Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of family on human behavior
Impact of family on human behavior
Theoretical approaches to aggression
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of family on human behavior
Aggression is the human behaviour of one that is directed towards another with the intention to cause harm (Anderson & Bushman, 2002). Violence is aggression with the intention to cause extreme harm (Anderson & Bushman, 2002). There are mainly two types of aggression. Firstly is hostile aggression which is an unplanned form of aggression which occurs as a reaction. Instrumental aggression on the other hand is a pre-planned form of aggression which has other goals than merely harming the victim (Anderson & Bushman, 2002). In this essay, we will view three different psychological theories of aggression. They are the biological phenomenon of aggression, aggression as a form of response to frustration and finally aggression as a learned social …show more content…
Learned social behaviour which is seen through extract 1 that is based in the American cultural context. As it is a norm to own a gun in America, shootings due to domestic violence is inevitable. Where violence is learnt when it is seen in the family, especially in the case of men (Minnesota Advocates for Human Rights, 2003). However, women on the other hand do not succumb to being violated, if they grew up seeing their mother abused (Minnesota Advocates for Human Rights, 2003). However, if they were abused or violated at a younger age, they tend to be a victim of domestic violence as they grow older (Minnesota Advocates for Human Rights, 2003). This can be aided alcohol which fuels the biological component of aggression, as alcohol causes one to lose control (Minnesota Advocates for Human Rights, 2003). However, it is also key to note that the violence used against someone might not be the original source of frustration. For example, when someone is frustrated with the superior or law enforcers and are unable to vent the frustration on them directly, they might …show more content…
Youths tend to join gangs in order to fulfil their social, emotional and psychological needs (SPF), 2015). It is also noted that youths that are part of the gang resort to violence at the slightest provocation (SPF), 2015). Many other social issues were also brought to light to question the emerging rise of youth gangs which were seen as eradicated in the past (Palatino, 2010). Issues such as whether youths are getting enough job opportunities in the job market as well as the role of schools were greatly highlighted as these were the reasons why gangs flourished in the history of Singapore (Palatino, 2010). Dysfunctional families were also seen as a reason for the rise of gang violence (Palatino, 2010). Domestic violence plays a role in making a family dysfunctional. Spousal violence is the most common type of violence in Singapore (Tai, 2013). From 1995 to 2012, the cases of family violence tripled from 978 cases to a whopping 3200 cases (Tai, 2013). It was also seen that 4 out of 5 victims of family violence suffer psychologically as well as physically (Tai, 2013), hence, leading to a more dysfunctional family. Though Singapore does not experience the wrath of gang violence as often as America, the existence of threat is still very real. As such we can see how similar America and Singapore are in terms
Tio Hardiman, the creator of the Violence Interrupters Program, said, “You can give them a history lesson. Your daddy was violent, your granddaddy was violent, and your great granddaddy was violent. And now your brothers are messed up because you misled them” (James et al., 2012). He is describing how violence is a learned behavior from your family and close peers. Hardiman goes on to tell a little about his own family’s history with violence. When he was fourteen, a man tried to hurt him in the streets, but his stepfather killed the man right in front of him, and he recalls feelings good about it. This family taught him violence was okay through their own
One of the most researched topics in the history of psychology is aggression. One goal of social scientists has been to define aggression. Some believe that aggression is biologically preprogrammed, others look toward situational factors and this study suggests that aggression is learned. This study was conducted by Albert Bandura and his associates in 1961 at Stanford University. The researchers proposed that the children be exposed to adult models with either aggressive or nonaggressive ways, they would then be tested without the models present to determine if they would imitate that aggression they observed in the adult.
Aggression is defined as any behavior intended to harm another person who is motivated to avoid the harm according to Baumeister & Bushman (2014). A study was conducted in 1967 by Leonard Berkowitz and Anthony LePage, to determine whether the presence of weapons would elicit aggressive behavior from an individual (Baumeister & Bushman, 2014). They hypothesized that participants were likely to associate weapons, particularly firearms, to aggression and violence, which would cause observing a weapon to elicit an aggressive response. The experiment determined that the presence of weapon can elicit an aggressive response from people ready to act aggressively. In the study, participants were shocked up to seven times then given the opportunity to
Goldstein, J. (1986). The Nature of Human Aggression. Aggression and Crimes of Violence. New York. Oxford University Press, 3-29.
Many experts do not accept that biology alone creates children who kill. They believe that violence is a learned behavior. Being abused or witnessing domestic violence is an environmental factor in ju...
Since the beginning of social psychology, psychologist has been trying to analyze how people’s thoughts, feelings, and behavior are impacted by aggression. When an aggressive person gets frustrated or upset, social psychologist tracks down what exactly drives them to commit crimes, atrocities, or even abuse. According to Kassin, Fein, and Markus, aggression is “behavior intended to harm another individual” (2016). Individuals who attain this trait don’t always have to physically abuse someone, aggressive attacks could be verbal, emotional, or mental as well. Although many might argue that people who are viewed as aggressive tend to harm another person because that is their only cure, however, there are alternative motives that drive aggression,
The world has a problem with violence. It is not a new problem, and it not one that is likely to disappear soon. It is estimated that around 1.6 million people die of violence each year. Half of these deaths are attributed to suicide, while the other half are attributed to homicide, war and other conflicts combined. Historically, violence was seen as a social ill. Before the 1970’s, when genetic research began to take hold, most researchers believed that violence was caused by a number of social aspects. Even with our increased knowledge, there are still groups that view violence as a social ill. This is evident in the fact that there are groups like MAVAV, Mothers against Video Game Addiction and Violence, and Parents against Violence. These groups aim to reduce the amount of violence shown in video games and other media, in a hope that it will reduce the rate of violence. Technological advances have allowed researchers to delve into the causes behind violent acts and tendencies. Although genetics does not fully predict who will have violent urges, it does play a large role in the predisposition towards violent tendencies. Some of these causes are linked to hormones, like the amount of adolescent testosterone. Others are linked to brain activity, mainly in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and the orbitofrontal cortex. There is even some evidence that the MAOA enzyme can play a role in violent expression. Of course, not all causes are genetically based. Although genetics can help determine who will have a predisposition towards violence, there are other factors at play. The peer group that one associates with, the environment that they are raised in, and the home life that they experience all play a role in determining if the vi...
There is no one causal factor, or single identifying marker that determines violent behavior in individuals. While studies show characteristics associated with violent offenders, no single variable predetermines such offenses. It is instead a number of factors that come in to play, that have shown an association to such reactive aggressive behavior. Factors such as environmental demographic (Hughs, 2008) (Barnes, 2012), biological and genetic predispositions to mental illness (Miller & Barnes, 2013), prenatal brain development (Michalska & Kinzler, 2011), abuse, psychological factors, and many other variables that somehow coincide to create a recipe for such violent actions. Strides to determine these factors, and what sets the stage for such pathology is as important as it is controversial. The closer we get to arrive at possible causal factors, the closer we are to preventing such acts from happening, and providing help and better treatments for those with such disorders early on.
The statement suggests that those with no history of violence within their family and/or those who had a good upbringing will most likely not go on to commit violent crimes. At first this does seem like a reasonable suggestion to make. However, once we look deeper into this topic we uncover more complex explanations that are used to understand the phenomenon that is violent crime. Psychological perspectives are widely used throughout the world of criminology in order to help comprehend why crime is committed and the patterns that occur between the type of offender and type of crime. There perspectives are broken down into four main areas within psychology; Biological/Evolutionary, Social/Learning theory, Psychoanalytical/Psychodynamic and finally
The cycle of violence functions by learning behavior only when the observer is paying attention, retaining the image of the action and reproducing it, and imitating the action. A person becomes an abuser when they are influenced into acting out in violence. On the other hand, Martin Seligman’s theory of learned helplessness (Sigal pg.25) explained the psychological paralysis a victim experienced. Experiments on dogs were conducted to see the effects of those who could and could not control the shocks they were given. According to the theory, depression occurred when the victim accepted the fact that they were helpless when they could not escape something painful (“Real World Psychology” pg.349). Once a victim is constantly beaten, they will begin to show signs of helplessness, where they believe there is no way to escape the abuse or receive help. Henceforth learned helplessness causes depression by the victim’s lack of effort to take care of their health and
In understanding moral and ethical development of individuals, we have been exposed to a vast amount of information enlightening us of the complex ways in which both males and females cognitively develop their moral and ethical values. Through this we have learned about the many gender differences in these values, which has raised the question of why males and females branch apart in this development, when the separation occurs, and if it is a result biological differences, or socialization. In studying violence, in particular, the two directions seem to lead further and further apart as most research shows that boys act more physically aggressive than girls. In fact, most books available on youth violence, and even studies done in the past, focus on the male population because that is where it seems to be most prevalent. "…Teenage girls are arrested far less frequently for serious violent crime than boys (a ratio of one to eight)" (Siegal & Senna, 1991, 56). Why does this drastic form of aggression occur to an extreme in young males, and can the same epidemic be forming in young females? To answer this question information has been gathered and a questionnaire formed to assess peoples’ views on gender differences in aggression and what factors contribute to it.
Freud believes that aggression is a primal instinct, and civilization thwarts this instinct, making man unhappy. Civilized society controls man's tendency toward aggression through rules and laws and the presence of authority. These mechanisms are put in place to guarantee safety and happiness for all individuals in a society. However, the necessity of suppressing the aggressive drive in m...
The field of psychology has opened different hypothesis from a variety of theories with the aim of studying the behaviour of humans being as a result they concluded with five psychological perspectives. Behaviourist, Biological, Psychodynamic, Cognitive and Humanistic perspectives are the deduction after a depth study of mental activity associate to human behaviour. In this essay I will be comparing two psychological perspectives according to aggressive behaviour.
“Domestic violence is a violent confrontation between family or household members involving physical harm, sexual assault, or fear of physical harm” (Stewart & Croudep, 1998-2012). In most places, domestic violence is looked at as one of the higher priorities when trying to stop crime. Domestic violence cases are thought to be influenced by the use of alcohol, drugs, stress or anger, but in reality, they are just learned behaviors by the batterer. These habits can be stopped as long as one seeks help (Stewart & Croudep, 1998-2012). For instance, a child is brought up in a household that is constantly involved in criminal acts.
Behaviorism is a classic psychology approach to understanding an organism's social and cognitive skills. This field of psychology focuses on observable behavior including measuring types of communication and natural mannerisms. It is important to understand how individuals present and express themselves in their natural environments in order to recognize and further advance knowledge about psychological disorders. When it comes to determining and labeling psychological disorders, especially behavioral disorders, it can be tricky to make the correct diagnosis. Psychologists have to assess all of the characteristics and symptoms an individual possesses and stick to textbook definitions when it comes to properly formulating a diagnosis.