals Decrease in net profit Increase in expenses Significant increase in long-term debt Not-for-profit status Opportunities Changes in government regulations Change in lifestyle Influx of patients due to higher patient satisfaction Cost savings Opening of some outpatient clinics and surgery centers Threats Too much competition
The standards of the Joint Commission are a foundation for an objective evaluation process the may help healthcare organizations measure, assess and improve performance. These standards are focused on organizational functions that are key for providing safe high quality care services. The Joint Commission’s standards set goal expectations of reasonable, achievable and surveyable performance of an organization. Only new standards that are relative to patient safety or care quality, have positive impact on healthcare outcomes, and can be accurately measured are added. Input from healthcare professionals, providers, experts, consumers and government agencies develop these standards.
... strategy, the outpatient clinic will benefit in several ways. Intra-departmental meetings will be held, both clinic and hospital staff will be present during such meetings. The staff at the clinic will no longer have to decipher through protocol; the outpatient clinic will be represented. This representation will make for a more productive staff. By making changes to the scheduling department and incorporating inter-departmental meetings, schedulers will have a greater respect for technologist’s workload. Customer service at the outpatient clinic will no longer suffer due to communication gaps. By implementing inter/intra-departmental meetings staff will be able to focus more on the patient and provide them with an overall better experience. By making these suggested changes the outpatient clinic will continue to grow and provide quality care to patients.
The Joint Commission is a highly reputable organization within the healthcare community and facilities that are accredited by the Joint Commission often have an advantage over non-accredited facilities within their community. Consumers understand that facilities accredited by the Joint Commission will provide a higher quality of care than other facilities (Joint 2013.) Another very big benefit associated with being accredited by the Joint Commission is the acceptance of Medicare and Medicaid. In order for a healthcare facility to receive payment from Medicare and Medicaid, the facility must have passed the accreditation process by the Joint Commission. The acceptance of Medicare and Medicaid payment plays a giant role when looking at the business side of healthcare. Consumers who only have Medicare or Medicaid without any additional health insurance are only able to afford facilities that except their insurance. Therefore, facilities that are accredited by the Joint Commission will have a much larger consumer base than unaccredited facilities (Salera
The Joint Commission is an independent, not-for-profit organization, established more than 60 years ago. TJC is governed by a board that includes physicians, nurses, and consumers. TJC sets the standards by which health care quality is measured in America and around the world. TJC evaluates the quality and safety of care for more than 19,000 health care organizations (The Joint Commission, 2011). To maintain and earn accreditation, establishments must have an extensive on-site review by a team of Joint Commission health care professionals, at least once every three years. The purpose of the review is to evaluate their performance in areas that affect clients’ care (The Joint Commission, 2011). Accreditation may then be awarded based on how well the organizations met TJC standard;, however, a site review is not a guarantee of accreditation.
State and local public health departments throughout the country have the responsibility for improving health in workplaces, schools, and communities through identifying top health problems within society and developing a plan to improve. Barriers the public health system has encountered over the years include: changes in the overall health system that support cost containment and improved health, and an increase in the number of individuals with insurance coverage for direct preventive services; reduction of qualified public health professional and funding at all levels of government; increasing focus on accountability, with higher expectations for demonstrating a return on investment in terms of cost and health improvement (Trust, 2013). In the near future, health departments ...
As a way of fulfilling its mission, it conducts and supports research in health services within AHRQ and in the following sectors: institutions of academic; in healthcare systems; in offices of physicians and in hospitals. Weinstock (2009) argues that the agency’s portfolio of research is very broad and addresses all aspects of the healthcare system. The HHS’s strategies and goals act as a guide to the Agency’s operations. The Agency fully supports the strategic goals of HHS.
Medicare suppliers must be accredited by the Joint Commission (JC) or by a state regulated survey, which is performed by selected state agencies on behalf of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS). As of July 2010 the CMS monitor and provide guidelines which the Joint Commission incorporates into its review processes. Accreditation consists of a in depth review of a hospital's physical plant, patient care , medical staffing and services based on quality factors and standards produced by CMS, as well as conditions of participation requirements under the Title 42, Part 482, of the United States Code.
The state is responsible for the overall regulatory, supervisory and fiscal functions as well as for quality monitoring and planning of the distribution of medical specialties at the hospital level (Schäfer et al., 2010). The 5 regions are responsible for hospitals and for self-employed health care professionals, whereas the municipalities are responsible for disease prevention and health promotion rel...
Because state and local public health programs are often funded at least in part with Federal dollars, accountability is often a key issue (“Ten Essential Public Health Services.” 2015). Public health programs therefore document progress towards positive change in health behavior or health status indicators (“Ten Essential Public Health Services.” 2015). Data such as these can be presented to policymakers to document the value or effectiveness of a program (“Ten Essential Public Health Services.” 2015). Those data can also be used for continued program planning and modification (“Ten Essential Public Health Services.” 2015). Policies have positive or negative influences on health. Examples of health policies include safety standards, which influence the incidence of injuries; tobacco regulations affect personal health; and safe city parks can affect the ability for people are active (California Department of Public Health “Strategic Plan”, 2013). It is a systematic process to utilize appropriate data, develop and track measurable health objectives, establish strategies and actions to guide the targeted improvements (California Department of Public Health “Strategic Plan”, 2013). The targeted strategies may be laws, codes, regulations and/or
The improvement of health, enforcing policies, and monitoring comes from interrelationships between governmental and non-governmental entities. Since the 21st century the apparent need for an improved public health infrastructure has been a recurring topic on the state, local, and national level. In 2010 the Affordable Care Act authorized numerous clinical health reforms, a big step towards providers being accountable. {ACOs} Accountable care organizations are conducting health assessments and reporting metrics to payers. According to Magnuson and Fu, Jr., “Public health agencies must, in turn, evolve from being the only entities capable of assessing and monitoring population health to strategic and enabling partners involved in population health practice” (2014). A sense of involvement and shared work load is needed to help shift the challenges public health officials face. Public health officials promote and protect the community. With the involvement of other organizations more polices can be enforced and created to improve population
The Joint Commission is an accreditation organization that ensures that patients receive safe and quality care is any health care institution. Healthcare employees
Beitsch et al. (2006) also conveys the main functions of state public health institutions, which include the assessment of diseases, policy development, and the commitment to health protection and promotion activities. While Brumback and Malecki (1996) reveal that the role of public health agencies is to assess and analyse public health problems, form policies, layout development, and implement
After moving to the United States, I took the initiative to familiarize myself with the US healthcare system by doing many clinical rotations in different family practice and pediatric clinics in Houston, TX. After these rotations, I was enamored with the delivery of public health measures in each clinic, according to the US public health standards.
To reiterate these six components, which are innovation, technical package, communication, management, and political commitment – the community is hand in hand associated with core functions of Public Health. In Public Health the three main core functions are assessment, policy development, and assurance. Assessment is a tool that helps monitors different health and environmental statutes to create, deploy, and identify solutions. It also used a diagnostic tool to investigate health-related problems and different health hazards. Policy development is an act of informing and educating those developed ideas and topics that help the communities and different organizations in their health care efforts. Lastly, assurance utilizes different laws and regulations to help in the aid of protecting the public or environment at risk. It also re-evaluates the laws and regulations to see its effectiveness and its quality (Schneider,