Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role and responsibility in counseling
Role and responsibility in counseling
Ethical dilemmas in drug abuse
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role and responsibility in counseling
Psychopharmacology is the scientific study of the effects that drugs have on mood, sensation, thinking, and behavior. Examples of these drugs include antipsychotics, antidepressants, and antianxiety medications. These drugs work by changing the chemistry in the body by altering hormones, neurotransmitters, or interactions between receptors. Modern drugs like antidepressants have been around since the 1960’s when the serotonin hypothesis was formed. Since this time, the ethical debate over psychopharmacology has been growing. Today, the debate focuses primarily on whether it is ethical to prescribe a patients a psychopharmaceutical who does not have a strict diagnosis of a mental disorder. Instead the patient is using the drug as a means of …show more content…
To counter this claim, the author brings up the point of a medication that is used for dementia. Even people on the other side of this debate would agree that this drug should be given to someone who falls about 2 standard deviations away from what is considered normal. This same person would have to disapprove of giving the same drug to a patient that is only one and a half standard deviations away from normal. Why is it okay to give the drug to someone who is 2 deviations away, but not one and a half? This concept of what normal is that biostatics relies on is completely arbitrary. These arbitrary measurements are stopping people from receiving medicine that could potentially slow down the progression of a terrible disease, and even save their lives. This is because they are dependent on statistical categorization like age, gender, and ethnicity. It is too hard to give normal a statistical definition because there are so many variables that factor into a patient’s disease. What is considered normal for the human race is ever changing based on the environment, technology, and society that is all around us. Synofzik also brings up this startling point: “If legitimation of drug use is simply bound to …show more content…
Everyday and everywhere people get plastic surgery or take oral contraceptives. We use caffeine to enhance ourselves. Plastic Surgery, oral contraceptives, and caffeine are all considered medicine. Yet, in many cases they are not used for treatment, but for enhancement. These practices do not relieve anyone of an illness, yet they are almost never argued over being ethical or not. They are almost universally accepted. So, why are some cases of using medicine for enhancement acceptable, but not all? Synofzik thinks that use of psychopharmaceuticals is ethical. He does not think that everyone should take them all the time. At the end of his article he makes the stipulation that there needs to be regulation of these drugs and should only be taken when recommended by a doctor. When recommending a psychopharmaceutical to be used it must be considered if the benefit outweighs the harm and whether or not the patient wants to take the drug. He states:” The real question is not whether enhancement should be legitimated or not, but under which circumstances and which role physicians should play” (Synofzik, 2009). He suggests that these drugs be regulated through laws and monitoring of doctors and patients, similar to how narcotic pain killers are
In the United States there are many examples of drugs that are used to help people with psychological problems. An example of this is the drug Antabuse. Antabuse
Understanding psychological disorders are very important in human development, the first step is to define what is meant by a disorder. How do psychologists determine that there something is psychologically wrong with a person? What behaviours are abnormal? A psychological disorder, also known as a mental disorder, is a pattern of behavioural or psychological symptoms that impact multiple life areas and/or create distress for the person experiencing these symptoms. A clear sign of abnormal behaviour or mental state is when an individual's behaviour is destructive to themselves or their social group, such as family, friends. Above all psychological disorders create a maladaptive pattern of thoughts, feelings, and behaviours that lead to detriments in relationships and other life areas. There are several ethical issues in treating psychological disorders. There two ways of treating psychological disorders through; psychotherapy this form of treatment involves social interactions between a trained professional (therapist) and client. This is delivered on a one-to-one, face-to-face meeting. Another way of treating psychological disorder is through pharmacological treatments. This is the use of proactive drugs to treat certain disorders. This essay will aim to highlight the pros and cons of using pharmacological and psychological treatments.
Forcing someone to take medication or be hospitalized against their will seems contrary to an individual’s right to refuse medical treatment, however, the issue becomes complicated when it involves individuals suffering from a mental illness. What should be done when a person has lost their grasp on reality, or if they are at a risk of harming themselves or others? Would that justify denying individuals the right to refuse treatment and issuing involuntary treatment? Numerous books and articles have been written which debates this issue and presents the recommendations of assorted experts.
In today’s society, a lot of emphasis is placed on administering drugs and medicating people with psychological issues; however, most of these ailments and issues have the ability be treated through the use of talk therapy rather than medication. Americans are particularly guilty of over medicating when it comes to our more common mental health diagnosis such as, ADHD, depression, and anxiety. We as a society expect things to be done at the snap of a finger; in our advancement of science, we have been able to discover ways of offering the results we want quickly, inexpensively, and with little effort. Unfortunately, although the use of medications, also known as psychoactive drugs, occasionally remove the symptoms, but they do little to remove the causes of these mental health issues. In addition, to the lack of solution that the use of psychoactive drugs offer, they can also have unwanted and dangerous side effects. These can include simple physical irritants such as dry mouth and head aches, and can range up to dependency and substance abuse, and in some cases even death. Moreover, there are cases of inappropriate prescribing, where doctors are authorizing the use of medications that don’t work or are not pertinent to the issue the patient is experiencing. Furthermore, some of these doctors are issuing these medications without subjecting the patient to a proper mental health evaluation by a psychological professional.
As science has evolved, so have treatments for mental illnesses have over time. The medical model is described as the view that psychological disorders are medical diseases with a biological origin (King, 2010, pg. 413). Abnormal behavior that categorizes some disorders can be impacted by biological factors such as genes, psychological factors such as childhood experiences, and even sociocultural factors such as gender and race (King, 2010). Treatments such as psychosurgery (lobotomy) , drug therapy (pharmaceuticals), electroconclusive therapy, and psychoanalysis are used to treat a wide range of psychological disorders. Back then, the public’s negative views on mental illnesses also went as far to associate with the people who treated it; psychiatrists. “Nunnally (1961) found that the public evaluated professionals who treated mental disorders significantly more negatively than those who treat physical disorders,” (Phelan, Link, Stueve, & Pescosolido, 2000, pg. 189). People back then didn’t see the point in “paying to be told that they were crazy”. However, in today’s society, it is now acceptable to seek help from psychiatric professionals; we are seeing more and more people seek mental health treatment. “In terms of facility-based records of utilization (Manderscheid and Henderson 1998), the data suggest that the rate of utilization of professional mental health services has at least doubled and maybe tripled, between the 1950’s and today,” (Phelan, Link, Stueve, & Pescosolido, 2000, pg. 189). In the 1950’s, neuroleptic drugs like Thorazine were introduced to treat the symptoms of schizophrenia. These drugs block a neurotransmitter called dopamine from getting to the brain, which in turn reduce schizophrenic symptoms, however there are some side effects such as substantial twitching of the neck, arms, and legs, and even dysphoria or lack of pleasure. (King, 2010, pg.
The American Psychiatric Association (APA) Code of Ethics (2002) is the foundation for psychology’s professional practice and ethical responsibility. Although it is important to know the ethical standards, professionals must also apply them into practice. The current case example examines the importance of professional consultation, when faced to identify ethical dilemmas in clinical practice, make ethical decisions, and gain insight into self-awareness. This case also highlights the importance of implementing self-care in clinical practice, especially when treating patients who present with severe symptomatology.
Second, the court must conclude that involuntary medication will significantly further those concomitant state interests. Third, the court must conclude that involuntary medication is necessary to further those interests. The court must find that any alternative, less intrusive treatments are unlikely to achieve substantially the same results. Fourth, as we have said, the court must conclude that administration of the drugs is medically appropriate, i.e., in the patient's best medical interest in light of his medical condition. The specific kinds of drugs at issue may matter here as elsewhere. Different kinds of antipsychotic drugs may produce different side effects and enjoy differen...
FDA research has shown that tricyclic antidepressants such as Paxil can actually increase the severity of depression and suicidal behavior in teens and young adults. In the shocking expose “Treating the Mentally Ill,” medical journalist Rob Waters warns “Antidepressants including Paxil, Prozac, Zoloft, and Effexor have provoked hostile behavior and thoughts about suicide in a number of teenagers who have been prescribed the drugs. Some of th...
The field of clinical mental health is one of great reward, but also one of grave responsibility. It is the duty of the counselor to provide the client with a safe environment and an open mind, in order to foster a healthy therapeutic relationship. The majority of mental health counselors would never intentionally harm their clients; however; good intentions are not enough to ensure that wrong will not occur. The ethical expectations and boundaries are regulated by both laws and professional codes. When discussing ethics, one must realize there are two categories, mandatory and aspirational. (Corey, Corey & Callanan, 2007)
Physician-assisted suicide refers to the physician acting indirectly in the death of the patient -- providing the means for death. The ethics of PAS is a continually debated topic. The range of arguments in support and opposition of PAS are vast. Justice, compassion, the moral irrelevance of the difference between killing and letting die, individual liberty are many arguments for PAS. The distinction between killing and letting die, sanctity of life, "do no harm" principle of medicine, and the potential for abuse are some of the arguments in favor of making PAS illegal. However, self-determination, and ultimately respect for autonomy are relied on heavily as principle arguments in the PAS issue.
Enhancements, such as steroids or abused prescription drugs, were originally created to alleviate symptoms; steroids, for example, are to assist patients with dangerously low body weights. The idea of medicine is to heal, and to restore patients to their normal status. However, technologies that the biomedical sector can supply are often capable of producing exceptional abilities in those without any health issues. While these technologies are strictly used for those with diagnosed disorders, many people with “normal” capabilities often abuse these technologies to attempt to gain an advantage. Those who enhance themselves further are scorned, seen as cheating and not gaining their victories fairly, as seen further into the paper. If we wish to give everyone equal opportunity, as the meritocracy suggest, we must address what we define as enhancement, and what we define as therapy? When would it be acceptable to use these
Placebos, whether we know it or not, are being used and prescribed to us throughout our lives. However, there are some questions that are tied to the use and suggestion to use placebos. The major question is, is it ethical to be prescribed a placebo while still maintaining our autonomy as a patient? This topic has been a subject of debate for over a century, however, little scientific data has been found to prefer the use of placebos over nonuse. The author will attempt to come to a conclusion of this debate, one that respects and acknowledges the ethics of the health care field and the patient. Before doing so, the author will provide information on what a placebo is, scientific comparisons to real drugs, pay consideration
“Legal, Ethical and Professional Issues” (Chapter 15) is an interesting chapter in the textbook “Abnormal Psychology.” Just like the name of the chapter, it helps understand legal, ethical, and professional issues related to the practice of psychology. This is very important because by offering service a psychologist is responsible for the people that are under his or her care, that even goes for people participating for research. Psychologist have authority to practice in their area of expertise, using methods that are not harmful to their recipients and “ that preferably have a strong scientific basis” and never doing treatments that are unorthodox and will put their patients health and safety in any more jeopardy. This also gives patients
Central Idea: Prescription drugs can cause serious mental and physical health problems if they are taken incorrectly or abused.
In this case, the psychologist is presented with several ethical issues which could cause harm to the client. The first ethical issue that arose in this case is the potential for a role conflict. The psychologist and Mr. Hartwig had contact prior to the development of a therapeutic relationship when the psychologist bought a car from Mr. Hartwig. It may not be enough that the brief, informal relationship ended. The psychologist must assess the dimensions of the previous relationship from the viewpoint of the client as well as his/her own personal feelings (Koocher & Keith-Spiegel, 2008). For example, the client could feel that he gave the psychologist a good deal and that the psychologist was indebted to him. This could leave the psychologist vulnerable to being manipulated by the client. Or, what if the car broke down? This could leave the psychologist feeling cheated and resulted in hostile feelings toward the client. The psychologist has an ethical responsibility to examine both relationships for role incompatibility prior to forming a therapeutic relationship. The psychologist seemed to be aware that there was the potential role conflict resulting from their initial meeting, and he acted ethically by attempting to refer Mr. Hartwig to a Psychology Registry.