Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Psychology of serial killers
Serial killers psychology case studies
Psychology of serial killers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Psychology of serial killers
Psychopathy is a mental illness that is categorized as a personality disorder. There have been different conceptions of the definition of psychopathy and what it represents. The conceptions tend to overlap and seem to be contradicted by each other. This mental illness is a mixture of violent behavior with no moral and antisocial personality disorder. It is said that in the general population the psychopaths are only one percent. However, if you want to look at just the adults in prisons and the youth in juvenile detention as opposed to just the general population, thirty percent of psychopaths.
One of the things that characterize a psychopath is their lack of empathy. Psychopathy has been also called sociopathy but, there is a slight difference.
…show more content…
A sociopath has a conscience they know right from wrong but its weak. The guilt and remorse wouldn’t stop them. They are said to be hot heads and disorganized when acting out, they don’t think they just do. Sociopaths have been known to be able to create attachments to people yet volatile, easily agitated and emotional. On the other hand, psychopaths are not able to form those attachments with people as they have no conscience. They can be manipulative and have a way of mimicking emotions even though they can feel any. Psychopaths are very charming, organized, and emotionally stable. psychopaths can be a result of genetics while sociopaths are a result of the environment. Psychopathy is an important mental illness to get aware of because it’s good to know if there is another reason why some people are criminals. It isn't just because of the criminal acts they commit, it is because they have a mental illness and something in their life has turned them into people without consciences or a weak conscience. Psychopaths are a little tricky to notice because it can be any person around you and you might not even know. However, people must understand that some psychopaths are violent. When one hears the word psychopath, one might think of the way the media portrays them. From the media, we see psychopaths as just serial killers or a criminal with a twisted mind who have no morals. However, we can't be so ignorant. An implication that has raised is the fact that this illness is rare and not something you can see in everyday life. Yet people use the word loosely. As you can tell two things stated have contracted themselves. The mental illness is rare yet it can be anyone around you. Victims can be blinded why those acts and psychopaths because they are able to hide you they are. "Psychopaths are usually only diagnosed if and when their behavior is so far outside of the bounds of societal norms that they end up in prison." As stated before, there are contradictions which cause controversies.
One ongoing controversy is whether if psychopathy is a genetic trait or if it is caused by environmental factor either trauma or the community. Researchers have said that those who have experienced child abuse and victimization have the likelihood of being violent and express sexually offending behavior as those traumas are considered risk factors. Empathy can be a genetic attribute or can even me progressed over time. In other words, it can be a motivated process that can be voluntary, which is why some suggest therapy. They also have said that therapy can help "rewire" this trait, yet it's counterproductive for many and can increase such behavior. Psychopathy has been associated with the antisocial disorder. Nevertheless, it can also consist of narcissistic, histrionic, and borderline disorder, which makes it difficult to categorize. Another thing researchers have noticed is that some psychopathic characteristics are adaptive and can be seen as helpful in society. What is meant by this is that having too much empathy can impede politicians' and police officers' ability to carry out their duties. Many in society have shown the opinion that those with mental illnesses have a clouded judgment and can't technically know what they are doing. Knowing this, some believe that those with psychopathy should excuse criminal responsibility and of course other say there is no excuse for committing a crime. …show more content…
These characteristic that a psychopath has have said to be demonstrable in a brain pathology or as developmental impairments. Franz Joseph Gall, a german physician in the late 1700s, came up with the theory that human behavior was controlled by twenty-seven different tendencies, each located in a specific part of the brain. Also, he said that the outer one structure of the skull showed which of those tendencies were exceedingly developed and which were degenerated in any individual. Three of these tendencies have been linked to criminal behavior if they are over developed. Greed is one of these tendencies and it could lead to theft. Another is the instinct of self-defense that has been seen to lead to violent fights. The third could lead to murder and this tendency is what some call the "carnivorous instinct.” Overall, Gall helped publicize to society that many criminals committed crimes as a result of innate tendencies. Moral insanity was the term use before psychopathy.
English physician James Pritchard define moral insanity as "the moral or active principles of the mind are strongly perverted or depraved." As a result, Pritchard identified two types of insanity. One type is the that which affects the intellect and the other that affects emotions and will. This term was mostly designated for emotional-volitional disorders in general. However, in France and Germany, moral insanity had a more specific definition that referred to immoral, violent, and criminal behavior that was attributed to an isolated defect of one's moral sense. Maudsley, a British psychiatrist, expanded Pritchard's concept further by recording that some individuals seem to lack a moral sense, no empathy. Pritchard helped differentiated personality from a mental disorder "by distinguishing between more transient symptomatic states and those that are related to more enduring characteristics." This was a significant distinction as it contributed to the development of the idea of
personality. Phillipe Pinel was a french physician, in the early 19th century, who is credited for being the one to recognize psychopathy as a mental disorder and known as the founding father of psychiatry. He described the individuals to be victims of "moral character defect or insanity without delirium." Pinel said that these individuals showed bouts of extreme violence without any sign of psychosis. Another german psychiatrist named Julius Koch was the first to use the term psychopathy which comes from the word psycho pastiche. He believed that psychopathy came from a flaw in our constitution at birth. Koch developed the degeneration theory where he proposed a system to classify those psychopathic traits. He said that those traits do not represent a mental illness but also don't let the individual have a normal mental capacity. He called these traits defects and those defects into three categories: psychopathic disposition, psychopathic taints, and psychopathic degeneration. Koch recognized that in order to assess psychopathic traits, it was required to look at the patient’s life history as a whole instead of just the sum of its parts. The term psychopathic replaced what society knew as moral insanity. Though Koch's psychopatische construct was more focused than the moral insanity concept, it was still too broad to comprehend personality disorders in general.
Psychopathy has fascinated the public for years due to the gruesome and evil portrayal it has received in the media. Psychopathy is defined in the DSM-III as a personality disorder characterized by enduring antisocial behavior, diminished empathy and remorse, and disinhibited or bold behavior (Patrick, Christopher, Fowles, Krueger, Rober, 2009). Psychopathy represents a cluster of different dimensions of personality found amongst the general population to varying degrees (Patrick et al, 2009). The diagnostic definition is meant to be applied to adults, however psychopathology can occur in children. Controversy surrounds the topic of childhood mental illness because the brain is not fully developed until the age of 18; thus allowing the possibility that symptoms are the result of growing up and will change. The triarchic model, formulated by Christopher J. Patrick, is the most commonly used model in diagnosing adult and childhood psychopathy. This model suggests that different conceptions of psychopathy emphasize three observable characteristics to varying degrees; boldness, disinhibition and meanness (Patrick, et al, 2009). Boldness is the first observable characteristic and is comprised of low fear including stress-tolerance, toleration of unfamiliarity and danger, and high self-confidence and social assertiveness. Disinhibition; characterized by poor impulse control including problems with planning and foresight, lacking affect and urge control, demand for immediate gratification, and poor behavioral restraints. Meanness is defined as lacking empathy and close attachments with others, disdain of close attachments, use of cruelty to gain empowerment, exploitative tendencies, defiance of authority, and destructive excitement seek...
Israel Keyes was born as the second oldest of nine on January 7, 1978 in Richmond, Utah. Keyes grew up in a Mormon household eventually moving to Washington and then ending in Maine only to reject his family’s religion resulting in him being kicked out. As a child, Keyes always carried a gun around with him, some of which were given to him by family members, specifically his grandfather ("Acting At Random"). Around the age of 19, Keyes enlists in the Army as a Specialist and works his way up only to leave on an honorable discharge after receiving a DUI and also after his first crime of abduction and rape of a young teenage girl between 1996 and 1998 (Noe). This is the beginning of Keyes’s journey of criminal behavior.
One area of research in psychopathy focuses on the set of structures in the brain known as the limbic system, but more specifically on a structure known as the amygdala. According to neuropsychology class slides, the amygdala is involved in emotions and storage of emotions in memory as well as the fear response when encountering threatening environmental stimuli. Osumi and colleagues (2012) note that the affective and interpersonal facets of psychopathy, such as cold-heartedness and lack of empathy, which are thought to be the core features of psychopathy, are associated with reduced activity in the amygdala. This is coupled with the fact that a less functional amygdala is associated with a psychopathic individual’s exhibition of antisocial behaviors, at least in part because he will not perceive the threat of punishment as a consequence of his actions. So whether it be the acts against other people or the acts of justice that may be carried out against the perpetrator, the psychopath will perceive both as less significant, as compared to a non-psychopathic individual. (Osumi et al., 2012)
The Psychopath Test: A Journey Through the Madness Industry is a book by Jon Ronson, where he investigates the idea of psychopathy and the many individuals involved. Psychopathy is defined as “a person who is mentally ill, who does not care about other people, and who is usually dangerous or violent.” Ronson visited mental health professionals and psychopaths in order to determine the right way to control the diagnosis of mental health disorders. Throughout the novel, Ronson focuses on three main themes, which are the definition of madness, unnecessary mental diagnoses and the problem with confirmation bias.
The psychopath know the reasons behind acting a certain way and just don't think about the consequences. Even in the DSM-IV clear definitions of a psychopath doe not exist but the closes to diagnose is anti-social personality disorder. Dr. Hare instead developed the Psychopathy Checklist for people to diagnose psychopathy. The first part of the Psychopathy Checklist looks at the emotional and interpersonal traits of the disorder(Hare, 1993). Some of the emotional qualities that the clinician would look for is as followed: glib/superficial, egocentric/grandiose and lack of empathy.
Psychopath and Sociopath are so closely related that many don’t know they are different illness. Both psychopath and sociopath have similar illness but their factors are completely different. Study’s shows this may be a product of nature vs nurture. Secondly, Psychopath behavior is shown to be controlled while sociopath is shown to have uncontrollable behavior. Thirdly, there violence outburst is different, psychopath usually plan out their crimes while sociopaths are erratic and careless with their crimes. Fourthly, Psychopaths don’t feel any type emotion towards others but they can be in relationships when it comes beneficial to them. Sociopaths often don’t have relationships, they don’t become attached to others. Lastly, Psychopath are actually
However, Glenn and Raine (2014) argue that the emotional deficits characteristic of psychopaths diminish their rational capacity, making them unable to be held accountable for the rash and harmful decisions. Additionally, psychopaths may display knowledge of right and wrong, however their understanding is substantially compromised (Maibom 2005). Therefore, because they cannot understand moral emotions, moral transgressions fail to motivate them and they cannot be held morally responsible for their actions. They treat moral transgressions as equal to conventional transgressions (Levy 2008); to them, they are merely breaking the rules. And although breaking the rules begets consequences, a short attention span prevents psychopaths from anticipating consequences. Nevertheless, say, for example, a psychopath on a different portion of the spectrum is aware of the consequences. In this case, they would be still be indifferent because their feelings of grandeur lead them to believe that they are removed from punishment (Gao, Glenn, Schug, Yang, Raine 2009). For these reasons, many argue that psychopaths should not be held responsible for their behaviors.
Four years ago, Peter Demerath, was placed under house arrest, not because he had committed a crime, but because he was dead. Peter had contracted an illness which ultimately led to his untimely demise at only twenty three years of age. When he had awoken to having found out he was now a member of the conscious dead, his body had already been removed from the county hospital’s morgue and stashed away in a government facility belong to U.A.C.T. (Undead American Citizen Taskforce)
Scientists have many theories concerning psychopaths. Scientists do not have a definite clear cut answer on what is the cause of psychopathy but they have many ideas: nature and the nurture of the person. Nature is the gene that the person carries. The nurture of the person when they were a child simply means how they were treated when they were growing up and/or how they were raised. Some scientists even consider it a possibility that it could be a mixture of the two.
Sociopaths are prevalent among society, and some researchers, like Martha Stout, claim that one out of every twenty-five people is a sociopath. However, this statistic is incorrect. This statistic is based on the assumption that sociopaths and psychopaths are the same people—which is untrue. While the sociopathic and psychopathic traits overlap, sociopaths differ in that they are obviously nervous and agitated, unable to create the illusions that psychopaths are so proud of. They live on the fringes of society, uneducated and unable to keep a steady job. Psychopaths, unlike sociopaths, are suave and able to maintain an illusion of conformity and maintain relationships on a superficial level. Both, however, are dominantly male, tend to disregard the rights and social mores of others, and have a tendency display violent and disruptive outbursts without remorse. Unlike psychopaths, who completely lack remorse and the ability to love, sociopaths may attach themselves to certain people, though they still remain contemptuous of the rest of humanity (7).
The study of the psychopath shows someone who is incapable of feeling guilt, remorse or empathy for what they do. They are generally cunning, manipulative and know what is right or wrong but dismisses it as applying to them. Such individuals are incapable of what some would call normal emotions such as love; generally react without thinking about the consequences of their actions and show extreme egotistical and narcissistic behavior. Some of the common characteristics among psychopaths are as follows: superficial charm and an average intelligence, unreliability, untruthfulness and insincerity, lack of shame, antisocial behavior, loss of insight, suicide threats rarely carried out, poverty in major affective reactions, no nervousness or neurotic manifestations, sex life trivial and poorly integrated, and failure to follow any life plan (Berko...
The definition of a psychopath is a person suffering from chronic mental disorder with abnormal or violent social behavior. The label “psychopath” cannot be placed on a child who is developing emotionally, mentally, or physically. A child’s brain is finished developing way past their teenage years. Most of the time when a child would be considered a psychopath is parents did not teach their children proper respect and they lacked parenting skills. The child just repeated what they saw and knew and continued to do wrong things throughout their life because they didn’t know until it was too late.
Psychopathy; the trait that truly distinguishes humans from ¨machines¨, emotionful to emotionless. Within the novel American Psycho by Bret Easton Ellis, one may logically assume that the protagonist, Patrick Bateman is indeed implied to be a psycho as the title suggests. However upon further analyzation, Bateman is revealed to be an unreliable narrator, he does not captivate the reader with all of his emotions verbally, for they are revealed through his actions. Bateman certainly does murder people, however, clinically murder doesn´t rule somebody to be a psychopath. Bateman feels no visible remorse for the victims he kills, because Bateman lives in an artificial hyperbole of a yuppie world where no love is shown, all relationships superficial.
The media most often showcases psychopaths as individuals who are inherently evil and dangerous towards themselves and others. Yet, this concept of psychopathy goes far beyond this idea of pure evil and instead necessitates a needed psychological understanding. These individuals, psychopaths, are generally characterized by a lack of empathy and conscience. Indeed, psychopath’s indifference to the repercussions of their actions combined with other characteristics such as hostility and aggression make for a potentially dangerous personality (Lyken, 1996, p.30). In order to identify a psychopath’s recidivism, it is important to differentiate them from sociopaths who, instead of having a psychological impairment that makes it difficult for them to socialize, have been systematically under socialized (Lyken, 1996, p.30). In accordance. psychologists have developed the methods such as the Psychopathy Checklist- Revised (PCL-R) to help identify those with psychopathic tendencies (Walters, 2012, p.409). That is why predictions of recidivism among psychopaths is most efficient when done
When Ronson wraps up his work in The Psychopath Test, a novel, he creates a theme of paranoia as he ventured into an industry of madness. He establishes his work’s meaning that any individual may appear normal, abnormal, or be a psychopath within. In other words, his theme follows the idea that life can be full of deceiving people. In order to convey his theme, he used four significant characters. They include himself as the narrator, David Shayler with Rachel North, and Robert Hare. These characters not only emphasize Ronson’s theme, but also help establish the purpose of his theme, which is to showcase that madness can be anywhere.