Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative effects of gmo's
Benefits and hazards of recombinant DNA technology
Negative effects of gmo's
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative effects of gmo's
Introduction – A historical overview
The history of rDNA technology dates back to 1865 when Gregor Mendel, using the pea plant demonstrated and proved some of the basic laws of genetics such as 1) Law of segregation, 2) Law of independent assortment and 3) Law of dominance. Mendel laid the foundation for genetics upon which experiments were conducted in later years. Later in 1915, T.H. Morgan established the fact that chromosome contains genes and these genes are linked through inheritance using Drosophila as a model organism. In 1928, Frederick Griffith observed the transformation of “rough” colonies of Streptococcus pnuemoniae into “smooth” colonies, which resulted in the fact at that time that, some information is passed on to the non-virulent strain to make it virulent. The famous “One gene - one enzyme” hypothesis was put forth by Beadle and Tatum in 1941. In 1944, Avery, MacLeod and McCarty purified DNA and proved them to be the carriers of genetic information, until which protein was believed to be the carrier.
Even before the structure was elucidated, in 1947, Erwin Chargoff postulated certain rules that DNA follows. Hershey and Chase conducted a series of experiments in 1952 to prove that DNA is the genetic material. DNA was crystallized and its helical nature was found out using X-ray crystallography by Franklin and Wilkins in 1953 and it was in the same year the 3-D structure of DNA was solved out by James Watson and Francis Crick. The later proposed the “Central Dogma of life”, where DNA produces mRNA and protein is synthesized from the mRNA through transcription and translation respectively. While Watson and Crick hinted at semi-conservative model of DNA replication, it was Meselson and Stahl in 1958 proved that rep...
... middle of paper ...
...geneic hyperacute organ rejection." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 91.23 (1994): 11153-11157.
2. Holton, T. A., and M. W. Graham. "A simple and efficient method for direct cloning of PCR products using ddT-tailed vectors." Nucleic acids research 19.5 (1991): 1156.
3. Martial, Joseph A., et al. "Human growth hormone: complementary DNA cloning and expression in bacteria." Science 205.4406 (1979): 602-607.
4. Martineau, Belinda. "First fruit: the creation of the Flavr Savr tomato and the birth of biotech foods." (2002).
5. Schnieke, Angelika E., et al. "Human factor IX transgenic sheep produced by transfer of nuclei from transfected fetal fibroblasts." Science 278.5346 (1997): 2130-2133.
6. Williams, Daniel C., et al. "Cytoplasmic inclusion bodies in Escherichia coli producing biosynthetic human insulin proteins." Science 215.4533 (1982): 687-689.
What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'? Why was Anderson’s incompetence with language and household skills both a problem and a blessing for her work in Tarnby? Anderson’s incompetence with language and household problems were due to the translation and understanding of a new culture. Barbara’s confusion of flour with sugar caused her meat loaf to be a disaster. The two words are very similar in Denmark.
What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'? Hochman, Steven H. “Biography of Jimmy Carter.” Jimmy Carter Presidential Library & Museum, March 13, 2014. http://www.jimmycarterlibrary.gov/documents/jec/jecbio.phtml (accessed May 3, 2014).
In 1953, Francis Crick bragged to his fellow colleagues from the Cavendish Laboratory (Cambridge), claiming that he and his American partner, James Watson, had “discovered the secret of life.” The claim, made in a bar over a glass of alcohol, was not unusual from the pair. In fact, workers in the Cavendish often found Crick to be tactless, arrogant and noisy; one even went so far as to comment that he had “never seen Francis Crick in a modest mood.” Yet, a little over a century later, it is undeniable that Crick’s statement is true. Using information derived from a number of other scientists, primarily Rosalind Franklin and Maurice Wilkins of King’s College, the duo solved a puzzle that had plagued biologists for decades; they created a three-dimensional model of the DNA helix.
The synthetic A and B chains are then inserted into the bacteria’s gene for B-galactosidase, which is carried in the vectors plasmid. The vector for the production of insulin is a weakened strain of the common bacteria Escherichia coli, usually called E. coli. The recombinant plasmids are then reintroduced to the E. coli cells. As the B-galactosidase replicates in a cell undergoing mitosis the insulin gene is expressed. To yield substantial amounts of insulin millions of the bacteria possessing the recombinant plasmid are required.
"The discovery of the structure by Crick and Watson, with all its biological implications, has been one of the major scientific events of this century." (Bragg, The Double Helix, p1) In the story of The Double Helix, James Watson tells of the road that led to the discovery of life's basic building block-DNA. This autobiography gives insight into science and the workings within a professional research laboratory that few members of society will ever be able to experience. It also gives the reader an idea of the reality of life for one scientist and how he struggled with the problem of DNA. However, the author's style is marked by his lack of objectivity and inclusion of many biased opinions and personal prejudices.
Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0036-8075%2819560817%293%3A124%3A3216%3C322%3ATPP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-L This site is very reliable. This is the Scholarly Journal Archive. 3. What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'?
Over the last fifty years or so, scientists have made a great amount of progress in this area, including the development of techniques which allow for the controlled manipulation and replication of specific segments of the human genome. These types of techniques have come to be known as recombinant DNA (rDNA) technology and have allowed scientists to analyze functions of genes which are not necessarily directly expressed at the phenotypic level. This is done by "cutting out" or excising a particular segment of DNA of interest from the genetic material of an individual and inserting it into a bacterial plasmid (a tiny ring of DNA in addition to the normal chromosomal material found within the cells of bacteria).
Zisser, Howard C. "Abstract." National Center for Biotechnology Information. U.S. National Library of Medicine, 13 Sept. 2010. Web. 06 Jan. 2014.
Vol. 3. What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'? Detroit, MI: St. James Press, 2000. 172-174.
Volume 5, Issue 10, 6 October 2010, e13181. 3. What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'? Cox-Foster, D.L., Conlan, S., Holmes, E.C., Palacios, G., Evans, J.D., Moran, N.A., Quan, P., Briese, T., Hornig, M., Geiser, D.M., Martinson, V., vanEngelsdorp, D., Kalkstein, A.L., Drysdale, A., Hui, J., Zhai, J., Cui, L., Hut Science. The. Volume 318, Number 58848, 6 September 2007, Pages 283 – 287. 4.
Vol. 6. What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'? Detroit: Gale Books, 1984. 32.
McKinnell, Robert G., and Marie A. Di Berardino. "The Biology of Cloning: History and Rationale."BioScience 49.11 (1999): 875-83. Print
of the book. Vol. 24. What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'? Berkeley, CA: University of California, 1984.
Vol. 3. What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'?