More handpicked essays just for you.
Roles played by the media and their responsibilities
Roles played by the media and their responsibilities
The role of media coverage
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The media in the U.S. presidential election is supposed to accurately portray what is going on without distorting or editing it. However, with the media the way it is today, this is usually not the case. While there are people who believe the media is good at showing the 2016 election, there are others who do not. The advantages of media are it is easily accessible, it is cheaper to get information everywhere, and it shows more of the candidate’s lives than before. The disadvantages of media are it can be distorted, it is not trustworthy all the time, and it focuses on the two major parties without talking to a great extent about the lesser parties. Media nowadays has changed from what it used to be in the past. While before it took several days to get word around, now you are able to access it 24/7 whenever you want. This is beneficial for the presidential election since the candidates can post something and have it seen automatically. In the article, ‘2016 Presidential Election Circus: Is Social Media the Cause?,’ it states, “Candidates have discovered the quickest way to make news is to put out a statement or comment in a social media post and avoid paying for ad space.” Before social media was big, the candidates had to buy …show more content…
The media is supposed to accurately display what is going on in the election without being biased. While this happens to some degree, I believe the media can do a better job at showing only the truth and not having it show more support to the leading parties. If the media wants people to trust them more, they need to write the truth about what is going on and make all parties have a reasonable amount of media time. By doing so, people would start to trust the media more and there would be a bigger chance that they would take the election more
Despite the overwhelming critics, Texas remains one of several states that keep supporting the concept of partisan judicial elections, where voters cast a straight-ticket vote. In fact, electing judges by the public leads to a number of ethical problems which necessarily require compromise between judicial integrity and independence. Most of the allegations of wrong-doing have caused a number of professional and citizen groups to become disaffected with the existing system.
The Electoral College is an outdated and unrealistic arrangement that caters to eighteenth century federalist America in a way that is detrimental to modern democracy. The electoral college gives too much power to the government, overlooks equal representation, and creates loopholes that do not serve to help America thrive.
Media concentration allows news reporters to fall victim to source bias, commercial impulse, and pack journalism. Together, all three of the aforementioned factors become known as horse race journalism, a cause for great concern in campaign media. In complying with horse race journalism, media outlets exclude third party candidates, reinforce the idea that politics is merely a game, and dismiss issues that directly affect voters and their day to day lives. Through horse race journalism, the media is mobilized in impeding an active form of the democratic debate in American politics. Even across the wide range of human values and beliefs, it is easy to see that campaign media coverage must be changed, if not for us, then for our children. It is imperative that we discern the flaws of the media and follow our civic duty to demand better media
Throughout the years, there has been much controversial concerning the Electoral College and whether or not it should be abolished. There was multiple way that were being considered at the time of the Constitutional Convention of 1787. Some including election of the President and Vice President by the Congress, by the governors of each state, by the state legislation, and by direction popular vote. Each idea was found to have some flaw which then lead to the creation of the Committee of Eleven which was is currently known as the Electoral College. The Electoral College is defined as “a body of people representing the states of the United States of America who formally case votes for the election of the President and Vice President”. The process
In the Electoral College system, every state has one electoral vote for each congressman and senator. Congressman is allotted by population and every state has two senators, so Rhode Island, which has basically nobody in it, has three electoral votes. California, with 53 representatives and two senators, has 55 electoral votes. The states choose electors and the electors meet in what is called the Electoral College to pick a president. In practice, nearly every state has passed a law that the electors will all vote for the popular vote winner in their state, but as the Supreme Court said in Bush v. Gore, the people of the United States do not have a constitutional right to pick the president. A state could, if it felt like it, select the electors
As the United States of America gets older, so does the presidential election voting system. The argument to change this method of voting has been becoming more and more popular as the years go on. It has been said that the Framers of the Constitution came up with this method because of the bad transportation, communication, and they feared the public’s intelligence was not suitable for choosing the President of the United States. Others say that the Framers made this method because they feared that the public did not receive sufficient information about candidates outside of their state to make such a decision based on direct popular vote. My research on this controversial issue of politics will look into the factors into why the Electoral College exists and if it is possibly outdated for today’s society. It will look into the pros and cons of this voting system, and it will explore the alternative methods of voting such as the Direct Popular vote. Many scholarly authors have gathered research to prove that this voting system is outdated and it does not accurately represent the national popular will. Many U.S. citizens value their vote because they only get one to cast towards the candidate of their choice in the presidential election. Based on the Electoral College system their vote may possibly not be represented. Because of today’s society in the U.S. the Electoral College should be abolished because it is not necessary to use a middle-man to choose our president for us. It is a vote by the people, all of us having one voice, one vote.
The aim of this paper is to look at the relationship between the mass media, specifically television, and presidential elections. This paper will focus on the function of television in presidential elections through three main areas: exit polls, presidential debates, and spots. The focus is on television for three reasons. First, television reaches more voters than any other medium. Second, television attracts the greatest part of presidential campaign budgets. Third, television provides the candidates a good opportunity to contact the people directly. A second main theme of this paper is the role of television in presidential elections in terms of representative democracy in the United States.
According to Rourke, “The Electoral College is an indirect process for selecting the U.S. president.” (Rourke, pg. 142) There has been a debate as to if the United States should adopt the National Popular Vote or preserve the Electoral College. In You Decide, we hear from the National Popular Vote (NPV), an advocacy group, and John Samples, who wants to keep the Electoral College.
News is all around us and is readily available to everyone. There are many flaws in the system that hurts the authenticity of the news when you see it. The media is indirectly part of the political system. Most news is either considered liberal or conservative by many.
The Constitutional Convention of 1787 established the process of the electoral college. The electoral college can be defined as a group of people representing their state’s population to form a majority of electoral votes that determines the United States Presidency and Vice Presidency. There are many debates on whether the electoral college properly displays democratic values. In this paper, I will go over the pros and cons of the electoral college process and gather creditable sources proving the electoral college is not democratic.
One day these two boys were running for president. There names are Braydon, Kaden. They are heading to Washington DC, To have the election. When they get there they had to have a meeting before the election started. When it started they were giving there speeches' on why they should be president. Braydon said, " The reason why I want to president is because I want to make the world a better place, For the homeless I want to make more shelters for them, for the people that don’t have homes, I want to make a business that will allow all the people to buy anything from food to clothes. Kaden's speech was, " I want to be president so I can stop illegal immigration, I don’t want terrorists coming in to this world , there would be a big difference if we
An election can be classified as a primary aspect of a political process of any country. It is the process by which the citizens of a country or an institution decide who will lead them for a certain period. There are specific election methods that have been adopted and popularized by various countries of the world for electing the members of governmental institutions. However, the United States implements the use of electoral colleges (electoral votes) to choose its president. Electoral College
In the US, mass media plays a significant role in politics. One of the key roles mass media plays in politics includes the airing of the platforms of various politicians. The media influences the view of people on politics and politicians. As the opinion of individuals is affected, the results of the votes are consequently changed (Holden, 2016).
Social media including Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Youtube, Flicker, internet websites, and blogs are becoming mainstream attracting a younger more technology savvy voter. Many candidates in the last elections learned to use these mediums so not to overlook tech savvy voters and learned how to use these to their advantage. Candidates took to the internet to raise awareness, state views, and even successfully raised donations. Social media was able to provide instant feedback on the standing of a candidate often days or weeks sooner than a more traditional poll.
The current role of mass media in politics has definitely played a significant role in how view and react to certain events and issues of the nation. Newspapers, magazines, television and radio are some of the ways information is passed onto many of the citizens. The World Wide Web is also an information superhighway, but not all of the sources on the Internet are credible. Therefore, I will only focus on the main three types of media: written, viewed, and audible, and how they affect whether or not democracy is being upheld in the land of the free. The media includes several different outlets through which people can receive information on politics, such as radio, television, advertising and mailings. When campaigning, politicians spend large quantities of money on media to reach voters, concentrating on voters who are undecided. Politicians may use television commercials, advertisements or mailings to point out potentially negative qualities in their opponents while extolling their own virtues. The media can also influence politics by deciding what news the public needs to hear. Often, there are more potential news stories available to the media than time or space to devote to them, so the media chooses the stories that are the most important and the most sensational for the public to hear. This choice can often be shaped,