Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Racial profiling muslims in america
Use of profiling in fighting terrorism
Is profiling good or bad
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Racial profiling muslims in america
Emmanuel De La Cruz Mrs. Bennett Pre-Ap English 1 23 May, 2014 Profiling the good and bad Philip Baum says that profiling, based on how someone acts, and the type of person they are can be an effective way to catch criminals. Obama administration has announced that they will be subjecting 14 countries and citizens from other countries. Therefore people from other countries will be treated differently. Because terrorists can’t be easily spotted out in crowds, unless they look suspicious, so foreign people will be screened asked questions and make sure they aren’t terrorists. But theres a problem with automatic profiling, it does not always work but just because there are people from other countries, does not mean they are all terrorists. If we focus on just a few countries and not from our own country, that can cause a problem. One example if we treat all muslims like terrorists, it undermines our effort to gain intelligence on terrorists. Most people in todays world think profiling people is a good idea, people at airports think that anyone is or looks like a muslim, is a terrorists. Sometimes profiling works and other times profiling does not work and point out terrorists but instead it offends people because they been profiled just because who they are and where they come from. Most people nowadays think that all Muslims are Arabs, but thats not true they are black, white, asian, and all other types of races. Because the numbers of actual terrorists is so low, most of everyone selected by the profile will be innocent, but because of that only certain people from different places will be profiled. Nowadays profiling is all about race and religion, critics feel that “Naked Scanners” and full body pat downs violate the priva... ... middle of paper ... ...is being spent on behavioral profiling and for what when most of the time it doesn't work. Overall in my opinion Airport profiling doesn't work and is kind of a waste of time when they should just do body pat downs at airports look at their luggage and make sure there isn’t harmful. Profiling should not even be practiced at airports because people can act anyway they want and just because they act how they want they most likely will be screened and profiled. Conclusion Airport Profiling will not work because it targets certain people and not everyone else, for example Muslims will be profiled because of who people think they are, when most of the time they are innocent pedestrians. If profiling should be considered then everyone at airports need and should be profiled in and out of the airports, no matter where they are from and what someone might have done.
In the United States of America today, racial profiling is a deeply troubling national problem. Many people, usually minorities, experience it every day, as they suffer the humiliation of being stopped by police while driving, flying, or even walking for no other reason than their color, religion, or ethnicity. Racial profiling is a law enforcement practice steeped in racial stereotypes and different assumptions about the inclination of African-American, Latino, Asian, Native American or Arab people to commit particular types of crimes. The idea that people stay silent because they live in fear of being judged based on their race, allows racial profiling to live on.
People of color are being pursued on the highways in the land of the free. In Bob Herbert’s “Hounding the innocent” acts of racial profiling are displayed flagrantly. Racial profiling should be illegal, since it is unfair to its victims, demoralizing, and it breaks the trust between the public and the police.
There are probably members from every group of iron triangle that are against racial profiling, but if this is the case why does racial profiling continue to happen? Racial profiling is in fact unconstitutional, but no end is in sight of this unnecessary punishment to the minorities. The intent of racial profiling is often to keep people from being harmed. For example, Hebshi was sitting on a plane next to two other men of Indian decent on the tenth anniversary of 9/11. Flight attendants aboard the plane warned federal agents that the Indian-Americans looked suspicious; therefore, the agents took Hebshi into custody to be searched and questioned. The flight attendants and the federal agents most likely were just trying to make sure that everyone on board the flight would be safe. Despite the motives in any circumstance, racial profiling is wrong. The problem with racial profiling in this case is the woman and the two men made it past extensive airport security; therefore, if they were exhibiting any suspicious behavior it would have already been dealt with by security professionals. The problem with racial profiling in every case is that it violates the natural rights of the person that is being victimized. Therefore, racial profiling should not continue to go on despite the somewhat good
Terrorism and racial profiling is nothing new in our society. Although some people would like to believe that it is nonexistent, it is still a major issue in today’s world. With that being said, my view on the subject is that racial profiling is going to continue to happen whether we like it or not. I believe profiling isn 't necessarily meant to intentionally harm anyone, but is used as a tool to prevent terrorism. Past terroristic attacks have lead to the many stereotypes and prejudice that our country has today.
Racial profiling is the tactic of stopping someone because of the color of his or her skin and a fleeting suspicion that the person is engaging in criminal behavior (Meeks, p. 4-5). This practice can be conducted with routine traffic stops, or can be completely random based on the car that is driven, the number of people in the car and the race of the driver and passengers. The practice of racial profiling may seem more prevalent in today’s society, but in reality has been a part of American culture since the days of slavery. According to Tracey Maclin, a professor at the Boston University School of Law, racial profiling is an old concept. The historical roots “can be traced to a time in early American society when court officials permitted constables and ordinary citizens the right to ‘take up’ all black persons seen ‘gadding abroad’ without their master’s permission” (Meeks, p. 5). Although slavery is long since gone, the frequency in which racial profiling takes place remains the same. However, because of our advanced electronic media, this issue has been brought to the American public’s attention.
Colleges profile by looking for the students that fit their criteria. They look at a student 's test scores, grades and extracurricular activities in order to see if they are the right fit for the school. Some colleges will even offer students free money to come to their college because they really want that student to attend their college. I was recently accepted to Biola because I fit the profile they were looking for. They were looking for someone that had the grades and test scores but was also a Christian. Employers also profile when looking to hire someone to work for the company. They want to hire someone that has the qualification to complete the tasks that will be assigned to them. Even stores profile in order to watch to make sure some of their merchandise is not stolen. People do not have a problem with stores, colleges, and employers profiling but has soon has police start to profile everyone is outraged even though it is practically the same thing. Many people feel that cops who profile are just being demeaning and it does not actually help to increase safety but in reality that is not
Racial profiling in the dictionary is “the assumption of criminality among ethnic groups: the alleged policy of some police to attribute criminal intentions to members of some ethnic groups and to stop and question them in disproportionate numbers without probable cause (“Racial Profiling”).” In other words racial profiling is making assumptions that certain individuals are more likely to be involved in misconduct or criminal activity based on that individual’s race or ethnicity. Racial profiling propels a brutalizing message to citizens of the United States that they are pre-judged by the color of their skin rather than who they are and this then leads to assumptions of ruthlessness inside the American criminal justice system. With race-based assumptions in the law enforcement system a “lose-lose” situation is created due to America’s diverse democracy and destroys the ability to keep the criminal justice system just and fair. Although most police officers perform their duties with fairness, honor, and dedication, the few officers who portray to be biased then harm the whole justice system resulting in the general public stereotyping every law enforcement officer as a racial profiler (Fact Sheet Racial Profiling). When thinking about racial profiling many people automatically think it happens only to blacks but sadly this is mistaken for far more ethnic groups and races such as Jews, Muslims, Mexicans, Native Americans, and many more are racially profiled on a day to day basis. Many people believe racial profiling to be a myth because they see it as police officers merely taking precautions of preventing a crime before it happens, but in reality racial profiling has just become an approved term for discrimination and unjust actio...
Profiling is unconstitutional and violates civil rights. Police can search a person without a warrant if they have reasonable doubt that they are armed and dangerous; however, of people who are pulled over while driving, less than 4% of whites are searched while about 10% of bla...
Racial profiling in America, as evidenced by recent events, has reached a critical breaking point. No longer can an African American, male or female, walk into a store, school, or any public place without fear of being stereotyped as a person of suspicion. Society constantly portrays the African American
Before any argument can be made against racial profiling, it is important to understand what racial profiling is. The American Civil Liberties Union, defines racial profiling as "the discriminatory practice by law enforcement officials of targeting individuals for suspicion of crime based on the individual's race, ethnicity, religion or national origin"(Racial Profiling: Definition). Using this definition we can determine that racial profiling excludes any evidence of wrong-doing and relies solely on the characteristics listed above. We can also see that racial profiling is different from criminal profiling, which uses evidence of wrong-doing and facts which can include information obtained from outside sources and evidence gathered from investigation. Based on these definitions, I will show that racial profiling is unfair and ineffective because it relies on stereotyping, encourages discrimination, and in many cases can be circumvented.
Andrew Guthrie Ferguson thinks that people should be able to choose what areas they want to be secure from “physical and sense-enhancing invasion.” Another scholar, Joel Reidenbuerg, believes that current views of privacy do not fit well with the current technology, instead surveillance is dependent on “the nature of the acts being surveilled.” One more scholar, Chris Slobogin, believes that “the justification for a search should be roughly proportional to the intrusiveness of the search” (Hartzog, 2015). Point is, legal issues surrounding government surveillance is a complex topic without a perfect all-encompassing solution; each situation is different and should be treated
Racial profiling is not a new activity but is now more widely seen on the streets and in social media which in turn has caused a negative impact on law enforcement and social unrest among minorities. In fact, "Carter indicates that the debate involving racial and ethnic profiling following the terroristic attacks opened the doors for the federal government to conduct more extensive routine enforcement and investigations which will probably get out of hand" [1].
The process of using behavioral evidence left at a crime scene to make inferences about the offender, including inferences about personality characteristics and psychopathology is called criminal profiling. Around the country, several agencies rely on the minds of criminal psychologists to lead them in the right direction to finding the correct offender. Criminal profiling provides investigators with knowledge of the appearance and behavior of a potential criminal.
...al profiled. The way is by the color of their skin. People say that racial profiling is a good way to stop terrorism and violence and stolen merchandise, but they don’t know the affect it has to the other minorities. If you were a minority you wouldn’t want to have people look at you differently or even make assumptions about you. To stop racial profiling we should stop judging how people look and stop recalling what happened in the pass with their ethnicity. Witherbee Amy ebscohost.com stated “Those who would defend racial profiling admitted that the policy bound to infringe upon the rights of African Americans who were targeted because of their appearance, but claimed that profiling made sense based on statistics that showed blacks and Latino Americans were more likely to be convicted with drugs crimes.” Would you make an effort to put an end to racial profiling?
...including: privacy issues, inaccuracies in database matching, cost inefficiency and racial prejudice. The current profiling systems in place are ineffective due to these inherent issues. Most passengers are wrongly identified as a threat and the passengers who are the actual threat are often missed. As suggested by Jacobson (2010) profiling could potentially be adequately applied by separating passengers that could virtually imply no risk from high-risk passengers. Also, RFID technology appears to be an efficient way to track passengers and could possibly be further explored. So, the profiling concept itself is not flawed, as its endeavour is to provide a safe operating environment to the aviation system by minimising potential threats. It is primarily lacking further research and development to enhance and address the issues in the current profiling methodologies.