In our military, leaders are always faced with risk, regardless if it is a training exercise or combat operations. The army has several processes to mitigate risks and commanders must put these safety procedures in place to decrease risk. According ADP 5-0, commanders have to accept prudent risk and exploit opportunities to complete missions. In Iraq and Afghanistan, leaders accepted prudent risks and placed soldiers in harm’s way to complete critical missions. The army defines prudent risk as a deliberate exposure to potential injury or loss and the commander judges the outcome in terms of mission accomplishment as worth the cost. Commanders must be able to recognize and visualize changes in the operational environment. The changes
to the operational environment may be caused by several factors such as weather, terrain, and the enemy. As change occurs on the battlefield, commanders must have the mental capability to see the changes in the operation environment and determine what necessary modifications have to happen to accomplish the desired end state. The organizational climate is very vital in an environment that is always changing and increasing in risk. Commanders have to take steps to ensure that soldiers know the intent and have a clear understanding of the current situation and possible future operations. Commanders and subordinate leaders can mitigate risk by ensuring soldiers understand the current situational environment and make sure they maintain an awareness of the environment. Leaders must apply critical thinking as they plan missions, especially in a combat environment. Leaders can use the basic decision process such as Troop Leaders Procedures (TLP) or a complex process like the Military Decision Making Process (MDMP). Moreover, leaders must communicate their intent verbally and in writing to make sure soldiers understand. In the case study of “Wanat” that involved the 173rd Airborne Brigade, there were decisions that the leadership made that mitigated risks, however there were decisions that cost soldiers their lives. The Battalion Commander made a good decision to move Chosen Company from COP Bella due to the fact the relationship between the local population, local police and US military was degrading. In addition, several incidents that were fatal to US soldiers. Furthermore, the leadership realized that COP Bella was in a location that could not be adequately defended. Once Chose Company relocated COP Wanat, there were several decisions made by the leadership that made it seem that no one recognize the changing circumstance and the increase in risk. Also, the factors that place the platoon at COP Wanat at greater risk. First, the location of the COP Wanat was next to a village that was known to have insurgents. Secondly, the contractors that were to provide logistical support never arrived to provide services to the soldiers. The absence of the contractors delayed the construction of fighting positions, which caused the soldiers to do the work themselves and caused the soldiers drank all their water in a matter of hours. Finally, the highest-ranking person on COB Wanat was a 1st Lieutenant, due to the Company Commander was tasked to conduct an investigation. These were factors that the leadership should recognize that the situation at COB Wanat was in need of some command presence. Furthermore, the leadership did not realize the risks and failed to mitigate the risks at COP Wanat.
The book Black Hearts by Jim Frederick is an in-depth narrative about the 1st platoon, Bravo Company 1-502nd Infantry 101st Airborne Division deployed to Iraq in 2005. The leadership failures documented in this book range all the way from the general officer level down to the lowest private. LT general Ricardo Sanchez failed to understand the climate his command group was entering as they were deployed into Iraq. From then on the entire leadership failures continued to compound upon each other with improper time to plan. It is customary to have a six month lead time to have a proper battle hand off when preparing to take over an AO from another unit. To compound this problem, the entire time the 502nd was in pre-deployment training, they were preparing for the rigors of urban combat. In reality, they were given six weeks to recon their new area of responsibility and were going to a countryside crafted by the heavens for guerilla warfare. As Colonel Ebel said in the book, “It is not going to be an easy road. They are not even sure of what they have in the area. It just feels bad. We can expect a real fight.”
a. Systems: Personnel Readiness Management (PRM), Personnel Information Management (PIM), Personnel Accounting and Strength Reporting (PASR), Unit Manning Roster (UMR), Electronic Military Personnel Office (eMILPO), Defense Theater Accounting System (DTAS), Interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS).
The mission command philosophy helps commanders counter the uncertainty of operations by reducing the amount of certainty needed to act. Commanders can build teams and achieve their final goals through adapting the six principles of mission command to warfighting situation. I analyzed and compared the performance of General Sherman and General Hampton in four of six mission command principles.
Now for the Army, it becomes an obligation more than“willingness” while you have to be willing to do it as well. Those that are unable to be accountable are the ones that jeopardize the combat readiness of any unit. Basically it is the understanding that from the bottom up. Top down and laterally everyone is going to do and is willing to do the right thing even when no one else is looking. This is practiced at your home base where everyone is assigned tasks and details not only including your own job that you are expected to do and do right but hold others accountable as well as a system of “check yourself, then check your buddy.” Doing the job correctly and ensuring others do it as well and do it safely are all part of accountability in the military as one does not have to experience combat to understand that just being in the military is inherently dangerous given the types of equipment and weapons that are used to train and deploy with. As an example any live weapons range you go to part of the safety brief is “everyone here is a range safety” meaning anyone can call a cease fire if they observe dangerous behavior or a situation regardless of rank and it can be a Colonel or a brand new private, does not matter. As such in that event everyone becomes accountable not only for the operation of the range, the mission objective to have everyone qualify but do it in a safe
As the incoming brigade commander, LTC (P) Owens, I see the critical leadership problem facing the 4th Armored Brigade Combat Team (ABCT) is the inability or unwillingness of Colonel Cutler to lead and manage change effectively. In initial talks with Col Cutler and in reviewing the brigade’s historical unit status reports, the 4th ABCT performed as well as can be expected in Afghanistan, but as the onion was peeled back there are numerous organizational issues that were brought to the surface while I walked around and listened to the soldiers of the 4th ABCT, in addition to reviewing the Center for Army Lessons Learned (CALL) report. One of the most formidable tasks of a leader is to improve the organization while simultaneously accomplishing
Effective planning is impossible without first understanding the problem. Commanders rely on personal observations, experiences, and input from others to develop understanding. They also prioritize information requests and incorporate additional information as those requests are answered. A complete understanding of the problem and environment builds the foundation for the operational process and ...
This book contains a powerful dramatization of current Marine Corps doctrine, but it also holds a hidden vision for many Generals. There are lessons in training methodology, leadership, and ethics as well. Because of this, it has made Card’s book, an often read title for many years; Ender’s Game has been a stalwart item on the Marine Corps Reading List since its inception. Then Captain John Schmitt, author of Warfighting (a foundational book on Marine maneuver warfare doctrine) used it to teach. Schmitt said, "Winning wars depends on the quality of the people you put into battle. Start with smart people, train them in imaginative and challenging ways, and ensure you force decisionmaking authority down to the person with a superior awareness of the tactical situation." Ender’s Game was published at the same time Marines started reading The Maneuver Warfare Handbook. We have since institutionalized maneuver warfare into the Marine Corps. The challenge to every generation of Marines is to continue to live up to what Maneuver Warfare philosophy demands of
Black Hearts is a great example of the reality on how severe bad leadership skills can ripple throughout a unit and impact its overall mission. This book serves as a guide for future leaders of America and will set the examples of what not to do in leadership positions. The lessons we can take from these soldiers can help us as potential leaders to become more competent and effective. The fact that this book focused on the hardships, poor decisions and sound judgment of the soldiers it helped emphasize on what was not the best choice of action and leaves a moment for you as the audience to think how you would of done it better. So right or wrong there was a lesson to be learned and the book did a good job including the reader. This book puts you in the shoes of a small group of soldiers from the 502nd Infantry Regiment and gives you an up close and personal take on the experience of the soldiers, from the bottom of the the ranks all the way up to the commander. 502nd Bravo Company 1st platoon deployed in the fall of 2005 into one of the most dangerous battle zones in Iraq known as the “Triangle of Death”. Thrown into the heartland of a growing insurgency, with undefined goals and a shortage of manpower, Bravo Company began piling up casualties at an alarming rate. They suffered many losses, as well as mental anguish. Because of the long and tragic deployment, a collapse in leadership began to unfold causing one of the most tragic, brutal, and infamous deployments in U.S Army history. There were many reasons that caused the deconstruction of leadership, and eventually, the actions of the soldiers accompanied by the lack of control, lead to the rape and murder of an innocent Iraqi girl and her family. This is a story about character...
From family to squad members, communication acts as the cornerstone for a military officer, assisting in the mental health of the individual as well as facilitating the conduction of successful operations by an intricate, yet responsive, organization. Military officers are often times imagined as infallible heroes, unwavering against and untouched by the realities of modern warfare. Yet, newly commissioned, 22 year old officers often faces the arduous responsibilities of leading a platoon or flight comprised of men and women generally the same age as themselves into combat, or managing millions of dollars worth
In the United States Navy Operational risk management (ORM) is personally experienced. The ORM process is taken seriously by everyone in leadership, particularly when failures can be fatal to personnel or equipment damage, therefore, understanding potential risks faced is vital (Eaamonn, 2013). In many organizations and specifically speaking from military experience, risk management is essential to avoiding catastrophic incidents from occurring. Risk management is sometimes unpopular among subordinates so; it is incumbent on leaders to be courageous and standby decisions made. Leaders must be bold and take a stand to protect the community from the effects of flooding even in times of budgetary austerity (Hall,
Stepping outside a comfort zone is a risk, and when it is doing something one is not accustomed to doing, the benefits gained raises ones overall confidence. “Breaking Through Uncertainty –Welcome Adversity,” Jim takes the risk of cutting away his original parachute (par. 15). Certainly this is a huge risk. Going outside the ordinary to trust your training is a life saver; however, though the benefit of taking the risk is saving his life, it is something he
However, what the military does not train for nearly enough, is the next natural or civil disaster. With so many rules and regulations within the U.S. Army, those in charge are expected to be well versed in how to manage a situation
The most effective commanders through their leadership build cohesive teams. Mutual trust, shared understanding, and accepting prudent risk serve as just a few principles for mission command. Mutual trust is the foundation of any successful professional relationship that a commander shares with his staff and subordinates. The shared understanding of an operational environment functions, as the basis for the commander to effectively accomplish the mission. While my advice for the commander on what prudent risks to take may create more opportunities rather than accepting defeat. Incorporating the principles of mission command by building cohesive teams through mutual trust, fostering an environment of shared understanding, and accepting prudent risk will make me an effective adviser to the commander, aid the staff during the operations process, and provide an example for Soldiers to emulate.
The very nature of an airborne operation requires tens of thousands of dollars, resources from several different units, and weeks of planning. Therefore, it can be tempting to bend the rules of safety when it comes to making a decision between pressing on through potentially unsafe situations, such as borderline weather conditions, and canceling a mission. The right thing to do is not allow that Drive For Success to interfere with the safety of my Airmen. No matter how tempting it might be to press forward to finish a training mission to justify all of the prep work, it is not worth the lives or the limbs of my Airmen. That is not a price I am willing to
Safety.When it comes down to it, everything that the Army does is done with one word in mind, and that word, is safety. One of the most important ways to promote safety in the Army, and in the military as a whole for that matter, is by providing and ensuring that all personnel properly utilize the appropriate equipment for the task at hand. One such piece of equipment, which I am certain that most soldiers are familiar with, are the Small Arms Protective Inserts.