Psychological Elements of the Crowd

1563 Words4 Pages

Conforming to Riots: Psychological Elements of the Crowd
I. Introduction
From a psychological standpoint, crowds have been an elusive, enigmatic and frightening phenomenon; the nuances of the human mind in itself are elements which evoke worlds of study on their own, let alone the implications of attempting to analyze a collective of such minds. However, the study of crowd psychology is obligatory to enhance knowledge in many a field of study, including criminology and political science. Society’s growth and recession alike hinge on the numerous phenomena we can attribute to crowds, and hence the subject lends itself much importance to examine. This paper will go on to scrutinize what is known of crowd psychology, the phenomena involved with crowd psychology, and what aspects of the human mind may cause them. Because of its dramatic effects and political implications, the instance of rioting will also be examined in conjunction with social psychology, with especial focus on the 2011 London Riots due to their relevancy to the times.
II. Summary – History and the two theories of crowd psychology
The years were from 1789 to the very end of the eighteenth century, and France was submerged in political unrest. The working class was drenched in its collective anger from years of oppression and meant to take the country back; mercilessly, they dragged out, imprisoned and subsequently beheaded thousands the wealthy of France, along with any even mildly suspected sympathizers. It was from this event that philosophers and politicians alike came to see the power of the crowd and why it must be vital to understand how to acquiesce one; hence, crowd psychology emerged.
Today, two forms of crowd psychology theory have emerged: Classic theory an...

... middle of paper ...

...NSYLVANIA STATE UNIV UNIVERSITY PARK APPLIED RESEARCH LAB.
7. Le Bon, G. (1897). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. Macmillan.
8. Morgan, T. J. H., & Laland, K. N. (2012). The biological bases of conformity.Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6.
9. Nowak, A., Szamrej, J., & Latané, B. (1990). From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. Psychological Review, 97(3), 362.
10. Shilling, C., & Mellor, P. A. (1998). Durkheim, morality and modernity: collective effervescence, homo duplex and the sources of moral action. British Journal of Sociology, 193-209.
11. Stott, C. (2009). Crowd Psychology & Public Order Policing: An Overview of Scientific Theory and Evidence. Submission to the HMIC of Policing of Public Protest Review Team (Liverpool, University of Liverpool).
12. Williams, Z. (2011). The UK riots: the psychology of looting. The Guardian.

Open Document