Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of pesticides on the environment
The effects of pesticides on the environment
The effects of pesticides on the environment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effects of pesticides on the environment
Protecting public health is an important factor in every sector. The government of Canada protects the health of public concerning, the quality, safety and effectiveness of drugs, medical devices and pesticides. They ensure the safety of consumer products and substances at workplace, that also includes the nutrional quality of food and its safety, toxic material in environment, the water and air quality. To provide safe and effective medicine, pesticides, food etc. to Canadians, The Health Canada does risk assessment for each and every product before going into the hands of consumers. Risk assessment is done or is necessary to be done to reduce the risk that users might get injured by using a product also ensures the product is harmless or …show more content…
Health Canada regulates major classes of science based products that is Drugs (Pharmaceutical), medical devices, pesticides, industrial chemicals, food, alcohol, first aid bandages, energy drinks, tetanus, vaccine, weed B Gon, cisplatin, insect repellant and many more. Most of the product whether it is Pharmaceutical, industrial chemical or pesticide or biotechnology product all of them possess some of the risk and are made from mixture of one another, following is the small example- In Pesticides. If we make use of any plant it is known as bio pesticide, its main motive is to protect the plant from insects its natural enemy. The Bacillis thurigiensis is a species of bacteria that produce a protein called “BT Cry Toxin”. The gene for this protein was found into corn where expression of the BT toxin kills the European corn borer, The EPA determined this doesn’t pose a risk to human because BT is not related to any known allergen or human toxin, it does not produce toxic effects when administered at high doses to animals, not stable in body (long term) also history of safe use of microbial products for …show more content…
These ingredients are mixed and compressed into tablet by machine. ASSUMING, one day a contingent of aspirin consumer became ill with E.coli poisoning. This was because contamination was traced back to the aspirin manufacturing plant where the tablet machinery was not being sterilized prior to use. Also, pre-market assessment is necessary because products are made using highly toxic materials, high dose of chemical but use of this toxic material is necessary too so as to save lives, or grow the crop, like in cancer patient, the drugs/medication used in chemotherapy are highly toxic, but these drugs can save life. Same in case of pesticides, pesticides are in high doses are toxic, but they are needed to protect crop from insect and grow the crop. Risk assessment of science based products in Canada, To sale any Product which is science based has to undergo evaluation process set by federal
In Samuelson and Antony’s book Power and Resistance, renowned sociologist Professor Pat Armstrong tackles the topic of health care reform from a critical feminist perspective. Her analytic critique of the historic tenets of Health Care policy in Canada, effectively points out a systemic disadvantage for the women of our society. Which, in the spirit of transparency, completely blind sighted me as a first time reader because, well, this is Canada. Canada, the internationally renowned first world nation with a reputation for progressive social reform. The same Canada that Americans make fun of for being ‘too soft’. As far as the world is concerned we’re the shining nation-state example of how to do health care right. Needless to say, Professor
Many people in the world may think that Canada has the ideal system of healthcare for it's citizens, but that may not be entirely correct. Although the healthcare system in Canada has excellent features such as the standard of care and acceptance of all it's residents, it is quite often misconstrued. Each province in Canada is different, but they all run with basically the same set of rules and regulations, each required by law for the basic health care services to be provided. Canada's healthcare system is based upon five main principles, those being universality, portability, comprehensiveness, accessibility, and public administration. These principles are usually enforced, however, what some people do not realize is that there are a few negative aspects of the way healthcare is
A Canadian Dermatologist who once worked in the United States breaks down the pros and cons of Canada’s health care system and explains why he thinks the Canadian system is superior to America’s. Canada runs a single payer health care system, which means that health care is controlled by the government rather than private insurance companies. One of the main pros of the Canadian health care system is that everyone is insured. He says that in the province of Ontario, the Ministry of Health insures all of its citizens, all important health needs such as physician visits, home nursing and physical therapy are covered. Since every resident is covered under the government plan the problem of patients being turned away due to lacking medical coverage
Being a Canadian citizen, it is hard for me to think of life without any health insurance. I have had public health insurance all my life growing up and have been free to go to any hospital at any time and get some form of health care. Residing in the United States off and for the last 7 years I have experienced health care from both sides. I feel that private health care has huge advantages over public health care. In the following essay I will explain in three points why I feel strongly about private health care as opposed to public. What is better is always subjective, and I will not try to argue the point of health for all, but instead for the individual who is seeking the best health care possible, and is willing to put the resources into obtaining that. I will be addressing efficiency and quality, not inclusion of everyone (free health care), I will be addressing the root of this and not just that one argument, which would detract from my focus. I will not be getting into the political debate of socialism vs. capitalism, as that is a separate argument in itself, and this country is currently running under capitalism. Again coming from living in both a socialist and then a capitalist society, I feel I can do so in an unbiased manner.
In Canada, access to health care is ‘universal’ to its citizens under the Canadian Health Care Act and this system is considered to the one of the best in the world (Laurel & Richard, 2002). Access to health care is assumed on the strong social value of equality and is defined as the distribution of services to all those in need and for the common good and health of all residents (Fierlbeck, 2011). Equitable access to health care does not mean that all citizens are subjected to receive the same number of services but rather that wherever the service is provided it is based on need. Therefore, not all Canadians have equal access to health services. The Aboriginal peoples in Canada in particular are a population that is overlooked and underserved
The Bt pesticide stands for Bacillus Thuringiensis. Scientists transferred the Bt gene into the corn to create a crop that produces its own pesticides. As the corn matures, it grows stronger poison, and as insects such as the corn borer eat fatal amounts, the Bt corn destroys the intestines (Burnham).... ... middle of paper ...
contamination, toxicity, and side effects. Most people believe these medications are compounded or mixed by a trained and licensed individual. However, this is inaccurate because the pharmacy technician actually compounds a large percentage of a patient’s medications. Compounding involves a techn...
In the past, Canada’s government-funded, universally accessible, health care system has been praised and admired both at home and abroad as one of the finest in the world. A great source of pride and comfort for many Canadians is that it is based on five fundamental principles. Principles that are a reflection of the values held by Canadian citizens since the formation of Medicare in 1966. These principles were reinforced in the Canada Health Act, (CHA), of 1984 and state that the Canadian system is universal, accessible, portable, comprehensive and non-profit.
The issue of a universal approach to Canadian Health Care has been contended for several years. Canada's national health insurance program, or Medicare, was designed to ensure that all people can have medical, hospital and physician services. The cost is to be paid for by Ontario medical insurance program (OHIP). The Canada Health Act was intended to represent certain principles of our health care system. It was intended to be a symbol of the Canadian values. Those values are fairness equity and togetherness. This oneness of a universal approach is what we call the one tier system. Many Canadians still believe the official government stand on this: Canada’s medical insurance covers all needs and services for every insured citizen. Officially then, there is a one level health care system. This paper shall argument that Canada has a two tier health care system.
Today, Canadians are concerned with many issues involving health care. It is the responsibility of the provincial party to come up with a fair, yet reasonable solution to this issue. This solution must support Canadians for the best; it involves people and how they are treated when in need for health care. The Liberal party feels that they have the best solution that will provide Canadians with the best results. It states that people will have the protection of medicare and will help with concerns like: injury prevention, nutrition, physical activity, mental health, etc. The Canadian Alliance Party’s plan is to make several policy-developments to benefit Canada’s health care. They believe it will serve the security and well-being best for all Canadians. The last party involved in this issue is the NDP Party; who indicate that they are fighting hard for a better Health Care system in our economy. The NDP Party states that the income of a family should not dictate the quality of health care.
The introductory of Canada’s health care system in the mid-20th century, known as Medicare, led the country into the proud tradition of a public health care system, opposite to America’s privatized health care system in the south. Though Canada’s health care system still holds some aspects of a privatized system, it is still readily available for all citizens throughout the nation. After continuous research, it is clear to state that public health care and the association it has with welfare state liberalism is by far a more favourable option for Canada, than that of private health care and the association it has with neo-conservatism. To help understand why public health care is a better and more favourable option for Canada, it is fundamental
Primary health care is the essential step to the Canadian health system. It is often associated with other specialized health care sectors, and community services. Many patients visit various services under primary health care such as family doctors' offices, mental health facilities, nurse practitioners' offices; they make phone calls to health information lines, for example, Tele-health; and receive suggestions from physicians and pharmacists (First Ministers; meeting on healthcare, n.d.). This service can prevent patients from visiting the emergency department, when all that is required is some guidance and advice. Having primary care services can reduce the consumption of acute beds, where only seriously ill patients can use the acute beds when it is available. Primary care not only deals with sickness care, but it helps patients receive preventable measures; it promotes healthy choices (Primary health care, n.d.). The focus on appropriate health care services, when and where they are needed, enhanced the ability of individuals to access primary care in various settings: at home, in a hospital or any number of family health care venues, such as Family Health Teams (FHTs), Community Health Centres (CHCs), or Nurse Practitioner- led clinics. This paper will look at the litigious heated argument in the Romanow Report concerning primary care. It will begin with a discussion of the outcome of the Accord on Health Care Renewal (2003) and The First Ministers' Meeting on the Future of Health in Canada (2004), both referring to primary care, which will then be followed with an assessment and analysis of the different ways in which the accords have been addressed in support of primary care. Followed by a discussion about the changes on ...
To help keep crops from being destroyed, conventional farmers use many methods such as pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides. Nearly 1 billion pounds of these chemicals are used every year (“pesticides”). Because of this excessive use, some scientists express concern that using artificial chemicals in the farming process could produce unhealthy crops. People who ate it over a long period of time could suffer from degraded health and stunted growth (“Organic Foods”). For example, in 1989, the EPA banned the use of Alar which was a chemical used to ripen apples (“Farming, Organics”). This chemical proved to be carcinogenic after causing tumors in mice after several laboratory tests (“Organic Food”). As a result of these findings there was a dramatic increase of the sales for organic food (“Organic Food”). Another study found that Atrazine (one of the most widely used herbicides in the United States) has the potential of being carcinogenic and reducing sperm counts in males (“Organic Food”). This was further proven when evidence was found that chemicals u...
Maple syrup, ice hockey, igloos, poutine, snow, and peacekeeping: these things conjure Canada in the minds of many around the world. Others will add health to the list, for Canada’s public health care system is one of the oldest, and most celebrated in the world because Canada has comforted to global humanitarian, migration, and medical crises for decades. To more than 90% of Canadians, the healthcare system is a source of collective pride and security, and a key element of being Canadian. To Canadians, the belief that access to health care should be based on need, not the ability to pay, is a defining national value.
Well, greet the sceptic with the good news before the bad: the government does place regulations on pesticides, the problem is that these regulations are not as strictly followed as one may hope. Do not start worrying too much; these regulations do prevent highly toxic pesticides from entering the market. However, there is a distressing loop hole in the system which allows some very dangerous concoctions a pass into our environment. Pesticides that fail safety regulations can still make it to market if their benefits are deemed “greater than the risks”, reports the Toxics Action Center. Pesticides are not judged based off a strict guideline; they are judged off a series of suggestions.