Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Keystone pipeline introduction
What are the effects the Keystone Pipeline has on the environment
Pros and cons of dakota access pipeline
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Keystone pipeline introduction
If you could make the decision whether the Keystone XL pipeline should be built, think about the impact it has on everyone; money, environment, animals, people. The Keystone XL pipeline is a crude oil pipeline that is an extension of the Keystone pipeline. It would run from Canada into the United States on the Gulf Coast of Texas. The pipeline would bring 830,000 barrels of crude oil per day to be refined in Texas. The Keystone XL pipeline should not be built because of the impact on the environment, not long term help for people, and ruining the lands it runs through. First, with the Keystone XL pipeline being built, it is not good for the environment. There is a chance that the pipeline could have a leak and cause problems. According to Fox …show more content…
The Keystone XL pipeline impacts the environment negatively with the chance of oil spills and leaks. It does not benefit the people because the number of jobs created won’t actually be permanent, and there is a chance prices for fuel could raise. As well as these problems, the pipeline also affects the lands. It can harm the animals and their habitats as well as the First Nation lands. The Keystone XL pipeline should not be built because of the impact on the environment, not long term help for people, and ruining the lands it runs through. If people could be affected by just the start of the construction to when it would end, it would only impact things more in the future. Animals could lose their habitats, not as many jobs, the environment could be destroyed, and these are only a few. We need to be smart in how we impact the environment because what we do to the earth, it impacts us too. As John Muir said, “God has cared for these trees, saved them from drought, disease, avalanches, and a thousand tempests and floods. But he cannot save them from
“Urge the Senate to Stop the Risky Keystone XL Pipeline”. Letter. League of Conservation of Voters. Change.org. Web. 10 December 2013
The Dakota Access Pipeline and the Keystone XL Pipeline are two pipeline projects that were suspended in the past. These pipelines were stopped because they could have a big impact of people and the environment. The making of these pipelines would cause a great amount of carbon pollution. Recently, President Trump signed the orders to approve the pipeline project. The projects have pros and cons, the people in favor of the pipelines think we would be able to rely less on foreign oil. The people against the pipeline believe that the pipelines would cause the release of gases into the air that could be harmful for other people.
Filibusters can surely be effective for Senate minority leaders. However, it can have both its pros and cons. Some of the advantages include that the filibuster was created to protect the privileges of the Senators in order to fully debate and modify laws in the United States Senate, therefore securing the concern of all the citizens in America. Filibusters tend to exist thanks to the Founding Fathers ideology of designing a democratic government in which politicians became involved and educated throughout many political processes. Whenever a Senator goes on the Senate floor and talks endlessly for hours on a particular issue, it automatically engages attention to the particular matter, such as the 11-hour filibuster Senator Wendy Davis accomplished
With our understanding that the pipeline is safe, and there are safety precautions in place if anything ever did happen. That it is the best economical way to transport this oil. And finally our need for this oil s huge and it will be huge for a long time unless we start the process of building nuclear power right now; even in that case we still have about 15 years before that is ready to take the work load of British Columbia. Even when we have a different sustained energy we will still have the need for oil due to the fact that’s cars are the main moat of transportation in the lower main land. That means we are far away from a province let alone a country that can run without the use of oil. And seeing how to transport it via pipe line is the safest spill wise and most economically friendly it seems to be the better choice.
The DREAM Act is an Act that targets children under the age of fifteen who have lived in the Unites States for at least five years since the Act was made to receive higher education. This Act allows these children to receive temporary legal status and go through a rigorous process to eventually become fully legal in the United States. The DREAM Act allows these individuals to go to college or join the military if they please. In order to receive full legal status these individuals must have either served our country for two years or graduated a two year college or at least studied for two years working towards a bachelors degree. This Act allows these children who are faced against the odds of having a dead end job to do something great
The border wall debate has become one of the most significant talking points in the United States and countries around the world. Many people believe that the wall is unnecessary and many think that it is necessary. Building a border wall may cost billions of dollars, but it might be able to save the country money as well. Some positive impacts of a border wall are for example a decline in apprehension rates, creating a safer America and putting a damper on the flow of illegal drugs. As well as the positive impacts, we will look at the negative implications as well. Some of these are that the symbolism, cost, effect of diversity, environmental impact and the higher death impact.
In 2012, President Obama introduced the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program for young people who had been residing in the United States at least five years prior to the bill’s passing. DACA was the most significant provision from the Obama administration that aimed to help undocumented youth be integrated in the American society. It protected them from deportation and allowed them to obtain a state identification, work permit, and Social Security number. The immigrant communities celebrated this bill as it had been a long time since there was a significant change in the country’s immigration policy. However, the current administration and government pose a serious threat to the beneficiaries of the DACA program as well as
The Keystone XL pipeline continues dividing the opinion of the people and being a controversial issue. The precious “black gold”, represents one of the main factors that moves the economy, nationally and globally. This extra-long pipeline will transport oil all the way from Canada to Texas. Some experts and the private oil corporation, who is the one in charge of this project, point to the benefits of this project, for example, will make the USA more independent from foreign oil, will create thousands of jobs and improve the economy. Nevertheless, are experts revealing how the pipeline is an unnecessary risk and will be negative for the environment, dangerous for the population living close to the big pipes, and long-term negative for the
The Keystone Pipeline started construction in 2008 for the main purpose of connecting Canadian and American oil refineries to transport crude oil from the oil sands of Canada faster and more efficient. So far the first three phases of the pipeline have been completed but the proposed and most controversial is Phase IV. It connects Hardisty, Alberta to Steele City, Oklahoma which requires a presidential permit and it also connects the 485-mile southern leg known as the Gulf Coast Project between Steele City and Port Arthur, Texas, which is now operating (Eilperin). The benefits of the pipeline include an increase in jobs, contribute $3.4 billion to the U.S economy and also save time and money from transporting the oil by pipeline instead of tanks and rails. At the same time it would be a great harm to the environment, making the climate unstable, and could cause possible future oil spills. The articles covering the Keystone Pipeline generally list out the same points, covering the same benefits and consequences of building the pipeline. Sources like Fox News and CNS have more of an opposition towards the pipeline and narrow in on the risks and of the effects it would have on the people. Whereas news stations such as CNN and The Washington Post address both sides of the controversy but are subtle about being in favor of the pipeline. The international sources such as Al Jazeera and Reuters oppose the pipeline and are more open with supporting the environmentalists.
The state of Nebraska currently has a Republican governor, who approves of the pipeline and is actively trying to convince Barack Obama of the economic benefits the pipeline can provide. Another potentially positive factor for them is the upcoming presidential election. If a pro-pipeline candidate is elected president, that will eliminate another hurdle in the approval process. Another positive factor is that 91% of landowners have voluntarily signed easements for the pipeline construction, so while interest groups such as Bold Nebraska may be an opponent, the actual landowners have taken a much warmer reception to the pipeline.
I think that the Keystone XL is a good project and the benefits of building it outweigh the potential negative effects. I will discuss the reasons I think that this pipeline project is a good idea. Firstly the U.S. economy would benefit from an increase in jobs and revenue that the pipeline would bring. Thousands of jobs would be created. Much of the taxes from the construction and property owned by the pipeline would contribute to the local areas that the pipeline runs through. Also transporting crude oil through pipeline is generally the safest option. Transportation by barge, rail, or trucker are the alternatives to pipeline transportation. These would generally cost more and harm the environment further, in terms of carbon emissions, than a pipeline would. People argue that the pipeline would result in more carbon emissions produced since more oil would be able to be transported down to the Gulf Coast refineries to be eventually burned by end users. This is not true because the oil from tar sands in Canada does not necessarily need a pipeline to transport the crude oil. They will use alternative transportation methods, such as listed above, to transport the crude to refineries. At least the transportation of crude oil through a pipeline would be more cost-effective, would emit fewer carbon emissions, and would benefit the U.S.
A further idea is to create the pipeline in a shorter amount of time and then there would be fewer job openings. Trump has also reversed Obama’s administration’s decision of blocking the pipeline. Trump reversed the prior decision and officially signed the papers it has become a controversial topic that was spreading. Also, stated on the Labor 4 Sustainability, “When the company’s own figures showed that the project would actually hire only 5,000 to 6,000 workers over the 3-year construction period, a large proportion of them not high-paid, high-skill jobs but low-skilled, low-paid pick and shovel jobs.” Companies along with people in higher use miscommunication to people who are in desperate need of a job. The use of the pipeline has not had any type of positive impact. The only positive impact there could have been being having more jobs and being dependent on oil, but those always come with a catch. The Keystone Pipeline is being built so that the United States can become dependent on there own fossil fuels. The cost of transporting oil from other countries will no longer be in the equation and will save the United States plenty of
The issue regarding the Northern Gateway pipeline conflicting with the Great Bear Rainforest is a major situation and its effect on the environment echoes across Canada. The proposal made by Enbridge to construct a pipeline from the Athabasca oil sands all the way to Kitimat is careless and completely disregards the environment. The oil tankers carrying the crude oil to china are required to travel through many dangerous canals in the great bear rainforest where navigation must show no imperfections, accordingly, the tanker would risk a catastrophic oil spill. This great bear rainforest is home to hundreds, maybe even thousands of animal species, as well as many indigenous dwellers who rely on the oceans as their food source. By proceeding
labor was scarce and relatively dear. A decline in the birthrate, as well as increases in
Throughout the world, environmental issues impact everyone in a negative way. Supporting an idea that will increase this impact is unjust and extremely tolling on our environment. The keystone pipeline is not safe for the environment. Furthermore the effects of this pipeline such as an impairment of fish habitat and a loss of various wildlife habitat. On top of that this pipelines increase our greenhouse emission. The quote, “From 1990 to 2011, Canada’s annual emissions of greenhouse gases increased from 591 million to 702 million tons” says Michael B. McElroy a Butler professor of environmental studies. According to this quote...